Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Nov 30;408(1):449.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03189-5.

Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™"

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Valvulotomy of the great saphenous vein in ex situ non-reversed and in situ setting: a multicenter post-market study to assess the safety and efficacy of the AndraValvulotome™"

Yaser Souri et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and technical success of the AndraValvulotome™ device (Andramed GmbH, Reutlingen, Germany) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) requiring bypass surgery using the great saphenous vein (GSV) as graft.

Methods: This was a multicenter, post-market observational study conducted in 2021 in 11 German centers. Safety and efficacy data were prospectively collected and analyzed. Primary endpoints were the absence of device-related serious adverse events until 30 ± 7 days follow-up, the clinical efficacy of valvulotomy, which was defined as pulsatile blood flow in the bypass and the number of insufficiently destroyed vein valves. Secondary endpoints were the number of valvulotomy passages, the primary patency rate of the venous bypass (determined by a color-duplex sonography showing a normal blood flow through the bypass and absence of stenosis or occlusion), and the primary technical success defined as the absence of product-specific (serious) adverse events and clinical efficacy.

Results: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled. The mean age of the patients was 71 years (46-91), and 74.6% were males. The vein material used for bypass grafting had a median length of 47.5 cm (range 20-70 cm) with a median diameter of 5.0 mm (range 3-6 mm) and 4.0 mm (range 2-6 mm) in the proximal and distal segments, respectively. The technical success rate was 96.6%. The primary patency rate was 89.9% at 30 days follow-up. The clinical efficacy was rated as very good in 81% of patients, fair in 17%, and poor in 2%. Between 1 and 5 (average 2.9) valvulotome passages were performed. One product-related serious adverse event was recorded (bypass vein dissection).

Conclusion: The AndraValvulotome™ can be considered a safe and effective device to disrupt venous valves during in situ non-reversed bypass surgeries using GSV grafts in patients with PAD.

Keywords: Bypass surgery; Great saphenous vein bypass; Infrainguinal bypass; Non-reversed bypass; Valvulotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of the AndraValvulotome™
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier plot. The number of patients planned for follow-up is shown in the figure with an interval of 10 days. A total of 58 patients were treated and planned for follow-up. Red dots indicate the moment of complete bypass occlusion. At every step down, an additional intervention was performed to keep the bypass open which decreases the primary patency rate. A vertical bar indicates the moment when a patient was seen last or came to follow-up. The primary patency rate reached 89.9%

Similar articles

References

    1. Dake MD, et al. Paclitaxel-eluting stents show superiority to balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents in femoropopliteal disease: twelve-month Zilver PTX randomized study results. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(5):495–504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.962324. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farber A et al (2022) Surgery or endovascular therapy for chronic limb-threatening ischemia. N Engl J Med 387(25):2305–2316 - PubMed
    1. Bradbury AW, et al. Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: analysis of amputation free and overall survival by treatment received. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(5 Suppl):18S–31S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conte MS, et al. Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(1S):S1–S109 e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stierli P, et al. Angioscopy guided in situ bypass versus angioscopy guided non reversed bypass for infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. A comparison of outcome. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1995;36(3):211–7. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

-