Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Arthritis Rheum. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as:
PMCID: PMC3205224
NIHMSID: NIHMS313373
PMID: 21792837

Identification of novel genetic susceptibility loci in African-American lupus patients using a candidate gene association study

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

Objective

Candidate gene and genome-wide association studies have identified several disease susceptibility loci in lupus patients. These studies have been largely performed in European-derived and Asian lupus patients. In this study, we examine if some of these same susceptibility loci increase lupus risk in African-American individuals.

Methods

Single nucleotide polymorphisms tagging 15 independent lupus susceptibility loci were genotyped in a set of 1,724 lupus patients and 2,024 normal healthy controls of African-American descent. The loci examined included: PTPN22, FCGR2A, TNFSF4, STAT4, CTLA4, PDCD1, PXK, BANK1, MSH5 (HLA region), CFB (HLA region), C8orf13-BLK region, MBL2, KIAA1542, ITGAM, and MECP2/IRAK1.

Results

We provide the first evidence for genetic association between lupus and five susceptibility loci in African-American patients (C8orf13-BLK, BANK1, TNFSF4, KIAA1542 andCTLA4; P values= 8.0 × 10−6, 1.9 × 10−5, 5.7 × 10−5, 0.00099, 0.0045, respectively). Further, we confirm the genetic association between lupus and five additional lupus susceptibility loci (ITGAM, MSH5, CFB, STAT4, and FCGR2A; P values= 7.5 × 10−11, 5.2 × 10−8, 8.7 × 10−7, 0.0058, and 0.0070, respectively), and provide evidence for a genome-wide significance for the association between ITGAM and MSH5 (HLA region) for the first time in African-American lupus patients.

Conclusion

These findings provide evidence for novel genetic susceptibility loci for lupus in African-Americans and demonstrate that the majority of lupus susceptibility loci examined confer lupus risk across multiple ethnicities.

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by autoantibody production, abnormalities of immune-inflammatory system function and damage in several organs. Although the exact pathogenesis of SLE is unknown, strong evidence exists for contributions of both genetic risk factors and environmental events which lead to a break in immunologic self-tolerance(1). SLE is nine times more common in women than in men(2), particularly during the childbearing years. There are also marked disparities in SLE incidence and prevalence worldwide; SLE prevalence varies among different ethnic and geographical populations (3). SLE is four times more common in people of African-American ancestry than those of European ancestry (45). In addition, African-Americans have a markedly increased risk for developing lupus nephritis relative to European-Americans (5). The ethnic and genetic heterogeneity of SLE may contribute to the complexity of its clinical manifestation.

Recent genome-wide association (GWA) and candidate gene studies have identified more than 30 common SLE risk alleles in European and Asian derived populations (67). These include genes encoding proteins important for adaptive immunity and the production of autoantibodies (HLA alleles, BLK, BANK1 and PTPN22) (810), proteins with roles in innate immunity and interferon signaling (ITGAM, STAT4, and IRF5) (8, 1113) and genes involved in DNA-methylation (MECP2) (14) among others.

In this study we analyzed 3,462 African-American and 286 Gullah African-American lupus patients and controls for genetic association with polymorphisms within 15 confirmed lupus susceptibility loci (89, 1122). We confirm that HLA alleles, STAT4, FCGR2A, and ITGAM are associated with SLE and provide evidence for a genome-wide significance for the association in HLA and ITGAM in African-derived lupus patients. Further, we described for the first time genetic association between C8orf13-BLK, BANK1, TNFSF4, CTLA4 and KIAA1542 and lupus in African-derived patients.

Material and Methods

Patients and controls

Two independent case-control cohorts with SLE were recruited through a multicenter collaboration within the USA and assembled at the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (OMRF). The study includes a total of 3,462 African-American samples (1569 SLE patients and 1893 healthy controls) and 286 Gullah African-American samples(23) (who have a considerably lower level of non-African genetic admixture when compared to other African-American populations) (155 SLE cases and 131 healthy controls). All cases fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification of SLE (24). All subjects provided informed consent for this study. The study was approved by the various institutional review boards at each of the participating institutions.

Genotyping

Genotyping was performed using the Illumina Custom Bead system on the iSCAN instrument as part of a large lupus candidate gene association study to reduce cost of genotyping and maximize sample size. The following SNPs within 15 confirmed susceptibility genes for SLE were used: rs2476601 (PTPN22), rs1801274 (FCGR2A), rs2205960 (TNFSF4), rs7574865 (STAT4), rs231775 (CTLA4), rs11568821 (PDCD1), rs6445975 (PXK), rs10516487 (BANK1), rs3131379 (MSH5 within the MHC class III region), rs1270942 (CFB, within the MHC class III), rs13277113 (C8orf13-BLK region), rs1800450 (MBL2), rs4963128 (KIAA1542), rs1143679 (ITGAM) and rs17435 (MECP2/IRAK1) (822, 25). IRF5, a known SLE susceptibility gene, was not included in the study because it was extensively studied in an African-American cohort with lupus that overlaps part of our samples (26). Similarly, the genetic association between IL21 and lupus in African-American patients has been recently reported (27). These SNPs were selected as they tag independent lupus susceptibility loci in European-derived lupus patients. In addition, 161 admixture informative markers (AIMs) were genotyped and evaluated in our samples. The AIMs were selected to distinguish four continental ancestral populations: Africans, Europeans, American Indians and East Asians (2832).

Data analysis

Samples with a genotype success rate of <90% were excluded from the analysis. A total of 19 African-American and 1 Gullah samples, were removed due to low genotype success rate. The remaining samples were then evaluated for duplicates or related individuals and one individual from each pair was removed if the proportion of alleles shared identical by descent (IBD) > 0.4 in African-Americans or > 0.35 in Gullah samples (57 African-American and 8 Gullah samples). Samples with increased heterozygosity (>5 standard deviation around the mean) were then removed from the analysis. Samples were assessed for mismatches between reported gender and genetic data and individuals with gender discrepancies were removed from the analysis. Finally, genetic outliers were removed from further analysis as determined by principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure 1) and admixture estimates using ADMIXMAP software (3335). A total of 30 and 1 genetic outliers were removed from the African-American and Gullah sample sets, respectively. After quality control a total of 1,527 cases and 1,811 control individuals of African-American descent and 152 cases and 123 controls of Gullah descent were included in subsequent analyses.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms313373f1.jpg

Scatter plots generated by the first two components of a principal component analysis (PCA). X-axis represents Principal Component 1 (PC1) and Y-axis represents Principal Component 2 (PC2) in the African-American samples (A) and the Gullah African-American samples (B).

For each sample set analyzed, markers with a genotype success rate <90%, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium <0.001 and minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.01 were excluded from further analysis. All fifteen markers were analyzed in African-American individuals and thirteen markers passed the inclusion threshold in Gullah participants (2 SNPs were excluded due to MAF <0.01).

To test for genetic association in SLE we performed logistic regression, as implemented in PLINK (36). Allele frequency differences between cases and controls were calculated while adjusting for ancestry estimates provided by ADMIXMAP. Analysis was also separately performed while adjusting for the first three principal components. The results obtained by either method were very similar, and data adjusted for principal components are reported in this manuscript. Inflation factors (λ) have been calculated using “null” ancestry informative markers. Pooled ORs were estimated using StatsDirect v2.4.6. The Meta-analysis was conducted using standard methods based on Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test(37). The Breslow-Day test(38)was performed for all SNPs to assess heterogeneity of the odds ratios in different populations.

Results

Population structure analyses showed that the African ancestry and European ancestry was 81.3% and 15.7%, respectively, among the African-American samples with an inflation factor λ of 1.32, and 90% and 7.2% among the Gullah samples with an inflation factor λ of 1.10. Therefore all results presented herein were reported after adjustment for principal component.

We genotyped 15 SNPs tagging 15 independent susceptibility loci previously established in European-derived SLE patients, in two independent cohorts with African descent. After excluding SNPs and individuals that did not pass our quality control standards, a total of 15 and 13 SNPs were analyzed in the African-American and Gullah samples respectively in a total of 1,679 SLE cases and 1,934 controls. Two SNPs in the Gullah samples failed after MAF quality control (PDCD1, rs11568821 and PTPN22, rs2476601).

Within the African-American samples, we found evidence for significant genetic association between SLE and 10 loci after correction for the first three pricipal components. Association was observed for ITGAM (P= 1.9 × 10−9, OR= 1.57), MSH5 (P= 4.1 × 10−8, OR= 1.65), CFB (P= 7.1 × 10−7, OR= 1.63), C8orf13-BLK (P= 6.4 × 10−6, OR= 1.36), BANK1 (P= 5.9 × 10−5, OR= 0.78), TNFSF4 (P= 0.00056 OR= 1.44), KIAA1542 (P= 0.0020, OR= 0.86), FCGR2A (P= 0.012, OR= 0.88), STAT4 (P= 0.012, OR= 1.19), and CTLA4 (P= 0.013, OR= 1.14) (Table 1).

Table 1

Genetic association between 15 lupus susceptibility loci and lupus in African-Americans adjusted by principal components.

GeneMarkerChrPositionMinor AlleleMinor Allele Frequency95% CIP value
CasesControlsORLLUL
PTPN22rs24766011114179091A0.018 (56:2996)0.014 (50:3568)1.310.901.920.16
FCGR2Ars18012741159746369A0.429 (1298:1726)0.460 (1645:1931)0.880.800.970.012
TNFSF4rs22059601171458098A0.070 (213:2839)0.049 (179:3441)1.441.171.760.00056
STAT4rs75748652191672878A0.168 (505:2503)0.145 (512:3022)1.191.041.360.012
CTLA4rs2317752204440959G0.392 (1193:1849)0.363 (1310:2302)1.141.031.260.013
PDCD1rs115688212242442585A0.026 (78:2956)0.020 (69:6441)1.310.941.810.11
PXKrs6445975358345217A0.429 (1310:1742)0.441 (1592:2016)0.950.861.050.32
BANK1rs105164874102970099A0.197 (599:2435)0.239 (859:2741)0.780.700.885.9×10-5
MSH5rs3131379631829012A0.101 (308:2744)0.064 (231:3389)1.651.381.984.1×10-8
CFBrs1270942632026839G0.085 (260:2794)0.054 (195:3242)1.631.341.977.1×10-7
C8orf13-BLKrs13277113811386595A0.172 (520:2506)0.131 (467:3111)1.361.191.556.4×10-6
MBL2rs18004501054201241A0.032 (98:2952)0.029 (104:3514)1.120.841.480.45
KIAA1542rs496312811579564A0.419 (1260:1746)0.458 (1621:1917)0.860.780.950.0020
ITGAMrs11436791631184312A0.153 (467:2583)0.104 (375:3233)1.571.361.821.9×10-9
MECP2rs1743523152965174A0.393 (1200:1850)0.384 (1401:2213)1.050.951.170.35

OR, odds ratio; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit; CI, confidence interval. The numbers between parenthesis represent the number of minor and major alleles, respectively.

Odds ratios represent differences in the minor allele between cases and controls in each locus.

Genetic association in the Gullah samples reveals only two associated markers, TNFSF4 (P= 0.0015, OR= 4.99) and ITGAM (P= 0.0080, OR= 1.97) with SLE (Table 2). Notably, these two markers are also associated in the African-American participants. Next, a meta-analysis using the African-American and the Gullah data sets was performed using the 13 SNPs that could be evaluated in both sample sets (Table 3). The meta-analysis of these genetic markers between the African-American and the Gullah data sets using the Mantel-Haenszel test under a fixed-effects model revealed a significant association with SLE for FCGR2A (Pmeta= 0.0070, ORmeta= 0.88), TNFSF4 (Pmeta= 5.7 × 10−5, ORmeta= 1.51), STAT4 (Pmeta= 0.0058, ORmeta= 1.20), CTLA4 (Pmeta= 0.0045, ORmeta= 1.15), BANK1 (Pmeta= 1.9 × 10−5, ORmeta= 0.78), MSH5 (Pmeta= 5.2 × 10−8, ORmeta= 1.63), CFB (Pmeta= 8.7 × 10−7, ORmeta= 1.60), C8orf13-BLK (Pmeta= 8.0 × 10−6, ORmeta= 1.34), KIAA1542 (Pmeta= 0.00099, ORmeta= 0.86) and ITGAM (Pmeta= 7.5 × 10−11, ORmeta= 1.60) (Table 3). Importantly, our data show that the risk alleles in the genetic associations we detected in lupus patients of African descent are the same as previously shown in European-derived patients (Table 3).

Table 2

Genetic associations between lupus susceptibility loci and lupus in Gullah African-Americans adjusted by principal components. Two out of 15 SNPs examined were not included in the analysis due to low minor allele frequencies.

GeneMarkerChrPositionMinor AlleleMinor Allele Frequency95% CIP value
CasesControlsORLLUL
FCGR2Ars18012741159746369A0.430 (129:171)0.476 (117:129)0.850.601.180.33
TNFSF4rs22059601171458098A0.092 (28:276)0.020 (5:241)4.991.8513.430.0015
STAT4rs75748652191672878A0.150 (44:250)0.107 (26:218)1.390.852.290.19
CTLA4rs2317752204440959G0.372 (113:197)0.303 (74:170)1.340.941.910.11
PXKrs6445975358345217A0.398 (121:183)0.390 (96:150)1.030.731.440.87
BANK1rs105164874102970099A0.211 (64:240)0.262 (64:180)0.740.501.100.14
MSH5rs3131379631829012A0.053 (16:288)0.045 (11:235)1.190.552.600.66
CFBrs1270942632026839G0.043 (13:291)0.037 (9:237)1.180.502.750.71
C8orf13-BLKrs13277113811386595A0.153 (46:254)0.139 (34:210)1.110.681.800.69
MBL2rs18004501054201241A0.016 (5:299)0.016 (4:242)1.020.273.900.98
KIAA1542rs496312811579564A0.389 (115:181)0.438 (105:135)0.820.581.150.25
ITGAMrs11436791631184312A0.191 (58:246)0.110 (27:219)1.971.193.260.0080
MECP2rs1743523152965174A0.308 (95:209)0.333 (81:165)0.850.571.270.42

OR, odds ratio; LL, lower limit; UL, upper limit; CI, confidence interval. The numbers between parenthesis represent the number of minor and major alleles, respectively.

Odds ratios represent differences in the minor allele between cases and controls in each locus.

Table 3

Meta-Analysis of genetic associations in the African-American samples combined with the Gullah African-American samples adjusted by principal component. Only the 13 SNPs that passed our quality control measures in both sample sets were included in this analysis.

GeneSNPOR (95% CI)PmetaPHeterogeneityOR (95% CI) in European-derived populations (ref)
FCGR2Ars18012740.88 (0.80–0.96)0.00700.810.86 (0.77–0.92) (67)
TNFSF4rs22059601.51 (1.24–1.86)5.7 × 10−50.021.22 (1.15–1.30) (67)
STAT4rs75748651.20 (1.06–1.37)0.00580.541.57 (1.49–1.69) (67)
CTLA4rs2317751.15 (1.04–1.26)0.00450.381.60 (1.01–2.53) (68)
PXKrs64459750.96 (0.87–1.05)0.360.670.80 (0.74–0.86)* (11)
BANK1rs105164870.78 (0.76–0.87)1.9 × 10−50.780.72 (0.66–0.80) (9)
MSH5rs31313791.63 (1.36–1.92)5.2 × 10−80.422.36 (2.11–2.64) (11)
CFBrs12709421.60 (1.33–1.94)8.7 × 10−70.472.35 (2.10–2.63) (11)
C8orf13-BLKrs132771131.34 (1.21–1.55)8.0 × 10−60.421.39 (1.28–1.51) (8)
MBL2rs18004501.11 (0.85–1.47)0.450.901.33 (1.08–1.65) (69)
KIAA1542rs49631280.86 (0.77–0.94)0.000990.800.83 (0.79–0.88) (67)
ITGAMrs11436791.60 (1.37–1.83)7.5 × 10−110.401.78 (1.56–2.03) (17)
MECP2rs174351.04 (0.94–1.16)0.490.301.22 (1.07–1.38) (70)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Odds ratios represent differences in the minor allele between cases and controls in each locus.

*The minor allele for rs644975 PXK polymorphism is the C allele European-derived populations and is the A allele in African-Americans.

Discussion

The genetic heterogeneity between ethnic populations has been suggested to be important in SLE risk (39), emphasizing the need for further studies in different populations. It has been consistently shown that patients of African descent have more severe lupus and a higher prevalence of lupus than those of European ancestry (45). In an attempt to determine whether some of the lupus susceptibility genes identified in European-derived patients also confer disease susceptibility in African-derived populations, we studied two independent African-American populations from the United States and genotyped common variants that represent 15 of the most established genetic susceptibility loci for lupus.

We found evidence of association between SLE and ten genetic variants in American patients of African descent. A meta-analysis of both African-derived populations examined revealed association at two loci, ITGAM and MSH5 (HLA region), with genome-wide significance.

The most significant effect was observed with a non-synonymous SNP in the third exon of the ITGAM gene (rs1143679, ORmeta= 1.60, Pmeta= 7.5 × 10−11). This variant was previously associated with SLE in African-derived populations (17), and has been hypothesized to disturb ITGAM interaction with its ligands. Another genetic association that we established with a genome-wide significance in our study is with the HLA region in the MSH5 gene (rs3131379, ORmeta= 1.63, Pmeta= 5.2 × 10−8). It was previously known that the HLA region confers risk for lupus in African-Americans (4042), but establishing this association with specific independent variants within this region and with a genome-wide significance is novel.

The next strongest associations (ORmeta= 1.34 and ORmeta= 0.78; Pmeta= 8.0 × 10−6 and 1.9 × 10−5) were with two non-synonymous polymorphisms (rs13277113 and rs10516487) located in the C8orf13-BLK locus and the BANK1 gene respectively, two genes involved in B-cell receptor-mediated signaling and B-cell development (4344). Although no functional variant has been identified in C8orf13-BLK, the risk alleles of the rs13277113 SNP correlates with low mRNA levels of BLK and high levels of C8orf13, raising the possibility that either of these two effects could be related to SLE(8). In addition, it has been hypothesized that rs10516487 could potentially alter the affinity of BANK1 for IP3R, altering B-cell signaling in SLE patients(9). TNFSF4 gene also showed a strong association (ORmeta= 1.51, Pmeta= 5.7 × 10−5) with African-American SLE in our study. TNFSF4 encodes the OX40 ligand, a costimulatory molecule involved in T-cell activation. A similar association between TNFSF4 rs2205960 and SLE has been reported in Chinese patients (45).

Two other genes previously associated with SLE in African-derived populations, STAT4 (rs7574865, Pmeta= 0.0058) and FCGR2A (rs1801274, Pmeta= 0.0070) (21, 4647), have been also detected in our study. FCGR2A gene is located in a previous region associated with SLE through linkage studies in African-Americans (1q41) (47) and has been described as a risk factor for lupus nephritis in this population(21). FCGR2A is an important receptor mediating phagocytic functions in different cells, and there is evidence that FCGR2A alleles confer distinct functional capacities to phagocytes providing a mechanism for heritable susceptibility to immune complex disease(4849). The association between STAT4 and SLE risk was initially reported in 2007 (13). This was subsequently confirmed by several GWAS in Europeans and Asians (8, 11, 5051) and in an African-American cohort through a high-density genotyping of STAT4 in different racial groups (46). STAT4 encodes a transcription factor that mediates the expression of genes in a number of key immunological pathways and induces relevant cytokine including, type 1 interferons, IL12 and IL23. STAT4 may also play a role in the differentiation of the potentially pathogenic Th17 T-cell subset (52). Although no functional candidate polymorphism has yet been clearly established for STAT4 its role in the susceptibility to several autoimmune diseases and modulating immune functions suggest that STAT4 is an important gene in autoimmunity.

No previous association between CTLA4 and KIAA1542 genes and SLE in African-American has been found (5354). However both genes were associated with SLE in our study (Pmeta= 0.0045 and 0.00099, respectively). The previous studies were underpowered to detect a significant association in these loci due to small sample size compared to our study (230 SLE patients and 276 controls, and 159 SLE patients and 115 controls). Interestingly, the lupus-protective allele in rs4963128 (KIAA1542) has been associated with anti-Sm antibody in African-American lupus patients, and in the presence of anti-Sm, this same allele is associated with higher serum interferon alpha activity levels(55). The rs6445975 SNP in the PXK gene, rs2476601 in the PTPN22 gene, rs11568821 in PDCD1 and the rs1800450 in MBL2 gene are not associated with SLE in our population. The PXK and MBL2 variants have been associated with SLE in different European cohorts (11, 20) however none of them has been replicated in other ethnic backgrounds (32, 39, 5659). Previous studies in African-American SLE individuals failed to find a significant genetic association with PTPN22 and PDCD1 genes (6061). Ethnic difference in PTPN22 rs2476601 and PDCD1 rs11568821 allele frequencies has been described (60, 62). African-Americans have much lower minor allele frequencies in rs2476601 (PTPN22) and rs11568821 (PDCD1) (2% and 3%, respectively) compared to European-derived individuals (8% and 13%, respectively) (62). Interestingly, both alleles are not observed in Asian-derived populations (6264). It is important to note that although we did not find association between PTPTN22 and PDCD1 in African-Americans, our study is underpowered (23% and 31%, respectively) to detect an association with an OR of 1.3 in these two loci, probably due to the lower minor allele frequency of these polymorphisms in African-Americans compared with European-derived populations. Therefore, we cannot rule out a possible role of these two genes in African-American lupus patients.

In addition, the genetic association with rs17435 within MECP2, which tags the MECP2/IRAK1 susceptibility locus that has been well established in Europeans-derived and Asian lupus cohorts (14, 6566), was not replicated in our African-derived populations. However, fine mapping and localization of the genetic effect in this locus in multiple ethnicities is underway (unpublished data).

The lack of genetic association between some of the established genetic susceptibility loci in European-derived lupus patients, in African-American lupus patients could be due to a different haplotype structure as causal variants for most of the genetic susceptibility loci have not been identified. Another possibility could be that some of the disease susceptibility loci operate in some but not all ethnicities. Figure 2 summarizes the unique and shared genetic susceptibility loci between European and African-American SLE patients. Further studies in African-American lupus patients would be necessary to identify new and possibly unique SLE susceptibility loci in this population.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is nihms313373f2.jpg

Unique and shared lupus susceptibility genes in lupus patients of European descent and African descent, as indicated by the susceptibility loci included in this study and the results of the meta-analysis performed in our African-American and Gullah sample sets. More genetic studies in African-American lupus patients are needed to explain the higher prevalence and the more severe presentation of the disease.

In summary, we provide evidence for genetic association with five loci for the first time in African-American lupus patients (C8orf13-BLK, BANK1, CTLA4, KIAA1542 and TNFSF4). In addition, we established the genetic association between the HLA region and ITGAM with a genome-wide significance in African-Americans and confirmed the genetic association with STAT4 and FCGR2A.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Acknowledgments

This work was made possible by the NIH R03AI076729, P20RR020143, P20RR015577, P30AR053483, R01AR042460, R37AI024717, R01AI031584, N01AR62277, P50AR048940, P01AI083194, RC1AR058554, U19AI082714, HHSN266200500026C, P30RR031152, P01AR049084, R01AR043274, R01AI063274, K08AI083790, P30DK42086, L30AI071651, UL1RR024999, K24AR002138, P602AR30692, UL1RR025741, R01DE018209, R01AR043727, UL1RR025005, UL1RR029882, P60AR049459, AR043814, the Lupus Research Institute, the Arthritis National Research Foundation, American College of Rheumatology/Research and Education Foundation, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Kirkland Scholar award, Alliance for Lupus Research, US Department of Veterans Affairs, US Department of Defense PR094002.

Footnotes

Financial conflict of interest: None of the authors has any financial conflict of interest to report.

References

1. Harley JB, Kelly JA, Kaufman KM. Unraveling the genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus. Springer Semin Immunopathol. 2006;28(2):119–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Weckerle CE, Niewold TB. The unexplained female predominance of systemic lupus erythematosus: clues from genetic and cytokine studies. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2011;40(1):42–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Lau CS, Yin G, Mok MY. Ethnic and geographical differences in systemic lupus erythematosus: an overview. Lupus. 2006;15(11):715–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Fessel WJ. Systemic lupus erythematosus in the community. Incidence, prevalence, outcome, and first symptoms; the high prevalence in black women. Arch Intern Med. 1974;134(6):1027–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Dooley MA, Hogan S, Jennette C, Falk R. Cyclophosphamide therapy for lupus nephritis: poor renal survival in black Americans. Glomerular Disease Collaborative Network. Kidney Int. 1997;51(4):1188–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Delgado-Vega A, Sanchez E, Lofgren S, Castillejo-Lopez C, Alarcon-Riquelme ME. Recent findings on genetics of systemic autoimmune diseases. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22(6):698–705. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Flesher DL, Sun X, Behrens TW, Graham RR, Criswell LA. Recent advances in the genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2010;6(3):461–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Hom G, Graham RR, Modrek B, Taylor KE, Ortmann W, Garnier S, et al. Association of systemic lupus erythematosus with C8orf13-BLK and ITGAM-ITGAX. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(9):900–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Kozyrev SV, Abelson AK, Wojcik J, Zaghlool A, Linga Reddy MV, Sanchez E, et al. Functional variants in the B-cell gene BANK1 are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2008;40(2):211–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Criswell LA, Pfeiffer KA, Lum RF, Gonzales B, Novitzke J, Kern M, et al. Analysis of families in the multiple autoimmune disease genetics consortium (MADGC) collection: the PTPN22 620W allele associates with multiple autoimmune phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76(4):561–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Harley JB, Alarcon-Riquelme ME, Criswell LA, Jacob CO, Kimberly RP, Moser KL, et al. Genome-wide association scan in women with systemic lupus erythematosus identifies susceptibility variants in ITGAM, PXK, KIAA1542 and other loci. Nat Genet. 2008;40(2):204–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Sigurdsson S, Nordmark G, Goring HH, Lindroos K, Wiman AC, Sturfelt G, et al. Polymorphisms in the tyrosine kinase 2 and interferon regulatory factor 5 genes are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76(3):528–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Remmers EF, Plenge RM, Lee AT, Graham RR, Hom G, Behrens TW, et al. STAT4 and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(10):977–86. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Sawalha AH, Webb R, Han S, Kelly JA, Kaufman KM, Kimberly RP, et al. Common variants within MECP2 confer risk of systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS One. 2008;3(3):e1727. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Graham RR, Kozyrev SV, Baechler EC, Reddy MV, Plenge RM, Bauer JW, et al. A common haplotype of interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) regulates splicing and expression and is associated with increased risk of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2006;38(5):550–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Abelson AK, Delgado-Vega AM, Kozyrev SV, Sanchez E, Velazquez-Cruz R, Eriksson N, et al. STAT4 associates with systemic lupus erythematosus through two independent effects that correlate with gene expression and act additively with IRF5 to increase risk. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68(11):1746–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Nath SK, Han S, Kim-Howard X, Kelly JA, Viswanathan P, Gilkeson GS, et al. A nonsynonymous functional variant in integrin-alpha(M) (encoded by ITGAM) is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2008;40(2):152–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Cunninghame Graham DS, Graham RR, Manku H, Wong AK, Whittaker JC, Gaffney PM, et al. Polymorphism at the TNF superfamily gene TNFSF4 confers susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2008;40(1):83–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Torres B, Aguilar F, Franco E, Sanchez E, Sanchez-Roman J, Jimenez Alonso J, et al. Association of the CT60 marker of the CTLA4 gene with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(7):2211–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Garred P, Madsen HO, Halberg P, Petersen J, Kronborg G, Svejgaard A, et al. Mannose-binding lectin polymorphisms and susceptibility to infection in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(10):2145–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Salmon JE, Millard S, Schachter LA, Arnett FC, Ginzler EM, Gourley MF, et al. Fc gamma RIIA alleles are heritable risk factors for lupus nephritis in African Americans. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(5):1348–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. Prokunina L, Castillejo-Lopez C, Oberg F, Gunnarsson I, Berg L, Magnusson V, et al. A regulatory polymorphism in PDCD1 is associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus in humans. Nat Genet. 2002;32(4):666–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Kamen DL, Barron M, Parker TM, Shaftman SR, Bruner GR, Aberle T, et al. Autoantibody prevalence and lupus characteristics in a unique African American population. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(5):1237–47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(9):1725. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Sawalha AH, Kaufman KM, Kelly JA, Adler AJ, Aberle T, Kilpatrick J, et al. Genetic association of interleukin-21 polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(4):458–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Kelly JA, Kelley JM, Kaufman KM, Kilpatrick J, Bruner GR, Merrill JT, et al. Interferon regulatory factor-5 is genetically associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in African Americans. Genes Immun. 2008;9(3):187–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Hughes T, Kim-Howard X, Kelly JA, Kaufman KM, Langefeld CD, Ziegler J, et al. Fine mapping and trans-ethnic genotyping establish IL2/IL21 genetic association with lupus and localize this genetic effect to IL21. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Halder I, Shriver M, Thomas M, Fernandez JR, Frudakis T. A panel of ancestry informative markers for estimating individual biogeographical ancestry and admixture from four continents: utility and applications. Hum Mutat. 2008;29(5):648–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Smith MW, Patterson N, Lautenberger JA, Truelove AL, McDonald GJ, Waliszewska A, et al. A high-density admixture map for disease gene discovery in african americans. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(5):1001–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Yang N, Li H, Criswell LA, Gregersen PK, Alarcon-Riquelme ME, Kittles R, et al. Examination of ancestry and ethnic affiliation using highly informative diallelic DNA markers: application to diverse and admixed populations and implications for clinical epidemiology and forensic medicine. Hum Genet. 2005;118(3–4):382–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Kosoy R, Nassir R, Tian C, White PA, Butler LM, Silva G, et al. Ancestry informative marker sets for determining continental origin and admixture proportions in common populations in America. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(1):69–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Sanchez E, Webb RD, Rasmussen A, Kelly JA, Riba L, Kaufman KM, et al. Genetically determined amerindian ancestry correlates with increased frequency of risk alleles for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(12):3722–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. McKeigue PM, Carpenter JR, Parra EJ, Shriver MD. Estimation of admixture and detection of linkage in admixed populations by a Bayesian approach: application to African-American populations. Ann Hum Genet. 2000;64(Pt 2):171–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Hoggart CJ, Parra EJ, Shriver MD, Bonilla C, Kittles RA, Clayton DG, et al. Control of confounding of genetic associations in stratified populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(6):1492–504. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Hoggart CJ, Shriver MD, Kittles RA, Clayton DG, McKeigue PM. Design and analysis of admixture mapping studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(5):965–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81(3):559–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Guedj M, Wojcik J, Della-Chiesa E, Nuel G, Forner K. A fast, unbiased and exact allelic test for case-control association studies. Hum Hered. 2006;61(4):210–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Breslow NE, Day NE, Halvorsen KT, Prentice RL, Sabai C. Estimation of multiple relative risk functions in matched case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1978;108(4):299–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39. Yang W, Ng P, Zhao M, Hirankarn N, Lau CS, Mok CC, et al. Population differences in SLE susceptibility genes: STAT4 and BLK, but not PXK, are associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in Hong Kong Chinese. Genes Immun. 2009;10(3):219–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Reveille JD, Schrohenloher RE, Acton RT, Barger BO. DNA analysis of HLA-DR and DQ genes in American blacks with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1989;32(10):1243–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41. Sullivan KE, Wooten C, Schmeckpeper BJ, Goldman D, Petri MA. A promoter polymorphism of tumor necrosis factor alpha associated with systemic lupus erythematosus in African-Americans. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(12):2207–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42. Lee YH, Nath SK. Systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility loci defined by genome scan meta-analysis. Hum Genet. 2005;118(3–4):434–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Yokoyama K, Su Ih IH, Tezuka T, Yasuda T, Mikoshiba K, Tarakhovsky A, et al. BANK regulates BCR-induced calcium mobilization by promoting tyrosine phosphorylation of IP(3) receptor. EMBO J. 2002;21(1–2):83–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Saijo K, Schmedt C, Su IH, Karasuyama H, Lowell CA, Reth M, et al. Essential role of Src-family protein tyrosine kinases in NF-kappaB activation during B cell development. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(3):274–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Chang YK, Yang W, Zhao M, Mok CC, Chan TM, Wong RW, et al. Association of BANK1 and TNFSF4 with systemic lupus erythematosus in Hong Kong Chinese. Genes Immun. 2009;10(5):414–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Namjou B, Sestak AL, Armstrong DL, Zidovetzki R, Kelly JA, Jacob N, et al. High-density genotyping of STAT4 reveals multiple haplotypic associations with systemic lupus erythematosus in different racial groups. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(4):1085–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47. Moser KL, Neas BR, Salmon JE, Yu H, Gray-McGuire C, Asundi N, et al. Genome scan of human systemic lupus erythematosus: evidence for linkage on chromosome 1q in African-American pedigrees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(25):14869–74. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Salmon JE, Edberg JC, Brogle NL, Kimberly RP. Allelic polymorphisms of human Fc gamma receptor IIA and Fc gamma receptor IIIB. Independent mechanisms for differences in human phagocyte function. J Clin Invest. 1992;89(4):1274–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Salmon JE, Edberg JC, Kimberly RP. Fc gamma receptor III on human neutrophils. Allelic variants have functionally distinct capacities. J Clin Invest. 1990;85(4):1287–95. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50. Han JW, Zheng HF, Cui Y, Sun LD, Ye DQ, Hu Z, et al. Genome-wide association study in a Chinese Han population identifies nine new susceptibility loci for systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2009;41(11):1234–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Yang W, Shen N, Ye DQ, Liu Q, Zhang Y, Qian XX, et al. Genome-wide association study in Asian populations identifies variants in ETS1 and WDFY4 associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(2):e1000841. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52. Mathur AN, Chang HC, Zisoulis DG, Stritesky GL, Yu Q, O’Malley JT, et al. Stat3 and Stat4 direct development of IL-17-secreting Th cells. J Immunol. 2007;178(8):4901–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Parks CG, Hudson LL, Cooper GS, Dooley MA, Treadwell EL, St Clair EW, et al. CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus in a population-based study of whites and African-Americans in the southeastern United States. Lupus. 2004;13(10):784–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. Fu Q, Zhao J, Qian X, Wong JL, Kaufman KM, Yu CY, et al. Association of a functional IRF7 variant with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55. Salloum R, Franek BS, Kariuki SN, Rhee L, Mikolaitis RA, Jolly M, et al. Genetic variation at the IRF7/PHRF1 locus is associated with autoantibody profile and serum interferon-alpha activity in lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(2):553–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56. Kim EM, Bang SY, Kim I, Shin HD, Park BL, Lee HS, et al. Different genetic effect of PXK on systemic lupus erythematosus in the Korean population. Rheumatol Int. 2011 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57. Tsai YC, Yao TC, Kuo ML, Cheng TT, Huang JL. Lack of association of mannose-binding lectin gene polymorphisms with development and clinical manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus in Chinese children. Lupus. 2009;18(4):372–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58. Li SG, Huang F, Liu XY, Deng XX, Xu M, Cong XZ, et al. The role of mannose binding lectin in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006;86(7):463–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59. Monticielo OA, Chies JA, Mucenic T, Rucatti GG, Junior JM, da Silva GK, et al. Mannose-binding lectin gene polymorphisms in Brazilian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2010;19(3):280–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60. Lea W, Lee Y. The association between the PTPN22 C1858T polymorphism and systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis update. Lupus. 2011;20(1):51–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61. Lee YH, Woo JH, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Song GG. Association of programmed cell death 1 polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Lupus. 2009;18(1):9–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62. Mori M, Yamada R, Kobayashi K, Kawaida R, Yamamoto K. Ethnic differences in allele frequency of autoimmune-disease-associated SNPs. J Hum Genet. 2005;50(5):264–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63. Lee HS, Korman BD, Le JM, Kastner DL, Remmers EF, Gregersen PK, et al. Genetic risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis differ in Caucasian and Korean populations. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(2):364–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64. Ban Y, Tozaki T, Taniyama M, Tomita M. The codon 620 single nucleotide polymorphism of the protein tyrosine phosphatase-22 gene does not contribute to autoimmune thyroid disease susceptibility in the Japanese. Thyroid. 2005;15(10):1115–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65. Suarez-Gestal M, Calaza M, Endreffy E, Pullmann R, Ordi-Ros J, Sebastiani GD, et al. Replication of recently identified systemic lupus erythematosus genetic associations: a case-control study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(3):R69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66. Jacob CO, Zhu J, Armstrong DL, Yan M, Han J, Zhou XJ, et al. Identification of IRAK1 as a risk gene with critical role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(15):6256–61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67. Gateva V, Sandling JK, Hom G, Taylor KE, Chung SA, Sun X, et al. A large-scale replication study identifies TNIP1, PRDM1, JAZF1, UHRF1BP1 and IL10 as risk loci for systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Genet. 2009;41(11):1228–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68. Pullmann R, Jr, Lukac J, Skerenova M, Rovensky J, Hybenova J, Melus V, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) dimorphism in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1999;17(6):725–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69. Lee YH, Witte T, Momot T, Schmidt RE, Kaufman KM, Harley JB, et al. The mannose-binding lectin gene polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus: two case-control studies and a meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(12):3966–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70. Webb R, Wren JD, Jeffries M, Kelly JA, Kaufman KM, Tang Y, et al. Variants within MECP2, a key transcription regulator, are associated with increased susceptibility to lupus and differential gene expression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(4):1076–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
-