Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Jul; 84(3): 375–385.
PMCID: PMC226158
PMID: 8883986

Clinical extracts of biomedical literature for patient-centered problem solving.

Abstract

This paper reports on a four-part qualitative research project aimed at designing an online document surrogate tailored to the needs of physicians seeking biomedical literature for use in clinical problem solving. The clinical extract, designed in collaboration with three practicing physicians, combines traditional elements of the MEDLINE record (e.g., title, author, source, abstract) with new elements (e.g., table captions, text headings, case profiles) suggested by the physicians. Specifications for the prototype clinical extract were developed through a series of relevance-scoring exercises and semi-structured interviews. For six clinical questions, three physicians assessed the applicability of selected articles and their document surrogates, articulating relevance criteria and reasons for their judgments. A prototype clinical extract based on their suggestions was developed, tested, evaluated, and revised. The final version includes content and format aids to make the extract easy to use. The goals, methods, and outcomes of the research study are summarized, and a template of the final design is provided.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.9M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  • Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA. 1992 Nov 4;268(17):2420–2425. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huth EJ. The information explosion. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1989 Jul-Aug;65(6):647–672. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lindberg DA, Siegel ER, Rapp BA, Wallingford KT, Wilson SR. Use of MEDLINE by physicians for clinical problem solving. JAMA. 1993 Jun 23;269(24):3124–3129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Timpka T, Ekström M, Bjurulf P. Information needs and information seeking behaviour in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1989 Jun;7(2):105–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ely JW, Burch RJ, Vinson DC. The information needs of family physicians: case-specific clinical questions. J Fam Pract. 1992 Sep;35(3):265–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Osheroff JA, Forsythe DE, Buchanan BG, Bankowitz RA, Blumenfeld BH, Miller RA. Physicians' information needs: analysis of questions posed during clinical teaching. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 1;114(7):576–581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Woolf SH, Benson DA. The medical information needs of internists and pediatricians at an academic medical center. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1989 Oct;77(4):372–380. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Timpka T, Arborelius E. The GP's dilemmas: a study of knowledge need and use during health care consultations. Methods Inf Med. 1990 Jan;29(1):23–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Florance V. Medical knowledge for clinical problem solving: a structural analysis of clinical questions. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1992 Apr;80(2):140–149. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nygren E, Henriksson P. Reading the medical record. I. Analysis of physicians' ways of reading the medical record. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1992 Sep-Oct;39(1-2):1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • DeBakey S, DeBakey L. The abstract: an abridged scientific report. Int J Cardiol. 1983 Jul;3(4):439–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. Ann Intern Med. 1987 Apr;106(4):598–604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

-