Long-Term Satisfaction with Breast Augmentation and Augmentation Mastopexy in the Latin American Population
- PMID: 38438758
- DOI: 10.1007/s00266-024-03900-x
Long-Term Satisfaction with Breast Augmentation and Augmentation Mastopexy in the Latin American Population
Abstract
Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine the long-term satisfaction levels of women who have undergone breast augmentation and augmentation mastopexy procedures, while identifying the factors influencing patient satisfaction.
Methods: A self-reported retrospective case study design was used to collect data from women with breast implants. The study employed a survey that included demographic information, preoperative diagnosis, implant details, and patient-reported outcomes measured using the Breast-Q Instrument, which evaluates satisfaction with breasts, self-esteem, sexual well-being, and physical symptoms. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify correlations and differences in outcomes between the different variables.
Results: The survey was completed by 1022 women from 19 countries, with Chile, Mexico, and Colombia being the most represented. Augmentation was performed on 72.2% of the patients, while 27.7% underwent augmentation mastopexy. Patient satisfaction with breast size and shape varied significantly between the two procedures, with patients undergoing augmentation mastopexy showing less satisfaction. In addition, patients who were unaware of their implant shape or placement reported lower satisfaction scores. The study also found that patient satisfaction decreased over time in the augmentation mastopexy cases and that patients with high body mass index had lower satisfaction.
Conclusion: Augmentation mastopexy in patients with breast ptosis yields lower satisfaction than augmentation alone. Dissatisfaction escalates with overweight/obesity (BMI), post-surgery time, and misinformation. Implant pocket (pre-vs. subpectoral), shape (round vs. anatomical), and size did not impact satisfaction.
Level of evidence iii: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Keywords: Body image; Breast augmentation; Breast-q; Long-term outcome; Mastopexy; Self-esteem.
© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
Similar articles
-
One-Stage Mastopexy-Lipofilling after Implant Removal in Cosmetic Breast Surgery.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Aug;46(4):1542-1550. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02727-0. Epub 2022 Jan 22. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 35064339
-
Breast Equalization Augmentation: The Use of Ultrasonic Assisted Liposuction for Correction of Primary Breast Asymmetry with Bilateral Augmentation.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):667-674. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02528-5. Epub 2021 Aug 30. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022. PMID: 34462800 Review.
-
One-Stage Mastopexy-Lipofilling in Cosmetic Breast Surgery: A Prospective Study.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Oct;45(5):1975-1985. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02327-y. Epub 2021 May 12. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 33982157
-
Hematoma After Non-Oncologic Breast Procedures: A Comprehensive Review of the Evidence.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):2602-2617. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02276-6. Epub 2021 Apr 16. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 33864116 Review.
-
Augmentation Mastopexy with a Dermal Encapsulated Round or Anatomic Autoprosthesis.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;42(1):88-97. doi: 10.1007/s00266-017-0987-8. Epub 2017 Oct 26. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018. PMID: 29075819
References
-
- Mccarthy CM, Cano SJ, Klassen AF et al (2012) The magnitude of effect of cosmetic breast augmentation on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(1):218–223. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b3bc - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ng S, Kirkman M, Fisher J et al (2019) Establishing the acceptability of a brief patient reported outcome measure and feasibility of implementing it in a breast device registry—a qualitative study. J Patient Rep Outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-019-0152-z - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Masoumi E, Seow C, Deva AP et al (2023) Prospective study of clinical outcomes from a breast implant assessment service. Aesthet Surg J 43(3):308–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjac266 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Oranges CM, Schaefer KM, Haug M, Schaefer DJ (2016) The impact of aesthetic surgery on body image and its implications for mental and physical health. Aesthet Surg J 36(8):NP256–NP258. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw066 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Snell L et al (2012) Measuring and managing patient expectations for breast reconstruction: impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 12(2):149–158. https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.11.105 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials