MethodsRandomized controlled trial
Participants1‐7 years, ASA I‐II, infraumbilical day case surgery
Exclusion criteria: allergy to study drugs, psychological or emotional disorders, developmental delay, contraindication to caudal block, caudal block failure (heart rate increase at skin incision)
Recruitment: 95 children randomly assigned, 84 analysed (42 in each group)
Location: Turkey
InterventionsGroup MH: midazolam 0.5 mg/kg and hydroxyzine 1 mg/kg oral premedication 30 minutes before
Group M: midazolam 0.5 mg/kg oral premedication 30 minutes before
All participants: no parental presence at induction, induction with sevoflurane 7% with nitrous oxide 60% in oxygen, maintenance sevoflurane 2% with 60% nitrous oxide, IV alfentanil 10 mcg/kg, LMA, caudal block 0.25% bupivacaine (0.8 mL/kg up to 16 mL), parental presence in PACU
OutcomesPAED scale score assessed every 5 minutes for first 30 minutes in PACU
EA defined as PAED score ≥ 16 at any time during the 30‐minute follow‐up period
Median PAED scores for each group also reported
Other outcomes: parental separation score, induction quality, sedation quality (before induction), Ramsay sedation score at 30 minutes in PACU, pain scores in PACU (CHIPPS)
Notes 
Risk of bias
BiasAuthors' judgementSupport for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)Low risk"randomisation and allocation....was performed using computerised numbers"
Allocation concealment (selection bias)Unclear riskmethod of allocation concealment not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes
Low riskchild blinded, anaesthetist blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes
Low riskoutcome assessor blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Low risk7 withdrawals from group M (5 did not take premedication, 2 delayed transfer to operating room) and 4 from group MH (3 did not take premedication, 1 had caudal block failure)
Selective reporting (reporting bias)Low riskreported incidence of EA
-