Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C infection in Libya: results from a national population based survey

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis B and C viruses (HBV and HCV) are the major causes of liver diseases in the world. The relative importance of HBV and HCV infections varies greatly from one part of the world to another and changes over time [1]. Worldwide, over two billion people are infected by HBV alone, of whom about one million die annually. Hepatitis C virus affects about 200 million people [2]. However, in many countries its prevalence is expected to surpass that of hepatitis B, particularly among certain risk groups that are vulnerable to both hepatitis B and C viruses [3].

The endemicity of HBV infection varies greatly over the world, from highly endemic areas (> 8% infection rate), to intermediate (2-8%) and low endemicity areas (< 2%). Africa is among the highly endemic areas, but some countries in the north fall in the intermediate category, with an average rate of about 7%, whereas most regions of west and east Africa are highly endemic areas with chronic infection rates of 7-10% [4]. In some countries, such as Senegal, a large part of the population will be exposed in the course of their lives to HBV and become infected [5]. All of central and southern Africa is also in the high endemicity category [6]. Few studies evaluated the status of HBV in Libya. In 2000, Daw et al. [7] reported a HBV prevalence of 10% among hospital health-care workers and that infection was associated with certain occupational risk factors.

Hepatitis C virus infection is a major public health problem [8,9]. African countries have among the highest prevalence rates of HCV in the world, ranging from 1 to 26% [10,11]. More than 28 million people are chronically infected with HCV in this continent, and it is difficult to speculate about current and future trends [3,12]. In Libya, one study reported that the prevalence of HCV among different populations varied according to the risk factor involved [13]. Recently, a comprehensive study was carried out on HCV genotypes in Libya. Hepatitis C virus genotype 4 was the predominant one, followed by HCV genotype 1 and then other less common genotypes [14]. However, further studies are needed to clarify the magnitude and impact of HCV in Libya.

Viral hepatitis has tremendous socioeconomic, health-care and even political repercussions. A better understanding of the epidemiology of viral hepatitis and the risk factors involved is among the priorities of any nation [15,16]. Reliable epidemiological data on prevalence rates and transmission routes [17,18] of viral hepatitis are essential for designing national control policies. The epidemiological data in Africa are scanty and vary greatly from one region to another [4]. Therefore, each country should adopt its own strategy to combat viral hepatitis.

Libya has an area of 1,775,500 km² and a population reported in mid 2006 as 5,323,991, giving a population density of 2.9 persons per km². The country boasts the highest literacy and educational enrolment in North Africa and among the Arab nations [19,20]. Life expectancy (73 years) and health-adjusted life expectancy (64 years) are among the best in the Middle East and North Africa [19,21]. Nevertheless, Libyan health services have been hampered by bureaucracy and lack of proper long-term planning [20,22]. Both Libyan and international medical experts have voiced concerns about the potential for increases in infection, particularly viral hepatitis and AIDS [23,24].

Recent data on the prevalence of hepatitis B and C viruses and risk factors among the Libyan population are lacking. Such data are important for understanding the burden of viral infection and for predicting future trends. Implementation of surveillance to guide public health policy is needed to efficiently control viral hepatitis spread in this country, and this requires reliable epidemiological data. In this comprehensive nationwide study we determined the prevalence of hepatitis B and C virus infections among the Libyan population and analysed the risk factors.

Methods

Results

The overall prevalence of HBsAg positivity was 2.2% (95% CI 2.1%-2.3%). The prevalence varied from one region to another (Figure 1). The rate was highest in Sirt (6.6%) and Tarhuna (3.4%), and lowest in Aljabel Alakhdar (1.0%), Benghazi (1.0%), and Ajdabia (1.4%). The overall prevalence of HCV was 1.2% but it varied from one region to another (Figure 1). The highest rates were in Fezzan (2.2%) and Albatnan (1.8%) and the lowest were in Misrata (0.6%), Sirt (1.0%) and Western Mountain (1.1%). The rate of HBV prevalence was significantly higher in males (2.6%; 95% CI 2.4-2.7) than in females (1.8%; 95% CI 1.6-1.9). The probability of being HBsAg positive was 1.4 times higher among males than females.

Open in a separate window

Figure 1

Map of Libya showing the prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections by region.

The overall unweighted prevalence of HCV was 1.2% (95% CI 1.1-1.3), and it rose to 1.3% after weighting. For those aged > 20 years, the unweighted and weighted percentages were not significantly different (1.5% and 1.6%, respectively). The prevalence rate was slightly higher among females than males but the difference was not statistically significant. The prevalence rates weighted for other factors (age group, education, marital status, type of dwelling, and risk exposure) are shown in Additional file 2: Table S2.

Figure 2 shows the prevalence of HBV and HCV among the Libyan population according to age. The prevalence of anti-HCV was stable at 0.8-0.9% until the age of 30 years, after which it rose steadily, reaching 2.7% in those above the age of 50 years. In contrast, the prevalence of HBsAg was lowest in the youngest age group (0.9%), and in the older groups it fluctuated between 2.0% and 2.9% without any evident temporal trend. However, it rose sharply after the age of 70 years.

Open in a separate window

Figure 2

Prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections by age, Libya, 2008.

The overall prevalence rates of HCV in males and females were similar (1.1% and 1.3%, respectively). The mean ages of anti-HCV positive females (31.7 ± 18.4 years) and males (35.6 + 20.9 years) were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than those of HBsAg positive females (26.3 + 16.8 years) and males (30.0 + 17.6 years). The mean age of HCV positive individuals was significantly higher than that of anti-HCV negative individuals for both males (almost 10 years difference) and females (7 years difference). The mean age of HBsAg positive individuals was also significantly higher (but to a lesser degree) among females (by < 2 years) and males (by < 4 years). More than 50% of the HBsAg positive individuals and about 40% of HCV positive cases were below 30 years of age.

The associations between hepatitis B and C virus infections and various factors are shown in Table 2. Hepatitis B virus was more prevalent among the illiterate group (2.9%) than among the literate groups: 1.6% among postgraduates and 2.3% among preparatory school students. The prevalence of HCV was also higher among the illiterate group (3.1%) whereas in the literate groups it ranged from 0.9% to 1.1%. The influence of marital status and living standard on the prevalence of hepatitis B and C is shown in Figure 3. Hepatitis B was more prevalent among the widowed, whereas HCV was more prevalent among single and younger individuals.

Open in a separate window

Figure 3

Prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections by demographic and social variables, Libya, 2008.A. Gender B. Education C. Marital Status D. Type of housing.

We also analysed the influence of risk factors, such as hospital admission, surgical operation, blood transfusion, intravenous drug use, and sexual behaviour, on the prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C (Figure 4). Hepatitis B virus was most prevalent among those with previous surgical operations (2.4%) or history of hospital admission (2.4%), followed by blood transfusion (2.1%) and promiscuous sexual behaviour (1.6%). Hepatitis C was most prevalent among intravenous drug users (7.4%) and less prevalent but still substantial in those undergoing blood transfusion (2.7%), surgical operation (2.3%) or hospital admission (1.9%).

Open in a separate window

Figure 4

Prevalence of hepatitis B and C infections by risk factors, Libya, 2008 *Statistically significant at 0.05.

Table 3 shows the distribution of the estimated seroprevalence of HBV and HCV according to demographic characteristics. There were minimal differences in the estimated number of cases between males and females for HCV, but more than 60% of the estimated number of HBsAg positive individuals were males. Over 50% of them were below 30 years old, and about 40% of HCV cases were also below that age. In terms of educational level, the highest prevalence rate of infection was among illiterates for both viruses (weighted prevalence 2.6% for HBsAg, representing 12.3% of all estimated cases, and 3.0% for HCV, representing 21.8% of all estimated cases).

Discussion

The few studies on the prevalence of hepatitis B and C viruses in Libya examined specific population groups, such as parturient women and their newborns [26], healthcare workers, blood donors, transfusion patients [13] and hemodialysis patients [27], or other issues such as prevalence of genotypes [14]. However, none of these studies lend themselves to extrapolation to the general population, and our study, the first of its kind in Libya and the largest in Africa, was done to provide a basis for prioritising public health measures in Libya.

In the European Mediterranean countries, the overall prevalence of HBV ranges between 2.5% and 3.5% [28,29]. In contrast, North Africa is overall an area of relatively high HBV endemicity. Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco fall in the intermediate category, with current infection rates of about 7% [30]. But Egypt is classified among the highest endemicity countries, along with Sudan, Chad and Niger, all of which neighbour Libya [31,32]. The lower prevalence rate of HBV we observed (2.2%) classifies Libya in the lower part of the low-intermediate endemicity class (2-7% category). This lower rate could be due to the better socioeconomic conditions and the early efforts by the National Prevention Program of Infectious Diseases in Libya. Vaccination against HBV infection has been strongly encouraged and offered free of charge in Libya since 1989, and in 1991 it became compulsory for infants 3 months of age and children 12 years of age.

Hepatitis C is an emerging problem among the Mediterranean countries, where the estimated prevalence ranges from 1.0-2.6%, and isolated areas in Italy and Greece have rates of 7-20% among the general adult population [33,34]. A similar picture was also found in Tunisia and Morocco, where the rates ranged from 1.7 to 2.9%, with higher rates in some regions [35,36]. Hepatitis C virus screening and surveillance is minimal at the national level in these countries. In Libya, a study conducted between 1991 and 2001 indicated that the prevalence of HCV ranged from 1.2% to 1.6% among blood donors and healthy individuals but was much higher (20.5%) among hospital personnel [13]. The 1.2% rate we observed in our country-wide study classifies Libya as a low endemicity country. Libya has made screening mandatory for all blood donors, pregnant women, and patients at high risk of having surgery, and has introduced a national registry system covering all positive individuals.

We were not surprised by the substantial regional variation in prevalence rate in Libya. Such variation has also been reported in other Mediterranean countries, such as Italy, Greece and Spain [37-39]. The variation observed in Libya is probably related to different factors, including socioeconomic conditions, but one particular observation is noteworthy. The prevalence of HCV was highest in the southern region of Fezzan (2.08%) and the eastern region of Albatnan (1.77%). The high prevalence in the southern region could be related to its proximity to sub-Saharan countries and the hosting of many African immigrants. Likewise, the eastern region of Albatnan borders Egypt, which has the highest prevalence rate of HCV in the world [40,41], and from where many workers, both legitimate and illegal, come to Libya.

In Libya, the prevalence of HBV was low in children < 10 years of age (0.8%), and in the other age groups it ranged from 2.0 to 2.9%. In most other African countries the prevalence is high among infants and increases rapidly until the age of 30 years, and it rises even higher among those over forty years old [5,6,42]. The lower rate in the Libyan population could be due to the compulsory children vaccination program, which was introduced earlier in Libya than in other African countries.

The overall prevalence of HCV in our study was not significantly different between females and males, and it increased gradually after the age of 30 years. This is in agreement with previous studies carried out in Libya, which showed a peak in the prevalence of HCV among those 46-55 years old [13]. Other studies, particularly from North America, also showed the highest prevalence in the 30-49 year age group in all racial groups [43,44].

We also analysed the risk factors associated with HBV and HCV infections. The influence of risk factors on the prevalence rate was evident for HCV. The prevalence rate among those with risk factors ranged from 1.9 to 7.4%, whereas among those without risk factors it was 1.3% (p < 0.025). The most prominent risk factor was intravenous drug use, with 7.4% of intravenous drug users testing positive for HCV. In this context, it is important to note that active drug users are less likely to participate in health surveys, and the actual overall prevalence rate is likely higher than the observed rate [45,46]. A recent study on ~1200 Libyan patients chronically infected with HCV correlated genotypes with risk factors. That study indicated that recent drug use was significantly linked to emergence of new genotypes, lending further credence to the role of intravenous drug use in HCV transmission in Libya [13]. Accordingly, we expect that the prevalence of HCV may increase in Libya because there is consensus that HCV-infected populations are heavily weighted towards intravenous drug use worldwide [47-49].

Our findings show that the prevalence rates of HBV and HCV in Libya are relatively low, and this could be an indicator of the success of the national efforts to control these infections. However, we only assessed a marker of the prevalence of HBV chronic infection (HBsAg), which represents the reservoir of infection and of future complications (cirrhosis and liver cancer). We did not estimate the proportion of those who had ever been infected in Libya, which can be estimated by testing for serum anti-HBc antibodies. Moreover, the higher rates in regions bordering high endemicity countries and the poorly controlled state of these borders can lead to an increase in prevalence, especially during this time when the country as whole is experiencing many difficulties. Continuous surveillance and maintenance of the national program for combating hepatitis are essential, and further studies are needed, particularly on co-infection with HIV, which is a problem in this region. Our findings would be useful for making estimates and projections about the overall disease burden, including the complications of hepatitis infection, such as cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma [50]. Recently, El-Bouzedi [51] constructed a mathematical model using published epidemiological data on viral hepatitis to estimate the future consequences of hepatitis infection in Libya. Such modelling will inform health policy, resource allocation and healthcare delivery and may improve the management of patients with viral hepatitis.

Competing interests

The authors state that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MD designed the study, extracted the data, and drafted and finalised the manuscript. AE analyzed the data and contributed to the drafting of the data. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/14/17/prepub

Supplementary Material

References