Personalized strategies of neurostimulation: from static biomarkers to dynamic closed-loop assessment of neural function
- PMID: 38516316
- PMCID: PMC10954825
- DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1363128
Personalized strategies of neurostimulation: from static biomarkers to dynamic closed-loop assessment of neural function
Abstract
Despite considerable advancement of first choice treatment (pharmacological, physical therapy, etc.) over many decades, neurological disorders still represent a major portion of the worldwide disease burden. Particularly concerning, the trend is that this scenario will worsen given an ever expanding and aging population. The many different methods of brain stimulation (electrical, magnetic, etc.) are, on the other hand, one of the most promising alternatives to mitigate the suffering of patients and families when conventional treatment fall short of delivering efficacious treatment. With applications in virtually all neurological conditions, neurostimulation has seen considerable success in providing relief of symptoms. On the other hand, a large variability of therapeutic outcomes has also been observed, particularly in the usage of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) modalities. Borrowing inspiration and concepts from its pharmacological counterpart and empowered by unprecedented neurotechnological advancement, the neurostimulation field has seen in recent years a widespread of methods aimed at the personalization of its parameters, based on biomarkers of the individuals being treated. The rationale is that, by taking into account important factors influencing the outcome, personalized stimulation can yield a much-improved therapy. Here, we review the literature to delineate the state-of-the-art of personalized stimulation, while also considering the important aspects of the type of informing parameter (anatomy, function, hybrid), invasiveness, and level of development (pre-clinical experimentation versus clinical trials). Moreover, by reviewing relevant literature on closed loop neuroengineering solutions in general and on activity dependent stimulation method in particular, we put forward the idea that improved personalization may be achieved when the method is able to track in real time brain dynamics and adjust its stimulation parameters accordingly. We conclude that such approaches have great potential of promoting the recovery of lost functions and enhance the quality of life for patients.
Keywords: activity-dependent; anatomical; functional; humans; in-vivo; individualized; neurodynamics.
Copyright © 2024 Carè, Chiappalone and Cota.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor FT declared a past collaboration with the author(s) MC and VC. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
The intervention, the patient and the illness - Personalizing non-invasive brain stimulation in psychiatry.Exp Neurol. 2021 Jul;341:113713. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2021.113713. Epub 2021 Mar 31. Exp Neurol. 2021. PMID: 33798562 Review.
-
Past, Present, and Future of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Approaches to Treat Cognitive Impairment in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Time for a Comprehensive Critical Review.Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Jan 20;12:578339. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.578339. eCollection 2020. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33551785 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical applications of neurochemical and electrophysiological measurements for closed-loop neurostimulation.Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Jul;49(1):E6. doi: 10.3171/2020.4.FOCUS20167. Neurosurg Focus. 2020. PMID: 32610297 Free PMC article.
-
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26. Artif Intell Med. 2019. PMID: 31383477 Review.
References
-
- Averna A., Barban F., Carè M., Murphy M. D., Iandolo R., De Michieli L., et al. . (2022). LFP analysis of brain injured anesthetized animals undergoing closed-loop intracortical stimulation. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 30, 1441–1451. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3177254, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources