Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Microbiol Resour Announc. 2023 Nov; 12(11): e00651-23.
Published online 2023 Oct 24. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00651-23
PMCID: PMC10652866
PMID: 37874142

Draft genome sequence of Pseudomonas sp. ER28, a cyclohexane pentanoic acid degrader isolated from oil sands process-affected water from Alberta, Canada

Kira L. Goff, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, 1 , 2 Jeff Gauthier, Software, Validation, Writing – review and editing, 3 Lisa M. Gieg, Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing, 4 Irena Kukavica-Ibrulj, Data curation, Methodology, Resources, 3 Esther Ramos-Padrón, Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Resources, 4 Shawn Lewenza, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Writing – review and editing, 1 , 2 and Roger C. Levesque, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review and editingcorresponding author 3
Simon Roux, Editor
Simon Roux, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA ;

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

ABSTRACT

We report the draft genome sequence of Pseudomonas sp. ER28, capable of utilizing the model naphthenic acid, cyclohexane pentanoic acid, as its sole carbon source. It was recovered from oil sands process-affected water containing cyclic and acyclic naphthenic acids. The genome size is 5.7 Mbp, and the G + C content is 60%.

KEYWORDS: Pseudomonas, oil sands tailings, naphthene, cyclohexane pentanoic acid

ANNOUNCEMENT

Industrial activity in oil sands regions results in the production of oil sand process-affected water (OSPW) that must be retained on-site. This complex mixture contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes; and cyclic and acyclic naphthenic acids (NAs) (1). Bioremediation of these compounds is of great interest.

Pseudomonas sp. ER28 is a known degrader of the model NA cyclohexane pentanoic acid (CHPA) via beta oxidation (2). It was collected in 2010 from OSPW from the Athabasca oil sands region of Alberta, Canada, as previously described (2), and transferred into modified Bushnell-Haas medium (2) modified to include CHPA (Sigma-Aldrich) as the sole carbon source to select for organisms capable of its biodegradation.

The isolate was plated on Brain-Heart Infusion (BHI) agar (BD Difco) for 48 h at room temperature (~25°C). Then, 2 mL of BHI broth was inoculated with a pure colony and grown to an OD600 of 1.0. Cells were centrifuged (10,000 × g) at 4°C for 20 min and DNA extracted using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN) following the manufacturer’s Gram-negative bacteria protocol. Resultant DNA was quantified via Qubit (dsDNA BR kit, ThermoFisher) and assessed for purity (OD260/OD280 >1.8) using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher). Total DNA (1 µg) was sheared into fragments of 400–700 bp using the G-tube protocol (Covaris). Paired-end sequencing (2× 300 bp) was done on an Illumina MiSeq apparatus using TruSeq3 PE 2× 300 bp chemistry. Reads were quality-controlled with FastQC (3), trimmed with TRIMMOMATIC version 0.39-2 (4), and assembled using the A5 pipeline version 20150522 (5). Annotation was done with the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline version 6.4 (6) Completeness was assessed with CheckM version 1.2.2 (7). Taxonomy was assigned using either (i) whole-genome in silico digital DNA-DNA hybridization via the Type Strain Genome Server (8) or (ii) the average nucleotide identity and phylogeny-based GTDB-Tk (9).

The genome size is 5.70 Mbp at 30× coverage and 100% complete (108 scaffolds, N50 111,151 bp; 5,310 coding DNA sequences, 67 ribosomal RNA genes, 119 transfer RNA genes), with a GC percent value of 62%. All bioinformatics tools were run with default parameters. The closest match was Pseudomonas putida NBRC 14164 at only 39.6% (species threshold 70%). Interestingly, GTDB-Tk assigned ER28 to Pseudomonas hunanensis slightly above thresholds (0.79% above 95%). This suggests that ER28 is a potential new species related to both P. putida and P. hunanensis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank Brian Boyle and the IBIS Genomics Platform for Illumina library preparation and sequencing and an operator for the OSPW samples.

This study was funded by CIHR and Genome Canada grants (to R.C.L.) and grants from NSERC and CNRL (to S.L.). Strain ER28 was isolated as part of the Hydrocarbon Metagenomics Project, funded by Genome Canada, Genome Alberta, the Government of Alberta, and Genome BC.

DATA AVAILABILITY

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession number JARIXT000000000. The version described in this paper is version JARIXT010000000. Raw reads were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRR25168147.

REFERENCES

1. Li C, Fu L, Stafford J, Belosevic M, Gamal El-Din M. 2017. The toxicity of oil sands process-affected water (OSPW): a critical review. Sci Total Environ 601–602:1785–1802. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.024 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Ramos Padrón E. 2013. Physiology and Molecular Characterization of Microbial Communities in Oil Sands Tailings Ponds. [Doctoral Thesis, University of Calgary]. PRISM University Repository. Available from: https://prism.ucalgary.ca/items/b64f7099-bd00-4df9-9dee-778c020376df [Google Scholar]
3. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available from: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
4. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Tritt A, Eisen JA, Facciotti MT, Darling AE. 2012. An integrated pipeline for de novo assembly of microbial genomes. PLoS One 7:e42304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042304 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. Checkm: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2019. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2022. GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 38:5315–5316. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac672 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

-