Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jun 18;24(1):351.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03196-8.

Psychological distress and uterine fibroids: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study

Affiliations

Psychological distress and uterine fibroids: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization study

Xinyu Han et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Observational data indicates a connection between emotional discomfort, such as anxiety and depression, and uterine fibroids (UFs). However, additional investigation is required to establish the causal relationship between them. Hence, we assessed the reciprocal causality between four psychological disorders and UFs utilizing two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR).

Methods: To evaluate the causal relationship between four types of psychological distress (depressive symptoms, severe depression, anxiety or panic attacks, mood swings) and UFs, bidirectional two-sample MR was employed, utilizing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with these conditions. Both univariate MR (UVMR) and multivariate MR (MVMR) primarily applied inverse variance weighted (IVW) as the method for estimating potential causal effects. Complementary approaches such as MR Egger, weighted median, simple mode, and weighted mode were utilized to validate the findings. To assess the robustness of our MR results, we conducted sensitivity analyses using Cochran's Q-test and the MR Egger intercept test.

Results: The results of our UVMR analysis suggest that genetic predispositions to depressive symptoms (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.563, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.209-2.021, P = 0.001) and major depressive disorder (MDD) (OR = 1.176, 95% CI = 1.044-1.324, P = 0.007) are associated with an increased risk of UFs. Moreover, the IVW model showed a nominally significant positive correlation between mood swings (OR: 1.578; 95% CI: 1.062-2.345; P = 0.024) and UFs risk. However, our analysis did not establish a causal relationship between UFs and the four types of psychological distress. Even after adjusting for confounders like body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol consumption, and number of live births in the MVMR, the causal link between MDD and UFs remained significant (OR = 1.217, 95% CI = 1.039-1.425, P = 0.015).

Conclusions: Our study presents evidence supporting the causal relationship between genetic susceptibility to MDD and the incidence of UFs. These findings highlight the significance of addressing psychological health issues, particularly depression, in both the prevention and treatment of UFs.

Keywords: Anxiety or panic attacks; Causality; Major depressive disorder; Mendelian randomization; Mood swings; UFs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Assumptions and study design of the MR study of the associations between psychological factors and UFs.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The effect of genetically determined psychological factors on UFs using UVMR.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The direct effect of genetically determined psychological factors on UFs using MVMR-IVW controlled for BMI, smoking, alcohol intake frequency, and number of live births
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Scatter plots for MR analyses of the correlation between psychological factors and UFs in the IVW model. (A) depressive symptoms; (B) MDD; (C) anxiety or panic attacks; (D) mood swings

Similar articles

References

    1. Navarro A, Bariani MV, Yang Q, Al-Hendy A. Understanding the impact of uterine fibroids on human endometrium function. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:633180. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.633180. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vercellini P, Frattaruolo MP. Uterine fibroids: from observational epidemiology to clinical management. BJOG. 2017;124:1513. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14730. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stewart EA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Catherino WH, Lalitkumar S, Gupta D, Vollenhoven B. Uterine fibroids. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16043. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.43. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qin H, Lin Z, Vásquez E, Luan X, Guo F, Xu L. Association between obesity and the risk of uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021;75:197–204. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213364. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pavone D, Clemenza S, Sorbi F, Fambrini M, Petraglia F. Epidemiology and risk factors of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;46:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.09.004. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

-