Table 1

Studies of arsenic exposure and clinical cardiovascular disease outcomes (18 new studies available after 2005 systematic review)

Study, yearDesignPopulationMen (%)Age Range (yrs)Arsenic AssessmentExposed vs. ReferenceEndpoint AscertainmentOutcome (s)No. of cases/non-casesRelative Risk95 % Confidence IntervalAdjustment Factors
Taiwan
Liao 2012 [27]CO (Int)HAA (3 villages in SW Taiwan)43.335–85CEI from village well water levels>14.7 vs. <17.4 ppm-yDeath RegistryCVD mortality10 deaths1.890.50–7.10Age, sex, cigarette smoking, hypertension, diabetes, abnormal LDH elevation, Framingham CVD risk score, AST
Cheng 2010a [34]CO (Ext)HAA (SW & NE Taiwan)56>35Village well water levelsHAA vs. general populationDeath registryStroke mortality8,867 deaths1.111.07–1.14Age, sex
Wu 2010 [33]CO (Int)HAA (NE Taiwan)47≥40Household well water levels50–300 vs. ≤50 μg/LDeath registryCVD mortality22 deaths2.070.74–5.80Age, sex, triglyceride, hypertension history, diabetes history, HO-1 genotype, and competing risk of death from malignant neoplasm or other specified causes
Tseng 2005b [24]CSHAA (3 villages in SW Taiwan)45≥30Urine total arsenic & CEI from village well water>64.33 μg/L urine vs. 0 mg/L-y CEIABIPAD prevalence54/4253.840.86–17.25Age, sex, BMI, alcohol drinking, cholesterol
Horng & Lin 1997a [35]CCHAA53NRUrine total arsenic>75th vs. <25th p (15.3 μg/L vs. 5.1 μg/L)Blackfoot disease patientsBFD prevalence32/321.851.43–2.40
Other high exposure areas (Bangladesh, Chile, Inner Mongolia, and Pakistan)
Chen 2011 [28••]CO (Int)Araihazar, BangladeshNR18–75Baseline individual well water levels>80th vs. <20th p (mean 266 μg/L vs. mean 3.7 μg/L)Verbal autopsy, medical recordsCVD mortality106 deaths1.460.96–2.20Age, sex, education, BMI, smoking status
CHD mortality40 deaths1.940.99–3.84
Stroke mortality41 deaths1.070.54–2.12
Baseline urine total arsenic levels (μg/g creatinine)>80th vs. <20th p (mean 642 μg/g vs. mean 69 μg/g)CVD mortality90 deaths1.551.01–2.37
CHD mortality34 deaths1.900.91–3.98
Stroke mortality35 deaths1.030.53–2.03
Khan 2010a [36]CS1 village in Bangladesh50≥30Village drinking water levels>50 μg/L w/arsenicosis vs. <50 μg/L w/out arsenicosisABIPAD prevalence19/2215.81.26–26.85Age, sex, smoking, BMI, diabetes, blood pressure status
Sohel 2009 [29•]CO (Int)Matlab, Bangladesh50≥15Household well levels>300 vs. <10 μg/LVerbal autopsyCVD mortality281 deaths1.371.07–1.77Age, sex, education, asset score (SES)
Yuan 2007a [37]CO (Ext)Regions of Chile in 1958–1970 (peak arsenic exposure in Region II)NR≥20Approximate population- weighted drinking water levelsRegion II vs. Region VDeath certificateCVD mortality6,164 deaths1.010.88–1.17Age, sex
CHD mortality2,196 deaths1.231.00–1.45
Stroke mortality1,624 deaths0.890.78–1.00
PAD mortality790 deaths1.030.84–1.21
Wade 2009c [30]CO (Int)Inner Mongolia (1 village)500–>80Household, shared, or community well levels>300 vs. <5 μg/LVerbal autopsy & medical record reviewCVD mortality152 deaths2.470.50–12.18Age, sex, education, smoking, drinking, and farm work
Stroke mortality54 deaths1.020.16–6.71
Xia 2009a [38]CSInner Mongolia (1 village)500 – >80Household well levels>300 vs. <5 μg/LSelf-reportCVD prevalence269/3,0381.720.81–3.67Age, sex, education, smoking, household income, water source type, alcohol consumption
Per 50 μg/L increaseStroke prevalence127/12,2071.030.93–1.15
Afridi 2010, 2011a,d [39,40]CCHyderabad, Pakistan5745–60Scalp hair total arsenic levels75th vs. 25th p (1.28 μg/g vs. 1.14 μg/g)eCoronary angiogram and at least one positive test of MI (stress text or echocardiography)MI incidence58/613.411.67–6.99Age, SES
Urine total arsenic levels75th vs. 25th p (6.06 μg/L vs. 3.66 μg/L)f58/616.622.05–21.33
Low to moderate exposure areas (U.S., Spain, Slovakia, Japan)
Gong & O’Bryant 2012a [41]CS3 rural counties (Texas, U.S.)3140–96Estimated residential drinking water levels75th vs. 25th p (8.1 μg/L vs. 4.1 μg/L)Self-reported physician diagnosisCHD prevalence69/4301.461.39–1.53AS3MT genotype, ethnicity, age, gender, education, smoking, use of antihypertensive meds, alcoholism
Lisabeth 2010f [31•]CO (Int)27 zip codes in Genesee county (Michigan, U.S.)50≥ 45Population-weighted average zip code drinking water levels80th vs. 20th p (19–22.3 μg/L vs. 0.3–<4.5 μg/L)Hospital inpatient databaseIschemic stroke hospitalizations14,033 admissions2.741.66–4.53Age, sex, income, race
Medrano 2010 [32•]CO (Ext)651 municipalities in SpainNR>20Municipal drinking water levels>10 vs. < 1 μg/LDeath certificateCVD mortality158,419 deaths1.030.98–1.08Sex, age and the following provincial level variables: income, hospital beds, CV risk factors, dietary factors, and water characteristics
CHD mortality50,244 deaths1.050.95–1.08
Stroke mortality42,164 deaths1.070.95–1.09
Rapant 2009a [42]CO (Ext)1 region in SlovakiagNRNRMean groundwater levelsExposed region vs. general populationDeath certificateCVD mortalityNR1.08NR
Yoshikaw a 2008a [43]CO (Ext)264 municipalities in Japan47NR5-year average municipal environmental air levels>90th vs. ≤10th p (≥2.70 ng/m3 vs. <0.77 ng/m3)National health mapsCVD mortality14,247 deaths1.030.99–1.06Age, sex
Stroke mortality13,596 deaths1.020.98–1.05
Meliker 2007a [44]CO (Ext)6 counties (Michigan, U.S.)NR≥35Population-weighted county drinking water levels6 counties vs. general populationDeath certificateCVD mortality52,606 deaths1.131.11–1.15Age, sex, race
CHD mortality26,646 deaths1.010.99–1.03
Stroke mortality8,503 deaths1.191.16–1.23
PAD mortality2,549 deaths1.030.97–1.08

ABI: ankle-brachial blood pressure index; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; BMI: body mass index; CABG: coronary artery bypass graft surgery; CBVD: cerebrovascular disease; CC: case-control; CEI: cumulative exposure index = Σ arsenic levels in drinking water × time of exposure (i: specific village); CI: confidence interval; CO: cohort; CS: cross-sectional; CV: cardiovascular; DAAC: diseases of the arteries, arterioles, and capillaries; ECG: electrocardiogram; Ext.: external comparisons; HAA: High arsenic area; Int.: internal comparisons; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase; MI: myocardial infarction; NR: not reported; PAD: peripheral arterial disease; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; p: percentile; RR: relative risk; SES: socioeconomic status.

aRR and/or 95 % CI derived using the results reported in the original study.
bTseng et al. 2005 [24] presented results from the same subjects as Tseng et al. 1996 [25], which was included in the previous systematic review by Navas–Acien et al. (2005) [6]. However, Tseng et al. 2005 presents a new analysis of PAD prevalence associated with urine total arsenic.
cSubset of residents exposed since 1990.
dOnly including subjects with their first MI.
eWeighted average of 75th and 25th percentiles, by number of cases.
fThe Genesee zip code analysis was selected over results from the entire state of Michigan; Genesee county has the highest levels of exposure and the results were presented in quintiles of exposure.
gSpišsko–Gemerské rudohorie Mountains (mean arsenic levels in drinking water: 13 μg/L)
-