Family and developmental correlates of adolescent involvement in decision making about screen use
- PMID: 38623581
- PMCID: PMC11016903
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102717
Family and developmental correlates of adolescent involvement in decision making about screen use
Abstract
Objective: Assess how child involvement in making rules about screen time relates to age, child prosocial functioning, and amount of screen use.
Methods: NORC's AmeriSpeak Panel was used to recruit a nationally representative sample of parents or guardians of school-aged children (age 5-17) in the United States (n = 2084). Parents completed survey that included measures of screen time, child involvement in rule making about screen use, family functioning, and dimensions of child psychosocial functioning.
Results: Across all age categories, most families had some form of rules about the allowable amount of screen-based digital media for uses other than schoolwork: 86% of elementary school-aged children (ages 5 to 10), 81% of middle school-aged children (ages 11-13), and 61% of high school aged children (ages 14-17). Across all age groups, having rules was associated with fewer hours of screen time (elementary school: B = -1.31, 95% CI = -1.80 to -0.81, p < 0.001; middle school: B = -1.40, 95% CI = -2.20 to -0.59, p < 0.001; high school: B = -0.97, 95% CI = -1.68 to -0.27, p = 0.007). Child involvement in making rules was significantly greater for high school students as compared to elementary school students (ß=0.12, p < 0.001), and not associated with high school- or middle-school aged child screen time. Across all age groups, child involvement in making rules was associated with higher levels of prosocial functioning (elementary school: ß=0.07, p < 0.001; middle school: ß=0.19, p = 0.001; high school: ß=0.21, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Child involvement in making rules about screen use may be an opportunity to strengthen developmentally important competencies, as part of a broader autonomy-supportive approach to parenting.
Keywords: Adolescent health; Autonomy; Digital media; Family decision making; Psychosocial health.
© 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
The Association Between School Closures and Child Mental Health During COVID-19.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2124092. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.24092. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34477850 Free PMC article.
-
How Much Is Too Much? Examining the Relationship Between Digital Screen Engagement and Psychosocial Functioning in a Confirmatory Cohort Study.J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;59(9):1080-1088. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Aug 7. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 31400437
-
Recreational screen media use in Danish school-aged children and the role of parental education, family structures, and household screen media rules.Prev Med. 2022 Feb;155:106908. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106908. Epub 2021 Dec 13. Prev Med. 2022. PMID: 34915040
-
The effectiveness of school-based family asthma educational programs on the quality of life and number of asthma exacerbations of children aged five to 18 years diagnosed with asthma: a systematic review protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):69-81. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2335. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26571284
-
Correlates of mobile screen media use among children aged 0-8: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 24;7(10):e014585. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014585. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 29070636 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Beyens I., Beullens K. Parent–child conflict about children’s tablet use: The role of parental mediation. New Media & Society. 2017;19(12):2075–2093.
-
- Crone E.A., Achterberg M. Prosocial development in adolescence. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022;44:220–225. - PubMed
-
- Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987;53:1024–1037. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources