Neuraxial versus general anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery and the incidence of postoperative delirium: a systematic review and stratified meta-analysis
- PMID: 37481517
- PMCID: PMC10362612
- DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02196-9
Neuraxial versus general anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery and the incidence of postoperative delirium: a systematic review and stratified meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Evidence-based effect of anesthetic regimens on postoperative delirium (POD) incidence after hip fracture surgery is still debated. Randomized trials have reported inconsistent contradictory results largely attributed to small sample size, use of outdated drugs and techniques, and inconsistent definitions of adverse outcomes. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of different anesthesia regimens on POD, cognitive impairment, and associated complications including mortality, duration of hospital stay, and rehabilitation capacity.
Methods: We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2000 to December 2021, in English and non-English language, comparing the effect of neuraxial anesthesia (NA) versus general anesthesia (GA) in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery, from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library database. They were included if POD incidence, cognitive impairment, mortality, duration of hospital stay, or rehabilitation capacity were reported as at least one of the outcomes. Study protocols, case reports, audits, editorials, commentaries, conference reports, and abstracts were excluded. Two investigators (KYC and TXY) independently screened studies for inclusion and performed data extraction. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool. The quality of the evidence for each outcome according to the GRADE working group criteria. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess the pooled data.
Results: A total of 10 RCTs with 3968 patients were included in the present analysis. No significant differences were found in the incidence of POD comparing NA vs GA [OR 1.10, 95% CI (0.89 to 1.37)], with or without including patients with a pre-existing condition of dementia or delirium, POD incidence from postoperative day 2-7 [OR 0.31, 95% CI (0.06 to -1.63)], in mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score [OR 0.07, 95% CI (-0.22 to 0.36)], or other neuropsychological test results. NA appeared to have a shorter duration of hospital stay, especially in patients without pre-existing dementia or delirium, however the observed effect did not reach statistical significance [OR -0.23, 95% CI (-0.46 to 0.01)]. There was no difference in other outcomes, including postoperative pain control, discharge to same preadmission residence [OR 1.05, 95% CI (0.85 to 1.31)], in-hospital mortality [OR 1.98, 95% CI (0.20 to 19.25)], 30-day [OR 1.03, 95% CI (0.47 to 2.25)] or 90-day mortality [OR 1.08, 95% CI (0.53-2.24)].
Conclusions: No significant differences were detected in incidence of POD, nor in other delirium-related outcomes between NA and GA groups and in subgroup analyses. NA appeared to be associated with a shorter hospital stay, especially in patients without pre-existing dementia, but the observed effect did not reach statistical significance. Further larger prospective randomized trials investigating POD incidence and its duration and addressing long-term clinical outcomes are indicated to rule out important differences between different methods of anesthesia for hip surgery.
Trial registration: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3DJ6C.
Keywords: General anesthesia; Hip fracture; Neuraxial anesthesia; Postoperative delirium.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
![Fig. 1](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10362612/bin/12871_2023_2196_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 2](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10362612/bin/12871_2023_2196_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 3](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10362612/bin/12871_2023_2196_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10362612/bin/12871_2023_2196_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![Fig. 5](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/10362612/bin/12871_2023_2196_Fig5_HTML.gif)
Similar articles
-
Comparing perioperative outcomes between regional anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jun;71(6):849-869. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02696-3. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Can J Anaesth. 2024. PMID: 38418761 Review. English.
-
Regional versus general anesthesia in older patients for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 13;18(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03903-5. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37312156 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of regional versus general anesthesia on postoperative neurocognitive outcomes in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2022 Sep;105:106854. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106854. Epub 2022 Aug 27. Int J Surg. 2022. PMID: 36031067 Review.
-
Effect of Regional vs General Anesthesia on Incidence of Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: The RAGA Randomized Trial.JAMA. 2022 Jan 4;327(1):50-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22647. JAMA. 2022. PMID: 34928310 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Parker MJ, Handoll HH, Griffiths R. Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2017:CD000521. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical