Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 May; 26(5): 846–849.
PMCID: PMC266472
PMID: 2454937

Sputum gram stain assessment in community-acquired bacteremic pneumonia.

Abstract

A prospective study was performed over a 4.5-year period to determine the ability of a sputum Gram stain to predict the cause of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. A blood culture isolate, rather than a sputum culture, served as the reference standard to provide precise identification of the etiologic agent. The study population comprised 59 bacteremic adults who expectorated a valid sputum sample. Data are presented that indicate that a physician, aided by the morphology of the stained sputum, could theoretically select appropriate monotherapy approximately 94% of the time when selective, defined criteria for the microbiology of valid sputum are met. Three of the five patients with pneumonia caused by Haemophilus influenzae, however, had sputum stains that suggested alternative pathogens. This study reaffirms that the Gram-stained sputum is a reliable, but not infallible, guide to direct initial antibiotic therapy in adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (677K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  • Boerner DF, Zwadyk P. The value of the sputum gram's stain in community-acquired pneumonia. JAMA. 1982 Feb 5;247(5):642–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brown RB, Sands M, Ryczak M. Community-acquired pneumonia caused by mixed aerobic bacteria. Chest. 1986 Dec;90(6):810–814. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dans PE, Charache P, Fahey M, Otter SE. Management of pneumonia in the prospective payment era. A need for more clinician and support service interaction. Arch Intern Med. 1984 Jul;144(7):1392–1397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Flatauer FE, Chabalko JJ, Wolinsky E. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in bacteriologic assessment of lower respiratory tract secretions. Importance of microscopic examination. JAMA. 1980 Nov 28;244(21):2427–2429. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gleckman R, Hibert D. Afebrile bacteremia. A phenomenon in geriatric patients. JAMA. 1982 Sep 24;248(12):1478–1481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hahn HH, Beaty HN. Transtracheal aspiration in the evaluation of patients with pneumonia. Ann Intern Med. 1970 Feb;72(2):183–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalin M, Lindberg AA, Tunevall G. Etiological diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia by gram stain and quantitative culture of expectorates. Leukocytes or alveolar macrophages as indicators of sample representativity. Scand J Infect Dis. 1983;15(2):153–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Murray PR, Washington JA. Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975 Jun;50(6):339–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pratter MR, Irwin RS. Clinical value of the Gram-stain smear of respiratory secretions. Chest. 1985 Aug;88(2):163–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ries K, Levison ME, Kaye D. Transtracheal aspiration in pulmonary infection. Arch Intern Med. 1974 Mar;133(3):453–458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

-