Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Mar; 80(3): 485–494.
Published online 2007 Jan 17. doi: 10.1086/511888
PMCID: PMC1821101
PMID: 17273969

Mutations in Cohesin Complex Members SMC3 and SMC1A Cause a Mild Variant of Cornelia de Lange Syndrome with Predominant Mental Retardation

Abstract

Mutations in the cohesin regulators NIPBL and ESCO2 are causative of the Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS) and Roberts or SC phocomelia syndrome, respectively. Recently, mutations in the cohesin complex structural component SMC1A have been identified in two probands with features of CdLS. Here, we report the identification of a mutation in the gene encoding the complementary subunit of the cohesin heterodimer, SMC3, and 14 additional SMC1A mutations. All mutations are predicted to retain an open reading frame, and no truncating mutations were identified. Structural analysis of the mutant SMC3 and SMC1A proteins indicate that all are likely to produce functional cohesin complexes, but we posit that they may alter their chromosome binding dynamics. Our data indicate that SMC3 and SMC1A mutations (1) contribute to ∼5% of cases of CdLS, (2) result in a consistently mild phenotype with absence of major structural anomalies typically associated with CdLS, and (3) in some instances, result in a phenotype that approaches that of apparently nonsyndromic mental retardation.

The cohesin proteins compose an evolutionarily conserved complex whose fundamental role in chromosome cohesion and coordinated segregation of sister chromatids has been well characterized across species.1,2 Recently, regulators of cohesin and a structural component of the complex have surprisingly been found to cause phenotypically specific human developmental disorders when mutated. Mutations in NIPBL, the vertebrate homolog of the yeast Sister chromatid cohesion 2 (Scc2) protein, a regulator of cohesin loading and unloading, are responsible for ∼50% of cases of Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS [MIM #122470 and #300590]).35 Mutations in another cohesin regulator, ESCO2, have been found to result in Roberts syndrome and SC phocomelia.6,7 Two mutations in the cohesin structural component SMC1A (for structural maintenance of chromosomes 1A based on revised HUGO nomenclature; also called “SMC1L1”) were recently found to result in an X-linked form of CdLS.8 The conserved developmental perturbations seen in these disorders are likely the result of disruption of the cohesin complex’s role in facilitating long-range enhancer promoter interactions and subsequent transcriptional dysregulation.9,10

CdLS is a dominantly inherited genetic multisystem developmental disorder. The clinical features consist of craniofacial dysmorphia, hirsutism, malformations of the upper extremities, gastroesophageal dysfunction, growth retardation, neurodevelopmental delay, and other structural anomalies (see facies and limbs of patient 1P in fig. 1).11,12 The mental retardation seen in CdLS, although typically moderate to severe, displays a wide range of variability.12

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is AJHGv80p485fg1.jpg

Facies and hands of classic CdLS in SMC3- and SMC1A-mutation–positive individuals. Proband numbers are indicated. A “P” following the number indicates proband, and an “S” indicates an affected sister. Facial features and upper extremities are shown for 1P, a patient with classic CdLS and a truncating NIPBL mutation; 2P, a male with a sporadic SMC3 E488del mutation; 3P, a female with a sporadic V58-R62del mutation; 4P, a male with a sporadic F133V mutation; 6P, a male with a sporadic R496C mutation; 7P and 7S, two sisters of family 2 with the R496H mutation and mosaicism in the unaffected parent; 8P and 8S, two sisters of family 1 who share a R496H mutation; 9P, a female with a sporadic R496H mutation; 10P, a male with a sporadic R711W mutation; 11P, a female with a sporadic R790Q mutation; and 12P, a female with a sporadic F1122L mutation.

The facial features of an individual with classical CdLS are unique, are easily recognizable, and may be among the most useful diagnostic signs. A milder CdLS phenotype has been reported consistently,11,1315 characterized by less significant psychomotor and growth retardation, a lower incidence of major malformations, and milder limb anomalies15 and accounting for ∼20%–30% of the CdLS population.15

Mutations in NIPBL account for ∼50% of CdLS cases and have been shown to cause both mild and severe forms.3,16,17 The recent discovery that mutations in the X-linked SMC1A gene also result in a variant of CdLS8 suggests that other cohesin complex members may contribute to the etiology of CdLS and related disorders. Here, we report the screening of 115 NIPBL-mutation–negative individuals with sporadic and familial CdLS and probands with CdLS-variant phenotypes for mutations in the cohesin complex components SMC3 and SMC1A.

Mutation analysis.—All probands were suspected to have CdLS or CdLS variant phenotypes by clinical geneticists experienced in the diagnosis of CdLS, and all were enrolled under an institutional review board–approved protocol of informed consent. All were prescreened for mutations in the 46 coding exons of NIPBL by use of conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis and/or direct sequencing, as reported elsewhere.3 No NIPBL mutations were previously identified in these 115 probands. SMC3 and SMC1A (GenBank accession numbers NM_005445 and NM_006306) were analyzed by PCR amplification and direct sequencing of coding exons 1–29 and 2–25, respectively. Oligonucleotide primer sequences and PCR conditions for SMC3 and SMC1A are available on request.

On the basis of examination, clinical information, and/or photographs, patients for whom detailed information was available were categorized as indicated in table 1, which also shows the percentage of SMC3 and SMC1A mutations in each subgroup. A single mutation was identified in SMC3 in 1 of the 96 probands screened. Eight unique SMC1A mutations were identified in 10 of 115 probands, giving a prevalence of 9% among this cohort of NIPBL-mutation–negative probands and an overall prevalence of ∼5% among unscreened patients with CdLS.

Table 1. 

Characteristics of NIPBL-Mutation–Negative Probands with CdLS[Note]

Feature and
Subcategory
SMC3-Mutation PositiveSMC1A-Mutation PositivePercentage SMC1A-Mutation Positive
Facies:
 Typical0/506/5212
 Atypicala1/463/496
Sex:
 Male1/433/546
 Female0/537/5413
Severityb:
 Mild:1/519/6015
  Males1/202/239
  Females0/317/3719
 Moderate0/270/270
 Severe0/180/140
Limb deficiencies:
 Present0/130/110
 Absent1/839/9010
Familial cases0/153/2015

Note.— Clinical information was not available from all patients, so all feature categories do not sum to 115. The denominator in each cell indicates the number screened within each subcategory.

aAtypical facies usually consisted of a more prominent nose with less upturn, lack of synophrys or arched eyebrows, and/or no micrognathia.
bSeverity was determined as by Gillis et al.3

One male (2P) (fig. 1 and tables tables22 and and3)3) was found to have a unique SMC3 mutation that comprised a 3-nt deletion (c.1464_1466delAGA) and that resulted in the deletion of a single amino acid (p.E488del). Paternity was confirmed, and neither parent carried the mutation, which indicates a de novo event. Furthermore, this change was not observed in >350 control alleles.

Table 2. 

Dysmorphia and Minor Anomalies of SMC3- and SMC1A-Mutation–Positive Patients with CdLS[Note]

Patient
Characteristic2P3P4P5P6P7P7S8P8S9P10P11P12P
SexMFMMMFFFFFFFF
Gene mutatedSMC3SMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1A
cDNA mutation1464_1466delAGA173del15397T→G587G→A1486C→T1487G→A1487G→A1487G→A1487G→A1487G→A2131C→T2369G→A3364T→C
Protein effectE488delV58_R62delF133VR196HR496CR496HR496HR496HR496HR496HR711WR790QF1122L
Brachycephaly++++
Low anterior hairline++++++
Arched eyebrows+++Full++++++++
Synophrys+++++++++++Mild
Long eyelashes+++++++++++++
PalpebraeNormalNormalNormalNormalMild ptosisLacrimal duct stenosisPtosis, lacrimal duct stenosisNormalLacrimal duct stenosisPtosisLacrimal duct stenosisLacrimal duct obstructionMild ptosis
Myopia++Astigmatism++++
Nasal bridgeHighLowHighHighNormalLowLowLowLowLowHighLowHigh
Anteverted nostrils++Mild+++++Mild+
Long/featureless philtrum++++++++
Thin lips++++++++++++
Downturned corners of the mouth+++++++++
PalateHighNormalNormalHighPosterior cleftHighNormalMild cleft
Micrognathia++++++++
Hearing loss++++
Cutis marmorata++++++++++
Small hands++++++++++++
Small feet++++++++++++
Proximally set thumbs++++++++++
Clinodactyly of 5th finger+++++++++++
Restriction of elbow movements+++
Hirsutism+++++++

Note.— Blank cells indicate that information was unavailable.

Table 3. 

Growth and Development of SMC3- and SMC1A-Mutation–Positive Patients with CdLS[Note]

Patient
Characteristic2P3P4P5P6P7P7S8P8S9P10P11P12P
SexMFMMMFFFFFFFF
Gene mutatedSMC3SMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1ASMC1A
cDNA mutation1464_1466delAGA173del15397T→G587G→A1486C→T1487G→A1487G→A1487G→A1487G→A1487G→A2131C→T2369G→A3364T→C
Protein effectE488delV58_R62delF133VR196HR496CR496HR496HR496HR496HR496HR711WR790QF1122L
Birth weight, percentile<3875108<3<323114015
Length at birth, percentile25163529<337355
HC at birth, percentile<373544
APGAR scorea8/99/108/9
Feeding problems in infancy++++++
Weight at time of study, percentile<312<35318<33<3444<325
Height at time of study, percentile<3<314<386<3<3<3<373625
HC at time of study, percentile<33<375<3<3<3<310<3<325
Psychomotor delay+++++ Nonverbal+++++++
Mental retardation+Mainstream 2nd gradeAutistic-like behavior+++++ DQV=36; DQM=68+ DQV=35; DQM=45+IQ = 59
Major malformationsMild PSASDPS
CNS anomaliesNormal CT scan
GER++++++++++
SeizuresSingleIn the pastIn the past+
Other medical problemsSmall hiatal herniaIntubated with pneumonia, VU refluxAnxietyHistory of encephalitis, now hemipareticPulmonic stenosisIntention tremorRecurrent sinusitis

Note.— Growth percentages were estimated from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts.19 ASD = atrial septal defect; DQM = developmental quotient, motor; DQV = developmental quotient, verbal; GER = gastroesophageal reflux; HC = head circumference; PS = pulmonic stenosis; VU = vesicoureteral. Blank cells indicate that information was unknown.

aAPGAR scores are indicated by score at 1 min/score at 5 min.

Nine probands had missense mutations in SMC1A, and one had an in-frame deletion of 5 aa. One amino acid residue (R496) was mutated in 4 unrelated probands, 2 of which involved familial cases, to account for 7 of the 14 mutation-positive patients. One R496H familial case (involving patients 8P and 8S) (fig. 1 and tables tables22 and and3)3) resulted from germline mosaicism, and the other (involving patients 7P and 7S) resulted from a somatic and germline mosaic parent with no clinical features of CdLS. The mother in the third family (5P) was found to carry the SMC1A mutation (R496C) and is thought to have mild mental retardation and small hands. A mutation-positive, mentally retarded, affected half-brother developed speech but is institutionalized. All other mutations (V58_R62del, F133V, R196H, R711W, R790Q, and F1122L) were de novo and were identified in patients with unaffected parents who were negative for mutations. In addition, all mutations were absent in >220 normal control alleles. Analysis of protein sequences for human, Fugu, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Thermotoga maritime, aligned by the ClustalW method18 (MacVector [Accelrys]), demonstrated that all mutated residues affect evolutionarily conserved amino acids (fig. 2).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is AJHGv80p485fg2.jpg

Conservation of SMC3 and SMC1A and location of mutations. Alignment of human, mouse, Drosophila melanogaster, S. cerevisiae, and T. maritima SMC3- and SMC1-related sequences. Identical residues are indicated in bold with dark shading. Similar residues are indicated in normal font with light shading. Amino acids for which human mutations have been identified are outlined by boxes, with the position indicated above.

SMC3 and SMC1A mutations result in a mild variant of CdLS.—Tables Tables22 and and33 list the mutations and clinical characteristics of all probands and available affected family members. Notably, the SMC3- and SMC1A-mutation–positive patients demonstrated very mild facial features, no absence or reduction of limbs or digits, and no other major structural anomalies. This is in contrast to classical CdLS (see patient 1P in fig. 1), as summarized in table 4. As noted for the patients studied by Musio et al.,8 several of our patients had a more prominent nasal bridge (4P, 8S, 10P, and 12P) (fig. 1) than is typically seen in CdLS. It should be emphasized that, unlike in classic CdLS, in this cohort (1) 80% had birth weights that were normal, and several probands (6P, 9P, and 12P) had growth and head circumferences within the normal range; (2) all individuals walked, and all but one acquired speech; and (3) all had cognitive delays—however, some participated in mainstream classes (3P and 4P), and one was employed in a supervised position in a greenhouse (2P). Of six individuals with the R496H and R496C mutations, considerable variability was noted for growth and development, although all were considered to have mild CdLS. Polymorphisms identified in this work are shown in table 5.

Table 4. 

Features of SMC3- and SMC1A-Mutation–Positive Patients Compared with Classic CdLS[Note]

Patients Positive for Mutation in
Time and FeatureSMC1ASMC3Percentage of Patients with Classic CdLS
At birth:
 Normal weight8/100/132
 Normal length6/70/150
 Normal HC3/6NA15
At later timepoint:
 Normal weight6/120/115
 Normal height5/110/15
 Normal HC3/12NA<5
 Prominent nose5/121/1NA
 Limb deficiencies/reductions0/130/133
 Small hands11/121/193
 MR and/or developmental delay12/121/1100
 Acquired speech11/121/135

Note.— Complete clinical information was not available from all mutation-positive patients. The denominator in each cell indicates the number assessed for each feature. CdLS data on a 310-member cohort is taken from Kline et al.20 and Jackson et al.12 Growth percentages were determined from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts.19 Normal growth parameters are defined as >3rd percentile for age and sex. HC = head circumference; MR = mental retardation; NA = not available.

Table 5. 

SMC3 and SMC1A Polymorphisms Identified[Note]

Gene and Nucleotide ChangeAmino AcidLocationdbSNPAlleles IdentifiedaAllele Frequency
SMC3:
 c.−99C→A5′ UTR5/192.03
 c.15+89_90insAIntron 11/20.05
 c.91+67C→GIntron 2rs11195194192/1921.00
 c.255A→Gp.S85SExon 52/192.02
 c.350+21T→AIntron 6rs1119519421/192.11
 c.350+30T→GIntron 6rs791435111/192.06
 c.351−9T→CIntron 614/192.07
 c.548−45A→CIntron 8rs227557028/192.15
 c.548−4_3insAAIntron 820/192.10
 c.547+92A→GIntron 8rs79111293/20.15
 c.724−5_6insTIntron 9rs1138091510/192.05
 c.724−206_201delTTGTAGIntron 93/20.15
 c.805−26A→GIntron 10rs118159602/20.10
 c.969+23A→GIntron 113/192.02
 c.970−8G→AIntron 11rs1119519928/192.15
 c.1092−18T→CIntron 12rs1119520022/190.12
 c.1306−81A→GIntron 131/20.05
 c.1365T→Cp.Y455YExon 1411/192.06
 c.1409+6T→CIntron 141/192.01
 c.1410−48T→CIntron 14rs373729314/192.07
 c.2116+23G→AIntron 19rs7075340192/1921.00
 c.2428−92A→GIntron 21rs373729221/192.11
 c.2644+48A→GIntron 23rs1119521325/192.13
 c.2892+23T→CIntron 244/192.02
 c.3039A→Gp.S1013SExon 25rs17846396192/1921.00
 c.3582+51G→AIntron 288/192.04
 c.3973G→A3′ UTR1/192.01
SMC1A:
 c.−19C→T5′ UTRrs126401196/150.64
 c.1338−32A→CIntron 8rs12640087/145.05

Note.— Numbering is based on SMC3 and SMC1A cDNA sequences (RefSeq accession numbers NM_005445 and NM_006306, respectively), starting from the first nucleotide of the ORF. Nomenclature is according to den Dunnen and Antonarakis21 and the Human Genome Variation Society Mutation Nomenclature Recommendations.

aThe denominator indicates the total number of alleles screened.

Mapping of mutations to the cohesin crystal structure.—To understand the molecular implications of SMC3 and SMC1A mutations, we capitalized on extensive previous SMC protein biochemistry, electron microscopy, and x-ray crystallography.1,2 SMC proteins consist of globular N- and C-terminal domains that contain ATP-binding Walker A and Walker B motifs, respectively. These motifs are juxtaposed in the globular head domain of SMCs as a result of an intramolecular antiparallel coiled coil (figs. (figs.33 and and4).4). A central domain of SMC1 (SMC1A in humans) forms a globular hinge domain that interacts with a similar motif of SMC3 to form a heterodimer. The C-terminal domains of SMC1 and SMC3 also contain ATP binding cassette (ABC) signature (or C) motifs. In addition to their interactions at the hinge domain, the globular head domains of SMC1 and SMC3 interact to complete two tripartite ATP-binding pockets formed by the Walker A and B motifs of one molecule and the signature/C motif of the other (figs. (figs.33 and and4).4). It has been shown that ATP binding promotes association of the two intermolecular heads and that ATP hydrolysis drives them apart22; both events facilitate the ability of cohesin to encircle chromatin.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is AJHGv80p485fg3.jpg

Mapping of SMC1A and SMC3 mutations to known SMC crystal structure data. A, Mutations in the hinge domain are represented on the Thermotoga SMC dimeric hinge crystal structure. Monomers are colored either red or blue. The darker red and blue regions indicate the N-terminal portions of each monomer. Arrows indicate the N- and C-termini, which are at the end of the coiled-coil domain nearest the hinge region. Mutated residues are shaded bright red. An asterisk (*) indicates the E493 altered residue reported by Musio et al.8 The R496 residue in humans is a glycine in Thermotoga (see fig. 2). B, Mutations placed on the yeast SMC1 head domain dimer. These regions are key in the binding and hydrolysis of ATP, indicated by ball and stick molecules. Magnesium molecules at the active sites are indicated by gray balls. Three SMC1A mutations occur in the head domain—two in the N-terminus and one in the C-terminus. The V58_R62del overlaps a loop that is unstructured in the yeast SMC1 crystal structure but is positioned near the Walker A and B motifs (yellow residues A and B) and thus could affect ATP binding or hydrolysis. The F133V mutation is adjacent to the Walker B motif that contains a serine, which contacts ATP directly at the active site. The F1122L mutation is in the signature/C motif (yellow residues C) of the C-terminal head domain. It is positioned at the SMC1/SMC3 head-domain intermolecular interface adjoining the adenine ring of ATP. Structural analysis was performed with Cn3D (NCBI Structure Group).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is AJHGv80p485fg4.jpg

Schematic indicating the presumed organization of the SMC1/SMC3 heterodimer and the locations of SMC1A and SMC3 mutations on the cohesin ring. SMC1 is shaded red, and SMC3 is shaded blue, with darker red and blue regions indicating the N-terminal portions of each monomer. Yellow circles indicate ATP molecules bound in proximity to Walker A, B, and C motifs (a, b, and c, respectively). The N-and C-termini are indicated. Mutation locations are indicated by black circles. Altered residues reported by Musio et al.8 are indicated by an asterisk (*).

In figure 3, SMC3 and SMC1A mutations are mapped onto crystal data derived from the Thermotoga SMC hinge domain dimer23 and a yeast Smc1 head domain dimer24 (NCBI Protein Database). The SMC3 E488del and the SMC1A R496H, R496C, and E493A8 mutations all map to the junction of the N-terminal coiled-coil and the hinge (fig. 3A). This region is remarkably conserved from bacteria to humans (fig. 2).

The process of loading the cohesin onto DNA is dependent on factors that include NIPBL (also known as “Scc2”)25,26 and the hydrolysis of ATP.26,27 It has been shown that mutations of the Bacillus SMC hinge domain disrupt both DNA binding22 and ATP hydrolysis.2 Thus, it is possible that SMC3 and SMC1A mutations at the boundary of the hinge domain disrupt DNA binding or ATP hydrolysis kinetics, leading to similar phenotypes as well as to those seen for some mutations in NIPBL. Three SMC1A mutations (V58_62del, F133V, and F1122L) occur in the head domain (fig. 3B) and are positioned near the Walker A, B, and signature/C motifs that could affect ATP binding, ATP hydrolysis, and/or SMC1/SMC3 head-domain dimerization, an ATP-dependent process.

The SMC1A mutations R196H, R711W, and R790Q and the familial D831_Q832delinsE mutation8 all reside in the coiled-coil domain (fig. 4). By use of the Coils program,28 which predicts the probability of a protein to form a coiled-coil, these mutations had a small likelihood of disrupting the coiled-coil arms. However, the alterations caused by these mutations may affect the angulation of the coiled-coil,29 resulting in impaired intra- or intermolecular approximation of the SMC head domains, or disrupt binding of accessory proteins to the cohesin ring.

SMC1A mutations in females.—In contrast to previous work on SMC1A,8 10 of 14 total SMC1A-mutation–positive individuals were female. Furthermore, we describe similarly affected male and female probands, implying an X-linked dominant mode of expression. Interestingly, several males were rather mildly affected (4P and 6P) and no more severely affected than many of the SMC1A-mutation–positive females. Since SMC1A escapes X inactivation,30 it is likely that the mechanism in affected females is due to a dominant negative effect of the altered protein and less likely that is is due to decreased protein levels8 or skewed X inactivation. Consistent with this dominant negative effect on cohesin, the SMC3 mutation is also a single amino acid deletion.

The cohesin complex and mental retardation.—Of note, all the patients described here have disease in the mild-to-moderate range of CdLS and were ascertained as having mild facial features reminiscent of CdLS, but none has major structural anomalies typically seen in classic CdLS (table 4). However, without exception, all had varying degrees of mental retardation (fig. 1 and tables tables33 and and4).4). Although the facial features in many of these individuals may be appreciated by dysmorphologists experienced in this diagnosis, for the most part, they would present to clinical attention as individuals with mild-to-moderate mental retardation, often without the hallmark short stature and/or microcephaly of CdLS (table 4). This strongly suggests that brain development is the process most sensitive to perturbation of these proteins. The relatively small contribution of SMC3 (∼1%) and SMC1A (∼5%) mutations in our study group may be the result of the selection bias of our study subjects, who were ascertained as having CdLS or CdLS-variant phenotypes. There may be a subset of individuals among the larger diagnostic category of mental retardation spectrum disorders with an apparently nonsyndromic etiology who may be carrying the bulk of mutations in cohesin pathway genes. Furthermore, additional “cohesinopathies” may result from perturbation of the >15 additional components of this complex that have yet to be associated with human disorders.

Acknowledgments

We are exceptionally grateful to the patients and families with Cornelia de Lange syndrome who participated in this study, as well as to the referring physicians and colleagues who have contributed samples and clinical information. We thank Dr. Antonio Baldellou and Dr. Teresa Calvo for clinical assistance. We are indebted to the continued support of the U.S. Cornelia de Lange Syndrome Foundation, its Executive Director, Julie Mairano, and the support staff. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grants PO1 HD052860 and RO1 HD39323; a National Institute of General Medical Sciences T-32 training award; research grants from the U.S. Cornelia de Lange Syndrome Foundation; NIH grants R01 GM055683 and R01 GM073837; March of Dimes grant 1-FY05-103; the Network Operativo per la Biomedicina di Eccellenza in Lombardia project, supported by Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio delle Provincie Lombardel; project B20 of the Diputación General de Aragón; and projects FIS PI051743 and PI051724 from Spain's Ministry of Health.

Web Resources

Accession numbers and URLs for data presented herein are as follows:

GenBank, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/ (for human SMC3 [accession number NM_005445] and human SMC1A [accession number NM_006306])
HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee, http://www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/nomenclature/
Human Genome Variation Society Mutation Nomenclature Recommendations, http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/
NCBI Protein Database, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (for struture coordinates for the Thermotoga SMC hinge domain [accession numbers 1GXLB and 1GXLA] and S. cerevisiae Smc1 head domain [accession numbers 1W1WA and 1W1WB])
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/ (for CdLS) [PubMed]

References

1. Nasmyth K, Haering CH (2005) The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu Rev Biochem 74:595–648 10.1146/annurev.biochem.74.082803.133219 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Hirano T (2006) At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:311–322 10.1038/nrm1909 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Gillis LA, McCallum J, Kaur M, DeScipio C, Yaeger D, Mariani A, Kline AD, Li HH, Devoto M, Jackson LG, et al (2004) NIPBL mutational analysis in 120 individuals with Cornelia de Lange syndrome and evaluation of genotype-phenotype correlations. Am J Hum Genet 75:610–623 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Krantz ID, McCallum J, DeScipio C, Kaur M, Gillis LA, Yaeger D, Jukofsky L, Wasserman N, Bottani A, Morris CA, et al (2004) Cornelia de Lange syndrome is caused by mutations in NIPBL, the human homolog of Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B. Nat Genet 36:631–635 10.1038/ng1364 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Tonkin ET, Wang TJ, Lisgo S, Bamshad MJ, Strachan T (2004) NIPBL, encoding a homolog of fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins and fly Nipped-B, is mutated in Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Nat Genet 36:636–641 10.1038/ng1363 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Schule B, Oviedo A, Johnston K, Pai S, Francke U (2005) Inactivating mutations in ESCO2 cause SC phocomelia and Roberts syndrome: no phenotype-genotype correlation. Am J Hum Genet 77:1117–1128 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Vega H, Waisfisz Q, Gordillo M, Sakai N, Yanagihara I, Yamada M, van Gosliga D, Kayserili H, Xu C, Ozono K, et al (2005) Roberts syndrome is caused by mutations in ESCO2, a human homolog of yeast ECO1 that is essential for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Nat Genet 37:468–470 10.1038/ng1548 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Musio A, Selicorni A, Focarelli ML, Gervasini C, Milani D, Russo S, Vezzoni P, Larizza L (2006) X-linked Cornelia de Lange syndrome owing to SMC1L1 mutations. Nat Genet 38:528–530 10.1038/ng1779 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Rollins RA, Korom M, Aulner N, Martens A, Dorsett D (2004) Drosophila nipped-B protein supports sister chromatid cohesion and opposes the stromalin/Scc3 cohesion factor to facilitate long-range activation of the cut gene. Mol Cell Biol 24:3100–3111 10.1128/MCB.24.8.3100-3111.2004 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Dorsett D, Eissenberg JC, Misulovin Z, Martens A, Redding B, McKim K (2005) Effects of sister chromatid cohesion proteins on cut gene expression during wing development in Drosophila. Development 132:4743–4753 10.1242/dev.02064 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Ireland M, Donnai D, Burn J (1993) Brachmann-de Lange syndrome: delineation of the clinical phenotype. Am J Med Genet 47:959–964 10.1002/ajmg.1320470705 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Jackson L, Kline AD, Barr MA, Koch S (1993) de Lange syndrome: a clinical review of 310 individuals. Am J Med Genet 47:940–946 10.1002/ajmg.1320470703 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Van Allen MI, Filippi G, Siegel-Bartelt J, Yong SL, McGillivray B, Zuker RM, Smith CR, Magee JF, Ritchie S, Toi A, et al (1993) Clinical variability within Brachmann-de Lange syndrome: a proposed classification system. Am J Med Genet 47:947–958 10.1002/ajmg.1320470704 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Saul RA, Rogers RC, Phelan MC, Stevenson RE (1993) Brachmann-de Lange syndrome: diagnostic difficulties posed by the mild phenotype. Am J Med Genet 47:999–1002 10.1002/ajmg.1320470712 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Allanson JE, Hennekam RC, Ireland M (1997) de Lange syndrome: subjective and objective comparison of the classical and mild phenotypes. J Med Genet 34:645–650 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Bhuiyan Z, Klein M, Hammond P, Mannens MM, Van Haeringen A, Van Berckelaer-Onnes I, Hennekam RC (2005) Genotype-phenotype correlations of 39 patients with Cornelia de Lange syndrome: the Dutch experience. J Med Genet 43:568–575 10.1136/jmg.2005.038240 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Yan J, Saifi GM, Wierzba TH, Withers M, Bien-Willner GA, Limon J, Stankiewicz P, Lupski JR, Wierzba J (2006) Mutational and genotype-phenotype correlation analyses in 28 Polish patients with Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 140:1531–1541 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Eddy SR (1995) Multiple alignment using hidden Markov models. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 3:114–120 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Guo SS, Wei R, Mei Z, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL (2000) CDC growth charts: United States. Adv Data 314:1–27 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Kline AD, Barr M, Jackson LG (1993) Growth manifestations in the Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. Am J Med Genet 47:1042–1049 10.1002/ajmg.1320470722 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. den Dunnen JT, Antonarakis SE (2000) Mutation nomenclature extensions and suggestions to describe complex mutations: a discussion. Hum Mutat 15:7–12 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(200001)15:1<7::AID-HUMU4>3.0.CO;2-N [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
22. Hirano T (2002) The ABCs of SMC proteins: two-armed ATPases for chromosome condensation, cohesion, and repair. Genes Dev 16:399–414 10.1101/gad.955102 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
23. Haering CH, Lowe J, Hochwagen A, Nasmyth K (2002) Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol Cell 9:773–788 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00515-4 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Haering CH, Schoffnegger D, Nishino T, Helmhart W, Nasmyth K, Lowe J (2004) Structure and stability of cohesin’s Smc1-kleisin interaction. Mol Cell 15:951–964 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.08.030 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Ciosk R, Shirayama M, Shevchenko A, Tanaka T, Toth A, Nasmyth K (2000) Cohesin’s binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol Cell 5:243–254 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80420-7 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Arumugam P, Gruber S, Tanaka K, Haering CH, Mechtler K, Nasmyth K (2003) ATP hydrolysis is required for cohesin’s association with chromosomes. Curr Biol 13:1941–1953 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.036 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
27. Weitzer S, Lehane C, Uhlmann F (2003) A model for ATP hydrolysis-dependent binding of cohesin to DNA. Curr Biol 13:1930–1940 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.030 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Lupas A, Van Dyke M, Stock J (1991) Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252:1162–1164 10.1126/science.252.5009.1162 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Anderson DE, Losada A, Erickson HP, Hirano T (2002) Condensin and cohesin display different arm conformations with characteristic hinge angles. J Cell Biol 156:419–424 10.1083/jcb.200111002 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Brown CJ, Miller AP, Carrel L, Rupert JL, Davies KE, Willard HF (1995) The DXS423E gene in Xp11.21 escapes X chromosome inactivation. Hum Mol Genet 4:251–255 10.1093/hmg/4.2.251 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

-