A guide to evaluating systematic reviews for the busy clinicians or reluctant readers
- PMID: 37730646
- PMCID: PMC10512578
- DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00501-4
A guide to evaluating systematic reviews for the busy clinicians or reluctant readers
Abstract
Systematic reviews (SRs) provide a solution to handle information overload for busy clinicians by summarising and synthesizing studies on a specific issue. However, because SRs are complicated and often boring to read, the busy or reluctant reader may make do with the abstract. When, as it has been shown, many authors overstate efficacy or understate harm in their abstracts, not consulting the underlying article could be misleading. This means that the prudent reader must have the ability to identify the 'tender points' of SRs to avoid falling for 'spin'. To this end we briefly review the method of SRs and ways to relatively quickly determine trustworthiness.
Keywords: Evaluation studies; Evidence-based medicine; Health personnel; Information literacy; Systematic review.
© 2023. Chiropractic and Osteopathic College of Australasia, European Academy of Chiropractic, The Royal College of Chiropractors, Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics and BioMed Central Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
None.
Similar articles
-
Chinese patent medicine Kanglaite injection for non-small-cell lung cancer: An overview of systematic reviews.J Ethnopharmacol. 2023 Feb 10;302(Pt A):115814. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115814. Epub 2022 Oct 12. J Ethnopharmacol. 2023. PMID: 36240975 Review.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Interventions during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD012505. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012505.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30480756 Free PMC article.
-
Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions.BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 15;8(10):e020222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020222. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30327397 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Dec 29;17(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0460-z. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017. PMID: 29284417 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Enhancing study quality assessment: an in-depth review of risk of bias tools for meta-analysis-a comprehensive guide for anesthesiologists.J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2023 Nov 6;3(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s44158-023-00129-z. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2023. PMID: 37932825 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bornmann L, Mutz R. Growth rates of modern science: a bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J Association Inform Sci Technol. 2015;66(11):2215–22. doi: 10.1002/asi.23329. - DOI
-
- Martinez-Calderon J, Flores-Cortes M, Morales-Asencio JM, Luque-Suarez A. Which psychological factors are involved in the onset and/or persistence of musculoskeletal pain? An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies. Clin J Pain. 2020;36(8):626–37. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000838. - DOI - PubMed
-
- King DW, Tenopir C, Clarke M. Measuring total readings of Journal Articles. D-Lib; 2006.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
