Logo of bmccanc
PMC full text:
Published online 2017 Nov 7. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3704-8

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the included studies

ArticleCountryNumber (M/F)a Age Mean ± SDb/Median (range) (yc)TSd MarkersAdjuvant therapySTe Rate (+)f OMg HRh estimateCSi MAj
Kust 2016 [33]Croatia82(49/33)Mean:66 ± 9.6I-IIICK20Post-OPk CTl for III and part of IIPre-OP22 (26.83%)OSm
DFSn
Data extrapolatedYesNo
Liu 2013 [28]China92(60/32)Mean:66 ± 9.6I-IIICK20_Pre-OP31 (25%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Liu 2013 (1) [28]China41(NR)NRo IICK20Without_NROS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Liu 2013 (2) [28]China51(NR)NRIIICK20Post-OP CT_NROS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Yokobori (1) 2013 [29]JapanTraining: 151(86/65)Mean:66.76 ± 11.02IIPLS3WithoutPre-OP33 (21.85%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Yokobori (2) 2013 [29]JapanTraining: 131(75/56)Mean:66.76 ± 11.02IIIPLS3Post-OP CTPre-OP38 (29%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Yokobori (3) 2013 [29]JapanValidation: 158(96/62)Mean:67.51 ± 11.08IIPLS3WithoutPre-OP35 (22.15%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Yokobori (4) 2013 [29]JapanValidation: 103(63/40)Mean:67.51 ± 11.08IIIPLS3Post-OP CTPre-OP30 (29.12%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Shimada (1) 2012 [19]Japan111(60/51)Median:68(27–82)IICEA, CK19, CK20, CD133WithoutPost-OP63 (56.76%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Shimada (2) 2012 [19]Japan86(47/39)Median:68(27–82)IIICEA, CK19, CK20, CD133Post-OP CTPost-OP61 (70.93%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Iinuma (1) 2011 [30]JapanTraining: 420(224/196)Mean:66.0 ± 12.4I-IIICEA, CK19, CK20, CD133_Post-OP106(25.24%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Iinuma (1–1) 2011 [30]JapanTraining: 176(NR)NRIICEA, CK19, CK20, CD133Without_NROS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Iinuma (1–2) 2011 [30]JapanTraining:150(NR)NRIIICEA, CK19, CK20, CD133Post-OP CT_NROS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Iinuma (2) 2011 [30]JapanValidation: 315(175/140)Mean:66.0 ± 12.4I-IIICEA, CK19, CK20, CD133_Post-OP75(23.81%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Iinuma (2–1) 2011 [30]JapanValidation: 143(NR)NRIICEA, CK19, CK20, CD133Without_NROS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Iinuma (2–2) 2011 [30]JapanValidation: 97(NR)NRIIICEA, CK19, CK20, CD133Post-OP CT_NROS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Uen 2008 [31]China438(234/204)NRI-IIICK19, CK20, CEA, hTERTPost-OP CT for III and part of IIPost-OP (1 Wp)137 (31.27%)DFSReported in textYesYes
Barreto 2007 [32]UK113(NR)Mean:67I-IIICEA, CK20Post-OP CT for III and part of IIPost-OP (24 hq)34 (30.09%)DFSReported in textYesYes
Koch 2006 [33]Germany90(59/31)Mean:66.1IICK20Post-OP CT for rectal cancerPost-OP28 (31.1%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesNo
Lloyd 2006 [34]Australia125 (74/51)Median:74 (43–95)I-IICK20, CEA, EphB4, LAMγ2, MATWithoutPre-OP5 (4%)DFSData extrapolatedYesNo
Sadahrio 2005 [35]Japan100(NR)NRI-IIICEANRIntra-OP39 (39%)OS
DFS
Data extrapolatedYesYes
Bessa 2003 [36]Spain66 (23/43)Median:73I-IIICEAPost-OP CT for III and part of IIPost-OP36 (54.55%)OS
DFS
Reported in textYesYes
Ito 2002 [37]Japan99(62/37)NRI-IIICEANRPost-OP26 (26.26%)DFSData extrapolatedYesNo

NOTE: a M/F Male/female, b SD Standard deviation, c Y Year, d TS Tumor stage (UICC), e ST Sampling time, f Rate (+) Rate of CTCs-positive patients, g OM Outcome measured, h HR Hazard ratio, i CS Curative surgery, j MA Multivariance analysis, k OP Operation, l CT Chemotherapy, m OS Overall survival, n DFS Disease-free survival, o NR Not reported, p W Week, q h hour

-