Logo of efsaLink to Publisher's site
PMC full text:

TABLE 15

Key epidemiological studies relating As exposure with birth weight.

Reference study population designOutcome definitionPopulation size (n)Arsenic exposure a ResultsAdditional information/confounders
Included in 2009 EFSA Opinion

Hopenhayn et al. (2003)

Chile

Cohort

BW844 (442 from Antofagasta and 444 from Valparaiso)Water: Antofagasta: 30–40 μg/L Valparaiso: < 1 μg/L−57 g in Antofagasta (95% CI ‐123, +9)

Aggregated w‐As data

Adjusted for many potential confounders, including GA

Yang et al. (2003)

Taiwan

Cohort

BW18,259 (3872 from As‐exposed townships, and 14,387 from similar reference townships)Water: In As‐exposed townships 30% > 50 μg/L−29 g (95% CI –44, –14) in As‐exposed townshipsAggregated w‐As data. Adjusted for some potential confounders

Huyck et al. (2007)

Rural Dacca, Bangladesh

CS/cohort (samplings early pregnancy and around birth)

BW, LBW49 live births

Water: max Q1: 0.5, Q2: 1.3, Q3: 9.0, Q4: 734 μg/L. Maternal hair 0.14–3.3, toenail 0.2–6.2

(both t‐As μg/g)

−194 g per μg/g As in hair

No association between BW and water‐As or nail‐As

OR for LBW versus hair As around 2 but CI included 1

LBW = < 2750 (=median in these newborns). Poor correlations between w‐As and most biomarkers

Adjusted for a number of potential confounders including GA

Rahman et al. (2009)

Matlab Bangladesh

Cohort

BW1578 singleton live birthsMaternal u‐tiAs: median 95 μg/L

No overall association, but

−1.7 g per μg/L in u‐tiAs at 0–100 μg/L. Mean BW 2.6 kg

Adjusted for many potential confounders. Exposure from water (70% > 10 μg/L, see Rahman et al., 2006)

Myers et al. (2010)

Inner Mongolia, China

CS

BW in term births9890 singleton births 1996–1999 with As measured in the wells of the sub villageWater: 66% < 20, 20% 21–50, 7% 50–100, 7% > 100 μg/L. Data from 1991 to 1997 in well‐water registryNo association between BW and water‐As categoriesw‐As data were averaged by sub village. No potential confounders were detected for BW. Women were generally health and well‐nourished
Not included in the 2009 Opinion

Kwok et al. (2006)

Rural Bangladesh, 261 villages in 3 districts

CS

LBW in term (≥ 37 week) births2006 live singleton births with As measured in the wells of the villagesWater: 2003 samples, mean about 70 μg/L, six categories < 10 μg/L to > 300 μg/L

Adjusted OR 1.00 for LBW (< 2500 g) in full term births

BW not analysed as continuous variable

Water samples (for each household), birth data for 2002, and covariates were collected in 2003 from Community Centres' registers + maternal interviews (2003). Most births at home

Gelmann et al. (2013)

Romania

CS

LBW38 singleton live births with LBW and normal BW from As‐in‐water exposed (19) and unexposed (19) villagesWater: means in exposed 54 μg/L and in unexposed 1 μg/L. u‐iAs 2–90 μg/L in exp and 0–1 μg/L in unexposedAmong exposed those with LBW had higher u‐tiAs than those with normal BWPilot study with too few cases

Chou et al. (2014)

Taiwan

Cohort

BW, LBW299 live births, 21 (7%) LBW (< 2500 g)Maternal u‐tiAs. Median 22 μg/g Cr (90% DMA)Significant adjusted association (multiple linear regression) between u‐MMA and BW. No association with LBWThe association btw u‐MMA and BW disappeared after further adjustment for DNA damage (N7‐MeG)

Laine et al. (2015)

Mexico

CS

BW199 singleton live births, only 4 with LBWWater: < 0.5–236, median 13 μg/L. Maternal u‐tiAs median 23 μg/L

w‐As, u‐tiAs, u‐DMA: null

U‐MMA and U‐%MMA had a significant adjusted negative slope

Mean u‐DMA 43 μg/L in women reporting seafood and 31 μg/L in the others. The association with BW seemed to be at least partly caused by an association with GA

Bloom et al. (2016)

Romania

CS

BW122 live singleton birthsWater: mean 4.1 μg/LNo overall association between As and BWAdjusted for potential confounders. An inverse association was found in the 29 smoking mothers

Gilbert‐Diamond et al. (2016)

USA, New Hampshire

Cohort

BW706 live singleton birthsMaternal u‐tiAs. Median 3.4 μg/LNo association between u‐tiAs, MMA or DMA and BWGeneral additive models adjusted for some potential confounders including gestational age

Kile, Cardenas, et al. (2016)

Rural Bangladesh

Cohort

BW1153 live singleton births

Water: < 0.5–1400, median 2.3 μg/L

Maternal toenail t‐As 0.2–35 μg/g, median 1.5 μg/g

Significant adjusted inverse association (multiple linear regression) between water As and BW, and between nail‐As and BWStructural equation modelling suggested that almost all the association was mediated by an association with GA

Almberg et al. (2017)

USA, Ohio

CS

LBW and VLBW (< 1500 g) in term infants428,804 live singleton births from records 2006–2008. In term births 2.9% LBW and 1.2% VLBWW‐As aggregated by 88 counties and year: 0.5–12 μg/L, median 1.5 μg/L. Based on 2968 measurements in 975 water systemsAdjusted ORs for LBW (1.00) and VLBW (0.99) were normal

ORs adjusted for many potential confounders from the records

ORs were increased in some sub analyses excluding counties with many private wells

Rahman et al. (2017)

Rural Bangladesh

Cohort

BW1180 live singleton births, same study base as Kile, Cardenas, et al. (2016)See Kile, Cardenas, et al. (2016), but median w‐As here 2.2 μg/L and nail‐As 1.2 μg/gAssociations: See Kile, Cardenas, et al. (2016)Mediation analyses suggested that most of the association was mediated by GA, but among the smallest infants there was also a direct effect

Lin et al. (2019)

Rural Bangladesh

Cohort

BW1057 live singleton births, Same study bas as Kile, Cardenas, et al. (2016) and Rahman et al. (2017)Toenail As 0.04–47, median 1.2BW inversely associated with protein, fat and fibre intake, but positively associated with carbohydrate intake. Nail‐As not significantly associated with BW, when adjusted for macronutrients, and nail‐As was not a significant mediator for BWSeems to weaken the conclusions from Kile, Cardenas, et al. (2016) regarding BW versus nail‐As, where macronutrients were not adjusted for. But still association between nail‐As and GA; the latter was a mediator to BW in Kile, Cardenas, et al. (2016)

Bozack et al. (2020)

Rural Bangladesh

Cohort

BWSubset of Kile, Cardenas, et al. (2016): 413 births with % methylation of DNA cord blood at 3 CpG sites in the gene body of DNA methyltransferase 3 alphaSee Kile, Cardenas, et al. (2016)Significant inverse association between nail‐As and BW.See Kile, Cardenas, et al. (2016), Rahman et al. (2017) and Lin et al. (2019). Here structural equation modelling also includes DNA methylation in cord blood.

Howe, Farzan, et al. (2020)

USA, Los Angeles

Cohort

BW

Births with maternal:

116 (hair‐As)

100 (blood As)

167 (u‐iAs)

Medians:

Hair: 0.01 μg/g

Blood: 0.67 μg/g

u‐tiAs: 5.7 μg/L

No association with u‐tiAsIn urine additionally 0.5 μg/L AsB
Howe, Claus Henn, et al. (2020)BW262Median u‐tiAs 5.8 μg/LNo significant association with BW in relation to GANote that then a possible impact of As on BW via GA is not taken into account

Shih et al. (2020)

USA, seven areas

Cohort (NCS)

BW212Total As (median 7.8 and DMA median 3.4 μg/L) in maternal urineNo association btw u‐DMA and BWHigh LODs: u‐tiAs 1.25, DMA 1.7, MMA 0.9. All had u‐tiAs >LOD and 77% had DMA > LOD, but for other species > 60% < LOD

Bulka et al. (2022)

USA nationwide

Cross‐sectional

BW3,305,090 term births in 3105 countiesThe probability of As in water in four categories (≤ 1, > 1, ≤ 5, > 5, ≤ 10, > 10) was estimated in 1 × 1 km grids, based on about 20,000 As measurements in private wells. Estimates were then aggregated on county level

Adjusted beta (grams) per 10% increase in probability of exceeding the following thresholds:

≤ 1, > 1

−3.1 (−4.0, −2.2)

≤ 5, > 5

−2.8 (−4.2, −1.3)

≤ 10, > 10

−3.9 (−6.1, −1.7)

Adjusted for proportion of private wells, maternal age, race/ethnicity, marital status, education, smoking during pregnancy, pre‐pregnancy BMI, rurality/urbanicity, annual concentration of PM < 2.5 μm in the county

Abbreviations: As, arsenic; AsB, arsenobetaine; BMI, body mass index; BW, birth weight; CI, confidence interval; Cr, creatinine; CpG, cytosine‐phosphate‐guanine; CS, cross‐sectional study; DMA, sum of dimethylarsinous acid and dimethylarsinic acid; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; EFSA, European Food Safety Authority; GA, gestational age; iAs, inorganic arsenic; km, kilometre(s); LBW, low birth weight; LOD, limit of detection; MMA, sum of monomethylarsonous acid and monomethylarsonic acid; n, number; N7‐MeG, N7‐methylguanine; NCS, National Children's Study; OR, odds ratio; PM, particulate matter; t‐As, total arsenic; u‐DMA, urinary DMA; u‐iAs, urinary inorganic arsenic; u‐MMA, urinary MMA; USA, United States of America; u‐tiAs, total urinary iAs (sum of iAs and methylated its metabolites MMA and DMA); VLBW, very low birth weight; w‐As, water arsenic.

a iAs in urine includes MMA and DMA, but not AsB.
-