This is the html version of the file https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781003336228-4/branding-co-creation-emerging-tourist-destinations-content-hotel-website-analysis-erisher-woyo-mohsin-abdur-rehman-raouf-ahmad-rather.
Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
Brand Co-Creation Tourism Research: Contemporary Issues and Challenges
Page 1
Brand Co-Creation Tourism Research: Contemporary Issues and Challenges. Raouf Ahmad Rather (Ed.)
© 2024 Apple Academic Press, Inc. Co-published with CRC Press (Taylor & Francis)
CHAPTER 4
Branding and Co-Creation in Emerging
Tourist Destinations: A Content Hotel
Website Analysis
ERISHER WOYO1, MOHSIN ABDUR REHMAN2, and
RAOUF AHMAD RATHER3
1Tourism Research in Economic Environs & Society (TREES), Faculty
of Economic and Management Sciences, North-West University,
Potchefstroom, South Africa
2Department of Marketing, Management and International Business,
Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, Finland
3Scientific Independent Researcher, Jammu and Kashmir, India
ABSTRACT
In the digital era, branding and co-creation of tourism experiences are
catching new heights. The brand value continuum is considered an essen-
tial source of value co-creation. Most recently, the quality of websites in the
tourism and hospitality industry has been examined, focusing more on the
booking intentions. However, a qualitative exploration of branding efforts
and orientations of co-creation using websites is still required, especially
in emerging economies. Thus, this chapter examines the branding of two
tourism destinations, including Zimbabwe and Dubai. This chapter also
compares the two destinations’ co-creation processes using symbolic and
narrative representations of hotel websites within the destinations. This
chapter undertakes a content analysis of the hotels’ websites in Victoria

Page 2
60
Brand Cocreation Tourism Research
Falls, Zimbabwe, and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, to reach mean-
ingful conclusions about branding efforts and orientations. The findings
of this chapter have added to the debate on destination branding and
co-creation. The close comparison shows that four-star hotels in Dubai
offer overall more co-creation value exchange than those in Victoria Falls,
Zimbabwe.
4.1 INTRODUCTION
With advances in information and communication technologies, brand
cocreating and branding of tourist destinations are catching new heights.
The brand value continuum is considered an essential source of brand
value co-creation (Buonincontri et al., 2017; Lund et al., 2020). Most
recently, the quality of hospitality websites has been examined the booking
intentions (Wang and Law, 2020). Kanazawa et al. (2021) argue that desti-
nation websites are critical in influencing destination choice, especially
during this ongoing COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. Consequently,
the websites of a destination and its supply-side organizations are critical
for destination branding, especially building a positive destination brand
image (Foroudi et al., 2018). These aspects are considered crucial for influ-
encing the tourists’ return visit intentions and word-of-mouth recommen-
dations (Kanazawa et al., 2021; Rather et al., 2020; Mathis et al., 2016).
While it has been acknowledged in research that online communica-
tion is critical for destination branding (Standing et al., 2014; Foroudi
et al., 2018; Kanazawa et al., 2021), limited studies have been done to
investigate the role that hotel websites play in destination branding and
brand co-creation, especially in the empirical contexts of Victoria Falls
and Dubai. This is despite the rise of information ubiquity which makes
communication channels to become more accessible. It is argued that
prospective travelers perceive the available information as the place’s
reality through the websites. Similarly, Giannopoulos et al. (2020) note
that destinations are often embedded with specific brand values that
need to be communicated to demonstrate the credibility of the destina-
tion brand.
In several destination studies, the concept of branding has largely
been investigated using demand perspectives (Chang et al., 2020;
Hultman et al., 2017; Trembath et al., 2011). Those that have explored

Page 3
Branding and Co-Creation in Emerging Tourist Destinations
61
the concept using supply data are relatively fewer (Balakrishnan, 2009).
Brand co-creation is a young discipline (Giannopoulos et al., 2020),
and its application in destination contexts is very recent (Oliveira and
Panyik, 2015). For example, Giannopoulos et al. (2020) applied desti-
nation-branding co-creation in the hospitality context by analyzing data
collected from regional destination management organizations, hotels,
and restaurants. González-Mansilla et al. (2019) investigated customers’
perceptions concerning the hotel’s co-creation strategy and the impacts
it has on their degree of participation during service provision. Addi-
tionally, studies have argued that technology plays a critical role in the
co-creation process (Kennedy, 2017; Lee and Soon, 2017). However,
Merrilees (2016) argues that despite acknowledging the role of tech-
nology in the co-creation process, the discussion of the construct of
brand co-creation is limited. A qualitative exploration of branding efforts
and orientations using hotel websites is still required. The literature on
value co-creation identifies which factors drive customers’ participation
with brands across different consumption contexts. This chapter provides
evidence that confirms, from hotel websites’ point of view, that website
quality is one of these critical factors that enhance user’s co-creation
with a destination.
This chapter aims to bridge the gap by analyzing destination branding
and brand co-creation using websites of hotels found in two tourism desti-
nations: Victoria Falls in Zimbabwe and Dubai in the United Arab Emir-
ates. Furthermore, this chapter compares these two destinations’ branding
co-creation processes using symbolic and narrative representations of
the hotel websites. The following sections detail the literature review,
methods adopted, and results followed by implications, limitations, and
future research areas.
4.2 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW
4.2.1 DESTINATION BRANDING
Competition for tourism arrivals has been high before the coronavirus
pandemic (Rather, 2021a). Global tourism competition “poses challenges
for destinations, including efforts to access to ideas, finance, talent, and
visitors” (Giannopoulos et al., 2020, p. 148). To compete globally, tourism

Page 4
62
Brand Cocreation Tourism Research
destinations must have an overall positive destination brand image (Parrey
et al., 2019; Rather et al., 2020; Rather and Camilleri, 2019a, b; Woyo,
2018). Brand branding helps destinations and companies within the desti-
nation compete using other features apart from prices (Bailey and Ball,
2006; Rather, 2020: Rather et al., 2021c; Woyo, 2018). Giannopoulos et
al. (2020, p. 148) argue that “the need for differentiation is increasing in
an era of reduced barriers, in terms of investment, information generation
and dissemination, travel accessibility and means of transport.” Like the
wider tourism industry, the hotel service industry is also characterized by
global competition (González-Mansilla et al., 2019: Rather and Shakir,
2018; Rather and Sharma, 2017, 2019).
A literature review shows that destinations will not successfully
compete globally (Michaelidou et al., 2013; Stylidis and Cherifi, 2018;
Giannopoulos et al., 2020; Woyo, 2018). The same view is also appli-
cable to the hotel and/or hospitality industry (e.g., Rather, 2017, 2019;
Rather and Hollebeek, 2019; Rather et al., 2018: Shams et al., 2020b).
Thus, there is a need for distinctive brands that cannot be overempha-
sized (Buil et al., 2013) for co-creation processes. Research focusing
on destination branding is still emerging (Almeyda-Ibáñez and Babu,
2017; Tran et al., 2019; Woyo, 2018), and much of the debate in these
studies have questioned the application of branding principles to a
destination context (Pedeliento and Kavaratzis, 2019; Woyo, 2018).
However, a growing stream of literature has shown that destinations,
like products, can be branded (e.g., Cai, 2002; Kotler and Gertner,
2002).
As branding continues to be applied and researched in destina-
tion contexts, technology is argued to be a critical enabler for destina-
tion branding co-creation (Kaufmann et al., 2016; Revilla Hernández
et al., 2016; Kennedy, 2017; Lee and Soon, 2017). Regardless of the
importance technology plays, Merrilees (2016) argues that the concept
of brand co-creation in destinations is not well explored and requires
further research. Giannopoulos et al. (2020, p. 150) argue that the
emphasis on past literature on destination branding has been on deliv-
ering brand experiences to tourists than “the co-creation of brand expe-
rience with them.” Past definitions of destination branding appear to
emphasize the notion that “destination branding is the creation of an
image that influences consumer’s decision to visit the destination in

Page 5
63
Branding and Co-Creation in Emerging Tourist Destinations
question, as opposed to an alternative destination” (Giannopoulos et al.,
2020, p. 150).
4.2.2 DESTINATION BRANDING AND BRAND CO-CREATION
Co-Creation is a concept that has been under investigation for close to
two decades now (Buhalis and Sinarta, 2019; Iglesias et al., 2017; Mathis
et al., 2016; Rasoolimanesh et al., 2021). It is defined as an approach
where consumers are regarded as active participants in creating products
and services (Prahalad and Ramaswamy, 2004; Rather, 2021a: Rather
et al., 2021a, b). Merz et al. (2009) define brand co-creation as the
co-created value through the engagement in specific activities related
to the brand. These aspects are often triggered by new design features
that make social commerce. In this chapter, brand co-creation is based
guided by Coupland (2005, p. 107), who stated, “the consumer is an
active partner with the marketer in brand-meaning formation.” González-
Mansilla et al. (2019) argue that creating value for customers is perhaps
the core reason for any business, including hotels/restaurants (Vo-Thanh
et al., 2021). Consequently, customers play a critical role “as decision-
makers and product information transmitters to other consumers” (Kim
et al., 2018). This shows a shift from traditional ways of doing things,
where the supplier was dominantly involved in creating value for the
customers (González-Mansilla et al., 2019; Hollebeek and Rather, 2019).
Co-Creation is critical for various brands/companies, including hotels, to
identify their customer’s needs in a manner that increases overall satis-
faction, strengthens brand loyalty, and improves the company’s bottom
line (Buonincontri et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2018; Rather, 2018; Rather et
al., 2019, 2021a; Shams et al., 2020a). As consumers of tourism prod-
ucts, tourists are thus regarded as cocreators in the tourism ecosystem
(Cooper and Hall, 2016).
Companies must apply their initiatives and innovation with
customers rather than customers (Buhalis and Sinarta, 2019; Hollebeek
and Rather, 2019: Taghizadeh et al., 2016). However, studies investi-
gating these aspects from hotels operating in Victoria Falls and Dubai
are limited and required. Co-Creation is primarily borrowed from the
traditional marketing sciences, and its application in the tourism context

Page 6
64
Brand Cocreation Tourism Research
is generally recent. Though value co-creation has been attracting a lot
of research interest in recent years (González-Mansilla et al., 2019),
research investigating co-creation of destination brands is limited
(Aitken and Campelo, 2011; Oliveira and Panyik, 2015; Rather, 2021b;
Rather and Hollebeek, 2020, 2021; Suntikul and Jachna, 2016), leaving
much to be explored especially when it comes to its strategic utility
for destination branding (Kim et al., 2018). This is specifically so in
the empirical context of a destination like Zimbabwe, which has expe-
rienced political and economic challenges for more than two decades
(Woyo and Slabbert, 2020, 2021).
Through Web 2.0, the interaction between firms and customers
was enhanced, and Web 2.0 has been instrumental in understanding
and improving value co-creation with customers (Bahri-Ammari et
al., 2021). Therefore, understanding how hotels in Victoria Falls and
Dubai have been using their websites to cocreate positive experiences
is critical, especially with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. González-
Mansilla et al. (2019, p. 52) note that “despite the widespread recog-
nition of the importance of value co-creation with customers, as well
as recent contributions, there is still a relative lack of research on this
topic in general management literature.” Studies that compare the
co-creation of destination brands are also limited, and this current study
seeks to fill in this gap by looking at a destination in crisis (Zimbabwe)
and a popular destination among the gulf countries, which is dubbed in
the literature as a star in the Middle East (Dubai) (Balakrishnan, 2009).
Furthermore, a literature review suggests that destination branding has
been investigated using demand and supply perspectives (Rather et
al., 2020). Of these perspectives, much focus has been done using the
demand side (Chang et al., 2020; Hultman et al., 2017; Woyo, 2018)
compared to the supply-side views (Cai, 2002; Balakrishnan, 2009;
Woyo, 2018).
4.3 RESEARCH METHODS
This current chapter examines the hotel branding of two tourism desti-
nations, including Zimbabwe and Dubai. Zimbabwe is a destination
that is currently faced with ongoing political and economic challenges
(Woyo and Slabbert, 2020), while Dubai is a popular emerging desti-
nation among the Gulf countries. Furthermore, this compares the two

Page 7
65
Branding and Co-Creation in Emerging Tourist Destinations
destinations’ brand co-creation processes using symbolic and narra-
tive representations of the websites of four-star hotels. A content anal-
ysis was employed in analyzing the narrative representations of hotel
websites in the resort town of Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, and Dubai,
UAE, to reach meaningful conclusions about branding efforts and
orientations.
We selected four-star hotels based on Forbes Travel Guide ranking
from both destinations Victoria Falls and Dubai. Forbes Travel Guide
was adopted to provide an independent global luxury hotel rating
(Minazzi, 2010). According to the latest Forbes Travel Guide (2021),
four hotels were chosen Kingdom Hotel, Elephant Hills Hotel, Safari
Lodge, and A’ Zambezi River Lodge Hotel in Zimbabwe’s resort town
of Victoria Falls. Alternatively, four hotels within the four-star category
were also chosen from Dubai, and these included Anantara the Palm
Dubai Resort, Armani Hotel Dubai, Emerald Palace Kempinski Dubai,
and Fairmont the Palm. Numerous previous research studies followed
a similar research approach (Govers and Go, 2004; Nyahunzvi, 2013;
Salem and Čavlek, 2016). In the race of enhancing tourism customer
experiences, researchers tried to understand the narratives and symbolic
aspects of the websites and how they enhanced the co-creation of tourist
experiences within the destination (Mak, 2017). Keeping the study’s
main objective in mind, the authors assessed the hotels’ websites in
Dubai and Victoria Falls as attractive destinations, using content anal-
ysis. This information is summarized in Table 4.1, detailing the basic
information about the four-star hotels that formed the sample for this
chapter, including the pop-up, website view, positioning, and COVID-19
information.
Content analysis of their websites was carried out to identify rele-
vant categories (Downe and Wamboldt, 1992). One expert coder from
the authors’ team completed the content analysis from all those selected
websites of four-star hotels for both destinations. The coding process
was executed by comparing the content at websites and the study themes
such as branding and co-creation in the tourist destinations. Another
author from the research team then verified the codes that were created.
Detailing the content and coding processes, authors have adopted a set
of criteria to establish a sense of “branding” and “co-creation” efforts by
hotels in the selected tourism destinations.

Page 8
66
Brand Cocreation Tourism Research
4.4 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS
4.4.1 HOTEL WEBSITES AND COVID-19 INFORMATION
The results presented in Table 4.1 show the first four hotels selected
from Dubai and the last four from Victoria Falls tourism destinations.
The information related to sensitivity toward the global pandemic
(COVID-19) was given by three out of four hotels sampled in Dubai.
This finding implies a more strategic role of hotels in Dubai in ensuring
and guaranteeing travelers that their safety is prioritized during the
COVID-19 pandemic. Communicating COVID-19 messages on the
websites is part of personalization of the service offered to customers
and could help reduce uncertainty among travelers during COVID-
19, thus enhancing value co-creation and brand equity of the hotels
concerned. These aspects of communication through websites have
been critical in facilitating that organizations can meet the customers’
needs (Nguyen, Nguyen, and Pervan, 2020).
However, the analysis of the results shows that there was no infor-
mation about COVID-19 protocols or safety measures at the hotels’
websites in the resort town of Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe. This raises
critical concerns, especially around the safety of tourists and the priori-
ties of managers of hotels during the ongoing pandemic, and can worsen
the destination’s image, which is already identified as negative in past
studies (Parrey et al., 2019; Woyo, 2018; Woyo and Slabbert, 2020).
These differences in the information provided by hotel websites, though
in different destinations, give different signals on the sensitivity about
safety protocols around these destinations. Jiménez-Barreto et al. (2021)
argue that communication, especially during COVID-19, is important
in achieving the new normal and showing tourists how they are dealing
with the pandemic. The findings of this chapter show that based on
analyzed websites, marketing managers of hotels in Dubai seem to be
effectively communicating in the current pandemic environment, while
those in Victoria Falls are not, and this could have negative repercus-
sions, especially in assuring travelers that hotels in Victoria Falls are
effectively dealing with the pandemic.

Page 9
67
Branding and Co-Creation in Emerging Tourist Destinations
TABLE 4.1 Basic Information.
Hotel name
Pop-up
Website view
COVID-19
information
Anantara the Palm Dubai Resort Available about promotions Dynamic, 360° Available
Armani Hotel Dubai
Available about promotions Dynamic
Available
Emerald Palace Kempinski Dubai Available about closure
Static, yet drone Not available
Fairmont the Palm Dubai
Not available
Static
Available
Kingdom Hotel
Not available
Static, yet flipped Not available
Elephant Hills Hotel
Not available
Static, yet drone Not available
Victoria Falls Safari Lodge
Not available
Static, yet flipped Not available
A’ Zambezi River Lodge Hotel
Not available
Static, yet drone Not available
Note: All hotels are four stars.
Source: Prepared by the authors.
4.4.2 HOTEL WEBSITES DYNAMISM
Dubai is an international tourist destination, perhaps one of the busiest
airports globally. This could explain why the hotels are careful about
having the global tourism safety measures concerning COVID-19 being
broadcasted on their websites. Further analysis of the results shows that
the website view of Dubai hotels was quite attractive compared to those
in Victoria Falls. Notably, of the four hotels in Dubai that formed part of
the study’s sample, two have a dynamic view that enhances the overall
tourism experience and improves the brand image and equity of the hotels.
This implies that hotels in Dubai believe that their websites are an impor-
tant aspect that helps in cocreating positive hotel brand experiences, and
thus, an investment making these websites quite attractive and easy to
navigate. Furthermore, investing in attractive hotel websites is important
for building hotel brands to convey information, like COVID-19 updates
and the hotel’s brand, which is generally important for the customer
co-creation process.
Past studies have argued that providing a seamless and attractive
website experience is important for hotel business (Li et al., 2017; Wang et
al., 2015). However, based on the content analysis of their websites, hotels
in Victoria Falls appear to be not seamless and attractive. Furthermore,
the hotels’ websites analyzed in this chapter show that four-star hotels in
Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, have static websites and drone view, which can

Page 10
68
Brand Cocreation Tourism Research
negatively affect their hotels’ competitiveness in the long term. This indi-
cates the deep-seated economic challenges that the destination is facing
could affect hotels’ information and communication technology infrastruc-
ture. Further analysis of the results showed that only two hotels in Victoria
Falls were having flipped views of different sites of tourism experience.
The trend of advancement in reflecting and engaging website visitors of
hotels get a more dynamic view of tourism experience, creating more
versatility for customers to perceive and interact through a co-creation
mindset. Therefore, hotels in Dubai as tourist destination offer a more
dynamic view of their websites to engage customers, which is crucial in
destination branding and the co-creation of experiences.
Alternatively, hotels in Zimbabwe show static yet flipped view with a
memorial view of tourism experiences. The study’s findings confirm the
views mentioned in earlier studies for the need for hotels to ensure they
can implement crisis management and protocols during and after a crisis
(Garrido-Moreno et al., 2021).
4.4.3 HOTEL WEBSITES AND POP-UP
Li et al. (2015) argue that websites are important in hotels as they create a
direct interface with the customers. Based on this, the data analysis shows
that four-star hotels in Dubai could create an interface with customers
compared to hotels in Victoria Falls. Generally, a pop-up screen appears to
announce or convey a specific message to all the website traffic. Table 4.1
shows only three hotels in Dubai presenting a pop-up screen for website
visitors to know more about the offers (daily, weekly, monthly, occasion-
ally, or event specific). This finding supports past studies that argue that
ICT plays an integral role in communicating the hotel experience (Benck-
endorff et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2016). These pop-ups and the information
they provide, especially now during a pandemic, are critical in shaping the
hotel’s brand perceptions and even purchasing considerations. Stankov et
al. (2019) argue that hotels must have ICT solutions that enable them to
interact with guests, including app working in the background and noti-
fying end users when needed.
However, the data analyzed in this chapter show that there has not been
any pop-up screen for the hotels in Victoria Falls to announce or commu-
nicate any alert or discounted offerings for the tourism experiences. In

Page 11
69
Branding and Co-Creation in Emerging Tourist Destinations
this sense, it implies that hotels in Victoria Falls are not perhaps inter-
acting with guests, limiting value co-creation and negatively conno-
tating the brand image of the tourist destination. Since the emergence of
the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been so much discussion about the
increased uptake of ICT as a means of decreasing personal contact. Earlier
studies argued that their ICT usage could accelerate due to COVID-19
(Jiang and Wen, 2020; Woyo and Nyamandi, 2021); our findings in terms
of website pop-ups in Victoria Falls are contrary, and this could further
create a lot of insecurities among guests.
4.4.4 HOTEL BRAND POSITIONING
Stankov et al. (2019) note a symbiotic relationship between hotel branding
and intentional effort to implement ICT efforts. Table 4.2 outlines help
explicitly to understand the branding efforts of selected hotels in both
tourism destinations. A deeper look into the conceptual background of
brand positioning around customization, connectivity, full-of-style tourism
experiences, and best value-for-money realization were categorized as the
branding efforts among four-star hotels in Dubai. As was echoed in earlier
studies, it appears that four-star hotels in Dubai are embracing the use of
websites as an approach through which they brand themselves in line with
technological trends (Stankov et al., 2019).
TABLE 4.2 Brand Positioning.
Hotel name
Brand positioning
Anantara the Palm Dubai Resort
Best Rate Guarantee
Armani Hotel Dubai
Tailored Hospitality, stay with Armani
Emerald Palace Kempinski Dubai
Travel the world in style
Fairmont the Palm Dubai
Soulful Hospitality
Kingdom Hotel
Diversified Hospitality
Elephant Hills Hotel
Relax and play in Victoria Falls
Victoria Falls Safari Lodge
Capturing the very essence of Africa
A’ Zambezi River Lodge
The only hotel with a river frontage
Note: All hotels are four stars.
Source: Prepared by the authors.

Page 12
70
Brand Cocreation Tourism Research
The analysis of hotels in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe, shows that most
of the branding of these hotels is themed along with the aspects of nature
and featuring leisure time and tends to promote diversified tourism experi-
ences based on natural attractions. Furthermore, for most of the hotels in
Victoria Falls, the Zambezi River stood out as the most important posi-
tioning element of the destination. This is so because the Victoria Falls
deemed the largest waterfall in Africa and the seventh wonder of the world
(Woyo and Slabbert, 2019), along the Zambezi River. Consequently, the
branding of the hotels is based on nature, and this approach helps in offering
co-creation opportunities in the tourism experience right at the start of the
journey, among all the four-star hotels selected, through a virtual agent to
address website visitor concerns (Fig. 4.1).
FIGURE 4.1 Snapshot from the website of A’Zambezi River Hotel.
Source: http://www.azambezi-hotel.com/
4.4.5 CO-CREATION VALUE PROPOSITION
Table 4.3 explains the co-creation value proposition categories heavily
designed through websites of selected hotels from both tourist destina-
tions. Offers with elements of value exchange have been significantly
dominated in Dubai’s four-star hotels. However, creating and offering
tourism experience in hotels in Victoria Falls in Zimbabwe was neces-
sary through the value co-creation processes. The count at a higher level,

Page 13
71
Branding and Co-Creation in Emerging Tourist Destinations
Dubai as a tourist destination, offers more features than Victoria Falls,
Zimbabwe. However, activities surrounded by nature are offered and
presented here in the Zimbabwean four-star hotels. Also, the set of activi-
ties are penetrating more in the overall co-creation value proposition. The
data analysis shows that the design aspects of the hotel websites can make
an important contribution to the co-creation value proposition. An invest-
ment in the aesthetics and symbolism of the hotel websites was critical in
influencing booking intentions (Baek and Ok, 2017).
TABLE 4.3 Co-Creation Value Proposition.
Co-Creation value
F
Dubai
p
F
Zimbabwe
p
Offers
44
40%
10
17%
Facilities
20
18%
21
35%
Accommodation
18
17%
7
12%
Activities
13
12%
18
30%
Events
14
13%
4
7%
Total
109
100%
60
100%
Figure 4.2 represents the Anantara The Palm Dubai Resort’s dynamic
view by timing the day and viewing the theme of “skyscapes inspire” at
11:00 AM.
FIGURE 4.2 Snapshot from the website of Anantara The Palm Dubai Resort.
Source: https://www.anantara.com/en/palm-dubai

Page 14
72
Brand Cocreation Tourism Research
4.5 CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
This chapter explores destination branding and brand co-creation, which
is found in two tourism destinations, namely, Victoria Falls in Zimbabwe
and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. This chapter also compares these
two destinations branding co-creation processes using symbolic and narra-
tive representations of the hotel websites. This chapter’s findings revealed
that the comparison shows that four-star hotels in Dubai offer overall
more co-creation value exchange than hotels in Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe.
Another key finding of the study was that the websites of hotels in Dubai
were more attractive and dynamic than those in Victoria Falls. Dubai, being
a busy getaway to the world, could be a critical driver of using websites to
present and position the brand using attractive and dynamic websites. On
the other hand, the numerous economic challenges obtaining in Zimbabwe
could be affecting the investment budget for creating attractive websites.
This chapter has contributed to the tourism destination branding and
co-creation efforts through website content analysis from Zimbabwe (a
destination facing political and economic challenges but natural adventures)
and Dubai (a popular destination among Gulf countries). It has compared
the two destinations’ co-creation processes; four-star hotels in Dubai offer
more branding and co-creation value proposition than Zimbabwe. Interest-
ingly, the orientation of sensitivity toward the safety of tourists has been
displayed in four-star hotels in Dubai. More importantly, brand position
activities “things to do” while at Victoria Falls as a tourist destination
in the four-star hotels offer more natural activities, waterfalls, and river
views. Alternatively, four-star hotels in Dubai offer more connectivity,
full of style tourism experiences, and the best value for money realization.
Hotels have critical stakeholders, and customers are expecting more safety
in the tourism and hospitality service context. The findings show that the
COVID-19 safety measures have been heavily cautioned on the hotels in
Dubai. The standout point attribute of co-creation from four-star hotels in
Dubai was “offers,” while Zimbabwean hotels were the “facilities.” There-
fore, hospitality or hotel managers and marketers should engage customers
and strategically integrate the website content for co-creation efforts and
destination branding (Buonincontri et al., 2017; González-Mansilla et
al., 2019; Merz et al., 2009). The research on value co-creation identifies
which factors drive customers’ participation with brands across different
consumption contexts (Giannopoulos et al., 2020; Mathis et al., 2016;
Rather et al., 2021a, b). This chapter provides evidence that confirms, from

Page 15
Branding and Co-Creation in Emerging Tourist Destinations
73
hotel websites’ point of view, that website quality is one of these critical
factors that enhance user’s co-creation with a destination.
The findings of this chapter may serve hotel marketing managers with
insights in terms of how to develop effective brand management strate-
gies that enhance customer co-creation. Following our findings, marketing
managers may better engage customers and increase their brand image.
Given the ongoing pandemic, hotel marketing managers must constantly
postnews about COVID-19 in their destinations, how hotels are being
cleaned, newly launched products, and discounts (Rather, 2021a, b). Addi-
tionally, there is a need for further investment in hotel websites to enhance
destination branding co-creation. This could be achieved by allowing
customers to share their experiences and information to be shared on the
hotel’s websites. Through this, hotel marketing managers will be able to
manage relationships with their customers, which is critical in improving
destination brand image.
4.6 LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE RESEARCH
This chapter is not without limitations. First, we employed exploratory
qualitative research. Future studies may need to improve data collection
and conduct large quantitative studies of tourism-brand co-creation and
destination branding to increase the generalizability of the findings (Rather
et al., 2020, 2021c). Second, we only explored four-star hotels’ websites to
understand brand co-creation in destinations. Bigger and varied samples
that collect sufficient data from other star-rated hotels in various destina-
tions in Zimbabwe and the UAE may offer insights into how websites are
affecting brand co-creation and destination branding.
KEYWORDS
• branding
• co-creation
• tourism destinations
• hotel websites
• emerging economies

Page 16
74
Brand Cocreation Tourism Research
REFERENCES
Aitken, R.; Campelo, A. The Four Rs of Place Branding. J. Market. Manage. 2011, 27
(9–10), 913–933.
Baek, J.; Ok, C. M. The Power of Design: How Does Design Affect Consumers’ Online
Hotel Booking? Int. J. Hospital. Manage. 2017, 65, 1–10.
Bahri-Ammari, N.; Rather, R. A.; Kallal, R. Brand Engagement and Identification in
Virtual Brand Community: The Moderating Role of Brand Community Subscription
Seniority. Int. J. Web Based Commun. 2021.
Bailey, R.; Ball, S. An Exploration of the Meaning of Hotel Brand Equity. Serv. Ind. J.
2006, 26 (1), 15–38.
Balakrishnan, M. S. Strategic Branding of Destinations: A Framework. Eur. J. Market.
2009, 43 (5/6), 611–629.
Benckendorff, P. J.; Xiang, Z.; Sheldon, P. J. Tourism Information Technology; Cabi, 2019.
Buonincontri, P.; Morvillo, A.; Okumus, F.; van Niekerk, M. Managing the Experience
Co-Creation Process in Tourism Destinations: Empirical Findings from Naples. Tour.
Manage. 2017, 62, 264–277.
Buhalis, D.; Sinarta, Y. Real-Time Co-Creation and Nowness Service: Lessons from
Tourism and Hospitality. J. Travel Tour. Market. 2019, 36 (5), 563–582.
Cai, L. A. Cooperative Branding for Rural Destinations. Ann. Tour. Res., 29 (3), 720–742.
Chang, C.; Ko, C.; Huang, H.; Wang, S. Brand Community Identification Matters: A Dual
Value-Creation Routes Framework. J. Product Brand Manage. 2020, 29 (3), 289–306.
Chen, M. M.; Murphy, H. C.; Knecht, S. An Importance Performance Analysis of
Smartphone Applications for Hotel Chains. J. Hospital. Tour. Manage. 2016, 29, 69–79.
Coupland, J. C. Invisible Brands: An Ethnography of Households and the Brands in Their
Kitchen Pantries. J. Consum. Res. 2005, 32 (1), 106–118.
Downe& Wamboldt, B. Content Analysis: Method, Applications, and Issues. Health Care
Women Int. 1992, 13 (3), 313–321.
Forbes Travel Guide, We Verify Luxury. https://www.forbestravelguide.com/ (accessed on
Mar 20, 2021).
Garrido-Moreno, A.; García-Morales, V. J.; Martín-Rojas, R. Going Beyond the Curve:
Strategic Measures to Recover Hotel Activity in Times of COVID-19. Int. J. Hospital.
Manage. 2021, 102928.
Giannopoulos, A.; Piha, L.; Skourtis, G. Destination Branding and Co-Creation: A Service
Ecosystem Perspective. J. Product Brand Manage. 2020, 30 (1), 148–166.
González-Mansilla, Ó.; Berenguer-Contri, G.; Serra-Cantallops, A. The Impact of Value
Co-Creation on Hotel Brand Equity and Customer Satisfaction. Tour. Manage. 2019,
75, 51–65.
Govers, R.; Go, F. M. Projected Destination Image Online: Website Content Analysis of
Pictures and Text. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2004, 7 (2), 73–89.
Hernandez, M. R.; Talavera, A. S.; Lopez, E. P. Effects of Co-Creation in a Tourism
Destination Brand Image Through Twitter. J. Tour. Herit. Serv. Market. 2016, 2 (2), 3–10.
Hollebeek, L. D.; Rather, R. A. Service Innovativeness and Tourism Customer Outcomes.
Int. J. Contemp. Hospital. Manage. 2019, 31 (11), 4227–4246.

Page 17
75
Branding and Co-Creation in Emerging Tourist Destinations
Hultman, M.; Strandberg, C.; Oghazi, P.; Mostaghel, R. The Role of Destination Personality
Fit in Destination Branding: Antecedents and Outcomes. Psychol. Market. 2017, 34,
1073–1083.
Iglesias, O.; Ind, N.; Alfaro, M. The Organic View of the Brand: A Brand Value Co-Creation
Model. In Advances in Corporate Branding; Palgrave Macmillan: London, 2017; pp
148–174.
Jiang, Y.; Wen, J. Effects of COVID-19 on Hotel Marketing and Management: APerspective
Article. Int. J. Contemp. Hospitali. Manage. 2020, 32 (8), 2563–2573.
Jiménez-Barreto, J.; Loureiro, S.; Braun, E.; Sthapit, E.; Zenker, S. Use Numbers Not
Words! Communicating Hotels’ Cleaning Programs for COVID-19 from the Brand
Perspective. Int. J. Hospital. Manage. 2021, 94, 102872.
Kanazawa, F. N.; Lourenção, M.; de Oliveira, J. H. C.; Giraldi, J. M. E. Destination
Website Management: A Social Constructionist Approach. J. Destin. Market. Manage.
2021, 19, 100545.
Kaufmann, H. R.; Loureiro, S. M. C.; Manarioti, A. Exploring Behavioural Branding,
Brand Love and Brand Co-Creation. J. Product Brand Manage. 2016, 25 (6), 516–526.
Kennedy, E. I Create, You Create, We All Create–for Whom? J. Product Brand Manage.
2017, 26 (1), 68–79.
Kim, H.; Stepchenkova, S.; Babalou, V. Branding Destination Co-Creatively: A Case
Study of Tourist’s Involvement in the Naming of Local Attraction. Tour. Manage. Persp.
2018, 28, 189–200.
Kotler, P.; Gertner, D. Country as a Brand, Product, and Beyond: A Place Marketing and
Brand Management Perspective. J. Brand Manage. 2002, 9 (4/5), 249–261.
Lee, M. S.; Soon, I. Taking a Bite Out of Apple: Jailbreaking and the Confluence of Brand
Loyalty, Consumer Resistance and the Co-Creation of Value. J. Product Brand Manage.
2017, 26 (4), 351–364.
Li, L.; Peng, M.; Jiang, N.; Law, R. An Empirical Study on the Influence of Economy Hotel
Website Quality on Online Booking Intentions. Int. J. Hospital. Manage. 2017, 63, 1–10.
Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y. Present and Future Hotel Website Marketing Activities: Change
Propensity Analysis. Int. J. Hospital. Manage. 2015, 47, 131–139.
Lund, N. F.; Scarles, C.; Cohen, S. A. The Brand Value Continuum: Countering
Co-Destruction of Destination Branding in Social Media Through Storytelling. J. Travel
Res. 2020, 59 (8), 1506–1521.
Mak, A. H. Online Destination Image: Comparing National Tourism Organisation’s and
Tourists’ Perspectives. Tour. Manage. 2017, 60, 280–297.
Mathis, E. F.; Kim, H. L.; Uysal, M.; Sirgy, J. M.; Prebensen, N. K. The Effect of
Co-Creation Experience on Outcome Variable. Ann. Tour. Res. 2016, 57, 62–75.
Merrilees, B. Interactive Brand Experience Pathways to Customer-Brand Engagement and
Value Co-Creation. J. Product Brand Manage. 2016, 25 (5), 402–408.
Merz, M. A.; He, Y.; Vargo, S. L. The Evolving Brand Logic: A Service-Dominant Logic
Perspective. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 2009, 37 (3), 328–344.
Michaelidou, N.; Siamagka, N. T.; Moraes, C.; Micevski, M. Do Marketers Use Visual
Representations That Tourists Value? Comparing Visitors’ Image of a Destination with
Marketer-Control Images Online. J. Travel Res. 2013, 52 (6), 789–804.
Minazzi, R. Hotel Classification Systems: A Comparison of International Case Studies.
Acta Universitatis Danubius 2010, 6 (4), 64–86.

Page 18
76
Brand Cocreation Tourism Research
Nguyen, H. T. T.; Nguyen, N.; Pervan, S. Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring
Hotel Website Service Quality (HWebSQ). Tour. Manage. Persp. 2020, 35, 100697.
Nyahunzvi, D. K. CSR Reporting Among Zimbabwe’s Hotel Groups: A Content Analysis.
Int. J. Contemp. Hospitali. Manage. 2013, 25 (4), 595–613.
Oliveira, E.; Panyik, E. Content, Context and Co-Creation: Digital Challenges in
Destination Branding with References to Portugal as a Tourist Destination. J. Vacation
Market. 2015, 21 (1), 53–74.
Parrey, S. H.; Hakim, I. A.; Rather, R. A. Mediating Role of Government Initiatives and
Media Influence Between Perceived Risks and Destination Image: A Study of Conflict
Zone. Int. J. Tour. Cities 2019, 5 (1), 90–106.
Pedeliento, G.; Kavaratzis, M. Bridging the Gap Between Culture, Identity and Image:
A Structurationist Conceptualization of Place Brands and Place Branding. J. Product
Brand Manage. 2019, 28 (3), 348–363.
Rasoolimanesh, S. M.; Seyfi, S.; Rather, R. A.; Hall, C. M. Investigating the Mediating Role
of Visitor Satisfaction in the Relationship Between Memorable Tourism Experiences and
Behavioral Intentions in Heritage Tourism Context. Tour. Rev. 2021.
Rather, R. A. Investigating the Impact of Customer Brand Identification on Hospitality
Brand Loyalty: A Social Identity Perspective. J. Hospital. Market. Manage. 2017, 27
(5), 487–513.
Rather, R. A. Exploring Customers’ Attitudes Towards the Hospitality Brands in India: A
Social Identity Perspective. In The Branding of Tourist Destinations: Theoretical and
Empirical Insights; Emerald Publishing, 2018; pp 207–231.
Rather, R. Consequences of Consumer Engagement in Service Marketing: An Empirical
Exploration. J. Global Market. 2019, 32 (2), 116–135.
Rather, R. A. Customer Experience and Engagement in Tourism Destinations: The
Experiential Marketing Perspective. J. Travel Tour. Market. 2020, 37 (1), 15–32.
Rather, R. A. Monitoring the Impacts of Tourism-Based Social Media, Risk Perception
and Fear on Tourist’s Attitude and Revisiting Behaviour in the Wake of COVID-19
Pandemic. Curr. Iss. Tour. 2021a.
Rather, R. A. Demystifying the Effects of Perceived Risk and Fear on Customer Engagement,
Co-Creation and Revisit Intention During COVID-19: A Protection Motivation Theory
Approach. J. Destin. Market. Manage. 2021b, 20.
Rather, R. A.; Camilleri, M. A. The Effects of Service Quality and Consumer-Brand Value
Congruity on Hospitality Brand Loyalty. Anatolia 2019a, 30 (4), 547–559.
Rather, R. A.; Camilleri, M. A. The Customers’ Brand Identification with Luxury Hotels:
A Social Identity Perspective. In Academy of Marketing Science World Marketing
Congress; Springer: Cham, 2019b; pp 429–443.
Rather, R. A.; Hollebeek, L. Exploring and Validating Social Identification and Social
Exchange-Based Drivers of Hospitality Customer Loyalty. Int. J. Contemp. Hospitali.
Manage. 2019, 31 (3), 1432–1451.
Rather, R. A.; Hollebeek, L. Experiential Marketing for Tourism Destinations. In Routledge
Handbook of Tourism Experience Management and Marketing; Dixit, S., Ed.; Routledge,
2020.
Rather, R. A.; Hollebeek, L. Customers’ Service-Related Engagement, Experience, and
Behavioral Intent: Moderating Role of Age. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021.

Page 19
77
Branding and Co-Creation in Emerging Tourist Destinations
Rather, R. A.; Najar, A. H.; Jaziri, D. Destination Branding in Tourism: Insights from Social
Identification, Attachment and Experience Theories. Anatolia 2020, 31 (2), 229–243.
Rather, R. A.; Hollebeek, L. D.; Ghasemi, M.; Kukk, J.; Smith, D. Visitors’ Destination
Brand Engagement’s Effect on Co-Creation: An Empirical Study. In The Routledge
Companion to Corporate Branding; Iglesias, O. et al., Eds.; Routledge, 2021a.
Rather, R. A.; Hollebeek, L. D.; Rasoolimanesh, S. First-Time versus Repeat Tourism
Customer Engagement, Experience, and Value Co-Creation: An Empirical Investigation.
J Travel Res. 2021b.
Rather, R. A.; Najar, A. H.; Jaziri, D. Destination Branding in Tourism: Insights from Social
Identification, Attachment and Experience Theories. In Tourism in India: Marketing
Perspectives; Dixit, S., Ed.; Routledge, 2021c.
Rather, R.; Tehseen, S.; Parrey, S. H. Promoting Customer Brand Engagement and Brand
Loyalty Through Customer Brand Identification and Value Congruity. Span. J. Market.
2018, 22 (3), 319–337.
Rather, R. A.; Hollebeek, L. D.; Islam J. U. Tourism-Based Customer Engagement: The
Construct, Antecedents, and Consequences. Serv. Ind. J. 2019, 39 (7–8), 519–540.
.; .;Rather, R. A.; Shakir, P. H. Customer Engagement in Increasing Affective Commitment
Within Hospitality Sector. J. Hospital. App. Res. 2018, 13 (1), 72–91.
Rather, R. A.; Sharma, J. Customer Engagement for Evaluating Customer Relationships in
Hotel Industry. Eur. J. Tour. Hospital. Recreat. 2017, 8 (1), 1–13.
Rather, R. A.; Sharma, J. Dimensionality and Consequences of Customer Engagement: A
Social Exchange Perspective. Vision 2019, 23 (3), 255–266.
Revilla Hernández, M.; Santana Talavera, A.; Parra López, E. Effects of Co-Creation
in a Tourism Destination Brand Image Through Twitter. J. Tour. Herit. Serv. Market.
(JTHSM) 2016, 2 (1), 3–10.
Salem, I. E. B.; Čavlek, N. Evaluation of Hotel Website Contents: Existence-Importance
Analysis. J. Hospital. Tour. Technol. 2016, 7 (4), 366–389.
Shams, G.; Rehman, M. A.; Samad, S.; Rather, R. The Impact of the Magnitude of Service
Failure and Complaint Handling on Satisfaction and Brand Credibility in the Banking
Industry. J. Financ. Serv. Market. 2020a, 25, 25–34.
Shams, G.; Rather, R.; Rehman, M. A.; Nawaz, L. B. (2020b). Hospitality-Based Service
Recovery, Outcome Favourability, Satisfaction with Service Recovery, and Consequent
Customer Loyalty: An Empirical Analysis. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hospital. 2020b.
Stankov, U.; Filimonau, V.; Slivar, I. Calm ICT Design in Hotels: A Critical Review of
Applications and Implications. Int. J. Hospital. Manage. 2019, 82, 298–307.
Stylidis, D.; Cherifi, B. Characteristics of Destination Image: Visitors and Non-Visitors’
Images of London. Tour. Rev. 2018, 73 (1), 55–67.
Stylidis, D. Residents’ Destination Image: A Perspective Article. Tour. Rev. 2020, 75 (1),
228–231.
Suntikul, W.; Jachna, T. The Co-Creation/Place Attachment Nexus. Tour. Manage. 2016,
52, 276–286.
Taghizadeh, S. K. Jayaraman, S.; Ismail, I.; Rahman, S. A. Scale Development and
Validation for DART Model of Value Co-Creation Process on Innovation Strategy. J.
Busi. Ind. Market. 2016, 31 (1), 24–35.

Page 20
78
Brand Cocreation Tourism Research
Tran, V. T.; Nguyen, N. P.; Tran, P. T.-K.; Tran, T. N.; Huynh, T. T.-P. Brand Equity in a
Tourism Destination: A Case Study of Domestic Tourists in Hoi An City, Vietnam. Tour.
Rev. 2019, 74 (3), 704–720.
Trembath, R.; Romaniuk, J.; Lockshin, L. Building the Destination Brand: An Empirical
Comparison of Two Approaches. J. Travel Tour. Market. 2011, 28, 804–816.
Vo-Thanh, T.; Zaman, M.; Hasan, R.; Rather, R. A.; Lombardi, R.; Secundo, G. How a
Mobile App Can Become a Catalyst for Sustainable Social Business: The Case of Too
Good To Go. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 171, 120962.
Wang, L.; Law, R. Relationship Between Hotels’ Website Quality and Consumers’
Booking Intentions with Internet Experience as Moderator. J. China Tour. Res. 2020, 16
(4), 585–605.
Wang, L.; Law, R.; Guillet, B. D.; Hung, K.; Fong, D. K. C. Impact of Hotel Website
Quality on Online Booking Intentions: eTrust as a Mediator. Int. J. Hospital. Manage.
2015, 47, 108–115.
Woyo, E. An Assessment of Brand Zimbabwe’s Competitiveness and Attractiveness as a
Tourism Destination; Doctoral Dissertation, North-West University, 2018.
Woyo, E.; Nyamandi, C. Application of Virtual Reality Technologies in the Comrades’
Marathon as a Response to COVID-19 Pandemic. Dev. Southern Afr. 2021, 1–15.
Woyo, E.; Slabbert, E. Cross-Border Destination Marketing of Attractions Between
Borders: The Case of Victoria Falls. J. Hospital. Tour. Insights, 2019.
Woyo, E.; Slabbert, E. Unpacking the Motivations, Satisfaction and Loyalty of Tourists
Travelling to a Distressed Destination. Anatolia 2020, 31 (4), 536–548.
-