Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Indian J Pharm Sci. 2010 Mar-Apr; 72(2): 267–269.
PMCID: PMC2929795
PMID: 20838540

In vitro Antioxidant Potential of Different Parts of Oroxylum indicum: A Comparative Study

Abstract

The present study evaluated the in vitro antioxidant potential of different parts of Oroxylum indicum. 2,2-diphelyl 1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), nitric oxide, superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical scavenging potential and reductive ability assay of methanol extract of different parts i.e. root, root bark, stem, stem bark, leaves and fruits were performed. Leaves and bark extracts exhibits highest free radical scavenging activity than bark, stem and fruit extract. Leaves extract showed maximum reductive ability and found to contain maximum amount of polyphenolic compounds. The highest free radical activity may be due to presence of polyphenolic compounds.

Keywords: Free radical scavenging, Oroxylum indicum, different parts, polyphenolic compounds

Antioxidants are now standing on the mainstay of the treatment and prevention of several diseases.[1-3]. Current research is directed towards finding naturally occurring antioxidants particularly of plant origin. Oroxylum indicum Vent. (Bignoniaceae), a rare endangered and threatened medicinal plant widely used traditionally for treating several disorders.[4]. The root-bark is used as an astringent and tonic and also in diarrhoea and dysentery. The stem bark is used in acute rheumatism. In the form of an infusion, it is used as a diaphoretic. The fruits are used as carminative and stomachic, while the seeds are used as purgative. The roots are used in dropsy and the leaves are reputed as an emollient. Tender fruits are described as carminative and stomachic[5]. The root of this plant is also one of the important ingredients in most commonly used ayurvedic formulations like dantyadyarista, brahma rasayana, dasamula, amartarista, dhanawantara ghrita, narayana taila[6]. The anti cancer potential of different parts of the plant has already been reported[7,8]. The present study describes a comparative evaluation of different parts of Oroxylum indicum for their in vitro antioxidant activity.

The different parts of the plant i.e. root, root bark, stem, stem bark, leaves and fruits were collected from the forest region of Orissa and identified at the Institute of Materials and Minerals Technology, Bhubaneswar, Orissa. All the plant materials were shade dried, powdered, sieved and successively extracted with petroleum ether and methanol to obtain the extracts. The each of these extracts was concentrated in a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure, giving individual extracts. Ten milligrams of methanol extract of different parts was dissolved in methanol (1 ml) and solution was serially diluted for antioxidant studies.

Total polyphenolic compounds of different extracts were performed according to the method of Slinkard and Singleton[9]. DPPH radical scavenging activity[10], nitric oxide scavenging assay[11], superoxide scavenging assay[12], hydroxyl radical scavenging assay[13] and reducing power assay[14] were performed as per the standard procedure.

Total polyphenolic content as pyrocatechol equivalent was determined from the standard curve equation of pyrocatechol and presented in Table 1. Root bark and leaves extract were found to contain maximum amount of polyphenolic compounds. The results of different radical scavenging activity are shown on Table 2. Leaves extract also showed maximum reducing power when tested in reducing power assay.

TABLE 1

TOTAL POLYPHENOLIC CONTENT OF DIFFERENT PARTS OF OROXYLUM INDICUM#

Plant part extractPhenolics as pyrocatechol equivalents (µg/mg)
RE35.65±3.25
RBE105.56±4.78
SE21.03±2.51
SBE80.36±5.03
LE124.7±4.36
FE21.03±1.15

RE is root extract, RBE is root bark extract, SE is stem extract, SBE is stem bark extract, LE is leaves extract and FE is fruit extract.

#Values are mean± standard deviation of n= 3 determinations

TABLE 2

IC50 VALUE OF EXTRACT OF DIFFERENT PARTS OF O. INDICUM AND STANDARD ANTIOXIDANTS

Scavenging methodIC50 value (µg/ml)
RERBESESBELEFEstandard
DPPH radical158.23112.21189.36149.59106.4159.4634.6 (Rutin)
Nitric oxide radical102.5689.3688.15139.9072.05182.2532.4 (Curcumin)
Superoxide radical455.36154.96681.22137.30170.87399.8617.84 (Curcumin)
Hydroxy radical179.3547.01309.2733.3046.5276.3925.85 (Catechin)

RE is root extract, RBE is root bark extract, SE is stem extract, SBE is stem bark extract, LE is leaves extract and FE is fruit extract

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJPhS-72-267-g002.jpg

Reducing power of the methanol extract of different parts of O. indicum

Reducing power is determined by the Fe3+-F2+ transformation. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of n=3 determinations. Fruit (–□–), stem (–○–),

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is IJPhS-72-267-g001.jpg

stem bark (–∆–), leaves (–■–), root (–◊–) and root bark (–٭–)

Many of the therapeutic potential of the phenolic compounds can be attributed to its antioxidant activity[15]. The result of this study on in vitro antioxidant activity of different parts of O. indicum reveals that leaves and root bark of the plant have highest radical scavenging activity. Leaves extract was found to contain maximum amount of polyphenolic compounds (124.7±4.36 µg/mg pyrocatechol equivalents) followed by root bark and stem bark extract. Phenolic compounds have been reported to be associated with antioxidative action in biological systems, acting as scavengers of singlet oxygen and free radicals[16]. Leaves extract also showed maximum reductive ability amongst all the extracts. The antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds is mainly due to their redox properties, which can play an important role in absorbing and neutralizing free radicals, quenching singlet and triplet oxygen, or decomposing peroxides[17].

As per the Ayurvedic aspect and reported literature, the root and root bark possess maximum therapeutic potentiality. Since, the plant is an endangered species availability of roots as well as root bark and stem bark is difficult. As per the antioxidant aspect, leaves also can be used instead of root, root bark and stem bark.

Footnotes

Mishra, et al.: Antioxidant Potential of Different Parts of O. indicum

REFERENCES

1. Uttara B, Singh AV, Zamboni P, Mahajan RT. Oxidative stress and neurodegenerative diseases: A review of upstream and downstream antioxidant therapeutic options. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2009;7:65–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Manda G, Nechifor MT, Neagu TM. Reactive oxygen species, cancer and anti-cancer therapies. Curr Chem Biol. 2009;3:22–46. [Google Scholar]
3. Paravicini TM, Touyz RM. NADPH oxidases, reactive oxygen species, and hypertension: clinical implications and therapeutic possibilities. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:S170–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Warrier PK, Nambiar VPK, Ramankutty C. Oroxylum indicum. In: Warrier PK, editor. Indian Medicinal Plants. Vol. 4. Chennai: Orient Longman Ltd; 2001. p. 186. [Google Scholar]
5. Chandel KPS, Shukla G, Sharma N. Biodiversity in medicinal and aromatic plants in India: conservation and utilization. New Delhi: National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources; 1996. p. 361. [Google Scholar]
6. Anonymous . The Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia of India.Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. New Delhi: Department of Indian System of Medicine and Homeopathy; 1998. p. 209. [Google Scholar]
7. Roy MK, Nakahara K, Na TV, Trakoontivakorn G, Takenaka M, Isobe S, et al. Baicaelin, a flavonoid extracted from a methanolic extract of Oroxylum indicum inhibits proliferation of a cancer cell line in vitro via induction of apoptosis. Die Pharmazie. 2007;62:149–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Costa-Lotufo LV, Khan MT, Ather A, Wilke DV, Jimenez PC, Pessoa C, et al. Studies of the anticancer potential of plants used in Bangladeshi folk medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;99:21–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Slinkard K, Singleton VL. Total phenol analyses: automation and comparison with manual methods. Am J Enol Viticulture. 1977;28:49–55. [Google Scholar]
10. Blois MS. Antioxidant determination by the use of a stable free radical. Nature. 1968;29:1199–200. [Google Scholar]
11. Marcocci L, Maguire JJ, Droy-Lafaix MT, Packer L. The nitric oxide scavenging property of Ginkgo biloba extracts EGb 761. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1994;201:748–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Nishimiki M, Rao NA, Yagi K. The occurrence of superoxide anion in the reaction of reduced phenazine methosulphate and molecular oxygen. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 1972;46:849–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Elizabeth K, Rao MNA. Oxygen radical scavenging activity of curcumin. Int J Pharm. 1990;58:237–40. [Google Scholar]
14. Oyaizu M. Studies on product of browning reaction prepared from glucose amine. Japanese J Nutr. 1986;44:307–15. [Google Scholar]
15. Srinivasan M, Sudheer AR, Menon VP. Ferulic acid: Therapeutic potential through its antioxidant property. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2007;40:92–100. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Jorgensen LV, Madsen HL, Thomsen MK, Dragsted LO and Skibsted LH. Regulation of phenolic antioxidants from phenoxyl radicals: An ESR and electrochemical study of antioxidant hierarchy. Free Rad Res. 1999;30:207–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Osawa T. Novel natural antioxidants for utilization in food and biological systems. In: Uritani I, Garcia VV, Mendoza EM, editors. Post harvest biochemistry of plant food-materials in the tropics. Japan: Scientific Societies Press; 1994. pp. 241–51. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

-