Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Hum Mutat. 2010 Oct; 31(10): E1709–E1766.
PMCID: PMC3048164
PMID: 20683928

Genetic Screening of LCA in Belgium: Predominance of CEP290 and Identification of Potential Modifier Alleles in AHI1 of CEP290-related Phenotypes

Abstract

Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA), the most severe inherited retinal dystrophy, is genetically heterogeneous, with 14 genes accounting for 70% of patients. Here, 91 LCA probands underwent LCA chip analysis and subsequent sequencing of 6 genes (CEP290, CRB1, RPE65, GUCY2D, AIPL1and CRX), revealing mutations in 69% of the cohort, with major involvement of CEP290 (30%). In addition, 11 patients with early-onset retinal dystrophy (EORD) and 13 patients with Senior-Loken syndrome (SLS), LCA-Joubert syndrome (LCA-JS) or cerebello-oculo-renal syndrome (CORS) were included. Exhaustive re-inspection of the overall phenotypes in our LCA cohort revealed novel insights mainly regarding the CEP290-related phenotype. The AHI1 gene was screened as a candidate modifier gene in three patients with the same CEP290 genotype but different neurological involvement. Interestingly, a heterozygous novel AHI1 mutation, p.Asn811Lys, was found in the most severely affected patient. Moreover, AHI1 screening in five other patients with CEP290-related disease and neurological involvement revealed a second novel missense variant, p.His758Pro, in one LCA patient with mild mental retardation and autism. These two AHI1 mutations might thus represent neurological modifiers of CEP290-related disease. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Keywords: LCA, CEP290, AHI1, modifier, genotype-phenotype correlation

INTRODUCTION

Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA; MIM# 204000) was first described as a congenital type of retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Approximately 20% of all blind children are thought to suffer from this disease. Phenotypic features include a congenital onset, severely reduced or absent electroretinogram (ERG), nystagmus, the oculo-digital sign and a fundus aspect varying from normal to severely atrophic. Two main types of LCA have been reported, based on the presence or absence of photophobia, night blindness, hyperopia, macular/peripheral retinal abnormalities and measurable visual acuity (Hanein et al., 2004; Hanein et al., 2006). LCA displays variable expression, and seems to represent the extreme and severe end of a spectrum of inherited retinal disease.

LCA is predominantly inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. So far, one locus – LCA9 (Keen et al., 2003) – and the following 14 genes have been identified: GUCY2D (Perrault et al., 1996), RPE65 (Marlhens et al., 1997), CRX (Freund et al., 1998), AIPL1 (Sohocki et al., 2000a), RPGRIP1 (Dryja et al., 2001), CRB1 (den Hollander et al., 2001), RDH12 (Perrault et al., 2004), IMPDH1 (Bowne et al., 2006), CEP290 (den Hollander et al., 2006), RD3 (Friedman et al., 2006), LCA5 (den Hollander et al., 2007) and SPATA7 (Wang et al., 2009), with the involvement of TULP1 (Hagstrom et al., 1998) and LRAT (Thompson et al., 2001) under debate. Mutations in these genes account for ∼70% of all LCA cases. Several of them are also implicated in other retinal dystrophies: CRB1, RPE65, RDH12and SPATA7are associated with both LCA and early-onset retinal dystrophy (EORD), which often overlap (Gu et al., 1997; den Hollander et al., 1999; Janecke et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2009).

Several subtypes of LCA can be considered part of the ciliopathies, as four disease genes – TULP1, RPGRIP1, CEP290 and LCA5 – encode ciliary proteins. Since cilia are present throughout the whole body, mutations in ciliary genes may cause a broad phenotypic spectrum. One of the best examples is CEP290, the most frequently mutated gene in the western European LCA population. In addition to LCA, CEP290 is associated with Joubert syndrome (JS; MIM# 213300), Senior-Loken syndrome (SLS; MIM# 266900), Meckel-Grüber syndrome (MKS; MIM# 249000) and Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS; MIM# 209900); a range of clinically and genetically heterogeneous ciliopathies (Sayer et al., 2006; Valente et al., 2006b; Baala et al., 2007; Brancati et al., 2007; Helou et al., 2007; Leitch et al., 2008). Recent studies suggest that modifiers may play a role in the pathogenesis of ciliopathies (Leitch et al., 2008; Khanna et al., 2009; Louie et al., 2010).

Establishing a molecular diagnosis for LCA is not only important in the context of genetic counselling and clinical prognosis, but is also essential in view of future gene therapy. Recent Phase I clinical trials for RPE65 gene replacement therapy provide hopeful prospects for the treatment of inherited retinal dystrophies (Bainbridge et al., 2008; Hauswirth et al., 2008; Maguire et al., 2008; Cideciyan et al., 2009; Maguire et al., 2009). As such therapies are likely to be gene-specific, the development of robust clinical testing and efforts toward gene identification are of utmost importance.

Current diagnostic testing for LCA generally involves chip analysis that contains known mutations in all known LCA and EORD genes (Asper Ophthalmics, Estonia). Depending on the population, causal mutations are found in approximately 55% of all cases (Yzer et al., 2006). Only a limited number of laboratories subsequently screen an additional number of genes (Stone, 2007; den Hollander et al., 2008).

This study includes an extensive genetic survey in order to identify the molecular cause in 91 LCA probands mainly of Belgian origin, using LCA chip analysis for 8 to 13 genes and subsequent sequencing of the following genes: CEP290 (MIM# 610142), CRB1 (MIM# 604210), RPE65 (MIM# 180069), GUCY2D (MIM# 600179), AIPL1 (MIM# 604392) and CRX (MIM# 602225). In addition, exhaustive phenotyping was performed in all patients carrying mutation(s), and the AHI1 gene was screened for modifier alleles of CEP290-related disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

Ninety-one consenting subjects initially diagnosed with LCA were referred for molecular testing by an ophthalmologist and/or geneticist, mainly associated with the University Hospitals of Ghent, Leuven or Brussels. Eleven probands are born from a consanguineous marriage. The inclusion criteria for LCA were bilateral visual loss before the age of 6 months accompanied by nystagmus and an undetectable or significantly reduced ERG. Twelve patients presented with additional mental retardation and/or autistic behaviour. For 18 patients with an available Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), the absence of a molar tooth sign (MTS) excluded the diagnosis of JS. In addition, genotyping was performed on 11 probands with EORD (disease diagnosed beyond the first six months of life but before the age of three) and 13 with a retinal dystrophy in the context of JS (LCA-JS), SLS or cerebello-oculo-renal syndrome (CORS). These patients were not included during calculations of gene-specific contributions in isolated LCA. Genomic DNA and RNA were extracted from leukocytes using the Puregene DNA isolation kit (Gentra) and the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) respectively, followed by cDNA synthesis with the iScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). If available, parents and/or siblings were also genotyped. Seven of the patients were reported previously (Yzer et al., 2006; Brancati et al., 2007; Perrault et al., 2007). Patient notation was performed according to their clinical diagnosis (prefixes LCA, SLS, LCA-JS, CORS and EORD), with consecutive numbering in the order of the genes involved.

Genotyping

As a pre-screening method, all patients with either isolated LCA or EORD were analysed with a microarray containing 344 to 641 mutations in 8 (GUCY2D, CRX, RPE65, CRB1, RPGRIP1,AIPL1, LRAT and MERTK) to 13 (addition of TULP1, LCA5, RDH12, CEP290 and SPATA7) LCA and EORD genes (LCA chip Versions 2004–2009; Asper Ophthalmics, Estonia) (http://www.asperbio.com) (Zernant et al., 2005). Each of the mutations found by the LCA chip was subsequently confirmed through Sanger sequencing. In case of a heterozygous mutation, the coding exons and intron-exon boundaries of the involved gene were sequenced.

Patients in whom no mutations were identified after LCA chip analysis were analysed through sequencing of all coding exons and intron-exon boundaries of CEP290, CRB1, RPE65, GUCY2D, AIPL1 and CRX, the first five genes being the most frequently mutated in LCA. At the time the LCA chip did not yet include CEP290 variants, stepwise targeted mutation analysis was performed prior to sequencing of the total coding region. We initially screened for the frequent c.2991+1655A>G mutation followed by four additional mutations: c.4723A>T (p.Lys1575X), c.5587-1G>C (splice site), c.5163del (p.Thr1722GlnfsX2) and c.3310-1_3310delinsAA (splice site). The first three mutations occurred multiple times in a previous study (Perrault et al., 2007); the latter was found in three patients with a heterozygous c.2991+1655A>G mutation in our population. CEP290 was also screened at cDNA level in patients with only a single mutation in CEP290. To this end, cDNA screening using 16 overlapping primer sets was optimized. Four patients with CEP29 0-related LCA who presented with mental retardation, two patients with SLS, one patient with CORS and one patient with LCA-JS underwent sequencing of the AHI1 gene. For 13 patients with SLS/LCA-JS/CORS, molecular testing of CEP290 was requested. Supp. Table S1 includes all primer sequences used in this study.

Mutation nomenclature

Mutation nomenclature uses numbering with the A of the initiation codon ATG as +1 (http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen), based on the following RefSeqs: NM_201253.1 (CRB1), NM_000329.2 (RPE65), NM_000180.3 (GUCY2D), NM_014336.3 (AIPL1), NM_000554.4 (CRX), NM_025114.3 (CEP290), NM_152443.2 (RDH12), NM_020366.3 (RPGRIP1) and NM_001134831.1 (AHI1) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore). All mutations and variants found in CEP290 were submitted to the locus-specific mutation database CEP290base (http://medgen.ugent.be/cep290base) (Coppieters et al., 2010).

Evaluation of sequence changes

The presence of all mutations was confirmed on a second PCR product. Segregation analysis of disease alleles was performed if possible. Genomic DNA obtained from > 340 unrelated ethnically matched healthy individuals was used as a control panel. Thorough bio-informatic evaluation of novel variants was done using Alamut software (v.1.5). Variants were designated as “unclassified variant (UV)” if no consensus was seen in all prediction programs used. The Alamut output for missense changes is listed in Supp. Table S2.

Clinical evaluation of patients

After identification of the molecular cause, clinical records were revisited, based on a clinical checklist comprising data on visual function, retinal appearance and associated (extra-) ocular features. When possible, ERG, fundus pictures, autofluorescence (AF) images and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were obtained. In case of CEP290-related LCA, neurological (MRI) and nephrological data (kidney ultrasound [US], urinary and blood parameters) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mutation screening strategy of known LCA genes

As a first step, 102 probands were subjected to LCA chip analysis (91 LCA and 11 EORD). In total, 30 sequence changes assigned as mutations by Asper Ophthalmics were identified in 47 individuals. Homozygous and compound heterozygous variants in one gene were each found in 13 patients; a single heterozygous variant was identified in 17 individuals. In addition, variants within two distinct genes were found in four patients. The zygosity of p.Glu1330X (CRB1) could not be determined in LCA-36. Confirmation of each mutation through direct sequencing identified two inconsistencies. At first, LCA-58 was genotyped heterozygously for the AIPL1 mutation p.Trp278X by chip, while she was in fact homozygous. Secondly, a heterozygous p.Arg38AlafsX3 mutation in AIPL1 (LCA chip version 2006) could not be confirmed in LCA-23. Instead, a heterozygous c.111C>T (p.=) variant was identified on the same nucleotide position. This miscall has previously been described (Henderson et al., 2007). In addition, subsequent sequencing of GUCY2D in LCA-51 revealed a heterozygous c.389del mutation that was not detected on the LCA chip. The variants c.2101C>T (p.Pro701Ser) (GUCY2D), c.3341A>G (p.Asp1114Gly) (RPGRIP1) (Vallespin et al., 2007a), c.286G>A p.Val96Ile (AIPL1) (Yzer et al., 2006) and C.1301C>T (p.Ala434Val) (RPE65) (Morimura et al., 1998) have already been reported as polymorphisms and were therefore discarded as mutations. Moreover, identification of the GUCY2D p.Pro701Ser variant in a homozygous state in both healthy parents from an LCA patient further supported its non-pathogenic nature. After the exclusion of these polymorphisms, variants were assigned to be mutations in 45 patients (39 LCA and 6 EORD).

Secondly, all patients with a heterozygous mutation identified through chip analysis were subjected to screening of the relevant gene. In addition, all patients with negative chip results underwent sequencing of 6 LCA genes. In the following sections, the molecular results are discussed in detail for each of the genes.

CEP290

CEP290 was found to be the most frequently mutated gene in our cohort, accounting for 30% (27/91) of cases with isolated LCA (Table 1). Since the LCA chip did not contain CEP290 variants at the onset of this study, only a fraction of currently known mutations were detected using this technique. The c.2991+1655A>G, c.4723A>T (p.Lys1575X) and c.3310-1_3310delinsAA mutations were the most recurrent, with gene-specific allele frequencies of 49%, 11% and 6%, respectively. Similar to previous studies, most of the mutations are either nonsense, frameshift or splice site mutations. Only two missense variants were identified, of which the pathogenic effect is currently uncertain (p.Ala1566Pro and p.Leu1694Pro) (Supp. Table S2). Overall, 13 novel CEP290 mutations were identified to cause LCA. The complex allele c.3310-1_3310delinsAA has a predicted effect on splicing, which was confirmed by cDNA analysis (data not shown). The silent c.1824G>A change affects the last nucleotide of exon 18 and was also predicted to alter splicing (data not shown).

Table 1

Mutations identified in 80 unrelated patients with LCA/EORD, using LCA chip analysis and direct sequencing of CEP290, CRB1, RPE65, AIPL1, GUCY2D and CRX

Allele 1Allele 2Reference


PatientOriginPar consSegrIntron/exonNucleotide changeAmino acid changeIntron/exonNucleotide changeAmino acid change
CEP290

LCA-1Belgium-XI26c.2991+1655A>G*p.Cys998X*I26c.2991+1655A>G*p.Cys998X*(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-2Belgium-XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998X(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-3+Belgium-XI26c.2991+1655A>G*p.Cys998X*E6c.322C>Tp.Arg108X(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-4Belgium-NAI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE25c.2695C>Tp.Gln899X(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-5Belgium-NAI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE34c.4393C>Tp.Arg1465X(den Hollander et al., 2006), (Brancati et al., 2007) (CORS)

LCA-6Belgium-XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE36c.4723A>Tp.Lys1575X(den Hollander et al., 2006), (Brancati et al., 2007; Perrault et al., 2007)

LCA-7FBelgium-NAI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE36c.4723A>Tp.Lys1575X(den Hollander et al., 2006), (Brancati et al., 2007; Perrault et al., 2007)

LCA-8Belgium-NAI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE36c.4723A>Tp.Lys1575X(den Hollander et al., 2006), (Brancati et al., 2007; Perrault et al., 2007)

LCA-9Belgium-XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE39c.5344C>Tp.Arg1782X(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-10Lithuania-XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE6c.384 385delp.Asp128GlufsX17(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-11Belgium-XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE6c.437delp.Glu146GlyfsX17(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-12The Netherlands-NA126c.2991+1655A>G*p.Cys998X*E19c.1859_1862delp.Arg621IlefsX2(den Hollander et al., 2006), (Perrault et al., 2007)

LCA-13Belgium-NAI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE29c.3422dupp.Leu1141PhefsX5(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-14Belgium/Morocco-XI26c.2991+1655A>G*p.Cys998X*E31c.4001delp.Thr1334IlefsX2(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-15 (Perrault et al., 2007)Belgium-NAI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE37c.4962_4963delp.Glu1656AsnfsX3(den Hollander et al., 2006), (Perrault et al., 2007)

LCA-16+Belgium/Greece-XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE40c.5493delp.Ala1832ProfsX19(den Hollander et al., 2006), (Brancati et al., 2007; Frank et al., 2008) (CORS)

LCA-17Belgium-XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE40c.5519 5537delp.Lys1840ArgfsX5(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-18Belgium-XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XE43c.5865 5867delins GGp.Glu1956GlyfsX9(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-19Belgium-XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XI13c.1189+1G>ASplice defect(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-20+ (Yzer et al., 2006)Belgium-NAI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998X121c.2218-2A>CSplice defect(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-21Belgium-XI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XI28-E29c.3310-1 3310delinsAASplice defect(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-22Belgium-NAI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XI28-E29c.3310-1 3310delinsAASplice defect(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-23Belgium-NAI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998XI28-E29c.3310-1 3310delinsAASplice defect(den Hollander et al., 2006)

LCA-24Belgium-NAE36c.4723A>Tp.Lys1575XE36c.4723A>Tp.Lys1575X(Perrault et al., 2007)

LCA-25FBelgium-XE36c.4723A>Tp.Lys1575XE35c.4696G>Cp.Ala1566Pro UV(Perrault et al., 2007)

LCA-26BelgiumXE18c.1824G>Ap.=, splice siteE38c.5081T>Cp.Leu1694Pro UV

LCA-27Belgium-NAI26c.2991+1655A>Gp.Cys998X???(den Hollander et al., 2006)

SLS-1PakistanFCXE2c.21G>Tp.Trp7CysE2c.21G>Tp.Trp7Cys(Valente et al., 2006b) (CORS)

SLS-2Belgium-NAE36c.4723A>Tp.Lys1575XE34c.4393C>Tp.Arg1465X(Perrault et al., 2007), (Brancati et al., 2007) (CORS)

SLS-3Belgium-NAE36c.4723A>Tp.Lys1575XE34c.4393C>Tp.Arg1465X(Perrault et al., 2007), (Brancati et al., 2007) (CORS)

CORS-1+ (Brancati et al., 2007)BelgiumSDNAE36c.4723A>Tp.Lys1575XE34c.4393C>Tp.Arg1465X(Perrault et al., 2007), (Brancati et al., 2007) (CORS)

LCA-JS-1Belgium-XI40c.5587-1G>CSplice defectE31c.3793C>Tp.Gln1265X(Perrault 2007), (Baala et al., 2007) (ML)

LCA-JS-2 II-1E54c.7366 7369delp.Thr2457AlafsX27E54c.7366 7369delp.Thr2457AlafsX27


LCA-JS-2 II-2ND+XE54c.7366 7369delp.Thr2457AlafsX27E54c.7366 7369delp.Thr2457AlafsX27

LCA-JS-3Belgium-NAI28-E29c.3310-1 3310delinsAASplice defectE54c.7341dupp.Leu2448ThrfsX8(Sayer et al., 2006)

CRB1

LCA-28Belgium-NAE7c.2401A>T*p.Lys801X*E7c.2401A>T*p.Lys801X*(den Hollander et al., 2001)

LCA-29 (Yzer et al., 2006)Belgium-NAE7c.2401A>T*p.Lys801X*E5c.1084C>Tp.Gln362X(den Hollander et al., 2001), (Yzer et al., 2006)

LCA-30Belgium-XE7c.2401A>T*p.Lys801X*E7c.2290C>T*p.Arg764Cys*(den Hollander et al., 2001), (Lotery et al., 2001)

LCA-31 (Yzer et al., 2006)Belgium-XE7c.2401A>T*p.Lys801X*E8c.2688T>A*p.Cys896X*(den Hollander et al., 2001), (Hanein et al., 2004)

LCA-32 (Yzer et al., 2006)Belgium-NAE7c.2401A>T*p.Lys801X*E8c.2688T>A*p.Cys896X*(den Hollander et al., 2001), (Hanein et al., 2004)

LCA-33Belgium-NAE7c.2401A>T*p.Lys801X*E9c.2843G>A*p.Cys948Tyr*(den Hollander et al., 2001), (Lotery et al., 2001)

LCA-34Belgium-XE7c.2401A>T*p.Lys801X*I11c.4006-1G>TSplice defect(den Hollander et al., 2001)

LCA-35Belgium+NAE9c.2843G>A*p.Cys948Tyr*E9c.2843G>A*p.Cys948Tyr*(Lotery et al., 2001)

LCA-36ND-NAE9c.2843G>A*p.Cys948Tyr*Ellc.3988G>T*p.Glu1330X*(Lotery et al., 2001), (LCA chip)

LCA-37Belgium-XE9c.2843G>A*p.Cys948Tyr*I8c.2842+5G>A*Splice defect*(Lotery et al., 2001), (den Hollander et al., 1999)

LCA-38Belgium-XE9c.2843G>A*p.Cys948Tyr*I8c.2842+5G>A*Splice defect*(Lotery et al., 2001), (den Hollander et al., 1999)

LCA-39aE9c.2843G>A*p.Cys948Tyr*I8c.2842+5G+A*Splice defect*(Lotery et al., 2001), (den Hollander et al., 1999)


LCA-39bBelgium-XI11c.4005+1G>ASplice defectI8c.2842+5G>ASplice defect(Hanein et al., 2004), (den Hollander et al., 1999)

LCA-40Belgium-NAI11c.4005+1G>A*Splice defect*I8c.2842+5G>A*Splice defect*(Hanein et al., 2004), (den Hollander et al., 1999)

LCA-41 II-1E7c.2441 2442delp.Leu814ArgfsX23E9c.3713 3716dupp.Cys1240ProfsX24


LCA-41 II-2E7c.2441 2442delp.Leu814ArgfsX23E9c.3713 3716dupp.Cys1240ProfsX24

LCA-42ND+NAE11c.3879G>A*p.Trp1293X*E11c.3879G>A*p.Trp1293X*(Hanein et al., 2004)

EORD-1 II-1E9c.2843G>A*p.Cys948Tyr*E7c.2401A>T*p.Lys801X*(Lotery et al., 2001), (den Hollander et al., 2001)


EORD-1 II-2Belgium-XE9c.2843G>Ap.Cys948TyrE7c.2401A>Tp.Lys801X(Lotery et al., 2001), (den Hollander et al., 2001)

EORD-2BelgiumNAE9c.2843G>Ap.Cys948TyrE4c.929G>Ap.Cys310Tyr(Lotery et al., 2001)

EORD-3Belgium-XE9c.2843G>A*p.Cys948Tyr*E6c.1472A>Tp.Asp491Val UV(Lotery et al., 2001)

EORD-4BelgiumNAE5c.1084C>T*p.Gln362X*E5c.1084C>T*p.Gln362X*(Yzer et al., 2006)

EORD-5Belgium-NAE7c.2290C>T*p.Arg764Cys*E7c.2290C>T*p.Arg764Cys*(Lotery et al., 2001)

RPE65

LCA-43TurkeyFCXE3c.131G>A*p.Arg44Gln*E3c.131G>A*p.Arg44Gln*(Simovich et al., 2001)

LCA-44TurkeyFCXE6c.542C>Tp.Pro181LeuE6c.542C>Tp.Pro181Leu

LCA-45aE7c.700C>T*p.Arg234X*E9c.991 993dupp.Trp331dup(Marlhens et al., 1997)


LCA-45bE9c.991 993dupp.Trp331dupE9c.991 993dupp.Trp331dup

LCA-46PortugalX (c.10 22T> C)E10c.1022T>C*p.Leu341Ser*E5c.361delTp.Ser121LeufsX6 de novo(Morimura et al., 1998) (ARRP)

LCA-47Belgium-XE14c.1590del*p.Phe530LeufsX40*E14c.1590del*p.Phe530LeufsX40*(Yzer et al., 2006)

LCA-48Belgium-XE14c.1590delp.Phe530LeufsX40E5c.370C>T*p.Arg124X*(Yzer et al., 2006), (Morimura et al., 1998)

LCA-49Belgium-XE14c.1590del*p.Phe530LeufsX40*11c.11+5G>A*Splice defect*(Yzer et al., 2006), (Gu et al., 1997)

LCA-50Belgium/Russia (mother)-XE9c.886dupAp.Arg296LysfsX711c.11+5G>A*Splice defect*(Gu et al., 1997)

GUCY2D

LCA-51Morocco/Belgium-NAE2c.389delp.Pro130LeufsX36I13c.2577-2A>CSplice defect(Perrault et al., 1996)

LCA-52TurkeyTCNAE8c.1694T>C*p.Phe565Ser*E8c.1694T>C*p.Phe565Ser*(Perrault et al., 1996)

LCA-53BelgiumNAE12c.2302C>T*p.Arg768Trp*E12c.2302C>T*p.Arg768Trp*(Lotery et al., 2000)

LCA-54Morocco/Belgium-XE12c.2302C>T*p.Arg768Trp*E8c.1694T>C*p.Phe565Ser*(Lotery et al., 2000), (Perrault et al., 1996)

LCA-55Belgium-XE12c.2302C>T*p.Arg768Trp*E14c.2598G>Cp.Lys866Asn(Lotery et al., 2000)

LCA-56Belgium/France-XE2c.587A>Tp.Glu196Val UVEllc.2132C>Tp.Pro711Leu UV

LCA-57Africa-NAE8c.1724C>T*p.Pro575Leu* UV???(Koenekoop et al., 2002)

AIPL1

LCA-58 (Yzer et al., 2006)Belgium-XE6c.834G>A*p.Trp278X*E6c.834G>Ap.Trp278X(Sohocki et al., 2000a)

LCA-59Belgium-NAE6c.834G>A*p.Trp278X*E6c.834G>A*p.Trp278X*(Sohocki et al., 2000a)

LCA-60BelgiumNAE6c.834G>A*p.Trp278X*E6c.834G>A*p.Trp278X*(Sohocki et al., 2000a)

LCA-61Belgium-XE6c.834G>A*p.Trp278X*E6c.834G>A*p.Trp278X*(Sohocki et al., 2000a)

LCA-62Africa-in cisE3c.341C>T*p.Thr114Ile*UV???(Sohocki et al., 2000b)
c.1126C>Tp.Pro376SerUV

CRX

LCA-63BelgiumSCNAE4c.425A>G*p.Tyr142Cys* UV???(Vallespin et al., 2007a)

LCA-64RuandaNAE3c.724G>A*p.Val242Met* UV???(Swain et al., 1997)

RDH12

EORD-6Belgium-XE6c.806_810del*p.Ala269GlyfsX2*E8c.698T>Ap.Val233Asp(Janecke et al., 2004), https://www.carverlab.org/carver-mutation-database

EORD-7Belgium+XE6c.806_810del*p.Ala269GlyfsX2*E7c.524C>Tp.Ser175Leu(Janecke et al., 2004)

EORD-8BelgiumE6c.806_810delp.Ala269GlyfsX2E6c.806_810delp.Ala269GlyfsX2(Janecke et al., 2004)

RPGRIP1

LCA-65BelgiumE16c.2668C>T*p.Arg890X*???(Gerber et al., 2001)

Novel mutations are indicated in bold.

+patients carrying a heterozygous mutation in an additional gene: LCA-3 (AHI1, c.2273A>C, p.His758Pro), LCA-16 (RPE65, c.253C>T, p.Arg85Cys) (Stone, 2007), LCA-20 (CRB1, c.2401A>T, p.Lys801X) (den Hollander et al., 2001) and CORS-1 (AHI1, c.2433T>G, p.Asn81 1Lys).
*identified through LCA chip analysis.
FLCA-7 and LCA-25 are distantly related. X: segregation analysis performed and segregation confirmed. NA: no material available of family members. Reference: first publication describing the mutation in patients with LCA or EORD. In case of CEP290, these references may also refer to papers dealing with other phenotypes (phenotype mentioned between brackets). Seven patients were already described (corresponding reference is indicated in the first column).

Abbreviations used: par cons: parental consanguinity; segr: segregation; FC: first cousins; SC: second cousins; TC: third cousins; SD: second degree; ND: no data; UV, unclassified variant; LCA, Leber Congenital Amaurosis; SLS, Senior-Loken syndrome; JS, joubert syndrome; ARRP, autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa; CORS, cerebello-oculo-renal syndrome; ML, Meckel-like syndrome.

Since CEP290 mutations may cause a phenotypic spectrum ranging from isolated LCA to more complex disorders, we analysed 13 additional probands suffering from LCA-JS, SLS or CORS. CEP290 harbored mutations in seven of them (Table 1). Six probands carried known mutations, whereas a novel p.Thr2457AlafsX27 mutation segregated in family LCA-JS-2.

Sequencing of the entire coding region did not reveal a second mutation in LCA-27, while the pathogenic effect of one variant was uncertain in LCA-25 and LCA-26. Subsequent cDNA screening in LCA-25 and LCA-27 was normal, thereby making deep intronic splice site mutations or large exon deletions/duplications very unlikely. No RNA was available for LCA-26.

CRB1

Mutations in CRB1 were found in 15 families with LCA (16%) and 5 families with EORD (Table 1). The LCA chip allowed the identification of a homozygous or compound heterozygous CRB1 mutation in 15 probands (12 LCA and 3 EORD), and a heterozygous CRB1 mutation in 3 patients. Sequencing of the whole coding region of CRB1 in the latter revealed a known and novel mutation, respectively (LCA-29, p.Gln362X and LCA-34, c.4006-1G>T), and a novel unclassified variant (EORD-3, p.Asp491Val) on the second allele (Supp. Table S2). Sequencing of the total coding region identified compound heterozygous mutations in two additional probands. In one of them, CRB1 screening was exceptionally performed without prior LCA chip analysis, given clear clinical indications for a CRB1-related phenotype (EORD-2). Indeed, this patient was compound heterozygous for the known p.Cys948Tyr mutation, and the novel p.Cys310Tyr variant, which is predicted to disrupt a disulfide bridge (Supp. Table S2). In addition, two sisters with LCA carried two novel frameshift mutations (LCA-41). As previously described, the p.Lys801X and p.Cys948Tyr mutations were most frequent, showing gene-specific allele frequencies in the LCA cohort of 27% and 23%, respectively.

RPE65

Eight cases with LCA showed mutations in RPE65 (9%) (Table 1). LCA chip analysis identified a homozygous RPE65 mutation in LCA-43 and LCA-47 and two compound heterozygous mutations in LCA-49. In addition, a heterozygous mutation was detected in four patients through LCA chip analysis. Sequencing of RPE65 in these individuals identified three novel mutations and the known p.Phe530LeufsX40 mutation which was not yet present on the LCA chip at the time (LCA-48). Although the evidence for a pathogenic nature of the novel mutation p.Trp331dup is not conclusive, segregation in patient LCA45a, her affected aunt LCA45b and her (healthy) parents sustains a causal role. The two other novel mutations result in a frameshift (LCA-46 and LCA-50). Following sequencing of the total coding region, one additional proband was found to be homozygous for the novel RPE65 mutation p.Pro181Leu (LCA-44) (Supp. Table S2). Interestingly, segregation analysis of the mutations found in LCA-46 could only confirm segregation of p.Leu341Ser in the mother, suggesting that p.Ser121LeufsX6 occurred de novo (paternity confirmed).

GUCY2D

Mutations in GUCY2D were found in seven probands with LCA (8%) (Table 1). Five of them were identified with GUCY2D mutations using the LCA chip. One was homozygous for p.Phe565Ser (LCA-52), while three others carried p.Arg768Trp. One of the latter was homozygous (LCA-53); the other two were compound heterozygous for p.Phe565Ser (LCA-54) and the novel missense change p.Lys866Asn (LCA-55), respectively (Supp. Table S2). In addition, LCA-57 was heterozygous for the p.Pro575Leu variant that was previously identified in the mother of an LCA patient (Koenekoop et al., 2002). However, no second mutation was found. LCA-56 was compound heterozygous for the novel missense changes p.Glu196Val and p.Pro71 1Leu (Supp. Table S2). In addition, a novel splice site mutation was identified in LCA-51 (c.2577-2A>C).

AIPL1

Only two distinct AIPL1 variants were detected through LCA chip analysis in five LCA patients (5%) (Table 1). The p.Trp278X mutation occurred homozygously in four probands (LCA-58 to LCA-61). In addition, a heterozygous p.Thr1 14Ile variant was found in proband LCA-62. Direct sequencing of the AIPL1 gene identified the known variant p.Pro376Ser (missing signal on LCA chip). Segregation analysis in the parents, however, revealed a cis-allelic inheritance from the mother. No further mutations were detected following additional sequencing of AIPL1 in other patients.

CRX

LCA chip analysis identified 2 CRX missense variants in two LCA patients (Table 1). The p.Tyr142Cys variant was previously described as a mutation (Vallespin et al., 2007a). Stone and colleagues, however, considered this variant as a polymorphism based on the estimate of pathogenic probability and the identification of this variant in a patient with two disease-causing alleles in another LCA gene (Stone, 2007) (LCA-63). The pathogenicity of the second variant p.Val242Met also remains unclear (LCA-64) (Swain et al., 1997; Rivolta et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2002). Given their uncertain pathogenic potential, both variants were discarded as mutations for further calculations.

RDH12

Mutation screening of RDH12 was performed downstream of LCA chip results involving this gene. A heterozygous p.Ala269GlyfsX2 mutation was identified in two probands with EORD. Subsequent sequencing of RDH12 identified an additional missense change in both patients, p.Val233Asp (EORD-6) and p.Ser175Leu (EORD-7) respectively (Supp. Table S2). According to UniProt, the Ser175 residue might be a substrate binding site (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q96NR8). A known mutation located in the same codon, p.Ser175Pro, lacks the ability to catalyze the reduction of retinaldehyde to retinol in vitro (Lee et al., 2007). In addition, a homozygous p.Ala269GlyfsX2 mutation was identified in patient EORD-8, for which RDH12 sequencing was performed prior to LCA-chip analysis (upon request).

RPGRIP1

Similarly, screening of RPGRIP1 was performed in the context of LCA chip analysis. In one LCA patient, a heterozygous mutation was identified. Sequencing of RPGRIP1, however, did not identify a second mutation (LCA-65).

Mutations in multiple LCA genes

For the assessment of the potential involvement of a second gene in LCA, only variants with significant pathogenic potential were taken into account (see above). Two patients with CEP290-related LCA displayed a heterozygous mutation in another LCA gene: LCA-16 was heterozygous for the known p.Arg85Cys mutation in RPE65, while LCA-20 carried the common p.Lys801X mutation in CRB1.

Identification of potential modifier alleles in the AHI1 gene

The AHI1 gene was sequenced as a candidate modifier gene in eight patients with CEP290-related LCA who presented with mental retardation. Four of them were diagnosed with LCA (LCA-3, LCA-20, LCA-23 and LCA-24); two patients also suffered from NPHP (SLS-2 and SLS-3) and in two other cases, the LCA phenotype was part of a JS diagnosis (CORS-1 and LCA-JS-3). A MTS was absent on brain imaging in two isolated patients with LCA (no data were available for LCA-20, LCA-24, SLS-2 and SLS-3).

A heterozygous novel AHI1 p.Asn811Lys mutation was found in the most severely affected patient CORS-1, out of three patients with the same CEP290 genotype but different neurological involvement (SLS-2, SLS-3 and CORS-1). Moreover, AHI1 screening in the five remaining patients revealed a second heterozygous missense variant, p.His758Pro, in LCA-3. Conservation and in silico predictions for both changes suggest a possible effect on protein structure/function (Supp. Table S2). Interestingly, exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) predictions point to a change in ESEs for both variants (data not shown). Moreover, both changes are located in a conserved WD-40 repeat (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q8N157) and were absent in > 340 Belgian control individuals.

In addition, SLS-2 was found to be heterozygous for the known p.Ser1123Phe change. Although it concerns a potentially pathogenic variant that affects a phosphorylation site and is located in a highly conserved region (Dephoure et al., 2008), this change was considered a polymorphism because of its frequency in the Dutch population and the observation that it did not segregate in a family with JS (Valente et al., 2006a; Kroes et al., 2008).

Clinical findings

Extensive ophthalmological data (best corrected visual acuity [BCVA], refraction, ERG, visual fields, color vision testing, fundus aspect both with white light and autofluorescence imaging and the presence of nystagmus, night blindness, photophobia and additional features) as well as associated manifestations in patients with CRB1, RPE65, GUCY2D, AIPL1, CRX, RPGRIP1 and RDH12 mutations are summarized in detail in Supp. Table S3. In addition, Figure 1 depicts several representative fundi from patients with an established molecular diagnosis. An MTS due to midbrain abnormalities with cerebellar vermis aplasia was demonstrated in five patients with JS-LCA/CORS and CEP290 mutations (Figure 2).

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is humu0031-E1709-f1.jpg

Clinical characteristics of eight LCA patients with an established molecular diagnosis, illustrating characteristic phenotypic features associated with different genotypes. CEP290. A & B: Early and later stage phenotype in right eye (RE) in LCA-3 at age 3 and 18 years respectively; note marbleized aspect of midperiphery at age 3, evolving towards atrophy later; macula stays well-preserved throughout evolution. C & D: Fundus and autofluorescence (AF) image of RE of LCA-25 at age eight years; note concentric hyperautofluorescent ring around macula suggesting a watershed zone between better and more affected retina with probably central area the better; midperipheral retina shows diffuse mottled hyperautofluorescence suggesting widespread outer retinal disease. E & F: Fundus image of RE and infrared image of left eye (LE) of LCA-7 at age 33 and 49 years respectively; note pigment epithelium alterations in the mid- and far periphery of retina but no intraretinal pigmentation, and with fair preservation of macular area at age 33; at age 49 macula is still fairly well-preserved, but outer retinal atrophy and spicular intraretinal pigmentation is now prominent. CRB1.G: Fundus of RE of LCA-3 9a at age 16, showing typical yellowish discoloration of atrophic macula, surrounded by nummular type of intraretinal pigmentation; mild pseudopapilledema and prepapillary paravascular fibrosis also visible, as is peripheral greyish hue of outer retinal atrophy with fine white flecks and nummular pigmentation. GUCY2D. H & I: Fundus and AF image of RE of LCA-55 at age 9 years; fundus is essentially quite normal with only mild pigment epithelium alterations in the retinal periphery; however, AF image shows hyperautofluorescence in central macular area. RPE65. J: Fundus of LE of LCA-49 at age 10 who subsequently underwent gene therapy with AAV2-hRPE65v2 in RE (Maguire et al. 2009); apart from some discrete pigment epithelium alterations fundus is essentially normal; autofluorescence imaging could not be obtained due to lack of lipofuscin accumulation in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) typical of this type of LCA. AIPL1. K & L: Fundus and AF image of RE of LCA-61 at age 19 years; central macular atrophy with yellowish hue is surrounded by area of better preserved peripheral macula; outer retinal atrophy with spicular intraretinal pigmentation visible in periphery; AF shows black area of atrophic central macula, but is typically not surrounded by hyperautofluorescent ring. RDH12. M & N: Fundus of EORD-7 at age 5 and 19 years respectively; note mild macular RPE changes which become more prominent with age; mild predominantly spicular intraretinal pigmentation also increases with age; however, preservation of patches of normal peripheral retina are most striking feature; these patches remain over time.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is humu0031-E1709-f2.jpg

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing characteristic molar tooth sign (MTS) in five patients with Joubert syndrome/cerebello-oculo-renal syndrome due to mutations in CEP290 (all are axial sections through midbrain). Images organized from left to right; arrows indicate MTS of midbrain present in all due to midbrain malformation with hypoplastic cerebellar vermis and midline cleft (all images are T1 weighted except for panel D which is T2 weighted). A) CORS-1 at age 5 years; B) LCA-JS-1 at age 7 years; C) LCA-JS-2 II-1 at age 14 years; D) LCA-JS-2 II-2 at age 17 years and E) LCA-JS-3 at age 2 years.

Special attention was paid to the CEP290-related ocular phenotype, since this has been described in only a few LCA studies so far. It appeared that this phenotype displays only limited fundus alterations in the first few years of life. In a small subset of patients, no fundus abnormalities were obvious early on, while in the majority a marbleized fundus and/or salt and pepper aspect was seen during the first decade. This aspect further evolved from young adulthood into progressive outer retinal atrophy in the midperiphery with relative sparing of the central macula. Abnormalities of the central macula were absent in our patient cohort, despite the impression that CEP290-related disease is probably of a cone-rod type (based on ERG findings and the occurrence of photophobia). Of note is the presence of a hyperautofluorescent ring around the central macula on AF imaging, observed in four patients starting from the age of six (LCA-2, LCA-3, LCA-7 and LCA-25). Mild intraretinal spicular pigment migration occurred in three patients at an age between 7 and 33 years old (LCA-JS-1, LCA-6 and LCA-7). This aspect became even more pronounced at the age of 49 in patient LCA-7, where a predominant spicular pigmentation was mixed with less frequent intraretinal pigment migration with a nummular aspect. Visual acuity of this group was mostly limited to light perception. In the few patients with better preserved central vision, basic color vision was present and visual fields varied from severely concentrically constricted (LCA-8) to sparing of the central 30° at an age of 49 (LCA-7) (Supp. Table S3).

DISCUSSION

Genotypes of the Belgian LCA population

In a cohort of 91 unrelated LCA patients, mainly originating from Belgium, a total of 61 different mutations (including 9 UVs) were found in 7 genes. Homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations were detected in 65% (59/91) of probands, whereas only one heterozygous mutation could be identified in 4% (4/91) of probands. In addition to isolated LCA, this study also identified mutations in eight probands with EORD and seven probands with syndromic LCA (SLS, LCA-JS and CORS) (Table 1).

LCA chip analysis proved to be a powerful initial tool as mutations were found in 41% (37/91) of patients with LCA. Subsequent sequencing of 6 genes (CEP290, CRB1, RPE65, GUCY2D, AIPL1 and CRX) enabled us to identify mutations in an additional 28% of cases. Of note, the majority of mutations found in the latter probands are now included in the LCA chip, increasing its detection rate to 65% if our cohort would have been analyzed using the latest version (v8, 641 variants).

Segregation of disease alleles was demonstrated in 41 out of 43 families available, with two exceptions. The first one is LCA-62, in which the AIPL1 variants p.Thr1 14Ile and p.Pro376Ser were located in cis on the maternal chromosome. This finding challenges a previous study proposing this genotype as causal in an LCA patient (Sohocki et al., 2000b). In the second case, only one of two mutations identified in LCA-46 was found in the mother but not in father, suggesting that the other mutation arose de novo (RPE65, p.Ser121LeufsX6, nonp-aternity excluded) (Table 1). Of note, two different mutations in CEP290 were identified in CORS-1, originating from a consanguineous marriage, which illustrates that assuming homozygosity in offspring from a consanguinous mating can be a potential pitfall for the identification of the causal defect (Table 1).

Our data demonstrate a key role for CEP290 in the Belgian LCA population, as CEP290 mutations were identified in 27 probands (30%). Although the prevalence of CEP290 mutations is not this high worldwide (Simonelli et al., 2007; Vallespin et al., 2007b; Seong et al., 2008; Li et al., 2009; Sundaresan et al., 2009), this study corroborates the importance of CEP290 in the Northwestern European population (den Hollander et al., 2006; Perrault et al., 2007). The second most frequently mutated gene in our LCA population was CRB1 (16%), followed by RPE65 (9%), GUCY2D (8%) and AIPL1 (5%), which is in agreement with previous data (den Hollander et al., 2008). The RPGRIP1 gene – in this study only investigated with the LCA chip – accounted for less than 1% of the LCA population.

In total, 30 novel mutations/variants were identified in this study (Table 1, Supp. Table S2). Interestingly, 5 out of 16 novel mutations in CEP290 are located nearby known changes: c.384_385del (c.384_387del, c.381_382delinsT) (Baala et al., 2007; Perrault et al., 2007), c.2218-2A>C (c.2218-4_2222del and c.2218-15_2220del) (Sayer et al., 2006; Stone, 2007), c.3310-1_3310delinsAA (c.3310-1G>C) (Tory et al., 2007), c.5519_5537del (c.5515_5518del) (Sayer et al., 2006) and c.5865_5867delinsGG (c.5866G>T) (den Hollander et al., 2006). A similar observation was made for RDH12, in which the novel mutation p.Ser175Leu affects the same codon as the known mutation p.Ser175Pro (Perrault et al., 2004). Overall, these regions/codons might be more prone to mutational events.

For several genes, a limited number of recurrent mutations made up the majority of mutated alleles. This was certainly the case for CEP290, in which c.2991+1655A>G was found in 89% of all LCA patients with CEP290- related pathology. Together with p.Lys1575X and c.3310-1_3310delinsAA, a significant fraction of mutated alleles was identified in the LCA population (35/53 alleles). So far, p.Lys1575X has only been found in patients originating from northern France (Perrault et al., 2007) or Belgium (Brancati et al., 2007). This potential founder effect is supported by our study, since all patients who carry p.Lys1575X live in Flanders (northern part of Belgium). A similar regional prevalence was seen for p.Ala1832ProfsX19, which was inherited from the Greek father of LCA-16. The same mutation occurred in an Italian patient with CORS (Brancati et al., 2007) and in two consanguineous families of Kosovar-Albanian and Kosovar origin with MKS, sharing a common haplotype (Frank et al., 2008). For the other genes, the following mutations presented with a gene-specific allele-frequency of at least 20% in the LCA population: p.Lys801X (CRB1, 27%), p.Cys948Tyr (CRB1, 23%), p.Phe530LeufsX40 (RPE65, 25%), p.Arg768Trp (GUCY2D, 31%), p.Phe565Ser (GUCY2D, 23%) and p.Trp278X (AIPL1, 89%). The presence of all but one of these mutations on the LCA chip significantly contributed to its high detection rate.

In six LCA patients, only one mutation was found after sequencing of the gene apparently involved following chip testing. Notably, we might have failed to detect deep intronic and regulatory mutations or multi-exon deletions, as were recently demonstrated in CEP290 (Travaglini et al., 2009). In addition, it cannot be excluded that the phenotype is caused by mutations in a different gene, as was the case for LCA-20. Furthermore, new mutations in the other known genes cannot be ruled out here. Their contribution is expected to be limited however, taking into account the high detection rate obtained using the current strategy. Finally, these patients may carry mutations in as yet unknown genes.

Phenotypes of the Belgian LCA population

In addition, the phenotypes of patients with a molecular diagnosis were extensively studied. For all genes, nystagmus and hypermetropia were recurrent features. The oculodigital sign (plus enophthalmos) was often seen in all but RPE65-related LCA patients. A relatively higher incidence of both keratoconus and cataract was observed in the CRB1-related group, which may reflect secondary effects of a more severe retinal dystrophy compared to other genes. Indeed, several retinal abnormalities such as macular atrophy and intraretinal pigment migration already became apparent in the first decade of life in patients with CRB1-related disease, being earlier than generally seen for the other genes. In addition, a yellowish discoloration of the central macula was often observed. However, this feature is not entirely gene-specific, since it also occurred in a patient carrying RDH12 mutations (EORD-7). This feature may be due to more severe outer retinal atrophy in the macula in CRB1- and RDH12-related disease, which may cause more intense scleral light reflection due to less absorption by the atrophic retinal pigment epithelium, with consequent highlighting of the macular luteal pigment.

The RPE65-related phenotype proved to be typically associated with a fundus appearance which is essentially normal during first years and displays only later on fundus alterations which are initially mild. Visual acuity is generally somewhat better than that seen in CRB1 -related LCA. However, it seems to be the relatively slow evolution of the phenotype which makes it particularly suitable for therapeutic intervention (Bainbridge et al., 2008; Hauswirth et al., 2008; Maguire et al., 2008). For two patients from our cohort (LCA-47 and LCA-49), RPE65 gene-replacement therapy resulted in better visual function (Maguire et al., 2009). In addition, two patients with RPE65 mutations reported a period of increased visual function, possibly reflecting postnatal physiological cone maturation (LCA-44 and LCA-47) (Koenekoop et al., 2007). Hanein et al. classified both CRB1- and RPE65- related LCA as rod-cone dystrophies because of a predominant occurrence of night blindness (Hanein et al., 2004). All RPE65-related phenotypes in this study correspond to this classification. In the CRB1-group, however, six patients with LCA and two with EORD also suffered from photophobia, even before the onset of night blindness in EORD-3.

Similarly, the GUCY2D-related phenotype was found to have only limited fundus abnormalities. Although this phenotype was previously categorized as cone-rod dystrophy, one patient in our cohort had severe night blindness before photophobia became apparent (LCA-54).

In the patients with AIPL1 mutations, an RP-like phenotype emerged by their teenage years at the latest, and a maculopathy with (partial) outer retinal atrophy was typically present in the majority of cases (Dharmaraj et al., 2004).

A unique feature of RDH12-related early-onset dystrophy was the occurrence of areas with complete preservation of the chorioretina in the retinal periphery, alternating with regions of total atrophy (EORD-7).

Notably, our study is one of the first reporting on the ocular phenotype of a larger group of LCA patients with CEP290 mutations (Supp. Table S3). In keeping with previously reported findings (Perrault et al., 2007), it appeared to be that of a severe cone-rod type retinal dystrophy. Visual acuity was mostly limited to light perception, as recently described (Walia et al., 2010). Interestingly, a limited subset of patients displayed no obvious retinal abnormalities in the first years of life. In general, the fundus contained either small white dots or, more frequently, a marbleized or salt and pepper aspect in the first to second decade. In two patients aged 18 and 49, predominant spicular pigment migration was observed (LCA-6 and LCA-7), in contrast to the reported nummular pigmentation in one patient in the fourth decade (den Hollander et al., 2006). In one patient, nummular pigmentation was described in the first decade (LCA-10). Interestingly, a more severe phenotype was seen in LCA-20, who carried a heterozygous CRB1 null allele on top of two mutations in CEP290.

Extra-ocular features of CEP290-related LCA and potential modifier alleles in AHI1

Several patients with CEP290-related retinal dystrophy showed additional systemic features. Two patients with isolated LCA had several symptoms suggestive of renal dysfunction (LCA-3 and LCA-23, Supp. Table S3). LCA-3 suffered from growth retardation, polydipsia, enuresis nocturna and diurnal incontinence. Kidney US at the age of seven, however, was normal. In LCA-23, kidney US at the age of three revealed increased echogenicity and kidneys without clear cortico-medullar differentiation. Despite this observation, no clinical nephrological manifestations were present at the age of 17. Since the age of onset of end-stage renal disease caused by CEP290 mutations may exceed the age of 20 (Helou et al., 2007; Tory et al., 2007), a close nephrological follow-up of these patients is required. Interestingly, both of these patients carry the recurrent c.2991+1655A>G mutation, which so far has only been reported in LCA patients without any other associated pathology. Of note, kidney US was available for only a subset of patients, and in general performed very early in life, when developing kidney disease might be difficult to detect.

In addition, four patients suffered from recurrent otitis media (OM) (LCA-5, SLS-1, SLS-3 and CORS-1, Supp. Table S3). Although this is common in childhood, it is worth mentioning that it is also a clinical manifestation often seen in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), a genetically heterogeneous disorder of motile cilia (Leigh et al., 2009). In a few cases, PCD with OM was associated with X-linked RP, caused by mutations in RPGR (Shu et al., 2007). Notably, RPGR is a centrosomal protein that interacts with CEP290 (Chang et al., 2006). Moreover, loss-of-function experiments of CEP290 in zebrafish caused developmental abnormalities of the otic cavity (Sayer et al., 2006).

Strikingly, 33% of patients with CEP290-related isolated LCA presented with mental retardation and/or autism, in contrast to only 8% of patients with mutations in the other genes. Subtle brain abnormalities such as broadened lateral ventricles were seen on MRI in some patients. Of note, brain imaging was not available for a subset of patients. Additional neurological manifestations included movement abnormalities (LCA-21), and dyspraxia and balance/coordination problems (LCA-18), the latter of which was also evident in two patients with syndromic CEP290-relatedLCA (SLS-2 and CORS-1) (Supp. Table S3).

Taken together, these extra-ocular manifestations fit well into the broad clinical spectrum of CEP290 mutations, varying from isolated LCA to the lethal MKS. In addition, the CEP290 allelic spectrum is highly complex. Mutations associated with isolated LCA in this study were previously reported in other ciliopathies (Table 1), albeit always in compound heterozygosity with a different mutation in the distinct phenotypes. Moreover, identical CEP290 genotypes can display interfamilial variable expressivity and intrafamilial variation of the neurological phenotype was observed in several families with CEP290-related pathology (Coppieters et al., 2010). The complexity of CEP290-related disease is further illustrated by two cases from this study.

The first one is SLS-1, homozygous for p.Trp7Cys. Valente and coworkers identified the same mutation in patient with CORS, also of Pakistani origin (COR22, II:1). Despite a similar ocular and renal phenotype, both patients significantly differ in their neurological phenotype. A second and even more pronounced example is the variability in both nephrological and neurological involvement in three unrelated patients with the same p.Lys1575X/p.Arg1465X genotype (SLS-2, SLS-3 and CORS-1). Patients SLS-3 and CORS-1 displayed a similar clinical course of renal disease, with renal failure at the age of 16 and 14 years, respectively. In contrast, renal insufficiency in patient SLS-2 was not substantiated until the age of 30 (Supp. Table S3). Neurological signs of these three patients ranged from a mild mental handicap (SLS-2) over severe autism in combination with moderate mental retardation (SLS-3) to severe mental retardation associated with ataxia and a MTS (CORS-1). An MRI was not available for the other two patients, however.

The AHI1 gene was screened as a candidate modifier gene in these three patients. Strikingly, CORS-1, with the most severe nephrologic and neurologic phenotype, carries a heterozygous novel p.Asn811Lys mutation in AHI1, which was absent in the two other patients. Upon screening of AHI1 in five additional patients with CEP290-related disease and neurological involvement, a novel missense variant, p.His758Pro, was identified in LCA-3. Mutations in AHI1 encoding Jouberin are responsible for JS, with retinal involvement in 75% and renal involvement in less than 10% of all AHI1-associated patients (Kroes et al., 2008). Interestingly, both p.Asn811Lys and p.His758Pro affect conserved residues and are located in the predicted WD40-repeat, a domain conserved across all eukaryotes, mediating functions such as vesicular trafficking (Li and Roberts, 2001). Since AHI1 and CEP290 appear to be in the same pathway through their interaction with rab8a, mutations in one of both genes may modify a phenotype caused by the other (Kim et al., 2008; Tsang et al., 2008; Hsiao et al., 2009). Tory and colleagues already suggested a similar potential epistatic effect of CEP290 and AHI1 mutations on phenotypes related to NPHP1, encoding another interactor of AHI1 (Tory et al., 2007; Eley et al., 2008). Strikingly, one of the AHI1 variants they described as a potential modifier for neurological involvement in patients with NPHP1 mutations, p.Arg830Trp, was recently identified as a modifier allele for retinal degeneration in patients with NPHP, independent of a primary NPHP1 mutation (Louie et al., 2010). Of note, four out of seven patients in the study from Tory and coworkers carrying p.Arg830Trp displayed visual impairment, with one blind individual (Tory et al., 2007). The p.Arg830Trp variant might affect AHI1 complex stability/formation (Louie et al., 2010). The variants identified here, assumed to represent a neurological modifier in patients with LCA, might disrupt interactions with other proteins, thereby influencing AHI1 function in other organ systems.

Overall, a molecular diagnosis of CEP290 mutations might have considerable consequences towards the clinical prognosis of an individual. Given the potential involvement of ciliary modifiers and the presence of cilia throughout the whole body, the development of various additional clinical manifestations should be taken into account. As for LCA, both children and (young) adults should have a long-term close clinical neurological and nephrological follow-up, since some features have a later onset.

In conclusion, molecular testing identified mutations in 69% of our LCA cohort, with a major involvement of CEP290. Detailed phenotyping of all patients with a molecular diagnosis revealed novel insights, mainly into the CEP290-related retinal phenotype, which is well documented for the first time in a larger patient group. The variable age-of-onset of the extra-ocular features emphasizes the importance of long-term clinical follow-up of LCA patients with CEP290 mutations. Moreover, the identification of potential modifiers of CEP290-related disease might contribute to a refined prognosis based on a molecular diagnosis. Finally, our findings fit with previous observations suggesting that the phenotype of ciliopathies is most likely determined by the synergistic effect of all variants occurring in the ciliary proteome.

Acknowledgments

Contract grant sponsor: Research Foundation – Flanders (KAN 1.5.174.09, 01F01206, 3F001206, OZP 3G004306); Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds (BOF06_Asp_FC UGent); Fund for Research in Ophthalmology.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Supp. Table S1

Exon-flanking primers for the amplification of the human CEP290, CRB1, RPE65, GUCY2D, AIPL1, CRX, RDH12, RPGRIP1 and AHI1 genes and for the c.2991+1655A>G mutation in CEP290

GeneExonForward primer (5′-3′)Reverse primer (5′-3′)

Exon 2tttgtggcccaattgtctgccacctaagtaaacagaaaagcaac

Exon 3ccaaggtgcttaattggtcatttcccctacacaccctttt

Exon 4tttactgaacgtctccatgtgctggcagatccataaaataggag

Exon 5ttctagactcctattttatggatctgcttcacaaccatatgctcagtcc

Exon 6atctgcactgaagtataatgctggtgatgacaaaatgaaca

Exon 7ggtgggagaattgcttgaacacccgcatagacctgagatg

Exon 8ttggttctactgagccaaataatgtctgaaggtaaccaaacacaaca

Exon 9ggtgaggctttaagtgtggtgcttaatgaccaagacaggcaaa

Exon 10tggtcaatgccaattagtaaagggtgaggtgattggagaaacaca

Exon 11ttccaggatgacttcaatgataaaaactcattgatgtgaaagaggtca

CEP290Exon 12cagagattatgccagtagttgctcttgggaccaggtggtagaag

Exon 13aaaaggcatacttgtacccacatccatcatttacaaatgtaagcac

Exon 14aatggcataccacttttcttgctggcaaaaagtaaatgctcaaag

Exon 15gcatatgtacattttcctttagacactccaaccccataaaatct

Exon 16tcacagaaagttacctcattcttccctctttcttgagccatttg

Exon 17tgtaggccttgaaccaaagacttcaggactgaacccactgac

Exon 18ggatcacgaggtcagaagataaatgagaagcttgtattggct

Exon 19gggattaagatcaccatctgcacagcaaggcaaatcaactg

Exon 20aactcaactattcacgttggatttttgaaagcagctcaagaaaaac

Exon 21tatcatgcttggcaatgaatcttataaggcacttattttccac

Exon 22ggcatttctaagcagaaactgaaatctgcatgctttggtgatg

Exon 23tgtgttgcttacagatttggtgacaggataatcccaggcttaatg

Exon 24tgataactttgttgccttgcattccgaatccatctgaagagc

Exon 25gatcaagtccaacaagatgccagaagaagcaattatgacaaa

Exon 26tgcatgtttttcttacatggaaatgcaggcaaactttaat

Intron 26cattagaaagtcctaggcaagagacatcagtaaggaggatgtaagactggagatagag

Exon 27ggacacagccaaaccatatccaggattattcatctgcctaagtt

Exon 28tccatggaactataatgctttctctgctttccttttaaacaattc

Exon 29tttaccctccttcagtctgttcttaaccctgttaaaaccgatct

Exon 30gcaaacatgataacctctgatggctgggcaacagaatgagacc

Exon 31_1agttccagctatgtttgcacctcgtttggagggaagaaac

Exon 31_2ccaagggtaaagctccactattgtagatctcatgtgccact

Exon 32caggagaatggcatgaaccatcattatcatcaatggaggaatgt

Exon 33tcacctctctgagtttgtattcagttgcagcattgagagtaa

Exon 34atcttgtttgttactctgtagcattggctattagaaacattataggag

Exon35_1aagcatgcaaataactgctgtcaccttgcttgcatgtttgc

Exon35_2aatcaatgaactgaggcttcgggtgtaatccaatcacatgcaa

Exon 36gaggggacatgcataccagtcggtgagctacaggaggaag

Exon 37tttgatcatttgaggaaccaaaccagcagtcctgaggataaa

Exon 38gttgcagtcagccgagattgactttttattacaacacggagat

Exon 39ttcaatgtggaaagaattgagtgtgtctagccaccaacagtgc

Exon 40_1tcctcaaggtagacttgacatgaattgccttttcagttcatcattc

Exon 40_2ctactacctctatattgtaaatcagacattgtgggtgtttgttgaaga

Exon 41aaaatgcagaagcagctaccattcaatactgcttatagtcctcaa

Exon 42tcaacctgtatagcaaaatgaacacgagatcacaggaaaatcca

Exon 43tggattttcctgtgatctcgtcaattcacatgggaaaagaaa

Exon 44catttaaaggaggccttcagtgtgagaaagatgtaatgcttttgg

Exon 45ggctttcaccagaacactccggccttcaacaaataaatgct

Exon 46tgcatcaggcaataatgtggcagatgcagaataaacactgaaa

Exon 47_1gctgcatgattttaggaatgtccaatttttcattttcctgctca

Exon 47_2tggtagaagtggaaagacaatcccccttagccttgcctctcat

Exon 48aacgttgggaacttcgttcttggtggaatgtgatgacagc

Exon 49aggaagaaaccaggttatccattgaatacactgaatctatgagaaca

Exon 50ttgccaccactttttaatgcggggtgcccttcagttagat

Exon 51tgcttgtctctagttgtagcactaggacaatgccagttatgc

Exon 52cgtgaaggcttttgtattccaaagacccaaagcttatcaggaa

Exon 53ggagggaggcagcattaagttgttaggaatagtcagatgaaca

Exon 54tgcctttattgctgtatttgacctcggagaactgcttatttcca

Exon 1atgaatccaatccagcctgatgactgttcacattgactgg

Exon 2_1gttgaggcagcacaaaggtcgctcctttctcctggggtg

Exon 2_2caatccctgtcaaggaagtgggagtaaccatcaattccatc

Exon 2_3gagtgtgcttccagcccttggagctaactacaccatctgtg

Exon 3ctctggtaaacaaagcattgtccagggagttctaagccaatc

CRB1Exon 4agtaagatgatgccatgggttcatttgctataagcgatatgtgt

Exon 5gacttagcagcttctctgaattgtcaagtcatatcccatctcc

Exon 6 1cctgagctattcatgcacttcgaagtgagggatgcatgttcc

Exon 6_2gatattctcctgggctgtaccgaagagccattggctgaacag

Exon 6 3ggctcagtttgtaacatagccggagtcgtcgattaaggtaag

Exon 6_4ccagcgatggagagtggcactacaaacgaaggtgtggatg

Exon 6_5ggtgttgctctgcttaacttcctgctctgctctgaggcatg

Exon7_ 1gtcttccatcccttctgtcttttgggagagtttggagtca

Exon 7_2agatttggccaggatgactcaggccaccaatgtagatgac

Exon 7_3gactgaacttaatggtggattcggtgggtcagtaacatcatc

Exon 8cagatatgtggtttcaccgtcgtcgcaacttaactggtgag

Exon 9_1caatgatcattactattaataacgggtgccatcattcactgactgc

Exon 9_2tcaattgcaaagtggcaacattaactgcaaacagccagtg

Exon 9_3caatataaagggcctgcaaggctgcaactctgtcagagcag

Exon 9_4cactgtgaactcaacatcgatgcagtgatgcagagtatagcttc

Exon 10gaacaagatgaacagctgtgggctcagaattctcttccagaag

Exon 11ccaatgtattcaacagggacccaactggctcgtcattcatac

Exon 12cctttgctatagaattcgcatcgtacagtcatcacattcacag

Exon 1ctcaagactgcttccaaacctcccaaagccataactcctt

Exon 2ctatctctgcggactttgagggaagccagagaagagagac

Exon 3cccaaggcagggataagaagctaggccctactttgaggag

Exon 4ttgtcagtaacctctactcctcatggccattctaagctcca

Exon 5ggcttgaaaattactggactgctgaacatcacctagcactg

Exon 6cctagggacaaaggtataatgcacaatacagtaactttctcac

RPE65Exon 7gtatcaaaggtaggcaaagcacgtttccaaatctgctgcta

Exon 8gtggcttgagaatcagccctcatcttcttcagaatcacaaac

Exon 9caagtttgtgattctgaagaagccgtaatttccaggaacaatg

Exon 10cattgcctgtgctcatgtttgcctgagagagatgaaacattc

Exon 11gaattctttcctgctcactgaggagcacatgcttaggaaaactc

Exon 12caaagatgggttctgatgggcctcgtcaaggtgagatga

Exon 13acgaactaacatacagaactgctcactttgttccagatagggt

Exon 14gacattcaatctatagcttggggcagacctgaagctgattttc

Exon 2_1catgggttactcgggcttggagaagatggggtcgcaag

Exon 2_2atcatcccatgggttactcggcgatcccggcttctt

Exon 2_3tcgtgggtccggtgaagtagtggatcgtgtcgaagg

Exon 3ggacggcgccgcgagccaagtcccctctcccttgccttct

Exon 4gtgggctgtgaccccgacctggtccatggcgattgtctc

Exon 5ctatcattcccagcctctccttgctgcagacttccatttc

Exon 6gacggaacttggtgcccttggggaaggaaccaaatttacgga

Exon 7ctcagcctgacctcaacccatcctcctgagagtgcgcctc

Exon 8gcattctgggacagtgagccagaaaccgatggccacctag

GUCY2DExon 9ccccacattgccctgggcagacctgcccccaggacgtcacc

Exon 10agcaggctgaggctgcctctcccggtggatcctcgtctgc

Exon 11ctttctctgagatggctccttttagaggaaagagtgaggct

Exon 12caggccagggtcagaggcagcctcaggttgctgacaagcat

Exon 13cagctttaccagcttccttcgcaggcagtgaggtcacctg

Exon 14gaccggctgcttacacagctggaggctggtgaag

Exon 15ggcaatcgcttcgtgtactcgatgggctggagcctgggaa

Exon 16ccccgaggccctacctaggtacctccccgtcttgtccccg

Exon 17gcatctccacaggtccatagggtgagctgaggtttg

Exon 18caaacctcagctcaccctttctaagtcagaaagggatcgg

Exon 19gatgacgtgggccctgccctccccttgggtgggacgttctgcag

Exon 1gcacacctggaatgttgaaaaaggtggatgggataggag

Exon 2gggccttgaacagtgtgtcttttcccgaaacacagcagc

AIPL1Exon 3agtgagggagcaggattctgcccatgatgcccgctgtc

Exon 4ctcctgcccagggagagggagatgtgccacagg

Exon 5aaagtccaggaaggctatggtaaggaacctgcagaccaag

Exon 6ctgggaagggagctgtagaaaagtgacaccacgatcc


Exon 2gtgcacgtcaccccatggtgagtaaccagaggtcctccaagagatgaggcc

CRXExon 3gtagaagggcagggaatgtctcctcccatcactctttgt

Exon 4_1gctggatgcaaagtagacagccatgggagaaaggtaggg

Exon 4_2tctccgagctcctatttcaggatctaaactgcagggaagc

Exon 3ggagaggagcagagaagcaggcttccagtgcaggtctttg

Exon 4tcttagtgtgagctcgtgaaggttctagtcagagcccccaag

Exon 5cccagtcccaagctcacttatagtggggtggatgatggtt

RDH12Exon 6gggcaattatgcaggtctgtccctggacattctccacatt

Exon 7aattggttcacacccagaagatgacttcccaagttgctgtg

Exon 8tcctgagtccctccttctcatcatcaggcacaaactcagc

Exon 9gggaccataaagatttccagactttagggttggccttctcc

Exon 1tgctgagaaattcctgctacaatctgtgaaggccagcaagat

Exon 2tgagacatctaaagggttcaaaaacagtctatcgacatgtttggc

Exon 3tgtactggggacagaaggctaaaacgtggctggcacatc

Exon 4cagcccttcatgttccagttttccctgatcatgctgaaaa

Exon 5ccaaggttactgattcacttaatttccctctgagatggaggaaagg

Exon 6cgtgatgagaaatgggagaaacgagttgtgaggcttggatt

RPGRIP1Exon 7agtgtgctaagtaacagtacctatttgctccagcaataggc

Exon 8caaagtcattctttgtgacatctgggagcttcgtttttgtcattt

Exon 9ggaaaatcctcattaatcccaatattgagtaccaatttccccata

Exon 10aggtccaggagatgctgaaaggatcaagtgaggggattaaa

Exon 11ttttgttttcggagtgcaaggttttctaatctcatcatcttccc

Exon 12agtttctgctgctggcatttggacagccattgtgtgtttg

Exon 13gggtctgcaaggaaatcaaaatgagaggcacccttcttga

Exon 14cacaacttggacttccaccaggggaatacagatggtgtgg

Exon 15agcaccaatgcagaatttccgatgtagctcgctccaaagg

Exon 16gctcttcctcaccacagatcctctgctctgttgctcttgaca

Exon 17ggtgctgacaaatgctcactcacatgacactcacagaggga

Exon 18tcccaaatccctttcttgtgtgtctgcttctgcttctgct

Exon 19aaagaaggcaggaaggaaggcttgaaagcctgatctcgtg

Exon 20tgaccagacagtggattggatgcattttccatcagcttca

Exon 21tgggttaattggatggcgtaattcaccccacaaaaatcca

Exon 22ccatgaataccactaatgaaagtctcatcagcacaaaaccaaactc

Exon 23aaatggaggcaagggaaaaggggataagatttcaatccactttg

Exon 24cattcatttagcatccccagtggtactggagaaaaatgcctttag

Exon 1_1agggcactgtcatgatctccggtaaacatgtcccgctgtg

Exon 1_2tcagtgccatcagaacagactggctggactggcaacaatg

Exon 1_3cacagcgggacatgtttaccggcaggagaattgcttgacc

Exon 1_4ggaacattgttgccagtccacgtggcctttgagttcagtt

Exon 1_5tctgggcatagcatcacacaatgctaacaatgtttgagaggca

Exon 2tttgtccttgctgaccatgcggccctagatcaaagcctca

AHI1Exon 3tgggtgacacagcaagactctggtcacatacctgaaagctga

Exon 4actttgggtccttgtcccatagcaggtccctggtaaatgt

Exon 5aactgtgcatgaggcaggtagcaaaccttgagacagcct

Exon 6agagaaatgaagcataatggcctacacatcttgcgctattgct

Exon 7tttgccctttaatgggatgtgatgacctatcatgtgtcctggt

Exon 8tggtgcattccagttctttggtgccatttgtttgggcaagt

Exon 9aggtgtggtcatctggttcacccatcccagtttacatggc

Exon 10aattgcggacacgaaagacagaggagggtcagtggaatgt

Exon 11tgtgttagcctccattaaacgcaaactccctgggctcttgg

Exon 12actgccagatgttccttggtcagccctaaactgacgttactc

Exon 13atgccacagtgcaaatgggacacatgtactgagaggctcat

Exon 14gcccggccaccatattattcggttcattggctgtgttggt

Exon 15gcaccactggattctacccttgtgctgcaaatgtctttggt

Exon 16gctatcaactagccacattggactggcagtgatggctttagagt

Exon 17ggcctccagaactgtgagaaggtgaagaagcagaaacaaagga

Exon 18tcaactcctgctttaaatcaaccttgttcagcgtgaaatctggca

Exon 19ggcatggctgtttgtgtcttatggaccctccctaactgaatg

Exon 20cgtctcacttgattccacagctcatgttacccaggctggtc

Exon 21tgaggcagtagaatcgcttgaggtttgctgttgtctggctt

Exon 22gagatcgtgccactgcattccatttacttggcagcagggt

Exon 23ggcagatgcccttaaatgtctcttccactcttttggcaat

Exon 24agcacaatgaaggaaagccatcatcttgtagcaccgaatgtt

Exon 25cctgtaggacagcactcaagaacaggctaggcacaccttag

Exon 26ccttgtccatctgagtcccaatcactgtgagtgtgctaccc

Exon 27ggaatgctaaacgcagcacagctgatagcgtagtgaccga

Exon 28cgtcggtcactacgctatcatttccctgcgctagctacaa

Supp. Table S2

In-silico predictions of the novel missense variants and known unclassified variants identified in this study using the Alamut software

PolyPhenSIFT


GeneNucleotide changeAmino acid changeDomain/RegionPredictionPSIC score differencePredictionScoreMedian sequence conservationGrantham scoreNucleotide conservationAmino acid conservationRemarks
CEP290c.5081T>Cp.Leu1694Pro UVCoiled coilPossibly damaging1.995Affect protein function0.00*3.4498Weakly conserved (score: 0.0)Moderately conserved (considering 12 species)

CEP290c.4696G>Cp.Ala1566Pro UVCoiled coilPossibly damaging1.638Tolerated0.103.4427Highly conserved (score: 1.0)Highly conserved, up to Frog (considering 12 species)

CRB1c.929G>Ap.Cys310TyrEGF-like 8, extracellular domainProbably damaging3.761Affect protein function0.00*3.96194Highly conserved (score: 1.0)Highly conserved, up to Cow (considering 8 species)Disruption of annotated bond formation site (PolyPhen)

CRB1c.1472A>Tp.Asp491Val UVLaminin G-like1, extracellular domainBenign1.410Affect protein function0.01*3.96152Highly conserved (score: 1.0)Weakly conserved (considering 8 species)

RPE65c.253C>Tp.Arg85CysProbably damaging2.476Tolerated0.052.90180Highly conserved (score: 1.0)Moderately conserved (considering 18 species)

RPE65c.542C>Tp.Pro181LeuProbably damaging2.956Affect protein function0.042.9098Highly conserved (score: 1.0)Highly conserved, up to Fruitfly (considering 18 species)Located next to metal ion binding site (UniProtKB)

GUCY2Dc.587A>Tp.Glu196Val UVExtracellular domainPossibly damaging1.650Affect protein function0.00*4.32121Weakly conserved (score: 0.3)Highly conserved, up to Opossum (considering 10 species)

GUCY2Dc.1724C>Tp.Pro575Leu UVCytoplasmic domainBenign1.433Affect protein function0.00*4.3298Weakly conserved (score: 0.0)Highly conserved, up to Opossum (considering 10 species)rs28743021

GUCY2Dc.2132C>Tp.Pro711Leu UVProtein kinase, Cytoplasmic domainProbably damaging3.140Affect protein function0.00*4.3298Highly conserved (score: 1.0)Highly conserved, up to Opossum (considering 10 species)

GUCY2Dc.2598G>Cp.Lys866AsnCytoplasmic domainProbably damaging2.236Affect protein function0.00*4.3294Highly conserved (score: 1.0)Highly conserved, up to Opossum (considering 10 species)

AIPL1c.341C>Tp.Thr114Ile UVPPIase FKBP-typeBenign0.179Tolerated0.133.3489Weakly conserved (score: 0.0)Moderately conserved (considering 12 species)rs8069375

AIPL1c.1126C>Tp.Pro376Ser UVBenign?Tolerated0.484.3274Weakly conserved (score: 0.0)Weakly conserved (considering 12 species)

CRXc.425A>Gp.Tyr142Cys UVBenign1.458Affect protein function0.00*4.32194Highly conserved (score: 1.0)Highly conserved, up to Little brown bat (considering 8 species)rs61748442

CRXc.724G>Ap.Val242Met UVBenign1.033Tolerated0.204.3221Weakly conserved (score: 0.2)Highly conserved, up to Dog (considering 8 species)RS61748459 VAR_007949

RDH12c.524C>Tp.Ser175LeuProbably damagingPrediction basis: sequence annotationAffect protein function0.00*3.61145Weakly conserved (score: 0.2)Highly conserved, up to Fruitfly (considering 15 species)Disruption of annotated binding site (PolyPhen)

RDH12c.698T>Ap.Val233AspProbably damaging2.616Affect protein function0.00*3.60152Weakly conserved (score: 0.0)Highly conserved, up to Fruitfly (considering 15 species)

AHI1c.2273A>Cp.His758ProWD4Probably damaging2.679Affect protein function0.03*3.3977Highly conserved (score: 1.0)Moderately conserved (considering 12 species)

AHI1c.2433T>Gp.Asn811LysWD5Possibly damaging1.719Affect protein function0.00*3.3994Highly conserved (score: 1.0)Highly conserved, up to Tetraodon (considering 12 species)

AHI1c.3368C>Tp.Ser1123PheProbably damagingPrediction basis: sequence annotationTolerated0.073.67155Highly conserved (score: 0.9)Weakly conserved (considering 12 species)Disruption of annotated functional site (modified residue) (PolyPhen)

Alamut provides for each variant the HGVS nomenclature and a nucleotide conservation score which was computed at UCSC from 17 vertebrates and has a range between 0 and 1 (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgTrackUi?g=multiz17way). For missense variants, Alamut calculates the Grantham distance and automatically fills in queries for PolyPhen and SIFT prediction servers, based on the UniProt protein identifiers and FASTA sequences of several orthologs, respectively. In addition, information on topological as well as functional domains and variations (VAR) was extracted from the UniProtKB database using the following identifiers: O15078 (CEP290), P82279 (CRB1), Q16518 (RPE65), Q02846 (GUCY2D), Q9NZN9 (AIPL1), O43186 (CRX), Q96NR8 (RDH12) and Q8N157 (AHI1) (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/). Variants were designated as “unclassified variant (UV)” if no consensus was seen in all prediction programs used.

*These substitutions may have been predicted to affect function just because the sequences used were not diverse enough.

Supp. Table S3

Clinical data of 80 patients with mutation(s) in one of the LCA genes Part I

GenePatient n°GenderNight BlindnessPhotophobiaERGColor visionFundus aspectOther features
CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Cys998X]LCA-1MAbsent (4mo)Optic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation Normal macula

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Cys998X]LCA-2MMildAbsent (5mo & 1.5yrs)Pigmentary retinopathy Normal macula (6yrs) Retinal vessel attenuation Salt and pepper alterations Pseudopapilledema HyperAF ring around macula (14yrs)Eyepoking

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Arg108X]LCA-3M++Absent (4mo)+ (6yrs)Normal optic discs Retinal vessel attenuation Normal peripheral retina Beginning of hyperAF around macula (6yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos

CEP290 p.[Cys998X(+ )Gln899X]LCA-4FAbsent (2yrs)Retinal vessel attenuation Tapetal reflex of posterior pole Pseudopapilledema

CEP290 p.[Cys998X(+ )Arg1465X]LCA-5MAbsent (4mo)Eyepoking Enophthalmos

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Lys1575X]LCA-6F-Strong (since 3.6yrs)Severe CRD (3.3yrs)B/Rand G/RRetinal vessel attenuation White marbleized changes Macular oedema (3.2yrs) Retinal vessel attenuation White marbleized around vascular arcade Discrete RPE alterations No macular reflex (4.9yrs) Extensive peripheral outer retinal atrophy Limited spicular intraretinal pigmentation Relative macular preservation Relatively darker perifoveal ring (18yrs)Exotropia

CEP290 p.[Cys998X(+ )Lys1575X]LCA-7M(+) (later in life)+ (early in life)Subnormal (1yr) Absent (21yrs)+ (early in life)Peripheral salt and pepper intraretinal pigmentation Relative macular preservation (22yrs) Extensive midperipheral and peripheral outer retinal atrophy Limited spicular intraretinal pigmentation Relative macular preservation Development of synchysis scintillans (33yrs) More extensive intraretinal pigmentation (predominantly spicular) Relative macular preservation Hyper AF in central macula and mid- and far periphery Extensive confluent atrophy (49yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Exotropia Posterior SCP cataract (star shaped) (49yrs)

CEP290 p.[Cys998X(+ )Lys1575X]LCA-8FAbsent (16yrs)R/GOptic disc pallor

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Arg1782X]LCA-9M+Severe CRD (5mo & 1.2yrs)Marbleized retinal changes

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Asp128GlufsX17]LCA-10FNummular pigmentation Pseudopapilledema Maculopathy

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Glu146GlyfsX17]LCA-11MAbsent (6mo)Optic disc pallor Yellow confluent peripheral spotsEyepoking Enophthalmos

CEP290 p.[Cys998X(+)Arg621IlefsX2]LCA-12MAbsentRetinal vessel attenuation Peripheral pepper and salt alterations Macular RPE alterations (6mo)Enophthalmos

CEP290LCA-13FAbsentOptic disc pallor

p.[Cys998X(+)Leu1141PhefsX5](4mo)Retinal vessel attenuation

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Thr1334IlefsX2]LCA-14FAbsent (5mo)Granular pigment alterations Normal macula (7mo)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Cataract

CEP290 p.[Cys998X(+)Glu1656AsnfsX3]LCA-15 (Perrault, Delphin et al. 2007)M-AbsentRetinal vessel attenuation (7mo) Hyperaemic optic disc Marbleized, white spots Nummular pigmentation (2yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Ala1832ProfsX19]LCA-16MAbsent (6mo & 10mo)Yellow spotsEyepoking

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Lys1840ArgfsX5]LCA-17MAbsent (5mo)Full optic disc with no apparent excavation Marbleized fundus changes in the midperiphery Normal macula (8yrs)Eyepoking

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Glu1956GlyfsX9]LCA-18M+ (early in life)Absent (3mo)Full optic discs Limited outer retinal atrophy Midperipheral salt and pepper alterations Normal macula (15yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Keratoconus with acute hy drops (OD>OS)(13yrs)

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Splice defect]LCA-19M++Absent (3mo)Very small optic disc excavation Retinal vessel attenuation Mild midperipheral salt and pepper alterations Bull's eye maculopathy with preservation of central macula, surrounded by concentric area of more pronounced outer retinal atrophy (14yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos

CEP290 p.[Cys998X(+)Splice defect]LCA-20 (Yzer, Leroy et al. 2006)F--Absent (9yrs)Optic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation RPE alterations maculopathy unknown (3mo)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Cataract with lens luxation Keratoconus (OD) Enucleation because of phacolytic glaucoma (OD)

CEP290 p.[Cys998X]+[Splice defect]LCA-21M+AbsentOptic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation

CEP290 p.[Cys998X(+)Splice defect]LCA-22M--Absent (4mo & 9mo)Normal optic discs White retinal spots Tapetal reflex

CEP290 p.[Cys998X(+)Splice defect]LCA-23FAbsent (5mo& 1.5yrs)Salt and pepper alterations Normal macula (5mo) Pinkish optic disc Mild retinal vessel attenuation RPE alterations (yellowish dots) (6yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos

CEP290 p.[Lys1575X(+)Lys1575X]LCA-24M

CEP290 p.[Lys1575X]+[Ala1566Pro]LCA-25M-StrongSevere CRD (1.1yrs)No RPE alterations (4mo) Retinal vessel attenuation Discrete RPE alterations (1.10yrs) Retinal vessel attenuation HyperAF ring around macula (8yrs) Retinal vessel attenuation Salt and pepper alterations Mild macular pigment epithelial alterations (10yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Exotropia

CEP290 p.[Leu1694Pr o]+[=, splice site]LCA-26-Absent (4.5yrs)No retinal vessel attenuation No hyperpigmentation Midperipheral reticular aspect, especially around vascular arcades Assymetric ectopia foveae OS>OD (3yrs) Normal optic disc Deep intraretinal white spots along vascular arcades HyperAF ring around macula No pigmentation/atrophy (5.4yrs)Strabismus

CEP290 p.Cys998XLCA-27MSubnormal (5mo & 1yr & 7yrs)+Optic disc pallor No RPE alterations Normal macula

CEP290 p.[Trp7Cys]+[ Trp7Cys]SLS-1FAbsent (2mo)Abnormal RPE

CEP290 p.[Lys1575X( +)Arg1465X]SLS-2F++ (12yrs)Keratoconus Cataract

CEP290 p.[Lys1575X( +)Arg1465X]SLS-3MEyepoking

CEP290 p.[Lys1575X( +)Arg1465X]CORS-1 (Brancati, Barrano et al. 2007)FEnophthalmos

CEP290 p.[Gln1265X] +[Splice defect]LCA-JS-1M-Absent (first year of life)Optic disc pallor Salt and pepper alterations Mild spicular intraretinal pigmentation

CEP290 p.[Thr2457Al afsX27]+[Thr 2457AlafsX27]LCA-JS-2II-1F++AbsentNormal optic discs Retinal vessel attenuation Salt and pepper alterations



LCA-JS-2II-1M+Absent

CEP290 p.[Leu2448Th rfsX8(+)Splice defect]LCA-JS-3M+Absent (4mo & 1.4yrs)Optic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation

CRB1 p.[Lys801X(+)Lys801X]LCA-28MMarbleized fundus changes

CRB1 p.[Lys801X(+)Gln362X]LCA-29 (Yzer, Leroy et al. 2006)M+MildAbsent (1yr&30.6yrs)Basic Severe R-G andB-Y deficientyOptic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation Perivascular fibrosis No clear PPRPE Fine intraretinal white flecks Nummular intraretinal pigmentation Macular atrophy (30.6yrs)Eyepoking (mild) Enophthalmos (mild) Posterior subcapsular cataract (OS>OD)

CRB1 p.[Lys801X]+[Arg764Cys]LCA-30M

CRB1 p.[Lys801X]+[Cys896X]LCA-31 (Yzer, Leroy et al. 2006)M+-Absent (3mo)BasicRetinal vessel attenuation Outer retinal atrophy RPE defects around vascular arcade Perimacular atrophic spots (3mo) Normal optic discs Perivascular fibrosis No clear PPRPE Outer retinal atrophy Small white dots Nummular hyperpigmentation Pseudopapilledema Macular atrophy (8yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Exotropia

CRB1 p.[Lys801X(+)Cys896X]LCA-32 (Yzer, Leroy et al. 2006)F+(+ after keratoconus)Depigmentation around macula (15yrs) Macular aplasia: vessels of choroid become apparent (17yrs) Normal optic disc Retinal vessel attenuation Perivascular fibrosis No clear PPRPE Outer retinal atrophy White retinal spots Peripheral intraretinal pigment migration, predominant nummular Some midperipheral lipofuscin depositions Macular aplasia Pseudopapilledema (33yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Esotropia Keratoconus with acute hydrops and rupture of Descemet membrane (20yrs)

CRB1 p.[Lys801X(+)Cys948Tyr]LCA-33F+Absent (9mo&1.7yrs)Pale and slightly swollen optic disc Diffuse outer retinal atrophy Small whitish deep intraretinal flecks Nummular intraretinal pigmentation Limited macular atrophy

CRB1 p.[Lys801X]+[Splice defect]LCA-34F+Absent (4mo & 1.5yrs)Retinal vessel attenuation Macular pigmentation PseudopapilledemaEyepoking Strabismus

CRB1 p.[Cys948Tyr( +)Cys948Tyr]LCA-35FKeratoconus (OS)

CRB1 p.[Cys948Tyr( +)Glu1330X]LCA-36FOptic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation Nummular intraretinal pigmentation Macular alterations Coats reactionEnophthalmos Cataract Glaucoma (neovascular with OD seclusio pupillae and anterior synechiae)

CRB1 p.[Cys948Tyr] +[Splice defect]LCA-37M+

CRB1 p.[Cys948Tyr] +[Splice defect]LCA-38M+-Absent (9.1yrs)Basic (until 9yrs) Disturbed (after 9yrs)Optic disc pallor with irregular shape Retinal vessel attenuation Peripheral salt and pepper alterations (6yrs) Retinal vessel attenuation with tortuous aspect Extensive peripheral and macular outer retinal atrophy Small white deep intraretinal flecks Nummular intraretinal pigment migrations Yellowish hue of the macula 6 astrocytoma-like retinal excrescences superior to right macula Pseudopapilledema with prominent sheathing of blood vessels near optic discs (18yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Exotropia

CRB1 p.[Cys948Tyr] +[Splice defect] (LCA-39a) and p. [Splice defect]+[Splic e defect] (LCA-39b)LCA-39aF++Absent (4mo)Basic (early in life) Declining at the age of 12yrs Absent (15.1 1yrs)Optic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation Salt and pepper aspect Macular aplasia Total chorioretina atrophy in the central macula Pseudopapilledema Atrophic macular region with pigment near border (3yrs) Total atrophy of retina and choriocapillaris Midperipheral small white dots Midperipheral small nummular pigmentationEyepoking Enophthalmos Esotropia

LCA-39bM+Absent (8yrs& 16yrs)-Optic disc pallor Small excavation optic disc (OD, not OS) Retinal vessel attenuation Extensive peripheral outer retinal atrophy Limited nummular intraretinal pigmentation Macular yellowish atrophy (OD>OS) (16yrs)

CRB1 p. [Splice defect(+)Splic e defect]LCA-40M+-Absent (2yrs)No optic disc excavation No perivascular sheathing Severe outer retinal and central macular atrophy Small deep intraretinal white flecks Extensive nummular intraretinal pigmentation (11yrs)Cataract (OS>OD) Retinal detachment (OD: partial -inferior, OS: total)

CRB1 p.[Leu814Arg fsX23]+[Cys1 240ProfsX24]LCA-41 II-1F+MildAbsent (31yrs)DisturbedHyperaemic optic disc Retinal vessel attenuation Small pigment clumps scattered through retina Pseudopapilledema Normal macula (12yrs) Macular atrophy with pigment clumping (21yrs) Macular pseudocoloboma (23yrs) Limited perivascular sheathing around optic disc Extensive outer retinal atrophy Small white intraretinal flecks Pronounced nummular intraretinal pigmentation Central macular atrophy (36yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Esotropia

LCA-41 II-2F+-Absent (24yrs)DisturbedBeginning macular atrophy with pigment alterations (10yrs) Extensive peripheral outer retinal atrophy Extensive macular atrophy Extreme hyperpigmentation around central macula Pronounced peripapillary perivascular fibrosis Relative sparing of small retinal area just nasal to the optic disc (used for fixation) Pronounced mid and far-peripheral nummular intraretinal pigmentation (24yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Esotropia SCP Cataract (complete, OS)

CRB1 p.[Trp1293X( +)Trp1293X]LCA-42F+Absent (2yrs)White retinal spots Salt and pepper pigmentation Maculopathy (2yrs)Keratoconus Cataract (OD)

CRB1 p.[Cys948Tyr] +[Lys801X]EORD-1 II-1F+-CRDOptic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation Salt and pepper alterations Nummular intraretinal pigmentation (over 360°) No maculopathy

EORD-1 II-2M+MildCRDOptic disc pallor Salt and pepper alterations No maculopathy

CRB1 p.[Cys948Tyr(+)Cys310Tyr]EORD-2MOptic disc pallor Peripheral nummular intraretinal pigmentation No maculopathyCataract

CRB1 p.[Cys948Tyr]+[Asp491Val]EORD-3F+ (since the age of 5)Strong (since early age)Absent (4.10yrs)Hyperaemic optic disc Retina vessel attenuation Midperipheral pigment alterations Pseudopapilledema Bull's maculopathy (4yrs)

CRB1 p.[Gln362X (+)Gln362X]EORD-4MAbsent (5yrs)Peripheral nummular intraretinal pigmentation No maculopathyCataract

CRB1 p.[Arg764Cys (+)Arg764Cys ]EORD-5F+ (since the age of 13-14)-Absent (12yrs)Normal (12yrs)Pseudopapilledema Maculopathy (edema) Coats reaction (OD) Mid-peripheral spicular intraretinal pigmentation Excavation optic disc (OS)SCP Cataract (OD) Glaucoma

RPE65 p.[Arg44Gln] +[Arg44Gln]LCA-43FStrong (since the age of 13-14)(searches for light)Absent (7mo & 2yrs)R/B(not R/Y) (4yrs)Discrete retinal vessel attenuation Normal fundus Very small white intraretinal flecks in mid- and far periphery No preretinal fibrosis (4yrs)Esotropia

RPE65 p.[Pro181Leu]+[Pro181Leu]LCA-44M+(searches for light)Absent (5mo & 4yrs)DisturbedRetinal vessel attenuation Discrete RPE alterations (5mo) Optic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation Mild thinning of inferior retina Limited midperipheral intraretinal pigmentation Well-preserved macula (7yrs)

RPE65 p.[Arg234X]+[Trp331dup] (LCA-45a) and p.[Trp331dup]+[Trp331dup] (LCA-45b)LCA-45a LCA-45bFOptic disc pallor Depigmentations and round hyperpigmentations

RPE65 p.Leu341Ser p.Ser121LeufsX6 (de novo)LCA-46FRetinal vessel attenuation Limited but clear peripheral outer retinal atrophy No intraretinal pigmentation Relative preservation of essentially normal macula (21yrs)

RPE65 p.[Phe530Leu fsX40]+[Phe5 30LeufsX40]LCA-47M+(searches for light)Absent (9mo & 9yrs)G/B R/0/POptic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation No pigmentation (5yrs) Normal optic discs Retinal vessel attenuation Discrete retinal thinning Cellophane maculopathy Limited macular pigment alterations Peripheral hypopigmentation Small discrete peripheral white flecks Total absence of AF (9yrs)Eyepoking Cataract (very limited posterior lens opacification) Semimydriasis (ODS)

RPE65 p.[Phe530Leu fsX40]+[Arg1 24X]LCA-48MAbsent (4mo & 1yr)BasicOptic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation Outer retinal atrophy especially in inferior midperiphery Relative sparing of the macula. Mild preretinal macular fibrosis

RPE65 p.[Phe530Leu fsX40]+[Splic e defect]LCA-49MStrong(searches for light)Absent (1.9yrs)BasicRetinal vessel attenuation No pigment alterations Normal macula (1yr&4.3yrs) Peripheral pigment alterations (6yrs) Normal optic disc Limited retinal vessel attenuation Peripheral RPE alterations without intraretinal pigment Very limited foveal pigment alterationsSemimydriasis

RPE65 p.[Arg296LysfsX7]+[Splice defect]LCA-50FAbsent (5mo)Normal vessels Mild RPE alterations No hyperpigmentation Normal maculaEsotropia Hypertropia

GUCY2D p.[Pro130Leuf sX36 (+)Splice defect]LCA-51MAbsent (11mo&3yrs)Normal fundusEyepoking

GUCY2D p.[Phe565Ser(+)Phe565Ser]LCA-52MAbsent (6mo)Normal fundusEyepoking Enophthalmos

GUCY2D p.[Arg768Trp(+)Arg768Trp]LCA-53M

GUCY2D p.[Arg768Trp] +[Phe565Ser]LCA-54F+ (since early age)+ (since the age of2.6)Absent (3mo)Normal fundus (1yr & 3.2yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Esotropia

GUCY2D p.[Arg768Trp] +[Lys866Asn]LCA-55MAbsent (4.4yrs)-Pseudopapilledema Essentially normal fundus Limited peripheral salt and pepper alterations Limited hyperAF of the central macula (13yrs)Eyepoking

GUCY2D p.[Glu196Val]+[Pro711Leu]LCA-56F-StrongAbsent (3mo)Basic Strong R/G andB/Y defectOptic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation Limited peripheral outer retinal atrophy No intraretinal pigmentation Normal macula Foveolar yellowish atrophy No hyper- or hypoAF (25yrs)Eyepoking Enophthalmos Esotropia Keratoconus with acute hydrops (OD>OS) (16yrs)

GUCY2D p.Pro575LeuLCA-57F+Absent (3.3yrs)Severely disturbedOptic disc hypoplasia Bull's maculopathy

AIPL1 p.[Trp278X]+[ Trp278X]LCA-58 (Yzer, Leroy et al. 2006)FMildAbsent (3mo & 1yr)Bull's eye maculopathy, diffuse RPE alterations; limited intraretinal pigment migration of spicular type; sub- or deep intraretinal fine white deposits predominantly along vascular arcades

AIPL1 p.[Trp278X (+)Trp278X]LCA-59M+ (since the age of4.10)Absent (2yrs)Retinal vessel attenuation No intraretinal pigmentation Macular pigment alterations (5yrs)Eyepoking

AIPL1 p.[Trp278X (+)Trp278X]LCA-60MNormal optic discs Retinal vessel attenuation Peripheral outer retinal atrophy Spicular intraretinal pigmentation Total outer retinal aplasia of central macula, surrounded by thin rim of hyperplastic RPE (28yrs)

AIPL1 p.[Trp278X]+[ Trp278X]LCA-61F+Strong (after first decade)Absent (3mo & 6mo)Limited optic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation Extensive outer retinal atrophy Mid and far-peripheral spicular pigmentation Better preserved macula with central yellow atrophy (19yrs)Eyepoking Esotropia

AIPL1 p.[Thr114Ile; Pro376Ser]LCA-62FAbsent (1.4yrs)Optic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuationEyepoking

CRX p.Tyr142CysLCA-63MAbsent (6mo)Eyepoking

CRX p.Val242MetLCA-64M

RDH12 p.[Ala269Glyf sX2]+[Val233Asp]EORD-6MOptic disc pallor Retinal vessel attenuation Salt and pepper alterations

RDH12 p.[Ala269Glyf sX2]+[Ser175Leu]EORD-7M+ (since early age)+Absent (3.5yrs)Basic (5.10yrs)Limited retinal vessel attenuation Better preservation of the chorioretina in the posterior pole than in the periphery Clear retinal pigment epithelium alterations Peripheral areas of preserved chorioretina alternating with areas of total atrophy with predominant spicular intraretinal pigmentation (5yrs) Retinal vessel attenuation Yellowish discoloration of central macula More prominent spicular intraretinal pigmentation Areas with complete preservation of peripheral chorioretina (19yrs)Esotropia

RDH12 p.[Ala269Glyf sX2(+)Ala269 GlyfsX2]EORD-8

RPGRIP1 p.Arg890XLCA-65Strong

Supp. Table S3

Clinical data of 80 patients with mutation(s) in one of the LCA genes Part II

BCVA (age)Refraction (age)


GenePatient n°GenderNystODOSODOSVFMTSNeurological FeaturesKidneyOther Features
CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Cys 998X]LCA-1MLP?LP?+5+5Normal MRI

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Cys 998X]LCA-2M+20/600 (1yr&5yrs)20/600 (1yr&5yrs)+7+7-

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Arg 108X]LCA-3M+2/24 (6yrs)2/24 (6yrs)+7 (3mo) +8.25 (6yrs)+7 (3mo) +8.25 (6yrs)MRI: Broadened supertentorial ventricular system without signs of intracranial hypertension (11mo)Mild MR AutismRDI Daytime incontine nce Normal kidney US (6.10yrs)Growth retardation (length and weigth) Prematurity (36w)

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X(+)Gln 899X]LCA-4F+NLP (since birth)NLP (since birth)-

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X(+)Arg 1465X]LCA-5MNLP (1.8yrs&8yrs)NLP (1.8yrs& 8yrs)+6 (4mo)+6 (4mo)TDM brains: modest cortical atrophy with limited subdural bifrontal fluid collection (4mo) EEG: normal (4mo)MEI

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Lys 1575X]LCA-6F+1.5/24 (3.6yrs) 1/20 (18.5yrs)3/36 (3.6yrs) 2/10 (18.5yrs)+4 (18yrs)+4 (18yrs)ReducedMRI: slightly broadened lateral ventricles (3.4yrs)Learning disabilityNormal kidney US, normal kidney function (3yrs)

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X(+)Lys 1575X]LCA-7M+CF at 2m (21yrs) LP with incomplete loc (49yrs)CF at 2m (21yrs) HM at 2m (49yrs)+3.5 (42yrs)+3.5 (42yrs)30° (35yrs & 49yrs)-

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X(+)Lys 1575X]LCA-8F+1/60 (6yrs) HM 2m (30yrs)1/36 (6yrs) HM 1.5m (30yrs)+5+5-

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Arg 1782X]LCA-9M+1/20 (6yrs)1/20 (6yrs)+2.25+2.2510° (6yrs)Normal MRI-

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Asp 128GlufsX17]LCA-10F+NLPNLP+4+4Normal MRI (10yrs)-Normal kidney US (10yrs)Obesity

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Glu 146GlyfsX17]LCA-11MREMNLPNLP+8+8Normal MRI-

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X(+)Arg 621IlefsX2]LCA-12M+NLPNLP+10 (6mo)+10 (6mo)-Normal kidney US (1yr)

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X(+)Leu 1141PhefsX5]LCA-13FNLPNLP+8+8Normal CT scan MRI: 2 atypical white matter lesions (17yrs-19yrs)MR Epilepsy

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Thr 1334IlefsX2]LCA-14F+LP? (7mo) NLP (7.8yrs)LP? (7mo) NLP (7.8yrs)MRI: slightly broadened lateral ventricles (5mo)-Limited ventricle septum defect (VSD): slow closure, Asthma Familial palatoschisis Brother died from SIDS

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X(+)Glu 1656Asnf sX3]LCA-15 (Perrault, Delphin et al. 2007)M+LPLPHypermetr ia hypermetr opic (strong)Hypermetr ia hypermetr opic (strong)Normal MRI (1.3yrs)Dev del Autism?Discrete scoliosis

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Ala 1832ProfsX19]LCA-16M+NLPNLP+8+8-Obesitas

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Lys 1840ArgfsX5]LCA-17M+LP No locLP No loc+7+7Autism Normal IQCarrier of a non-pathogenic translocation : 45,XY,t(13;14) (father has the same)

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Glu 1956GlyfsX9]LCA-18M+LP No loc (early in life)LP No loc (early in life)Conc constrNormal CT scan (5mo)Non-verbal learning disability Ataxia (Mild) Dyspraxia (10yrs) Balance and coordinatio n problemsNormal kidney US (5mo)

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Splice defect]LCA-19M+NLP (since birth)NLP (since birth)MRI: Frontal and temporal cortical atrophyAutism Mild-moderate MR Verbal IQ = 55 Coordinati on problemsNormal kidney US (6mo)

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X(+)Splice defect]LCA-20 (Yzer, Leroy et al. 2006)F+<1/20 (45yrs) NLP (54yrs)<1/20 (45yrs) NLP (54yrs)Severe MRMeningitis (6w)

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X]+[Splice defect]LCA-21M+LPLP+5+5Normal CT scanMild MR ADHD Movement abnormalitiesChrom dupl 14q24-32.3 (< mother: carrier of a balanced translocation)

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X(+)Splice defect]LCA-22M-LPLP-

CEP290 p.[Cys99 8X(+)Splice defect]LCA-23F+LP?LP?(1.2yrs)Severe MR Dev Del Epilepsy Axial hypotonia (mild)Kidney US: hyperden sity (3yrs) No other signs of NPHP (17yrs)Hyperlax ligaments Hyperlordosis

CEP290 p.[Lys157 5X(+)Lys 1575X]LCA-24MSevere MR

CEP290 p.[Lys157 5X]+[Ala 1566Pro]LCA-25M+20/600 (9mo) 1/60 (5yrs)20/600 (9mo) 1/24 (5yrs)+3.5 (9yrs)+3.5 (9yrs)10°- 15° paracent ralNormal MRI (4mo)-

CEP290 p.[Leu1694Pro]+[=,splice site]LCA-26+5/60 (3yrs) 1/10 (4.5yrs)5/60 (3yrs) 1/10 (4.5yrs)+3.25 (4.5yrs)+3 (4.5yrs)

CEP290 p.Cys998XLCA-27M+0.160.1650°-

CEP290 p.[Trp7C ys]+[Trp7Cys]SLS-1F+No reaction on light (2mo)No reaction on light (2mo)>+4>+4-?-No ataxia/hypotoniaUTI RDI CKD5 (5yrs) RTx (6yrs)Glue ear Clinodactyly Sibling died shortly after birth (enlarged kidneys, chrom 6 defect)

CEP290 p.[Lys157 5X(+)Arg 1465X]SLS-2F+LP with locLP with loc<20° (14yrs)Broadened 4th ventricleMild MR Balance problemsDiagnosi s renal insufficie ncy (30yrs) RDI Peritonea l dialysis (34yrs) Kidney transplan t (34yrs)Syncopes Scoliosis

CEP290 p.[Lys157 5X(+)Arg 1465X]SLS-3MNLPNLPModerate MR Severe autism Mild ataxiaRDI (7yrs) Kidney US: hyperden sity (13yrs) CKD5 (16yrs) Peritoneal dialysis (since the age of 17)Recurrent OM

CEP290 p.[Lys157 5X(+)Arg 1465X]CORS-1 (Brancati, Barrano et al. 2007)F+LP with locLP with loc+10, +12+10, +12+Severe MR Ataxia Balance problemsRDI (6yrs) Kidney US: hyperden sity (6yrs) CKD5 (14yrs) Deceased (16yrs)Scoliosis Recurrent OM Congenital chylothorax Alternating tachypnea Syncopes

CEP290 p.[Gln126 5X]+[Splice defect]LCA-JS-1M+1/1001/100+5+5tubular+ (4yrs)Hypotonia Walking problems

CEP290 p.[Thr24 57AlafsX27]+[Thr2457AlafsX27]LCA-JS-2 II-1F+1.5/101/10+5+510°+Walking problems

LCA-JS-2 II-2A+1/201/20+4.5+3.510°+Mild MR Walking problems

CEP290 p.[Leu24 48ThrfsX 8(+)Splice defect]LCA-JS-3MREMNLP (since birth)NLP (since birth)+Severe psychomot or retardation Hypotonia No ataxiaNormal kidney US (1yr)Scoliosis

CRB1 p.[Lys801X(+)Lys801X]LCA-28M1/1001/100

CRB1 p.[Lys801X(+)Gln362X]LCA-29 (Yzer, Leroy et al. 2006)M+20/600 (1yr) 1/30 (7.9yrs) 1/40 (25 yrs)20/600 (1yr) <1/50 (7.9yrs) 1/40 (25 yrs)+2.25 (30.6yrs) (astigm)+1.88 (30.6yrs) (astigm)OD:central residual visual field, OS: temporal inferior and partially superior visual field intact (30.6yrs)-

CRB1 p.[Lys801X]+[Arg7 64Cys]LCA-30M

CRB1 p.[Lys801X]+[Cys8 96X]LCA-31 (Yzer, Leroy et al. 2006)M+HM on 20 cm (3mo & 6yrs)HM on 20 cm (3mo & 6yrs)+10+9.5-

CRB1 p.[Lys801X(+)Cys8 96X]LCA-32 (Yzer, Leroy et al. 2006)F+1/100 (1yr) < 1/600 (35yrs)1/100 (1yr) < 1/600 (35yrs)+4 (19yrs)+4 (19yrs)40°; remaining temporal crescent (19yrs)Asthma Torticollis (to the left)

CRB1 p.[Lys801X(+)Cys9 48Tyr]LCA-33F+CF at 1m (until 8yrs) HM at 0.5m (9yrs)CF at 1m (until 8yrs) CF at 10cm (9yrs)+4+410°-

CRB1 p.[Lys801X]+[Splice defect]LCA-34F+20/800 (1.11yrs)20/800 (1.11yrs)+5+5Remaining island in peripher al field-

CRB1 p.[Cys94 8Tyr(+)Cys948Tyr]LCA-35FLPLP

CRB1 p.[Cys94 8Tyr(+)Glu1330X]LCA-36F+LPLP-

CRB1 p.[Cys94 8Tyr]+[Splice defect]LCA-37M+LP (decreased since the age of 13)LP (decreased since the age of 13)Normal CT scan-

CRB1 p.[Cys94 8Tyr]+[S plice defect]LCA-38M+0.07 LP with localisation (17yrs)0.07 LP with localisation (17yrs)+9+910°Normal CT scan (5.9yrs)-

CRB1 p.[Cys94 8Tyr]+[Splice defect] (LCA-39a) and p. [Splice defect]+[ Splice defect] (LCA-39b)LCA-39aF+1.5/36 (4.9yrs) HM1m (15.1 1yrs)2/36 (4.9yrs) HM1m (15.1 1yrs)+4.75+5.2510°-

LCA-39bM0.080.0810°-20°-

CRB1 p. [Splice defect(+) Splice defect]LCA-40M+0.08 (3yrs) LP (22 yrs)0.08 (3yrs) NLP (22 yrs)<10°Normal CT scan-

CRB1 p.[Leu81 4ArgfsX23]+[Cys1240ProfsX24]LCA-41 II-1F+3/10 (8yrs) CF at 15cm (37yrs)3/10 (8yrs) CF at 15cm (37yrs)+9+930-50°-

LCA-41 II-2F+1/20 (14yrs) 1/20 (28yrs)1/100 (14yrs) CF at 50cm (28yrs)+4.5 Astigm+1.5 Astigm50-60° horizont ally 70° vertically-

CRB1 p.[Trp129 3X(+)Trp 1293X]LCA-42F2/10 (2yrs) LP4/10 (2yrs) LP+5+510°-

CRB1 p.[Cys948Tyr]+[Lys801X]EORD-1 II-1F-1/501/50+6+660°-

EORD-1 II-2M1/501/20+3+310°-

CRB1 p.[Cys94 8Tyr(+)C ys310Tyr]EORD-2MLPNLP++10°-

CRB1 p.[Cys94 8Tyr]+[A sp491Valt]EORD-3F+2/10 (4yrs) 1/20 (11.9yrs)2/10 (4yrs) 1/20 (11.9yrs)+4.5 (10.10yrs)+4.5 (10.10yrs)Complet e (4yrs) 15°-30° (11yrs)MRI: subcortical white matter lesions, frontal (right) in centrum semi-ovaleLearning disability (but normal IQ)

CRB1 p.[Gln362X (+)Gln36 2X]EORD-4M+3/10 (16yrs) LP3/10 (16yrs) LP+6+610°-

CRB1 p.[Arg764Cys(+)Arg764Cys]EORD-5F-5/10 (until 5yrs) LP no loc (18.4yrs)7/10 (until 5yrs) HM (18.4yrs)+2D (12yrs) +5D+3D (12yrs) +5D30° (12yrs) Absent (19yrs)-Normal kidney US

RPE65 p.[Arg44 Gln]+[Ar g44Gln]LCA-43F+1/201/20+4.5 (7mo)+4.5 (7mo)Conc constrNormal MRIMR AutismObesitas

RPE65 p.[Pro181Leu]+[Pro181Leu]LCA-44M+1/10 (4yrs & 9yrs)3/10 (4yrs & 9yrs)-6-6Normal CT scan andEEG (5mo)Behavioural anomaliesNormal kidney US (2yrs)Mild perceptive hearing loss (Cx26 negative)

RPE65 p.[Arg23 4X]+[Trp 331dup] (LCA-45a) and p.[Trp331dup]+[Trp331dup] (LCA-45b)LCA-45aF<1/20<1/20

LCA-45b

RPE65 p.Leu341Ser p.Ser121 LeufsX6 (de novo)LCA-46F

RPE65 p.[Phe530LeufsX40]+[Phe530LeufsX40]LCA-47M+1/10 (5yrs) 5/100 (9yrs)1/10 (5yrs) 5/100 (9yrs)+4 (9yrs)+4.5 (9yrs)Moderate conc constrAttention deficit disorder

RPE65 p.[Phe530LeufsX40]+[Arg124X]LCA-48M+15/100 (5yrs) 2/10 (10yrs)12/100 (5yrs) 2/10 (10yrs)-2.25-2.540°-

RPE65 p.[Phe530LeufsX40]+[Splice defect]LCA-49M+ (compensatory head movements)< 0.035 (4.3yrs) 1/60 (10yrs)0.1 (4.3yrs) 1/20 (10yrs)+1.5 (20mo) +2.6 (10yrs)+2.5 (20mo) +1 (10yrs)Moderate conc constrNormal MRI (9mo)-

RPE65 p.[Arg296LysfsX7]+[Splice defect]LCA-50F+1/10 (3yrs)1/10 (3yrs)+5 (8mo)+5.75 (8mo)Normal MRI (7mo)

GUCY2D p. [Pro130LeufsX36 (+)Splice defect]LCA-51M+NLPNLP

GUCY2D p.[Phe565 Ser(+)Phe565Ser]LCA-52M+LPLP+4+4Normal MRI-US: hydro-uretero-nephrosis

GUCY2D p.[Arg768Trp(+)Arg768Trp]LCA-53M

GUCY2D p.[Arg768Trp]+[Phe565Ser]LCA-54F+1/600 (4.9yrs)1/120 (4.9yrs)+3.75 (4.7yrs)+4.25 (4.7yrs)Constricted (2.6yrs)-

GUCY2D p.[Arg76 8Trp]+[Lys866Asn]LCA-55M+LPLP+9+910°MR autism

GUCY2D p.[Glu196Val]+[Pro711Leu]LCA-56F+1/30 (5.5yrs) 3/100 (23yrs)1/30 (5.5yrs) 3/100 (23yrs)+6+6Moderate conc constr-

GUCY2D p.Pro575 LeuLCA-57F+6/606/36-6-6MRI: hypoplasia optic nervesMR

AIPL1 p.[Trp278X]+[Trp278X]LCA-58 (Yzer, Leroy et al. 2006)F<20/600 (3yrs) 1/50 (8 yrs)<20/600 (3yrs) 1/50 (8 yrs)+8+8Normal CT scan-

AIPL1 p.[Trp278X (+)Trp278X]LCA-59M+<1/50 (2yrs) 1/100 (4.10yrs)<1/50 (2yrs) 1/100 (4.10yrs)+3.5D (2.5yrs)?Normal CT scan (6mo)Mild Developmental delay

AIPL1 p.[Trp278X (+)Trp278X]LCA-60M

AIPL1 p.[Trp278X]+[Trp278X]LCA-61F+<1/100 (7yrs) LP with limited loc (21yrs)<1/100 (7yrs) LP with limited loc (21yrs)+6+620° (7yrs) Residual pericentral remnants (21yrs)Normal CT scan (10mo)-

AIPL1 p.[Thr114 Ile; Pro376Ser]LCA-62F+1/101/10Normal MRI-

CRX p.Tyr142 CysLCA-63M+LPLP+9+9-

CRX p.Val242 MetLCA-64M

RDH12 p.[Ala269 GlyfsX2] +[Val233Asp]EORD-6M-5/10 (4yrs) 1/10 (23yrs)5/10 (4yrs) 1/10 (23yrs)30° (8yrs) 5° (12yrs)Normal CT scan-

RDH12 p.[Ala269 GlyfsX2] +[Ser175Leu]EORD-7M+3/9 (3.5yrs) HM (19yrs)3/9 (3.5yrs) 1.5/10 (19yrs)OD: temporal crescent, OS: 70° (6yrs) OD: status-quo OS: central 5° (19.3yrs)-

RDH12 p.[Ala269 GlyfsX2(+)Ala269 GlyfsX2]EORD-8M4/104/1010°

RPGRIP1 p.Arg890XLCA-65M1/101/1010°

If available, the age of the first and last measurement is mentioned between brackets. A question mark indicates an uncertain status. Blank fields indicate features for which no information could be obtained. Clinical data on the two patients included in the Phase I clinical trial for RPE65 gene-replacement therapy (LCA-47 and LCA-49) concern the period preceding therapy. Characteristics described in “Other features” are binocular, if not mentioned otherwise.

Abbreviations used: N°, number;; nyst, nystagmus; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; OD, right eye; OS, left eye; ODS, both eyes; ERG, electroretinogram; VF, visual field; MTS, molar tooth sign; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MR, mental retardation; NPHP, nephronophtisis; SE, spherical equivalent; +, present; -, absent; yr(s), year(s); mo, month(s); W, week(s); REM, roving eye movements; HM, hand motion; LP, light perception; NLP, no light perception; CF, counting fingers; AF, autofluorescence; OCT, optical coherence tomography; US, ultrasound; SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome; conc constr, concentrically constricted; G, green; B, blue; R, red; O, orange; P, pink; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; PPRPE, preserved para-arteriolar retinal pigment epithelium; astigm, astigmatism; loc, localization; CRD, cone-rod dystrophy; SCP, subcapsularis posterior; dev del, developmental delay; MEI, middle ear infections; RDI, renal diabetes insipidus; CKD5, renal failure; RTx, transplantation.

REFERENCES

  • Baala L, Audollent S, Martinovic J, Ozilou C, Babron MC, Sivanandamoorthy S, Saunier S, Salomon R, Gonzales M, Rattenberry E, Esculpavit C, Toutain A, Moraine C, Parent P, Marcorelles P, Dauge MC, Roume J, Le Merrer M, Meiner V, Meir K, Menez F, Beaufrere AM, Francannet C, Tantau J, Sinico M, Dumez Y, MacDonald F, Munnich A, Lyonnet S, Gubler MC, Genin E, Johnson CA, Vekemans M, Encha-Razavi F, Attie-Bitach T. Pleiotropic effects of CEP290 (NPHP6) mutations extend to Meckel syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(1):170–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bainbridge JW, Smith AJ, Barker SS, Robbie S, Henderson R, Balaggan K, Viswanathan A, Holder GE, Stockman A, Tyler N, Petersen-Jones S, Bhattacharya SS, Thrasher AJ, Fitzke FW, Carter BJ, Rubin GS, Moore AT, Ali RR. Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(21):2231–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bowne SJ, Sullivan LS, Mortimer SE, Hedstrom L, Zhu J, Spellicy CJ, Gire AI, Hughbanks-Wheaton D, Birch DG, Lewis RA, Heckenlively JR, Daiger SP. Spectrum and frequency of mutations in IMPDH1 associated with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa and leber congenital amaurosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(1):34–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brancati F, Barrano G, Silhavy JL, Marsh SE, Travaglini L, Bielas SL, Amorini M, Zablocka D, Kayserili H, Al-Gazali L, Bertini E, Boltshauser E, D'Hooghe M, Fazzi E, Fenerci EY, Hennekam RC, Kiss A, Lees MM, Marco E, Phadke SR, Rigoli L, Romano S, Salpietro CD, Sherr EH, Signorini S, Stromme P, Stuart B, Sztriha L, Viskochil DH, Yuksel A, Dallapiccola B, Valente EM, Gleeson JG. CEP290 mutations are frequently identified in the oculo-renal form of Joubert syndrome-related disorders. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(1):104–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang B, Khanna H, Hawes N, Jimeno D, He S, Lillo C, Parapuram SK, Cheng H, Scott A, Hurd RE, Sayer JA, Otto EA, Attanasio M, O'Toole JF, Jin G, Shou C, Hildebrandt F, Williams DS, Heckenlively JR, Swaroop A. In-frame deletion in a novel centrosomal/ciliary protein CEP290/NPHP6 perturbs its interaction with RPGR and results in early-onset retinal degeneration in the rd1 6 mouse. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15(11):1847–57. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen S, Wang QL, Xu S, Liu I, Li LY, Wang Y, Zack DJ. Functional analysis of cone-rod homeobox (CRX) mutations associated with retinal dystrophy. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(8):873–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cideciyan AV, Hauswirth WW, Aleman TS, Kaushal S, Schwartz SB, Boye SL, Windsor EA, Conlon TJ, Sumaroka A, Pang JJ, Roman AJ, Byrne BJ, Jacobson SG. Human RPE65 gene therapy for Leber congenital amaurosis: persistence of early visual improvements and safety at 1 year. Hum Gene Ther. 2009;20(9):999–1004. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Coppieters F, Lefever S, Vandesompele J, Leroy BP, De Baere E. CEP290, a gene with many faces: mutation overview and presentation of CEP290base. Hum Mutat. 2010:31. e-pub before print. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • den Hollander AI, Heckenlively JR, van den Born LI, de Kok YJ, van der Velde-Visser SD, Kellner U, Jurklies B, van Schooneveld MJ, Blankenagel A, Rohrschneider K, Wissinger B, Cruysberg JR, Deutman AF, Brunner HG, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Hoyng CB, Cremers FP. Leber congenital amaurosis and retinitis pigmentosa with Coats-like exudative vasculopathy are associated with mutations in the crumbs homologue 1 (CRB1) gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69(1):198–203. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • den Hollander AI, Koenekoop RK, Mohamed MD, Arts HH, Boldt K, Towns KV, Sedmak T, Beer M, Nagel-Wolfrum K, McKibbin M, Dharmaraj S, Lopez I, Ivings L, Williams GA, Springell K, Woods CG, Jafri H, Rashid Y, Strom TM, van der Zwaag B, Gosens I, Kersten FF, van Wijk E, Veltman JA, Zonneveld MN, van Beersum SE, Maumenee IH, Wolfrum U, Cheetham ME, Ueffing M, Cremers FP, Inglehearn CF, Roepman R. Mutations in LCA5, encoding the ciliary protein lebercilin, cause Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet. 2007;39(7):889–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • den Hollander AI, Koenekoop RK, Yzer S, Lopez I, Arends ML, Voesenek KE, Zonneveld MN, Strom TM, Meitinger T, Brunner HG, Hoyng CB, van den Born LI, Rohrschneider K, Cremers FP. Mutations in the CEP290 (NPHP6) gene are a frequent cause of Leber congenital amaurosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79(3):556–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • den Hollander AI, Roepman R, Koenekoop RK, Cremers FP. Leber congenital amaurosis: genes, proteins and disease mechanisms. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27(4):391–419. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • den Hollander AI, ten Brink JB, de Kok YJ, van Soest S, van den Born LI, van Driel MA, van de Pol DJ, Payne AM, Bhattacharya SS, Kellner U, Hoyng CB, Westerveld A, Brunner HG, Bleeker-Wagemakers EM, Deutman AF, Heckenlively JR, Cremers FP, Bergen AA. Mutations in a human homologue of Drosophila crumbs cause retinitis pigmentosa (RP12) Nat Genet. 1999;23(2):217–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dephoure N, Zhou C, Villen J, Beausoleil SA, Bakalarski CE, Elledge SJ, Gygi SP. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(31):10762–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dharmaraj S, Leroy BP, Sohocki MM, Koenekoop RK, Perrault I, Anwar K, Khaliq S, Devi RS, Birch DG, De Pool E, Izquierdo N, Van Maldergem L, Ismail M, Payne AM, Holder GE, Bhattacharya SS, Bird AC, Kaplan J, Maumenee IH. The phenotype of Leber congenital amaurosis in patients with AIPL1 mutations. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(7):1029–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dryja TP, Adams SM, Grimsby JL, McGee TL, Hong DH, Li T, Andreasson S, Berson EL. Null RPGRIP1 alleles in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68(5):1295–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eley L, Gabrielides C, Adams M, Johnson CA, Hildebrandt F, Sayer JA. Jouberin localizes to collecting ducts and interacts with nephrocystin-1. Kidney Int. 2008;74(9):1139–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Frank V, den Hollander AI, Bruchle NO, Zonneveld MN, Nurnberg G, Becker C, Du Bois G, Kendziorra H, Roosing S, Senderek J, Nurnberg P, Cremers FP, Zerres K, Bergmann C. Mutations of the CEP290 gene encoding a centrosomal protein cause Meckel-Gruber syndrome. Hum Mutat. 2008;29(1):45–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Freund CL, Wang QL, Chen S, Muskat BL, Wiles CD, Sheffield VC, Jacobson SG, McInnes RR, Zack DJ, Stone EM. De novo mutations in the CRX homeobox gene associated with Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet. 1998;18(4):311–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Friedman JS, Chang B, Kannabiran C, Chakarova C, Singh HP, Jalali S, Hawes NL, Branham K, Othman M, Filippova E, Thompson DA, Webster AR, Andreasson S, Jacobson SG, Bhattacharya SS, Heckenlively JR, Swaroop A. Premature truncation of a novel protein, RD3, exhibiting subnuclear localization is associated with retinal degeneration. Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79(6):1059–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gerber S, Perrault I, Hanein S, Barbet F, Ducroq D, Ghazi I, Martin-Coignard D, Leowski C, Homfray T, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Kaplan J, Rozet JM. Complete exon-intron structure of the RPGR-interacting protein (RPGRIP1) gene allows the identification of mutations underlying Leber congenital amaurosis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9(8):561–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gu SM, Thompson DA, Srikumari CR, Lorenz B, Finckh U, Nicoletti A, Murthy KR, Rathmann M, Kumaramanickavel G, Denton MJ, Gal A. Mutations in RPE65 cause autosomal recessive childhood-onset severe retinal dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1997;17(2):194–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hagstrom SA, North MA, Nishina PL, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Recessive mutations in the gene encoding the tubby-like protein TULP1 in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Nat Genet. 1998;18(2):174–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hanein S, Perrault I, Gerber S, Tanguy G, Barbet F, Ducroq D, Calvas P, Dollfus H, Hamel C, Lopponen T, Munier F, Santos L, Shalev S, Zafeiriou D, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Rozet JM, Kaplan J. Leber congenital amaurosis: comprehensive survey of the genetic heterogeneity, refinement of the clinical definition, and genotype-phenotype correlations as a strategy for molecular diagnosis. Hum Mutat. 2004;23(4):306–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hanein S, Perrault I, Gerber S, Tanguy G, Rozet JM, Kaplan J. Leber congenital amaurosis: survey of the genetic heterogeneity, refinement of the clinical definition and phenotype-genotype correlations as a strategy for molecular diagnosis. Clinical and molecular survey in LCA. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2006;572:15–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hauswirth WW, Aleman TS, Kaushal S, Cideciyan AV, Schwartz SB, Wang L, Conlon TJ, Boye SL, Flotte TR, Byrne BJ, Jacobson SG. Treatment of leber congenital amaurosis due to RPE65 mutations by ocular subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus gene vector: short-term results of a phase I trial. Hum Gene Ther. 2008;19(10):979–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Helou J, Otto EA, Attanasio M, Allen SJ, Parisi MA, Glass I, Utsch B, Hashmi S, Fazzi E, Omran H, O'Toole JF, Sayer JA, Hildebrandt F. Mutation analysis of NPHP6/CEP290 in patients with Joubert syndrome and Senior-Loken syndrome. J Med Genet. 2007;44(10):657–63. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Henderson RH, Waseem N, Searle R, van der Spuy J, Russell-Eggitt I, Bhattacharya SS, Thompson DA, Holder GE, Cheetham ME, Webster AR, Moore AT. An assessment of the apex microarray technology in genotyping patients with Leber congenital amaurosis and early-onset severe retinal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(12):5684–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hsiao YC, Tong ZJ, Westfall JE, Ault JG, Page-McCaw PS, Ferland RJ. Ahi1, whose human ortholog is mutated in Joubert syndrome, is required for Rab8a localization, ciliogenesis and vesicle trafficking. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(20):3926–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Janecke AR, Thompson DA, Utermann G, Becker C, Hubner CA, Schmid E, McHenry CL, Nair AR, Ruschendorf F, Heckenlively J, Wissinger B, Nurnberg P, Gal A. Mutations in RDH12 encoding a photoreceptor cell retinol dehydrogenase cause childhood-onset severe retinal dystrophy. Nat Genet. 2004;36(8):850–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Keen TJ, Mohamed MD, McKibbin M, Rashid Y, Jafri H, Maumenee IH, Inglehearn CF. Identification of a locus (LCA9) for Leber's congenital amaurosis on chromosome 1p36. Eur J Hum Genet. 2003;11(5):420–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Khanna H, Davis EE, Murga-Zamalloa CA, Estrada-Cuzcano A, Lopez I, den Hollander AI, Zonneveld MN, Othman MI, Waseem N, Chakarova CF, Maubaret C, Diaz-Font A, Macdonald I, Muzny DM, Wheeler DA, Morgan M, Lewis LR, Logan CV, Tan PL, Beer MA, Inglehearn CF, Lewis RA, Jacobson SG, Bergmann C, Beales PL, Attie-Bitach T, Johnson CA, Otto EA, Bhattacharya SS, Hildebrandt F, Gibbs RA, Koenekoop RK, Swaroop A, Katsanis N. A common allele in RPGRIP1L is a modifier of retinal degeneration in ciliopathies. Nat Genet. 2009 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim J, Krishnaswami SR, Gleeson JG. CEP290 interacts with the centriolar satellite component PCM-1 and is required for Rab8 localization to the primary cilium. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(23):3796–805. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Koenekoop RK, Fishman GA, Iannaccone A, Ezzeldin H, Ciccarelli ML, Baldi A, Sunness JS, Lotery AJ, Jablonski MM, Pittler SJ, Maumenee I. Electroretinographic abnormalities in parents of patients with Leber congenital amaurosis who have heterozygous GUCY2D mutations. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(10):1325–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Koenekoop RK, Lopez I, den Hollander AI, Allikmets R, Cremers FP. Genetic testing for retinal dystrophies and dysfunctions: benefits, dilemmas and solutions. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2007;35(5):473–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kroes HY, van Zon PH, Fransen van de Putte D, Nelen MR, Nievelstein RJ, Wittebol-Post D, van Nieuwenhuizen O, Mancini GM, van der Knaap MS, Kwee ML, Maas SM, Cobben JM, De Nef JE, Lindhout D, Sinke RJ. DNA analysis of AHI1, NPHP1 and CYCLIN D1 in Joubert syndrome patients from the Netherlands. Eur J Med Genet. 2008;51(1):24–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee SA, Belyaeva OV, Popov IK, Kedishvili NY. Overproduction of bioactive retinoic acid in cells expressing disease-associated mutants of retinol dehydrogenase 12. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(49):35621–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Leigh MW, Pittman JE, Carson JL, Ferkol TW, Dell SD, Davis SD, Knowles MR, Zariwala MA. Clinical and genetic aspects of primary ciliary dyskinesia/Kartagener syndrome. Genet Med. 2009;11(7):473–87. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Leitch CC, Zaghloul NA, Davis EE, Stoetzel C, Diaz-Font A, Rix S, Al-Fadhel M, Lewis RA, Eyaid W, Banin E, Dollfus H, Beales PL, Badano JL, Katsanis N. Hypomorphic mutations in syndromic encephalocele genes are associated with Bardet-Biedl syndrome. Nat Genet. 2008;40(4):443–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li D, Roberts R. WD-repeat proteins: structure characteristics, biological function, and their involvement in human diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001;58(14):2085–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li Y, Wang H, Peng J, Gibbs RA, Lewis RA, Lupski JR, Mardon G, Chen R. Mutation survey of known LCA genes and loci in the Saudi Arabian population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(3):1336–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lotery AJ, Jacobson SG, Fishman GA, Weleber RG, Fulton AB, Namperumalsamy P, Heon E, Levin AV, Grover S, Rosenow JR, Kopp KK, Sheffield VC, Stone EM. Mutations in the CRB1 gene cause Leber congenital amaurosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(3):415–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lotery AJ, Namperumalsamy P, Jacobson SG, Weleber RG, Fishman GA, Musarella MA, Hoyt CS, Heon E, Levin A, Jan J, Lam B, Carr RE, Franklin A, Radha S, Andorf JL, Sheffield VC, Stone EM. Mutation analysis of 3 genes in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(4):538–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Louie CM, Caridi G, Lopes VS, Brancati F, Kispert A, Lancaster MA, Schlossman AM, Otto EA, Leitges M, Grone HJ, Lopez I, Gudiseva HV, O'Toole JF, Vallespin E, Ayyagari R, Ayuso C, Cremers FP, den Hollander AI, Koenekoop RK, Dallapiccola B, Ghiggeri GM, Hildebrandt F, Valente EM, Williams DS, Gleeson JG. AHI1 is required for photoreceptor outer segment development and is a modifier for retinal degeneration in nephronophthisis. Nat Genet. 2010;42(2):175–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire AM, High KA, Auricchio A, Wright JF, Pierce EA, Testa F, Mingozzi F, Bennicelli JL, Ying GS, Rossi S, Fulton A, Marshall KA, Banfi S, Chung DC, Morgan JI, Hauck B, Zelenaia O, Zhu X, Raffini L, Coppieters F, De Baere E, Shindler KS, Volpe NJ, Surace EM, Acerra C, Lyubarsky A, Redmond TM, Stone E, Sun J, McDonnell JW, Leroy BP, Simonelli F, Gauderman JB. Age-dependent effects of RPE65 gene therapy for Leber's congenital amaurosis: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9701):1597–605. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Maguire AM, Simonelli F, Pierce EA, Pugh EN, Jr., Mingozzi F, Bennicelli J, Banfi S, Marshall KA, Testa F, Surace EM, Rossi S, Lyubarsky A, Arruda VR, Konkle B, Stone E, Sun J, Jacobs J, Dell'Osso L, Hertle R,, Ma JX, Redmond TM, Zhu X, Hauck B, Zelenaia O, Shindler KS, Maguire MG, Wright JF, Volpe NJ, McDonnell JW, Auricchio A, High KA, Bennett J. Safety and efficacy of gene transfer for Leber's congenital amaurosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(21):2240–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marlhens F, Bareil C, Griffoin JM, Zrenner E, Amalric P, Eliaou C, Liu SY, Harris E, Redmond TM, Arnaud B, Claustres M, Hamel CP. Mutations in RPE65 cause Leber's congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet. 1997;17(2):139–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morimura H, Fishman GA, Grover SA, Fulton AB, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Mutations in the RPE65 gene in patients with autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa or leber congenital amaurosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(6):3088–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Perrault I, Delphin N, Hanein S, Gerber S, Dufier JL, Roche O, Defoort-Dhellemmes S, Dollfus H, Fazzi E, Munnich A, Kaplan J, Rozet JM. Spectrum of NPHP6/CEP290 mutations in Leber congenital amaurosis and delineation of the associated phenotype. Hum Mutat. 2007;28(4):416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Perrault I, Hanein S, Gerber S, Barbet F, Ducroq D, Dollfus H, Hamel C, Dufier JL, Munnich A, Kaplan J, Rozet JM. Retinal dehydrogenase 12 (RDH12) mutations in leber congenital amaurosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75(4):639–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Perrault I, Rozet JM, Calvas P, Gerber S, Camuzat A, Dollfus H, Chatelin S, Souied E, Ghazi I, Leowski C, Bonnemaison M, Le Paslier D, Frezal J, Dufier JL, Pittler S, Munnich A, Kaplan J. Retinal-specific guanylate cyclase gene mutations in Leber's congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet. 1996;14(4):461–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rivolta C, Peck NE, Fulton AB, Fishman GA, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Novel frameshift mutations in CRX associated with Leber congenital amaurosis. Hum Mutat. 2001;18(6):550–1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sayer JA, Otto EA, O'Toole JF, Nurnberg G, Kennedy MA, Becker C, Hennies HC, Helou J, Attanasio M, Fausett BV, Utsch B, Khanna H, Liu Y, Drummond I, Kawakami I, Kusakabe T, Tsuda M, Ma L, Lee H, Larson RG, Allen SJ, Wilkinson CJ, Nigg EA, Shou C, Lillo C, Williams DS, Hoppe B, Kemper MJ, Neuhaus T, Parisi MA, Glass IA, Petry M, Kispert A, Gloy J, Ganner A, Walz G, Zhu X, Goldman D, Nurnberg P, Swaroop A, Leroux MR, Hildebrandt F. The centrosomal protein nephrocystin-6 is mutated in Joubert syndrome and activates transcription factor ATF4. Nat Genet. 2006;38(6):674–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Seong MW, Kim SY, Yu YS, Hwang JM, Kim JY, Park SS. Molecular characterization of Leber congenital amaurosis in Koreans. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1429–36. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shu X, Black GC, Rice JM, Hart-Holden N, Jones A, O'Grady A, Ramsden S, Wright AF. RPGR mutation analysis and disease: an update. Hum Mutat. 2007;28(4):322–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Simonelli F, Ziviello C, Testa F, Rossi S, Fazzi E, Bianchi PE, Fossarello M, Signorini S, Bertone C, Galantuomo S, Brancati F, Valente EM, Ciccodicola A, Rinaldi E, Auricchio A, Banfi S. Clinical and molecular genetics of Leber's congenital amaurosis: a multicenter study of Italian patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(9):4284–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Simovich MJ, Miller B, Ezzeldin H, Kirkland BT, McLeod G, Fulmer C, Nathans J, Jacobson SG, Pittler SJ. Four novel mutations in the RPE65 gene in patients with Leber congenital amaurosis. Hum Mutat. 2001;18(2):164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sohocki MM, Bowne SJ, Sullivan LS, Blackshaw S, Cepko CL, Payne AM, Bhattacharya SS, Khaliq S, Qasim Mehdi S, Birch DG, Harrison WR, Elder FF, Heckenlively JR, Daiger SP. Mutations in a new photoreceptor-pineal gene on 17p cause Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat Genet. 2000a;24(1):79–83. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sohocki MM, Perrault I, Leroy BP, Payne AM, Dharmaraj S, Bhattacharya SS, Kaplan J, Maumenee IH, Koenekoop R, Meire FM, Birch DG, Heckenlively JR, Daiger SP. Prevalence of AIPL1 mutations in inherited retinal degenerative disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2000b;70(2):142–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stone EM. Leber congenital amaurosis – a model for efficient genetic testing of heterogeneous disorders: LXIV Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(6):791–811. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sundaresan P, Vijayalakshmi P, Thompson S, Ko AC, Fingert JH, Stone EM. Mutations that are a common cause of Leber congenital amaurosis in northern America are rare in Southern India. Mol Vis. 2009;15:1781–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Swain PK, Chen S, Wang QL, Affatigato LM, Coats CL, Brady KD, Fishman GA, Jacobson SG, Swaroop A, Stone E, Sieving PA, Zack DJ. Mutations in the cone-rod homeobox gene are associated with the cone-rod dystrophy photoreceptor degeneration. Neuron. 1997;19(6):1329–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson DA, Li Y, McHenry CL, Carlson TJ, Ding X, Sieving PA, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Gal A. Mutations in the gene encoding lecithin retinol acyltransferase are associated with early-onset severe retinal dystrophy. Nat Genet. 2001;28(2):123–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tory K, Lacoste T, Burglen L, Moriniere V, Boddaert N, Macher MA, Llanas B, Nivet H, Bensman A, Niaudet P, Antignac C, Salomon R, Saunier S. High NPHP1 and NPHP6 mutation rate in patients with Joubert syndrome and nephronophthisis: potential epistatic effect of NPHP6 and AHI1 mutations in patients with NPHP1 mutations. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(5):1566–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Travaglini L, Brancati F, Attie-Bitach T, Audollent S, Bertini E, Kaplan J, Perrault I, Iannicelli M, Mancuso B, Rigoli L, Rozet JM, Swistun D, Tolentino J, Dallapiccola B, Gleeson JG, Valente EM, Zankl A, Leventer R, Grattan-Smith P, Janecke A, D'Hooghe M, Sznajer Y, Van Coster R, Demerleir L, Dias K, Moco C, Moreira A, Kim CA, Maegawa G, Petkovic D, Abdel-Salam GM, Abdel-Aleem A, Zaki MS, Marti I, Quijano-Roy S, Sigaudy S, de Lonlay P, Romano S, Touraine R, Koenig M, Lagier-Tourenne C, Messer J, Collignon P, Wolf N, Philippi H, Kitsiou Tzeli S, Halldorsson S, Johannsdottir J, Ludvigsson P, Phadke SR, Udani V, Stuart B, Magee A, Lev D, Michelson M, Ben-Zeev B, Fischetto R, Benedicenti F, Stanzial F, Borgatti R, Accorsi P, Battaglia S, Fazzi E, Giordano L, Pinelli L, Boccone L, Bigoni S, Ferlini A, Donati MA, Caridi G, Divizia MT, Faravelli F, Ghiggeri G, Pessagno A, Briguglio M, Briuglia S, Salpietro CD, Tortorella G, Adami A, Castorina P, Lalatta F, Marra G, Riva D, Scelsa B, Spaccini L, Uziel G, Del Giudice E, Laverda AM, Ludwig K, Permunian A, Suppiej A, Signorini S, Uggetti C, Battini R, Di Giacomo M, Cilio MR, Di Sabato ML, Leuzzi V, Parisi P, Pollazzon M, Silengo M, De Vescovi R, Greco D, Romano C, Cazzagon M, Simonati A, Al-Tawari AA, Bastaki L, Megarbane A, Sabolic Avramovska V, de Jong MM, Stromme P, Koul R, Rajab A, Azam M, Barbot C, Martorell Sampol L, Rodriguez B, Pascual-Castroviejo I, Teber S, Anlar B, Comu S, Karaca E, Kayserili H, Yuksel A, Akcakus M, Al Gazali L, Sztriha L, Nicholl D, Woods CG, Bennett C, Hurst J, Sheridan E, Barnicoat A, Hennekam R, Lees M, Blair E, Bernes S, Sanchez H, Clark AE, DeMarco E, Donahue C, Sherr E, Hahn J, Sanger TD, Gallager TE, Dobyns WB, Daugherty C, Krishnamoorthy KS, Sarco D, Walsh CA, McKanna T, Milisa J, Chung WK, De Vivo DC, Raynes H, Schubert R, Seward A, Brooks DG, Goldstein A, Caldwell J, Finsecke E, Maria BL, Holden K, Cruse RP, Swoboda KJ, Viskochil D. Expanding CEP290 mutational spectrum in ciliopathies. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A(10):2173–80. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsang WY, Bossard C, Khanna H, Peranen J, Swaroop A, Malhotra V, Dynlacht BD. CP110 suppresses primary cilia formation through its interaction with CEP290, a protein deficient in human ciliary disease. Dev Cell. 2008;15(2):187–97. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Valente EM, Brancati F, Silhavy JL, Castori M, Marsh SE, Barrano G, Bertini E, Boltshauser E, Zaki MS, Abdel-Aleem A, Abdel-Salam GM, Bellacchio E, Battini R, Cruse RP, Dobyns WB, Krishnamoorthy KS, Lagier-Tourenne C, Magee A, Pascual-Castroviejo I, Salpietro CD, Sarco D, Dallapiccola B, Gleeson JG. AHI1 gene mutations cause specific forms of Joubert syndrome-related disorders. AnnNeurol. 2006a;59(3):527–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Valente EM, Silhavy JL, Brancati F, Barrano G, Krishnaswami SR, Castori M, Lancaster MA, Boltshauser E, Boccone L, Al-Gazali L, Fazzi E, Signorini S, Louie CM, Bellacchio E, Bertini E, Dallapiccola B, Gleeson JG. Mutations in CEP290, which encodes a centrosomal protein, cause pleiotropic forms of Joubert syndrome. Nat Genet. 2006b;38(6):623–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vallespin E, Cantalapiedra D, Riveiro-Alvarez R, Wilke R, Aguirre-Lamban J, Avila-Fernandez A, Lopez-Martinez MA, Gimenez A, Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Ramos C, Ayuso C. Mutation screening of 299 Spanish families with retinal dystrophies by Leber congenital amaurosis genotyping microarray. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007a;48(12):5653–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vallespin E, Lopez-Martinez MA, Cantalapiedra D, Riveiro-Alvarez R, Aguirre-Lamban J, Avila-Fernandez A, Villaverde C, Trujillo-Tiebas MJ, Ayuso C. Frequency of CEP290 c.2991_1655A>G mutation in 175 Spanish families affected with Leber congenital amaurosis and early-onset retinitis pigmentosa. Mol Vis. 2007b;13:2160–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Walia S, Fishman GA, Jacobson SG, Aleman TS, Koenekoop RK, Traboulsi EI, Weleber RG, Pennesi ME, Heon E, Drack A, Lam BL, Allikmets R, Stone EM. Visual Acuity in Patients with Leber's Congenital Amaurosis and Early Childhood-Onset Retinitis Pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(6):1190–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang H, den Hollander AI, Moayedi Y, Abulimiti A, Li Y, Collin RW, Hoyng CB, Lopez I, Bray M, Lewis RA, Lupski JR, Mardon G, Koenekoop RK, Chen R. Mutations in SPATA7 cause Leber congenital amaurosis and juvenile retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84(3):380–7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yzer S, Leroy BP, De Baere E, de Ravel TJ, Zonneveld MN, Voesenek K, Kellner U, Ciriano JP, de Faber JT, Rohrschneider K, Roepman R, den Hollander AI, Cruysberg JR, Meire F, Casteels I, van Moll-Ramirez NG, Allikmets R, van den Born LI, Cremers FP. Microarray-based mutation detection and phenotypic characterization of patients with Leber congenital amaurosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(3):1167–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zernant J, Kulm M, Dharmaraj S, den Hollander AI, Perrault I, Preising MN, Lorenz B, Kaplan J, Cremers FP, Maumenee I, Koenekoop RK, Allikmets R. Genotyping microarray (disease chip) for Leber congenital amaurosis: detection of modifier alleles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(9):3052–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Human Mutation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

-