A modified motor-clutch model reveals that neuronal growth cones respond faster to soft substrates
- PMID: 38354034
- PMCID: PMC11064671
- DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E23-09-0364
A modified motor-clutch model reveals that neuronal growth cones respond faster to soft substrates
Abstract
Neuronal growth cones sense a variety of cues including chemical and mechanical ones to establish functional connections during nervous system development. Substrate-cytoskeletal coupling is an established model for adhesion-mediated growth cone advance; however, the detailed molecular and biophysical mechanisms underlying the mechanosensing and mechanotransduction process remain unclear. Here, we adapted a motor-clutch model to better understand the changes in clutch and cytoskeletal dynamics, traction forces, and substrate deformation when a growth cone interacts with adhesive substrates of different stiffnesses. Model parameters were optimized using experimental data from Aplysia growth cones probed with force-calibrated glass microneedles. We included a reinforcement mechanism at both motor and clutch level. Furthermore, we added a threshold for retrograde F-actin flow that indicates when the growth cone is strongly coupled to the substrate. Our modeling results are in strong agreement with experimental data with respect to the substrate deformation and the latency time after which substrate-cytoskeletal coupling is strong enough for the growth cone to advance. Our simulations show that it takes the shortest time to achieve strong coupling when substrate stiffness was low at 4 pN/nm. Taken together, these results suggest that Aplysia growth cones respond faster and more efficiently to soft than stiff substrates.
Figures
![FIGURE 1:](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11064671/bin/mbc-35-ar47-g001.gif)
![FIGURE 2:](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11064671/bin/mbc-35-ar47-g002.gif)
![FIGURE 3:](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11064671/bin/mbc-35-ar47-g003.gif)
![FIGURE 4:](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11064671/bin/mbc-35-ar47-g004.gif)
![FIGURE 5:](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11064671/bin/mbc-35-ar47-g005.gif)
![FIGURE 6:](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11064671/bin/mbc-35-ar47-g006.gif)
![FIGURE 7:](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/11064671/bin/mbc-35-ar47-g007.gif)
Similar articles
-
Analyses of Actin Dynamics, Clutch Coupling and Traction Force for Growth Cone Advance.J Vis Exp. 2021 Oct 21;(176). doi: 10.3791/63227. J Vis Exp. 2021. PMID: 34747402
-
Substrate Deformation Predicts Neuronal Growth Cone Advance.Biophys J. 2015 Oct 6;109(7):1358-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.013. Biophys J. 2015. PMID: 26445437 Free PMC article.
-
Interrogating the Molecular Clutch in Neuronal Growth Cones: Measuring Traction Forces, F-actin Retrograde Flow, and Point Contact Demographics.Methods Mol Biol. 2024;2831:251-264. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3969-6_17. Methods Mol Biol. 2024. PMID: 39134855
-
Cytoskeletal dynamics in growth-cone steering.J Cell Sci. 2009 Oct 15;122(Pt 20):3595-604. doi: 10.1242/jcs.042309. J Cell Sci. 2009. PMID: 19812305 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The clutch hypothesis revisited: ascribing the roles of actin-associated proteins in filopodial protrusion in the nerve growth cone.J Neurobiol. 2000 Aug;44(2):114-25. doi: 10.1002/1097-4695(200008)44:2<114::aid-neu3>3.0.co;2-8. J Neurobiol. 2000. PMID: 10934316 Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources