Protrusio Acetabuli: New Insights and Experience with Joint Preservation

PMC full text:

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep; 467(9): 2241–2250.

Published online 2009 May 1. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0853-3

Table 5

Description of patients evaluated for joint preserving surgery

No.	Age	Gender	Hips	Type	X-Rays	False profile	CT	MRI	Open surgical dislocation	Therapeutic procedure	Follow-up (months)	Outcome
1	21	Female	Bilateral	Primary	Yes	No	No	Yes	No	Reverse PAO	24	Good
2	37	Female	Bilateral	Primary	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	None	-	-
3	16	Male	Bilateral	Primary	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Rim trim Valgus IO Labral refixation	24 18	Very Good
4	24	Female	Unilateral	Traumatic	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	Reverse PAO	24	Very Good
5	25	Female	Bilateral	Osteogenesis Imperfecta	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Rim trim Neck lengthening Reverse PAO	48	Good
6	23	Female	Bilateral	Primary	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Rim trim Labral refixation	60 60	Good
7	29	Female	Bilateral	Primary	Yes	No	No	No	No	None	-	-
8	23	Female	Bilateral	Primary	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes Yes	Yes	Rim trim Neck lengthening Reverse PAO	24 12	Very Good
9	19	Female	Bilateral	Marfan	Yes	No	No	No	No	None	-	-
10	39	Male	Unilateral	Primary	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Total hip arthroplasty	-	-
11	43	Female	Bilateral	Primary	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Rim trim	84	Candidate for THA
12	19	Female	Bilateral	Primary	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Total hip arthroplasty	-	-

No., number; PAO, periacetabular osteotomy; IO, intertrochanteric osteotomy; THA, total hip arthroplasty.