Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 8;14(1):5733.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56396-5.

Gender awareness among general practitioners in France: a cross sectional study using the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale (N-GAMS)

Perrine Goussault-Capmas  1   2 , Henri Panjo  1 , Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury  3
Affiliations

Gender awareness among general practitioners in France: a cross sectional study using the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale (N-GAMS)

Perrine Goussault-Capmas et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Gender is a key determinant of health and healthcare use. The question of whether physicians are aware of gender issues is important to avoid gender bias in medical practice. This study aimed to validate the Nijmegen Gender Awareness in Medicine Scale (N-GAMS) in a representative population of French general practitioners (GPs) and to analyze their gender sensitivity and the presence of gender stereotypes among them. The N-GAMS, already validated in medical students, measures gender awareness through 3 subscores: gender sensitivity (GS) and gender-role ideology towards patients (GRIP) and doctors (GRID) (gender stereotypes). After translation into French, it was distributed to 900 GPs. The scale was validated through exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Psychometric properties were tested. Multivariate linear regressions were conducted to explore the associations between GPs' characteristics and N-GAMS subscores. EFA identified 3 meaningful factors consistent with prior theory. Subscores exhibited good internal consistency. The main findings were that GRIP was significantly higher in older physicians, in male physicians, among those who less involved their patients in decisions, and those who were not training supervisors. For GRID, results were quite similar to those of GRIP. GS was significantly higher for physicians working in health centres or medical homes and for those with gynecological practices but lower when they less involved patients in medical decisions. This study suggests that it is necessary to teach gender issues not only in medical schools but also as part of continuing medical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scree test and modified latent root criteria.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of item values and mean scores for the NGAMS by dimension.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Clayton JA, Tannenbaum C. Reporting sex, gender, or both in clinical research? JAMA. 2016;316(18):1863–1864. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16405. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mauvais-Jarvis F, et al. Sex and gender: Modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020;396(10250):565–582. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31561-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pelletier R, Ditto B, Pilote L. A composite measure of gender and its association with risk factors in patients with premature acute coronary syndrome. Psychosom. Med. 2015;77(5):517–526. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000186. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson J, Greaves L, Repta R. Better Science with Sex and Gender. A Primer for Health Research. Women’s Health Research Network; 2007. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pelletier R, et al. Sex versus gender-related characteristics: Which predicts outcome after acute coronary syndrome in the young? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016;67(2):127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.067. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

-