Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Bioinformatics. 2016 Oct 1; 32(19): 3012–3014.
Published online 2016 Jun 10. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw325
PMCID: PMC5039916
PMID: 27288499

GenVisR: Genomic Visualizations in R

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

Summary: Visualizing and summarizing data from genomic studies continues to be a challenge. Here, we introduce the GenVisR package to addresses this challenge by providing highly customizable, publication-quality graphics focused on cohort level genome analyses. GenVisR provides a rapid and easy-to-use suite of genomic visualization tools, while maintaining a high degree of flexibility by leveraging the abilities of ggplot2 and Bioconductor.

Availability and Implementation: GenVisR is an R package available via Bioconductor (https://bioconductor.org/packages/GenVisR) under GPLv3. Support is available via GitHub (https://github.com/griffithlab/GenVisR/issues) and the Bioconductor support website.

Contacts: ude.ltsuw@htiffirgibo or ude.ltsuw@tiffirgm

Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

1 Introduction

The continued development of massively parallel sequencing technologies has led to an exponential growth in the amount of genomic data produced (Kodama et al., 2012). This growth has in turn enabled scientists to investigate increasingly large, cohort-level genomic datasets. Generating intuitive visualizations is a critical component in recognizing patterns and investigating underlying biological properties in cohorts under study. A significant bottleneck exists, however, between data generation and subsequent visualization and interpretation (Good et al., 2014). Additionally, generating publication-quality figures for effective communication of these data typically requires ad hoc methods such as manual creation or extensive graphic manipulation with third party software. This process is both time intensive and difficult to automate/reproduce. Further, the absence of software supporting multiple species can make this process even more demanding. Here, we present GenVisR, a Bioconductor package to address these issues. GenVisR provides a user-friendly, flexible and comprehensive suite of tools for visualizing complex genomic data in three categories (small variants, copy number alterations and data quality) for multiple species of interest.

2 Visualization of small variants

The identification of small variants (SNVs and indels) within a genomic context is of paramount importance for the elucidation of the genetic basis of disease. Numerous tools and resources have been created to identify variants in sequencing data (Wang et al., 2013). Conversely, few tools exist to visually display and summarize these variants across sample cohorts. Given a gene of interest, it is often useful to view variant occurrences in the context of the translated protein product (Zhang et al., 2012). A variety of options exist to achieve this; however tools that offer both automation and flexibility to perform this task are lacking (Supplementary Table S1) (Griffith et al., 2015; Leiserson et al., 2015; Nilsen et al., 2012; Yin et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2015). The function lolliplot was developed to allow for precise control over visualization options (Fig. 1A). This includes the ability to choose Ensembl annotation databases for protein domain displays and to plot multiple tracks of mutations above and below the protein representation. Another common objective of genomic studies is to identify variant recurrence across multiple genes within a cohort. The GenVisR function waterfall was developed to calculate and rapidly illustrate the mutational burden of variants on both a gene and sample level, and further differentiates between variant types (Fig. 1B) (Krysiak et al., 2016; Ma et al., 2016; Wagner et al., 2016). Mutually exclusive genomic events at the variant level are emphasized in this visualization by arranging samples in a hierarchical fashion such that samples with mutations in the most recurrently mutated genes are ranked first. Finally, it is often informative to investigate the rate of transition and transversion mutations observed across a set of cases. For example, lung tumors originating from patients with a history of tobacco smoke exposure display a pattern of enrichment for C to A or G to T transversions (Govindan et al., 2012). The function TvTi (transversion/transition) was developed to improve recognition of these types of patterns within a cohort.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is btw325f1p.jpg

Selected representation of GenVisR visualizations. (A) Output from lolliplot for select TCGA breast cancer samples (Cancer Genome Atlas Network, 2012) shows two mutational hotspots in PIK3CA within the accessory and catalytic kinase domains. (B) Output from waterfall shows mutations for five genes across 50 select TCGA breast cancer samples with mutation type indicated by colour in the grid and per sample/gene mutation rates indicated in the top and left sidebars. (C) Output from genCov displays coverage (bottom plots) showing focal deletions in sample A (last exon) and B (second intron) within a gene of interest. GC content (top plot) is encoded via a range of colours for each exon. (D) Output from lohSpec for HCC1395 (Griffith et al., 2015), HCC38 and HCC1143 (Daemen et al., 2013) breast cancer cell lines shows LOH events, across all chromosomes, shaded as dark blue. (E) Output from covBars shows cumulative coverage for 10 samples indicating that for each sample, at least ∼75% of targeted regions were covered at ≥ 35× depth. (F) Output from compIdent for the HCC1395 breast cancer cell line (tumor and normal) shows variant coverage (bottom plot) and SNP allele fraction (main plot) indicating highly related samples. Note that 4/24 positions are discrepant and likely result from extensive LOH in this cell line

3 Visualization of copy number alterations

Copy number alterations occurring within the genome are implicated in a variety of diseases (Beroukhim et al., 2010). The function GenCov illustrates amplifications and deletions across one or more samples in a genomic region of interest (Fig. 1C). A key feature of GenCov is the effective use of plot space, especially for large regions of interest, via the differential compression of various features (introns, exons, UTR) within the region of interest. For a broader view the function cnView plots copy number calls, and the corresponding ideogram, for an individual sample at the chromosome level. The function cnSpec displays amplifications and deletions on a still larger scale via copy number segments calls. This information is displayed as a heat map arranged in a grid indexed by chromosomes and samples. Alternatively, cnFreq displays the frequency of samples within a cohort that are observed to have copy number gains or losses at specific genomic loci. In addition to copy number changes, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) often plays an important role in genomic diseases. For example, in acute myeloid leukemia copy neutral LOH has been associated with shorter complete remission and worse overall survival (Gronseth et al., 2015). The function lohSpec displays LOH regions observed within a cohort (Fig. 1D) by plotting a sliding window mean difference in variant allele fractions for tumor and normal germline variants.

4 Visualization of data quality

In genomic studies, the quality of sequencing data is of critical importance to the proper interpretation of observed variations. Therefore, we provide a suite of functions focused on data quality assessment and visualization. The first of these, covBars, provides a framework for displaying the sequencing coverage achieved for targeted bases in a study (Fig. 1E). A second function, compIdent, aids in the identification of mix-ups among samples that are thought to originate from the same individual (Fig. 1F). This is achieved by displaying the variant allele fraction of SNPs in relation to each sample. By default, 24 biallelic ‘identity SNPs’ (Pengelly et al., 2013) are used to determine sample identity.

5 Example usage

GenVisR was developed with the naïve R user in mind. Functions are well documented and have reasonable defaults set for optional parameters. To illustrate, creating Figure 1B was as simple as executing the waterfall function call on a standard MAF (version 2.4) file containing variant mutation data and choosing which genes to plot:

genes = c(“PIK3CA”, “TP53”, “USH2”, “MLL3”, “BRCA1”)

GenVisR::waterfall(x=maf_file, plotGenes=genes)

The MAF file format originally developed for The Cancer Genome Atlas project (Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2008) is the default file format accepted by waterfall. This format was chosen based on its simplicity and accessibility. A number of resources exist to convert VCF files common to most variant callers to MAF format. In the interest of maintaining flexibility, the waterfall and other GenVisR functions are able to accept alternative file types as input.

6 Conclusion

GenVisR provides features and functions for many popular genomic visualizations not otherwise available in a single convenient package (Table S1). By leveraging the abilities of ggplot2 (Wickham, 2009) it confers a level of customizability not previously possible. Virtually any aspect of a plot can be changed simply by adding an additional layer onto the graphical object. Thus, GenVisR allows for publication quality figures with a minimal amount of required input and data manipulation while maintaining a high degree of flexibility and customizability.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data:

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Richard K. Wilson and Elaine R. Mardis for their encouragement and support in the creation of this work. We also thank Chris A. Miller and Dave Larson for their creative guidance.

Funding

MG was supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute (K99HG007940). OLG was supported by the National Cancer Institute (K22CA188163).

Conflict of Interest: none declared.

References

  • Beroukhim R. et al. (2010) The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers. Nature, 463, 899–905. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cancer Genome Atlas Network. (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature, 490, 61–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. (2008) Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature, 455, 1061–1068. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Daemen A. et al. (2013) Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer. Genome Biol., 14, R110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Good B.M. et al. (2014) Organizing knowledge to enable personalization of medicine in cancer. Genome Biol., 15, 438. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Govindan R. et al. (2012) Genomic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer in smokers and never-smokers. Cell, 150, 1121–1134. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Griffith M. et al. (2015) Genome Modeling System: A Knowledge Management Platform for Genomics. PLoS Comput. Biol., 11, e1004274. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gronseth C.M. et al. (2015) Prognostic significance of acquired copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer, 121, 2900–2908. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kodama Y. et al. (2012) The Sequence Read Archive: explosive growth of sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D54–D56. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Krysiak K. et al. (2016) A genomic analysis of Philadelphia chromosome-negative AML arising in patients with CML. Blood Cancer J., 6, e413. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Leiserson M.D. et al. (2015) MAGI: visualization and collaborative annotation of genomic aberrations. Nat. Methods, 12, 483–484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ma C.X. et al. (2016) A phase I trial of BKM120 (Buparlisib) in combination with fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 22, 1583–1591. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nilsen G. et al. (2012) Copynumber: efficient algorithms for single- and multi-track copy number segmentation. BMC Genomics, 13, 591. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pengelly R.J. et al. (2013) A SNP profiling panel for sample tracking in whole-exome sequencing studies. Genome Med., 5, 89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wagner A.H. et al. (2016) DGIdb 2.0: mining clinically relevant drug-gene interactions. Nucleic Acids Res., 44, D1036–D1044. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Q. et al. (2013) Detecting somatic point mutations in cancer genome sequencing data: a comparison of mutation callers. Genome Med., 5, 91. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wickham H. (2009) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Yin T. et al. (2012) ggbio: an R package for extending the grammar of graphics for genomic data. Genome Biol., 13, R77.. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang J. et al. (2012) The genetic basis of early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nature, 481, 157–163. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou X. et al. (2015) Exploring genomic alteration in pediatric cancer using ProteinPaint. Nat. Genet., 48, 4–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bioinformatics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

-