Activation of Ras Signaling Pathway by 8-Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase Bound to Its Excision Product, 8-Oxoguanine^*

Abstract

Introduction

Reactive oxygen species, generated both endogenously during respiration and by various oxidases and environmental insults, induce multiple types of damage in the genome, including strand breaks and several types of oxidized bases (1). The highly mutagenic 8-oxoG⁵ is a predominant base lesion (2, 3) that does not block replication or transcription (4, 5). In the genome, 8-oxoG is predominantly repaired via the base excision repair pathway, in which OGG1 recognizes and excises this lesion (1, 6). Unrepaired 8-oxoG in the genome has been linked to various pathological states, including cancer and aging processes (7, 8); however, Ogg1-null mice have a normal phenotype and longevity (9, 10), suggesting that alternative, compensatory enzymes could also repair 8-oxoG, at least in the active genes. On the other hand, Ogg1-deficient mice are resistant to inflammation, implicating OGG1 in proinflammatory signaling (11, 12). We thus hypothesized a DNA repair-independent function of OGG1 that depends on the free 8-oxoG base. We report here that the OGG1·8-oxoG complex activates canonical Ras family GTPases, cellular signaling, and gene expression. We thus document for the first time a distinct, cell-signaling function of a DNA repair enzyme.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The free 8-oxoG base is generated exclusively during the repair of 8-oxoG in DNA, initiated by OGG1 (1). To mimic a transient increase in its intracellular level, we added 8-oxoG base to OGG1-proficient cells (MRC5) and analyzed the impact on the transcriptome using Affymetrix GeneChip. Ingenuity Pathways Analysis of microarray gene expression data (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), GEO accession number {"type":"entrez-geo","attrs":{"text":"GSE26813","term_id":"26813","extlink":"1"}}GSE26813) showed that 8 of the top 10 pathways that responded to 8-oxoG involved the small G protein Ras (supplemental Fig. S1). Ras GTPases activate a variety of cellular signaling pathways (20, 21).

To confirm these observations, we showed that the addition of 8-oxoG increased GTP-bound Ras levels in a time- (Fig. 1A) and dose-dependent (Fig. 1B) manner. The lowest dose of 8-oxoG base that increased Ras-GTP to a detectable level was 100 nm in MRC5 cells (Fig. 1B). The time course of Ras activation was consistent with rapid cellular uptake of 8-oxoG base. For example, at 1 min after the addition, ∼70% of 8-oxoG was taken up by the cells, as shown by GS/MS analysis (supplemental Fig. S2A). Importantly, after intranasal challenge of mice (13) with 8-oxoG (60 μl of 1 μm 8-oxoG), we observed increased Ras-GTP levels in the lungs (Fig. 1E).

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 1.

Activation of Ras GTPases in OGG1-expressing cells by 8-oxoG base. A–F, parallel cell cultures were exposed to 1 μm (A, C, D, and F) or increasing concentration of 8-oxoG (B). Cell extracts were made at the times points indicated (in A) or 15 min after challenge (B, C, D, E, and F). Ras-GTP levels were determined by GST pulldown assays (15, 16). A and B, activation of Ras GTPases in a time-dependent (A) and dose-dependent manner (B) in MRC5 cells upon 8-oxoG exposure. C and D, siRNA-mediated OGG1 depletion causes decreased Ras activation. C and D, MRC5 (C) and HeLa-S (D) cells were transfected with siRNA to OGG1 (see “Experimental Procedures”) or control siRNA using two cycles of transfection and cell culture and then exposed to 8-oxoG for 15 min. Ras-GTP levels were determined as above. E, increase in Ras-GTP levels in murine lungs. BALB/c mice were challenged intranasally with 60 μl of 1 μm 8-oxoG (13), and the lungs were excised after 15 min. Ras-GTP levels in individual mouse lung extracts were determined as above. F, 8-oxoG base, but not 8-oxodG, FapyG, 8-oxoA, or guanine base increased Ras-GTP levels. 250 and 25 μg of cell extract per assay were used to determine Ras-GTP and Ras levels, respectively; n = 3–8.

We hypothesized that 8-oxoG bound to OGG1 mediates guanine nucleotide exchange in Ras. In support of this idea, adding 8-oxoG to OGG1-depleted MRC5 (Fig. 1C; supplemental Fig. S2, B and D) or HeLa-S cells (Fig. 1D; supplemental Fig. S2, C and D) did not cause an increase in Ras-GTP levels. Free 8-oxoG was unique in increasing the Ras-GTP level as neither 8-oxodG nor other oxidized bases (FapyG or 8-oxoA) nor the original guanine base displayed this activity (Fig. 1F).

The binding of free 8-oxoG base to OGG1 was analyzed by changes in the intrinsic Trp fluorescence of OGG1 (18). A concentration-dependent decrease in Trp fluorescence (Fig. 2A) indicated the OGG1 conformational change as a result of the interaction. The binding constant (K_d) 0.56 ± 0.19 nm calculated from the binding isotherms (Fig. 2B) indicates its high affinity for 8-oxoG, which was unexpected, and predicted that the product binding would inhibit the enzyme. However, we observed the exact opposite in that 8-oxoG stimulated the activity of OGG1 in a concentration-dependent manner (supplemental Fig. S3A). This suggests that 8-oxoG serves as a cofactor for OGG1 by binding to an independent site and not to the active site pocket in OGG1. This was further supported by our observation that the free FapyG base, with abundance similar to that of 8-oxoG in oxidatively damaged DNA, and which is an equally good OGG1 substrate (22, 23), did not affect the fluorescence of OGG1. Furthermore, OGG1 did not bind 8-oxodG (supplemental Fig. S3, B and C), demonstrating the specificity of the binding of OGG1 to free 8-oxoG base.

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 2.

OGG1 complexed with 8-oxoG has guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity. A, fluorescent spectroscopic analysis of 8-oxoG binding to OGG1. FL indicates fluorescence. B, the K_d was calculated from the binding isotherms shown in A (18). C, interaction of OGG1 with Ras protein requires 8-oxoG base. H-Ras (2.7 pmol) was bound to nickel-agarose beads (see “Experimental Procedures”), and OGG1 ± 8-oxoG was added. After washing three times, the amount of OGG1 bound was analyzed by immunoblotting. D, OGG1 physically interacts with Ras protein. Increasing amounts (0.16–2.7 pmol) of His-H-Ras were immobilized on nickel-agarose beads before incubation with OGG1 (2.7 pmol) plus 8-oxoG (2.7 pmol) for 1 h at 4 °C. The proteins were stripped from the beads for immunoblotting. Upper panel, His-H-Ras bound to nickel-agarose beads; lower panel, OGG1 protein eluted from H-Ras. E, guanine nucleotides decrease the OGG1 interaction with Ras. His-H-Ras (2.7 pmol) bound to agarose beads was incubated with untagged OGG1 (2.7, 1.3, 0.67, and 0 pmol) and equimolar 8-oxoG for 30 min, and a 10-fold molar excess of GTP or GDP was then added for 30 min at 24 °C. Levels of eluted proteins were determined by Western blotting. F, exchange of Ras-bound GDP for GTP. H-Ras protein (6 pmol) was loaded with GDP (6 pmol), and nucleotide exchange was initiated by adding OGG1 (6 pmol) plus 8-oxoG (♦) or 0.6 pmol of OGG1 plus 8-oxoG (■), OGG1 (□), or 8-oxoG (▴) alone, together with GTPγS (60 pmol). G, GTP-GDP exchange by OGG1. H-Ras protein (6 pmol) was loaded with GTP, and guanine nucleotide exchange was initiated by adding 6 pmol of OGG1 plus 8-oxoG (♦) or 0.6 pmol of OGG1 plus 8-oxoG (■), OGG1 (□), or 8-oxoG (▴) alone, together with 10-fold excess GDP. Ras-GTP was quantified using pulldown immunoblot assays as in Fig. 1. G and F, right panels, bands in left panels were quantitated by densitometry (ImageJ), and the time course of nucleotide exchange is depicted graphically. n = 3–4.

Activation of GTPases involves displacement of GDP by GTP, a process mediated by GEFs (24). GEFs accelerate the exchange of GDP for GTP in Ras-GTPase, and active GTP-bound Ras releases GEF (24, 25). We then explored a possible interaction between OGG1 and Ras (16, 17, 26) and observed that in the presence of 8-oxoG, OGG1 specifically was bound to H-Ras (Fig. 2C, lane 2). However, OGG1 alone did not interact with H-Ras under identical conditions (Fig. 2C, lane 1), suggesting that an 8-oxoG-induced conformational change in OGG1 (Fig. 2A) allows its binding to Ras. Quantitation of eluted OGG1 and comparison with input Ras indicated a nearly equimolar binding of OGG1 to H-Ras (Fig. 2D). Furthermore, GTP was more effective than GDP in inhibiting the interaction between Ras and OGG1·8-oxoG (Fig. 2E). These data strongly suggest that the conformation of nucleotide-free Ras allows the most stable interaction with OGG1·8-oxoG, which is weakened in the presence of guanine nucleotides. Similar interactions of K-Ras and N-Ras with OGG1·8-oxoG were also observed, and guanine nucleotides, especially GTP, decreased these interactions (supplemental Fig. S4, A and B). Our observations are consistent with those showing high affinity binding between nucleotide-free Ras and GEF (e.g. CDC25), which is decreased to an undetectable level by guanine nucleotides, especially GTP, due to nucleotide-induced conformational changes in the Ras protein (16, 27). In controls, other oxidized base-specific DNA glycosylases (NEIL1 and NEIL2) did not interact with H-Ras (supplemental Fig. S4, C and D).

Increases in the Ras-GTP level upon exposure of cells to 8-oxoG (Fig. 1) and physical interaction between Ras and OGG1 (Fig. 2, C, D, and E) could cause guanine nucleotide exchange. Indeed, in the presence of 8-oxoG, OGG1 caused replacement of GDP-bound to Ras with GTP (Fig. 2F) at equimolar or higher molar ratios of H-Ras:OGG1. We subsequently showed that OGG1 also catalyzed the release of H-Ras-bound GTP replacement with GDP (Fig. 2G). OGG1 or 8-oxoG alone did not induce guanine nucleotide exchange (Fig. 2, F and G). Densitometric analysis of the bands in Fig. 2, F and G (left panels) shows striking similarities between the kinetics of GDP-GTP and GTP-GDP exchange on Ras (Fig. 2, F and G, right panels), suggesting that OGG1 indiscriminately releases the nucleotide in vitro and allows rebinding; thus its activity is similar to that of other Ras-GEFs (16, 27). In the intracellular environment, due to the high GTP:GDP ratio (∼10-fold higher GTP than GDP; (25)), the released GDP is exchanged for GTP in the Ras protein. OGG1·8-oxoG induced similar guanine nucleotide exchange with N-Ras and K-Ras (supplemental Fig. S5, A–D).

Ras-GTP binds to the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of the Raf1 serine/threonine kinase (14), and its subsequent phosphorylation is necessary, but not sufficient, for mediating the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity of Raf1 as phosphorylated Raf1 requires additional protein-protein and membrane-lipid interactions (28). Increasing the cellular 8-oxoG level in MRC5 cells induced rapid phosphorylation of the MAPK kinase (MEK1/2) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) and the nuclear translocation of the latter (Fig. 3, A and B). To verify that ERK1/2 phosphorylation is Ras-dependent, H-, K-, and N-Ras were depleted with siRNA (Fig. 3C, upper panel). After 8-oxoG addition, ERK1/2 phosphorylation was significantly decreased in N-Ras-ablated MRC5 cells (Fig. 3C, middle panel, last lane).

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 3.

Activated Ras-mediated phosphorylation of MAPKs in 8-oxoG-treated cells. A, MRC5 cells were exposed to 1 μm 8-oxoG and lysed at the times indicated, and phosphorylated MEK 1/2 (p-MEK1/2) and -ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) levels were determined (upper panels) by Western blotting. Total MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 levels served as loading controls (lower panels). B, nuclear accumulation of phosphorylated ERK1/2 in MRC5 cells in response to 8-oxoG. Right panels, DAPI-stained nuclei. Scale bars: 10 μm. C, N-Ras-dependent ERK1/2 phosphorylation in MRC5 cells. Upper panel, levels of total Ras after depletion by siRNA to H-, K-, and N-Ras, shown by Western blotting. siRNA-transfected cells were treated with 1 μm 8-oxoG for 15 min, and phosphorylated ERK1/2 and ERK1/2 levels were assessed by Western blot analysis (middle and lower panels). D, isotype-specific activation of Ras in 8-oxoG-exposed MRC5 cells. Upper panel, activation of Ras isoforms after 8-oxoG addition (15 min). Ras-GTP levels were determined in 250 μg of cell extracts by pulldown assay (15, 16). Middle panel, H-, K-, and N-Ras levels in mock- and 8-oxoG-treated cells. Lower panel, total Ras in cell extracts (25 μg/lane) is shown by pan-Ras antibody. n = 3–6.

Immunoblotting analysis showed abundant expression of N-Ras and K-Ras in MRC5 cells, whereas H-Ras was barely detectable (Fig. 3D, middle panel). Importantly, the addition of 8-oxoG to these cells resulted almost exclusively in N-Ras activation (Fig. 3D, upper panels), demonstrating selectivity to the activation process. These data are consistent with those showing that siRNA to N-Ras decreased ERK1/2 phosphorylation, whereas only a marginal effect of K-Ras depletion was seen (Fig. 3C, middle panel). To test whether 8-oxoG activates only N-Ras or other isoforms as well, we examined HeLa-S cells, which express H-Ras, K-Ras, and N-Ras (supplemental Fig. 6A). After 8-oxoG addition, H-, K-, and N-Ras were all activated (supplemental Fig. 6B), which implies that the 8-oxoG base activates Ras isoforms in a cell type-specific manner in OGG1-proficient cells.

In conclusion, we document for the first time that OGG1 binds the free 8-oxoG base at a nonsubstrate site with high affinity and that this complex interacts with the canonical Ras family GTPases to increase their GTP-bound forms by facilitating guanine nucleotide exchange. OGG1-mediated Ras activation initiates signal transduction for transcriptional activation of downstream genes. We propose that 8-oxoG released from DNA by OGG1 binds back to the enzyme to activate signaling pathways including those that may modulate expression of enzymes that inhibit 8-oxoG-induced mutagenesis by activating or preventing 8-oxoG incorporation into DNA from the nucleotide pool. We thus tested whether OGG1·8-oxoG-induced signaling affects the expression of MutT homolog-1 (MTH1) and MTH2 isoforms, the human homologs of Escherichia coli MutT, which hydrolyzes 8-oxodGTP (28). MTH1 but not the MTH2 gene was activated in MRC5 cells at 6 h after treatment with 8-oxoG (supplemental Fig. S7). Whether 8-oxoG similarly activates DNA repair in vivo has not yet been investigated. In any case, our results so far suggest an unusual, complex signaling network activated by small GTPases and triggered by the generation and repair of 8-oxoG in the genome.

Acknowledgments

REFERENCES