Table 5

Binary logistic regression; DV: Metabolic syndrome in men, fully adjusted model a.

IVNormal BMI bOverweight BMI cObese BMI d
R2OR [95% CI]p-Value eR2OR [95% CI]p-ValueR2OR [95% CI]p-Value
%iAs f0.0730.979 [0.879, 1.069]0.6390.1011.017 [0.966, 1.071]0.5120.1101.000 [0.946, 1.058]0.994
%MMA g0.0730.974 [0.888, 1.068]0.5770.1011.019 [0.958, 1.083]0.5540.1120.979 [0.913, 1.049]0.549
%DMA h0.0741.019 [0.963, 1.078]0.5190.1020.986 [0.951 1.022]0.4290.1101.007 [0.966 1.050]0.728
PMI i0.0721.179 [0.230, 6.043] 0.8430.0990.926 [0.312, 2.748]0.8900.1100.995 [0.333, 2.979] 0.993
SMI j0.0721.470 [0.238, 9.081]0.6780.1060.477 [0.129, 1.757]0.2660.1100.929 [0.275, 3.144]0.906

a adjusted for age (continuous), Poverty Income Ratio (PIR < 1 vs. PIR ≥ 1)—calculated by dividing family income by the poverty guidelines specific to the survey year [30], race (White vs. non-White), and smoking status (dichotomous); b BMI < 25.0; c 25.0 ≤ BMI < 30.0; d BMI ≥ 30.0, R2 represents Cox & Snell R2 value; e p-value obtained from binary logistic regression (* significant at (α = 0.05)); f urine % arsenite; g urine % monomethylarsonous and monomethylarsonic acid; h urine % dimethylarsinic and dimethylarsinous acid; i primary methylation index; j secondary methylation index.

-