2014
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/016006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access resistance of stimulation electrodes as a function of electrode proximity to the retina

Abstract: The proximity of stimulus electrodes to neural tissue in fluid-filled spaces can be estimated from access resistance changes in the stimulus pulse waveform. Because many prosthetic devices allow back telemetry communication of the stimulus electrode waveform, it is possible these series resistance increases observed with retinal proximity could be used as a metric of stimulus electrode placement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that these electrodes were the ones that were closest to the retinal surface, since the surgical tack used to attach the implant to the retina was located next to the first row of electrodes. However, we did not have access to optical coherence tomography (OCT) or impedance data, which would have allowed us to estimate electrode-retina distance 35,36 (see Discussion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is possible that these electrodes were the ones that were closest to the retinal surface, since the surgical tack used to attach the implant to the retina was located next to the first row of electrodes. However, we did not have access to optical coherence tomography (OCT) or impedance data, which would have allowed us to estimate electrode-retina distance 35,36 (see Discussion).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, low electrode-retina distances could explain why Subject 3 reported predominantly thin and elongated phosphenes (small errors in the tactile target control task argue against drawing bias; see Figures S2–S3). Unfortunately, we did not have access to OCT images or impedance measurements for our subjects, which would have allowed us to infer electrode-retina distances for each electrode 35,36 . Future studies could use such data to constrain the values of ρ and λ .
Figure 8Simulated phosphenes as a function of electrode-retina distance, z .
…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However no information is available beyond 500 µm. Majdi reports a similar rise in impedance when approaching the retina with a 1.6mm outer diameter (OD) insulated probe over a range of 1mm [13]. Majdi explains this impedance rise by a decreasing electrically excited neuronal surface, hence causing an increased access resistance of the retina.…”
Section: B Proximity Sensing For Eye Surgerymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Electrode-retina distance is correlated with perceptual thresholds and thus visual perception [16][17][18][19]. Though the correlation between electrode-retina distance and electrical thresholds of stimulation has been shown across numerous animal models including mammals [20][21][22] and rodents [23][24][25], detailed studies of a range of electrode-retina proximity and its impact on cortical activation are limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that has been widely used to estimate the proximity between the retina and epiretinal implants [26][27][28][29][30] in clinical settings. However, it is not easy to monitor insertion depth with OCT during stimulation [19,21,31]. In vivo impedance spectroscopy has been shown to be a robust monitoring tool for characterizing retinal tissue [32,33] and assessing performance of electrode array [34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
-