A review and comparison of arm-based versus contrast-based network meta-analysis for binary outcomes-Understanding their differences and limitations
- PMID: 38818353
- PMCID: PMC11134325
- DOI: 10.1002/wics.1639
A review and comparison of arm-based versus contrast-based network meta-analysis for binary outcomes-Understanding their differences and limitations
Abstract
Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a statistical procedure to simultaneously compare multiple interventions. Despite the added complexity of performing an NMA compared with the traditional pairwise meta-analysis, under proper assumptions the NMA can lead to more efficient estimates on the comparisons of interventions by combining and contrasting the direct and indirect evidence into a form of evidence that can be used to underpin treatment guidelines. Two broad classes of NMA methods are commonly used in practice: the contrast-based (CB-NMA) and the arm-based (AB-NMA) models. While CB-NMA only focuses on the relative effects by assuming fixed intercepts, the AB-NMA offers greater flexibility on the estimands, including both the absolute and relative effects by assuming random intercepts. A major criticism of the AB-NMA, on which we aim to elaborate in this paper, is that it does not retain randomization within trials, which may introduce bias in the estimated relative effects in some scenarios. This criticism was drawn under the implicit assumption that a given relative effect is transportable, in which case the data generating mechanism favors the inference based on CB-NMA, which models the relative effect. In this article, we aim to review, summarize, and elaborate on the underlying assumptions, similarities and differences, and also the advantages and disadvantages, between CB-NMA and AB-NMA methods. As indirect treatment comparison is susceptible to risk of bias no matter which approach is taken, it is important to consider both approaches in practice as complementary sensitivity analyses and to provide the totality of evidence from the data.
Keywords: Bayesian hierarchical model; arm-based; binary outcome; contrast-based; network meta-analysis; patient-centered outcome research.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest Cappelleri and Chu are employed by Pfizer. They own stocks in their company.
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Ablation: Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management: Network meta-analysis J2.London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2021 Apr. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2021 Apr. PMID: 34165931 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
A comparison of arm-based and contrast-based models for network meta-analysis.Stat Med. 2019 Nov 30;38(27):5197-5213. doi: 10.1002/sim.8360. Epub 2019 Oct 3. Stat Med. 2019. PMID: 31583750 Free PMC article.
-
Biologic or tofacitinib monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis in people with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) failure: a Cochrane Systematic Review and network meta-analysis (NMA).Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):CD012437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012437. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27855242 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001.
-
- Sutton AJ, Higgins JP. Recent developments in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2008; 27(5): 625–50. - PubMed
-
- Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to Meta-Analysis: Wiley; 2009.
-
- Schmid CH, Stijnen T, White I. Handbook of Meta-analysis. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2020.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials