Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 18;7(1):474.
doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06142-4.

Multiple factors and features dictate the selective production of ct-siRNA in Arabidopsis

Affiliations

Multiple factors and features dictate the selective production of ct-siRNA in Arabidopsis

Li Feng et al. Commun Biol. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Coding transcript-derived siRNAs (ct-siRNAs) produced from specific endogenous loci can suppress the translation of their source genes to balance plant growth and stress response. In this study, we generated Arabidopsis mutants with deficiencies in RNA decay and/or post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) pathways and performed comparative sRNA-seq analysis, revealing that multiple RNA decay and PTGS factors impede the ct-siRNA selective production. Genes that produce ct-siRNAs often show increased or unchanged expression and typically have higher GC content in sequence composition. The growth and development of plants can perturb the dynamic accumulation of ct-siRNAs from different gene loci. Two nitrate reductase genes, NIA1 and NIA2, produce massive amounts of 22-nt ct-siRNAs and are highly expressed in a subtype of mesophyll cells where DCL2 exhibits higher expression relative to DCL4, suggesting a potential role of cell-specific expression of ct-siRNAs. Overall, our findings unveil the multifaceted factors and features involved in the selective production and regulation of ct-siRNAs and enrich our understanding of gene silencing process in plants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. RNA decay and PTGS factors regulate ct-siRNA production.
a The percentage of siRNAs derived from various siRNA-generating loci, including protein-coding, structure RNA, non-coding RNA, pseudogenes & TE, and pri-miRNA. The mutant alleles used in this study are abbreviated as x2 (xrn2-2), x3 (xrn3-3), x2×3(xrn2-2 xrn3-3), s2 (ski2-2), h2 (hen2-1), e5 (ein5-1), es3 (ein5-1 ski2-3), dcp2 (dcp2-1), dcl4 (dcl4-2), x3d4 (xrn3-3 dcl4-2), x2d4 (xrn2-2 dcl4-2), fd4 (fry1-6 dcl4-2), sd4 (ski2-2 dcl4-2), hd4 (hen2-1 dcl4-2), ed4 (ein5-1 dcl4-2), dd4 (dxo1-2 dcl4-2), ud4 (urt1-1 dcl4-2), esa1-27 (ein5-1 ski2-3 ago1-27), esa1-45 (ein5-1 ski2-3 ago1-45), sda1-27 (ski2-2 dcl4-2 ago1-27), sda-45 (ski2-2 dcl4-2 ago1-45), hda1-27 (hen2-1 dcl4-2 ago1-27), hda1-45 (hen2-1 dcl4-2 ago1-45), eda1-27 (ein5-1 dcl4-2 ago1-27), eda-45 (ein5-1 dcl4-2 ago1-45), rdr6 (rdr6-11), res3 (ein5-1 ski2-3 rdr6-11), rres3 (ein5-1 ski2-3 rdr1-1 rdr6-11), hr6 (hen2-1 rdr6-11), hdr6 (hen2-1 dcl4-2 rdr6-11), dcl2 (dcl2-1), hd2 (hen2-1 dcl2-1), sd2 (ski2-2 dcl2-1), ed2 (ein5-1 dcl2-1), esd2 (ein5-1 ski2-3 dcl2-1), d4d2 (dcl4-2 dcl2-1), hdd (hen2-1 dcl4-2 dcl2-1), edd (ein5-1 dcl4-2 dcl2-1), sdd (ski2-2 dcl4-2 dcl2-1), es3dd (ein5-1 ski2-3 dcl4-2 dcl2-1), and fdd (fry1-6 dcl2-1 dcl4-2). b The percentage of ct-siRNAs with lengths ranging from 20-nt to 24-nt. Only reads produced from the antisense strand of protein-coding genes, representing ct-siRNAs, were calculated.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Accumulation and distribution of ct-siRNAs in mutants deficient in RNA decay and PTGS factors.
a Pie charts ranking the top10-scoring 22-nt ct-siRNA-producing loci by accumulated ct-siRNA abundance. b Heatmap depicting the expression of ct-siRNAs produced by 52 hotspot genes. c Dot plot of the relative expression levels (log2) of hotspot genes in ed4 (ein5 dcl4-2) or sd4 (ski2-2 dcl4-2) mutant versus Col-0 plants. d An Integrated Genome View (IGV) illustrating the distribution of 21-nt and 22-nt ct-siRNAs accumulated at specific genes. e Clustering of samples based on the relative expression of ct-siRNAs in mutants versus Col-0. f A Gene Ontology (GO) annotation network illustrating the function categories of ct-siRNA source genes influenced by different groups of RNA decay factors.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Impact of source gene characteristics on ct-siRNA production.
a The sequence length distribution of source genes. b The 5’ UTR length distribution of source genes. c The abundance of ct-siRNAs derived from genes with low, medium, and high GC content, as well as their 1Kb upstream and downstream regions. A total of 3838 genes exhibited differential accumulation of 22-nt ct-siRNAs in the eight selected mutants when compared to Col-0, with a padj < 0.05 and log2FC (Fold Change) > 1. The curves figures in the left and right represent 21-nt and 22-nt ct-siRNAs, respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Transgenes of truncated NIA1 and NIA2 fragments effectively induce both gene silencing.
a Schematic illustration of the consecutive truncated 600-nt NIA1 and NIA2 fragments. b GFP fluorescence in transgenic plants expressing truncated NIA1 and NIA2 fragments. Scale bar = 100 μm. c Fluorescence intensity was detected in transgenic plants. d Abundance of 21-nt and 22-nt ct-siRNAs (TPM, tags per million) accumulated at NIA1 and NIA2 in transgenic plants. n = 2 biologically independent samples. FL, full-length. e Northern blotting of ct-siRNAs produced from GFP, NIA1, and NIA2 in transgenic plants. f Distribution of 21-nt and 22-nt ct-siRNAs generated from NIA1 and NIA2 in transgenic plants. g Sequence similarity between truncated NIA1 and NIA2 fragments. h GC contents of full-length and truncated NIA1 and NIA2 fragments.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Dynamic accumulation of ct-siRNAs in ein5 dcl4 and ski2 dcl4 plants across different stages of growth and development.
a, b The accumulation and percentage of 20-nt to 24-nt ct-siRNAs in ed4 (ein5-1 dcl4-2) and sd4 (ski2-2 dcl4-2) plants across different days. The 7th and 10th days mark the earliest time points at which homozygous mutants of sd4 and ed4 can be distinguished from heterozygous mutants. Both mutants die on the 21st day. c The percentage of top-scoring 22-nt ct-siRNA source genes ranked by accumulated 22-nt ct-siRNA abundance in each mutant. d Clustering analysis of genes with differentially accumulated 22-nt ct-siRNAs by their abundance in ed4 and sd4 plants. 583 and 423 genes with 22-nt ct-siRNA abundance TPM > 10 in at least two stages and an absolute log2FC > 1 when comparing any two stages were used.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Cell-specific expression of ct-siRNA source genes.
a UMAP visualization of seedling cell types. Each dot represents an individual cell, with color represents the respective cell type. Corresponding seedling clusters are indicated on the right. “n” indicates cell numbers. b UMAP visualization of Col-0, ed4 (ein5-1 dcl4-2), sd4 (ski2-2 dcl4-2), and hd4 (hen2-1 dcl4-2) samples as shown in a. c Expression of NIA1 and NIA2 in each sample at the single-cell level visualized by UMAP. d Average expression of NIA1 and NIA2 and relative expression of DCL2 versus DCL4 in eight subtypes of mesophyll cells.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Proposed model for the selective generation of ct-siRNAs.
RNA decay, PTGS, and associated factors synergistically influence ct-siRNA production, exerting either inhibitory or promotional effects. The accumulation of ct-siRNAs correlates with sequence length, GC content, and 5’ UTR length of their source genes. Concerning the expression of these genes, fluctuations induced by plant growth and development, combined with cell-level specificity, dictate ct-siRNA selective production. We hypothesize that the impact of each factor is proportional to the strength exhibited when considered individually.

Similar articles

References

    1. Elkind Y, et al. Abnormal plant development and down-regulation of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis in transgenic tobacco containing a heterologous phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1990;87:9057–9061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.22.9057. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borges F, Martienssen RA. The expanding world of small RNAs in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015;16:727–741. doi: 10.1038/nrm4085. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrer-Orta C, Agudo R, Domingo E, Verdaguer N. Structural insights into replication initiation and elongation processes by the FMDV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009;19:752–758. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.10.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bologna NG, Voinnet O. The diversity, biogenesis, and activities of endogenous silencing small RNAs in Arabidopsis. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 2014;65:473–503. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035728. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu L, Chen X. RNA quality control as a key to suppressing RNA silencing of endogenous genes in plants. Mol. Plant. 2016;9:826–836. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.03.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

-