Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Genetics. 1989 Dec; 123(4): 887–899.
PMCID: PMC1203897
PMID: 2612899

The ``hitchhiking Effect'' Revisited

Abstract

The number of selectively neutral polymorphic sites in a random sample of genes can be affected by ancestral selectively favored substitutions at linked loci. The degree to which this happens depends on when in the history of the sample the selected substitutions happen, the strength of selection and the amount of crossing over between the sampled locus and the loci at which the selected substitutions occur. This phenomenon is commonly called hitchhiking. Using the coalescent process for a random sample of genes from a selectively neutral locus that is linked to a locus at which selection is taking place, a stochastic, finite population model is developed that describes the steady state effect of hitchhiking on the distribution of the number of selectively neutral polymorphic sites in a random sample. A prediction of the model is that, in regions of low crossing over, strongly selected substitutions in the history of the sample can substantially reduce the number of polymorphic sites in a random sample of genes from that expected under a neutral model.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (2.1M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  • Aguade M, Miyashita N, Langley CH. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):607–615. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Griffiths RC. Lines of descent in the diffusion approximation of neutral Wright-Fisher models. Theor Popul Biol. 1980 Feb;17(1):37–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Haigh J, Smith JM. The hitch-hiking effect-a reply. Genet Res. 1976 Feb;27(1):85–87. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hudson RR. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Apr;23(2):183–201. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hudson RR, Kaplan NL. The coalescent process in models with selection and recombination. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):831–840. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaplan NL, Darden T, Hudson RR. The coalescent process in models with selection. Genetics. 1988 Nov;120(3):819–829. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith JM, Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ohta TMKimura M. Hitch-hiking effect - counter reply. Genet Res. 1976 Dec;28(3):307–308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stephan W, Langley CH. Molecular genetic variation in the centromeric region of the X chromosome in three Drosophila ananassae populations. I. Contrasts between the vermilion and forked loci. Genetics. 1989 Jan;121(1):89–99. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Watterson GA. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

-