Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 5:540:12-26.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.01.004. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

Punishment Leads to Greater Sensorimotor Learning But Less Movement Variability Compared to Reward

Adam M Roth  1 , Rakshith Lokesh  2 , Jiaqiao Tang  3 , John H Buggeln  2 , Carly Smith  2 , Jan A Calalo  1 , Seth R Sullivan  2 , Truc Ngo  2 , Laura St Germain  3 , Michael J Carter  4 , Joshua G A Cashaback  5
Affiliations

Punishment Leads to Greater Sensorimotor Learning But Less Movement Variability Compared to Reward

Adam M Roth et al. Neuroscience. .

Abstract

When a musician practices a new song, hitting a correct note sounds pleasant while striking an incorrect note sounds unpleasant. Such reward and punishment feedback has been shown to differentially influence the ability to learn a new motor skill. Recent work has suggested that punishment leads to greater movement variability, which causes greater exploration and faster learning. To further test this idea, we collected 102 participants over two experiments. Unlike previous work, in Experiment 1 we found that punishment did not lead to faster learning compared to reward (n = 68), but did lead to a greater extent of learning. Surprisingly, we also found evidence to suggest that punishment led to less movement variability, which was related to the extent of learning. We then designed a second experiment that did not involve adaptation, allowing us to further isolate the influence of punishment feedback on movement variability. In Experiment 2, we again found that punishment led to significantly less movement variability compared to reward (n = 34). Collectively our results suggest that punishment feedback leads to less movement variability. Future work should investigate whether punishment feedback leads to a greater knowledge of movement variability and or increases the sensitivity of updating motor actions.

Keywords: motor learning; movement variability; punishment; reinforcement; reward; sensorimotor adaptation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Abe M, Schambra H, Wassermann EM, Luckenbaugh D, Schweighofer N, & Cohen LG (2011). Reward Improves Long-Term Retention of a Motor Memory through Induction of Offline Memory Gains. Current Biology, 21 (7), 557–562. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Acerbi L, Vijayakumar S, & Wolpert DM (2014). On the Origins of Suboptimality in Human Probabilistic Inference. PLOS Computational Biology, 10 (6), e1003661. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beers R. van (2009). Motor learning is optimally tuned to the properties of motor noise. Neuron, 63 (3), 406–417. - PubMed
    1. Beers R. van, Brenner E, & Smeets J (2013). Random walk of motor planning in task-irrelevant dimensions. Journal of neurophysiology, 109 (4), 969–977. - PubMed
    1. Beers R. van, Haggard P, & Wolpert D (2004). The role of execution noise in movement variability. Journal of neurophysiology, 91 (2), 1050–1063. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

-