Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Qual Health Care. 1995 Mar; 4(1): 45–47.
PMCID: PMC1055266
PMID: 10142035

Implementing findings of medical research: the Cochrane Collaboration on Effective Professional Practice.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (542K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

 
 

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  • Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992 Jul 8;268(2):240–248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1992 Sep 2;268(9):1111–1117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eddy DM. Clinical policies and the quality of clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 1982 Aug 5;307(6):343–347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):597–599. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mulrow CD. The medical review article: state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):485–488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ketley D, Woods KL. Impact of clinical trials on clinical practice: example of thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1993 Oct 9;342(8876):891–894. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jan 15;120(2):135–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chalmers I, Dickersin K, Chalmers TC. Getting to grips with Archie Cochrane's agenda. BMJ. 1992 Oct 3;305(6857):786–788. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286–1291. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sheldon T, Chalmers I. The UK Cochrane Centre and the NHS Centre for reviews and dissemination: respective roles within the information systems strategy of the NHS R&D programme, coordination and principles underlying collaboration. Health Econ. 1994 May-Jun;3(3):201–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Quality in Health Care : QHC are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

-