Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Version 1. Wellcome Open Res. 2018; 3: 46.
Published online 2018 Apr 23. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14430.1
PMCID: PMC5964628
PMID: 29900417

The Tatton-Brown-Rahman Syndrome: A clinical study of 55 individuals with de novo constitutive DNMT3A variants

Katrina Tatton-Brown, Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Original Draft Preparation,a,1,2,3 Anna Zachariou, Data Curation, Project Administration,1 Chey Loveday, Investigation,1 Anthony Renwick, Investigation,1 Shazia Mahamdallie, Investigation,1 Lise Aksglaede, Resources,4 Diana Baralle, Resources,5 Daniela Barge-Schaapveld, Resources,6 Moira Blyth, Resources,7 Mieke Bouma, Resources,8 Jeroen Breckpot, Resources,9 Beau Crabb, Resources,10 Tabib Dabir, Resources,11 Valerie Cormier-Daire, Resources,12 Christine Fauth, Resources,13 Richard Fisher, Resources,14 Blanca Gener, Resources,15 David Goudie, Resources,16 Tessa Homfray, Resources,2,3 Matthew Hunter, Resources,17,18 Agnete Jorgensen, Resources,19 Sarina G. Kant, Resources,6 Cathy Kirally-Borri, Resources,20 David Koolen, Resources,21 Ajith Kumar, Resources,22 Anatalia Labilloy, Resources,23,24 Melissa Lees, Resources,22 Carlo Marcelis, Resources,21 Catherine Mercer, Resources,5 Cyril Mignot, Resources,25 Kathryn Miller, Resources,26 Katherine Neas, Resources,27 Ruth Newbury-Ecob, Resources,28 Daniela T. Pilz, Resources,29 Renata Posmyk, Resources,30,31 Carlos Prada, Resources,23,24 Keri Ramsey, Resources,32 Linda M. Randolph, Resources,33 Angelo Selicorni, Resources,34 Deborah Shears, Resources,35 Mohnish Suri, Resources,36 I. Karen Temple, Resources,5 Peter Turnpenny, Resources,37 Lionel Van Maldergem, Resources,38 Vinod Varghese, Resources,39 Hermine E. Veenstra-Knol, Resources,40 Naomi Yachelevich, Resources,41 Laura Yates, Resources,14 Clinical Assessment of the Utility of Sequencing and Evaluation as a Service (CAUSES) Research Study, Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) Study, and Nazneen Rahman, Conceptualization, Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing1,42

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement

Peer Review Summary

Review dateReviewer name(s)Version reviewedReview status
2018 May 29Wei ShenVersion 1Approved
2018 May 18William T. Gibson and Sharri CyrusVersion 1Approved
2018 May 2Emma L. WakelingVersion 1Approved

Abstract

Tatton-Brown-Rahman syndrome (TBRS; OMIM 615879), also known as the DNMT3A-overgrowth syndrome, is an overgrowth intellectual disability syndrome first described in 2014 with a report of 13 individuals with constitutive heterozygous DNMT3A variants. Here we have undertaken a detailed clinical study of 55 individuals with de novo DNMT3A variants, including the 13 previously reported individuals. An intellectual disability and overgrowth were reported in >80% of individuals with TBRS and were designated major clinical associations. Additional frequent clinical associations (reported in 20-80% individuals) included an evolving facial appearance with low-set, heavy, horizontal eyebrows and prominent upper central incisors; joint hypermobility (74%); obesity (weight ³2SD, 67%); hypotonia (54%); behavioural/psychiatric issues (most frequently autistic spectrum disorder, 51%); kyphoscoliosis (33%) and afebrile seizures (22%). One individual was diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia in teenage years. Based upon the results from this study, we present our current management for individuals with TBRS

Keywords: DNMT3A, Tatton-Brown-Rahman, overgrowth, intellectual disability

Introduction

Tatton-Brown-Rahman syndrome (TBRS; OMIM 615879), also known as the DNMT3A-overgrowth syndrome, is an overgrowth intellectual disability (OGID) syndrome first described in 2014 with a report of 13 individuals with de novo heterozygous DNMT3A variants 1, 2. Subsequently, a further 22 individuals with TBRS have been reported 39.

In this report we have undertaken a detailed clinical evaluation of 55 individuals with de novo DNMT3A variants, including the 13 individuals we first reported in 2014. We have expanded and clarified the TBRS phenotype, delineating major and frequent clinical associations, which has informed our management of individuals with this new OGID syndrome.

Methods

The study was approved by the London Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (MREC MREC/01/2/44). Patients were identified through Clinical Genetics Services worldwide and written informed consent was obtained from all participating individuals and/or parents. Photographs, with accompanying written informed consent to publish, were requested from all participants and received from the families of 41 individuals. Detailed phenotype data were collected through a standardized clinical proforma, a DNMT3A specific clinical proforma and clinical review by one of the authors. Growth parameter standard deviations were calculated with reference to UK90 growth data 10.

The degree of intellectual disability was defined in relation to educational support as a child and living impairment as an adult:

  • -
    an individual with a mild intellectual disability typically had delayed milestones but would attend a mainstream school with some support and live independently, with support, as an adult;
  • -
    an individual with a moderate intellectual disability typically required high level support in a mainstream school or special educational needs schooling and would live with support as an adult;
  • -
    an individual with a severe intellectual disability typically required special educational needs schooling, had limited speech, and would not live independently as an adult.

55 individuals were included with a range of de novo heterozygous DNMT3A variants: missense variants (36 individuals with 30 different variants); stop gain variants (six individuals); frameshift variants (six individuals); whole gene deletions (four individuals including identical twins (COG1961 and COG2006)); in-frame deletions (two individuals) and a splice site variant (one individual, Figure 1, Table 1). Computational tools predicted all 30 missense variants to be deleterious ( Mutation Taster2 and SIFT (version 6.2.1), Supplementary Table 1) and the splice site variant was predicted to disrupt normal splicing. Importantly, some of the variants are common in the general population due to age-related clonal haematopoiesis, limiting the utility of databases such as gnomAD in DNMT3A variant pathogenicity stratification ( Supplementary Table 1) 11, 12.

Figure 1.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is wellcomeopenres-3-15708-g0000.jpg
DNMT3A and the positions and types of variants with protein truncating variants shown below the protein (black and red lollipops) and missense variants and inframe deletions (yellow and blue lollipops) shown above the protein.

Whole gene deletions and the splice site variant are not shown on this figure. The three DNMT3A domains are shaded in grey: the proline-tryptophan-tryptophan-proline (PWWP) domain, the ATRX-Dnmt3-Dnmt3L (ADD) domain and the Methyltransferase (MTase) domain.

Table 1.

Table of all individuals with TBRS and their associated phenotypes including growth and cognitive profiles.
Case
number
Variant typeNucleotide
change
Protein
change
InheritanceBW/
SD
BHC/
SD
BL/
SD
Age/
yrs
Ht/
SD
HC/
SD
Wt/
SD
IDBehavioural
issues
Joint
hyper
mobility
Hypotonia KyphoscoliosisAfebrile
seizures
Other clinical issues
COG1849frameshiftc.26_27delinsTde novo1.0nknk10.05.1nknkmodASDnoyesnoyesMultiple fungal and viral
infections, precocious
puberty, leg length
discrepancy
COG1919missensec.541C>Tp.(Arg181Cys)de novonknknk11.33.11.62.8modnononononoPre-auricular skin tags, 5th
toe nail hypoplasia
COG2017frameshiftc.759dupCde novo-0.4nknk7.73.92.23.3modnoyesyesnonoCAL macules, soft skin
COG0274in-frame
deletion
c.889_891delTGGde novo3.3nk1.718.03.02.7nkmodnonkyesnoyes
COG1843missensec.892G>Tp.(Gly298Trp)de novo1.6nk4.412.14.12.23.9modASD, anxietyyesyesnonoArachnoid cyst,
hypospadias
COG2008/
DDD260414
missensec.892G>Ap.(Gly298Arg)de novo2.12.8nk18.00.20.72.9modAnxietyyesnoyesnoMyopia (-3D)
COG2019/
DDD293780
missensec.901C>Tp.(Arg301Trp)de novonknknk9.32.12.11.3mildnoyesnonono
COG1963stop gainc.918G>Ap.(Trp306X)de novo1.51.2nk6.22.74.01.9sevASD,
regression
nkyesnoyesSeizures
COG1770missensec.929T>Ap.(Ile310Asn)de novo2.22.82.710.33.83.33.3sevASD,
compulsive
eating
yesyesyesyesVentriculomegaly and
Chiari malformation,
multiple renal cysts,
multiple urinary tract
infections, constipation,
lumbar haemangioma
COG1670frameshiftc.934_937dupTCTTde novo3.6nknk20.53.22.82.8sevTemper
tantrums,
aggressive,
Psychosis
(paranoid
hallucinations)
nononono
COG1962/
DDD271500
stop gainc.941G>Ap.(Trp314X)de novo0.7nknk5.02.10.52.2modnonononono
COG1974frameshiftc.1015delCde novo1.41.60.410.02.01.42.1modnonononono
COG1998missensec.1154C>Tp.(Pro385Leu)de novo-0.72.31.45.23.10.82.1modASDyesyesyesno
COG1916stop gainc.1296C>Gp.(Tyr432X)de novo2.94.43.621.03.90.63.2modASDyesnoyesnoAVNRT, mitral regurgitation,
pectus carinatum,
amblyopia, photophobia
COG2007/
DDD294475
stop gainc.1320G>Ap.(Trp440X)de novo1.8nknk10.53.22.81.3modnoyesnononoCryptorchidism
COG1925missensec.1523T>Cp.(Leu508Pro)de novo2.86.53.86.34.03.74.4mildASDyesyesyesnoCryptorchidism
COG0141missensec.1594G>Ap.(Gly532Ser)de novo2.2nknk25.02.32.94.5modASDnononono
COG1995missensec.1594G>Ap.(Gly532Ser)de novo3.9nknk22.02.93.63.0mildASDyesnonono
COG0422missensec.1643T>Ap.(Met548Lys)de novo1.31.6nk15.31.43.4/12.8
yrs
3.4sevAggressionyesyesnonoAtrial septal defect
COG2009/
DDD282776
missensec.1643T>Cp.(Met548Thr)de novo1.7nknk15.31.73.41.9sevASDyesyesnoyesUmbilical hernia, early
puberty, cryptorchidism
COG1288missensec.1645T>Cp.(Cys549Arg)de novo1.11.62.617.91.63.62.6modnoyesyesyesnoAtrial septal defect, sagittal
craniosynostosis
COG2010/
DDD283406
missensec.1684T>Cp.(Cys562Arg)de novonknknk9.51.70.3/5.1yrs1.0/5.1yrsmodnoyesnononoMild tonsillar ectopia
COG2003missensec.1743G>Cp.(Trp581Cys)de novo-1.0nknk20.31.11.11.2sevnoyesyesnoyesCryptorchidism, lipoma,
hirsutism
COG2013/
DDD265343
missensec.1743G>Tp.(Trp581Cys)de novo0.7nk2.32.52.52.71.4modnoyesyesnoyesChiari malformation and
ventriculomegaly, umbilical
hernia
COG2002missensec.1748G>Ap.(Cys583Tyr)de novo2.5nk1.115.41.71.61.2sevregressionyesyesyesyesSeizures (tonic-clonic)
COG0510stop gainc.1803G>Ap.(Trp601X)de novo2.9nk1.518.82.10.64.1sevobsessiveyesnononoEndochrondroma
COG1972splice sitec.1851+3G>Cde novo1.3nk1.76.64.0-1.23.1modnoyesnoyesnoStrabismus, myopia,
thyroid cyst
COG0553missensec.1943T>Cp.(Leu648Pro)de novo-0.4nknk19.02.53.14.3mildASDnononono
COG2021frameshiftc.2056delGde novo0.81.80.810.00.62.00.7mildnonknonoyesSeizures
COG1942missensec.2094G>Cp.(Trp698Cys)de novo0.4nknk21.03.72.51.4/18.9yrsmodASD, severe
psychosis
and bipolar
disorder
yesyesyesnoMenorrhagia, severe
constipation
COG1688missensec.2099C>Tp.(Pro700Leu)de novo1.2nk0.415.42.63.3modASDyesyesyesno
COG0316missensec.2141C>Gp.(Ser714Cys)de novo1.2nknk4.43.01.42.9sevnoyesyesyesnoBilateral
hydroureteronephrosis and
left ureteral ectasia, platelet
disorder, thick skull vault
and sclerosis of sutures
COG2004missensec.2204A>Cp.(Tyr735Ser)de novo1.6nknk20.02.52.82.5mildnononononoAML-FAB type M4
diagnosed age 12 years
COG0447missensec.2207G>Ap.(Arg736His)de novo1.0nk0.68.53.02.02.5mildnoyesnonono
COG1695missensec.2245C>Tp.(Arg749Cys)de novo0.80.62.015.52.83.81.4modnoyesnoyesnoVesico-ureteric reflux,
hypodontia
COG2005missensec.2245C>Tp.(Arg749Cys)de novo-1.0nk0.423.00.52.7modASD,
psychosis and
schizophrenia
yesnonono
COG0108missensec.2246G>Ap.(Arg749His)de novo0.3nknk20.81.21.34.4modnoyesyesnono
COG1632/
DDD263319
in-frame
deletion
c.2255_2257delTCTde novo1.82.22.5nknknkmodnonknononoTight achilles tendons
COG1512frameshiftc.2297dupAde novo4.03.5nk13.33.81.51.9modnoyesnonono
COG2011missensec.2309C>Tp.(Ser770Leu)de novo0.9nknk16.32.6-0.10.4modBipolar
disorder
yesyesyesnoAortic root enlargement
and mitral valve
regurgitation,
hyperthyroidism
COG1971missensec.2312G>Ap.(Arg771Gln)de novo1.2nknk3.13.43.4/2.6yrs3.1modASDnkyesnonoKeratosis pilaris
COG1964missensec.2401A>Gp.(Met801Val)de novo3.02.82.68.82.1-0.22.0modregressionyesnkyesyes
COG1771missensec.2512A>Gp.(Asn838Asp)de novo0.8nk1.5nknknkmildnoyesnkyesyesTesticular atrophy
COG1923missensec.2644C>Tp.(Arg882Cys)de novo3.04.4nk5.8-0.22.51.1modnoyesyesnonoHydrocephalus secondary
to neonatal intraventricular
bleed, swallowing
difficulties
COG1945missensec.2644C>Tp.(Arg882Cys)de novo0.80.50.62.02.70.32.9modnonoyesnonoCryptorchidism, capillary
malformation, strabismus,
bilateral inguinal herniae,
ventriculomegaly
COG1999missensec.2644C>Tp.(Arg882Cys)de novo0.9nk2.00.92.12.2modnoyesyesnonoVentriculomegaly,
obstructive and
central sleep apnoea,
cryptorchidism
COG2012missensec.2645G>Ap.(Arg882His)de novo0.32.21.21.5-0.2-0.8-1.4modnoyesyesyesnoAtrial septal defect, bifid
sternum, umbilical hernia
COG1760stop gainc.2675C>Ap.(Ser892X)de novo0.91.20.412.94.23.03.4mildnononononoPes planus
COG0109missensec.2705T>Cp.(Phe902Ser)de novo1.7nk2.021.51.51.41.7modASDyesnoyesnoMitral and tricuspid
regurgitation, polycystic
ovarian syndrome, myopia
COG1677missensec.2711C>Tp.(Pro904Leu)de novo0.7nk7.33.9-0.43.9modASDyesyesnonoGowers manoeuvre on
standing
COG1887missensec.2711C>Tp.(Pro904Leu)de novo1.8nk0.09.5-0.30.3-1.1modAnxiety and
ADHD
yesyesyesnoMitral regurgitation, Chiari
malformation
COG1813gene delde novo1.01.61.523.03.03.24.0modnoyesnononoDouble teeth, recurrent
infections, polycystic
ovaries syndrome
COG1961gene delde novo-0.1nknk5.82.71.92.8modASDnoyesnonoPatent ductus arteriosus,
hirsutism
COG2006gene delde novo-1.1nknk5.82.31.62.1modASDnoyesnonoPatent ductus arteriosus,
hirsutism
COG2014gene delde novo0.30.80.23.02.20.7/2.0yrs2.8mildASD,
regression
nononoyesRecurrent ear infections,
subclinical seizures

Abbreviations: nk, not known; ID, intellectual disability; CAL, café au lait; SD, standard deviation; gene del, whole gene deletion; BW, birth weight; BHC, birth head circumference; BL, birth length; Ht, height; Wt, weight; HC, head circumference; mod, moderate; sev, severe; ASD, autistic spectrum disorder; br MRI, brain magnetic resonance imaging; AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; FAB, Franco-American-British; ADHD, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; AVNRT, atrio-ventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia

Results

All 55 individuals had an intellectual disability: 18% had a mild intellectual disability (10/55); 65% had a moderate intellectual disability (36/55) and 16% had a severe intellectual disability (9/55) ( Table 1, Figure 2). Behavioural/psychiatric issues were reported in 51% (28/55) individuals and included combinations of autistic spectrum disorder (20 individuals); anxiety (three individuals); neurodevelopmental regression (four individuals two of whom regressed in teenage years); psychosis/schizophrenia (three individuals); aggressive outbursts (two individuals), and bipolar disorder (two individuals) ( Table 1).

Figure 2.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is wellcomeopenres-3-15708-g0001.jpg
Graph showing the range of intellectual disability in TBRS.

Postnatal overgrowth (defined as height and/or head circumference at least two standard deviations above the mean (≥2SD) 2, 13, was reported in 83% (44/53) individuals. Obesity, with a weight ≥2SD, was reported in 67% (34/51). The range of individual postnatal heights, head circumferences and weights is shown in Table 1 and Figure 3. The mean birth weight was 1.3SD with a range from -1.1 to 4.0 SD. We had limited data for birth head circumference and birth length, but their mean was 2.3SD and 1.6SD, respectively.

Figure 3.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is wellcomeopenres-3-15708-g0002.jpg

Growth profile in individuals with TBRS a) height, b) head circumference and c) weight. The blue line represents the mean.

There were some shared, but subtle, facial characteristics often only becoming apparent in early adolescence ( Figure 4a and b). These included low-set, horizontal thick eyebrows; narrow palpebral fissures; coarse features and a round face. The two upper central incisors were also frequently enlarged and prominent.

Figure 4.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is wellcomeopenres-3-15708-g0003.jpg

a) The facial appearance of children and adults with TBRS; b) the evolving facial appearance in four individuals with TBRS; and c) the characteristic short, widely spaced toes seen in TBRS.

Additional clinical features reported in greater than 20% (≥ 11) individuals included: joint hypermobility (74%, 37/50); hypotonia (54%, 28/52); kyphoscoliosis (33%, 18/55) and afebrile seizures (22%, 12/55) ( Table 1). In addition, short, widely spaced toes were frequently mentioned, but the overall frequency is unclear as we did not specifically ask about feet/toes on the clinical proforma ( Figure 4c).

Clinical features reported in at least two but fewer than 20% individuals included cryptorchidism (six individuals); ventriculomegaly (four individuals) and Chiari malformation (three individuals). In addition, a range of cardiac anomalies (including atrial septal defect, mitral/tricuspid valve incompetence, patent ductus arteriosus, aortic root enlargement and atrio-ventricular re-entry tachycardia) were reported in nine individuals. However, of note, two individuals with cardiac anomalies (patent ductus arteriosus, COG1961 and COG2006) were identical twins with DNMT3A whole gene deletions encompassing >40 genes. The patent ductus arteriosus in these individuals may, therefore, be attributable to twinning, alternative genes in the deleted region or the combined effect of a number of deleted genes.

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), AML-FAB (French-American-British classification) type M4, was diagnosed in one individual at the age of 12 years (COG2004). This individual had a de novo heterozygous c.2204A>C p.(Tyr735Ser) DNMT3A variant, identified in DNA obtained seven years prior to the diagnosis of AML.

Full clinical details from the 55 individuals are provided in Table 1.

Discussion

We have evaluated clinical data from 55 individuals with de novo constitutive DNMT3A variants to define the phenotype of TBRS. An intellectual disability (most frequently in the moderate range) and overgrowth (defined as height and/or head circumference ≥2SD above the mean) were reported in ≥80% of individuals and have been designated major clinical associations. Frequent clinical associations, reported in 20–80% of individuals with constitutive DNMT3A variants, included joint hypermobility, obesity, hypotonia, behavioural/psychiatric issues (most frequently autistic spectrum disorder), kyphoscoliosis and afebrile seizures. In addition, many individuals had a characteristic facial appearance although this may only be recognizable in adolescence.

TBRS overlaps clinically with other OGID syndromes including Sotos syndrome ( OMIM 117550), Weaver syndrome ( OMIM 277590), Malan syndrome ( OMIM 614753) and the OGID syndrome due to CHD8 gene variants 2. However, TBRS is more frequently associated with increased weight than the other OGID syndromes and may be distinguishable through recognition of the associated facial features, and absence of the facial gestalt of other OGID syndromes.

Somatic DNMT3A variants are known to drive the development of adult AML and myelodysplastic syndrome and over half of the DNMT3A somatic variants target a single residue, the p.Arg882 residue 1417. AML, diagnosed in childhood, has now been identified in two individuals with (likely) constitutive DNMT3A variants from a total of 77 (1/55 individuals in the current study and 1/22 previously reported individuals) 7. One of these individuals had a de novo c.2644CT p.(Arg882Cys) DNMT3A variant and developed AML at 15 years of age 7. The variant was present in genomic DNA extracted from the patient’s remission blood sample and skin fibroblasts. The second individual had a c.2204A>C p.(Tyr735Ser) DNMT3A variant identified in DNA obtained at 5 years of age and developed AML at the age of 12 years. Whilst these data indicate that AML may be a rare association of TBRS, currently the numbers of individuals reported with TBRS and AML are too few to either accurately quantify the risk of AML in TBRS or determine whether this risk is influenced by the underlying DNMT3A genotype. Further studies are required to address this.

The majority of individuals with TBRS are healthy and do not require intensive clinical follow up. However, our practice is to inform families and paediatricians of the possible TBRS complications of behavioural/psychiatric issues, kyphoscoliosis and afebrile seizures to introduce a low threshold for their investigation and/or management. In addition, we undertake a baseline echocardiogram at initial diagnosis to investigate cardiac anomalies detectable on ultrasound scan and frequently refer patients to physiotherapy to evaluate the degree of hypotonia and/or joint hypermobility and to determine whether targeted exercises may be beneficial. Finally, in the absence of evidence-based surveillance protocols for haematological malignancies, we advise clinical vigilance for symptoms possibly related to a haematological malignancy such as easy bruising, recurrent bleeding from gums or nosebleeds, persistent tiredness and recurrent infections.

Ethics and consent

The study was approved by the London Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (MREC MREC/01/2/44).

Written informed consent was obtained from participants and/or parents for participation in the study (n=55) and publication of photographs of participants shown in Figure 4 (n=41).

Data availability

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and families for their active participation in this study and the clinicians that recruited them. The full list of collaborators is in Supplementary File 1. We also acknowledge the contribution Amanda Springer who helped in the recruitment of patient COG1945 and of the CAUSES Study whose investigators include: Shelin Adam, Christele Du Souich, Jane Gillis, Alison Elliott, Anna Lehman, Jill Mwenifumbo, Tanya Nelson, Clara Van Karnebeek, Sylvia Stockler, James O’Byrne and Jan Friedman. All are affiliated with the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. In addition, we would like to thank the DDD study for their collaboration.

Notes

[version 1; peer review: 3 approved]

Funding Statement

K.T.-B. is supported by funding from the Child Growth Foundation (GR01/13) and the Childhood Overgrowth Study is funded by the Wellcome Trust [100210]. The CAUSES Study is funded by Mining for Miracles, British Columbia Children’s Hospital Foundation and Genome British Columbia. The DDD study presents independent research commissioned by the Health Innovation Challenge Fund [HICF-1009-003], a parallel funding partnership between the Wellcome Trust and the Department of Health, and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute [098051]. The DDD study has UK Research Ethics Committee approval (10/H0305/83, granted by the Cambridge South REC, and GEN/284/12 granted by the Republic of Ireland REC). The research team acknowledges the support of the National Institute for Health Research, through the Comprehensive Clinical Research Network. This study makes use of DECIPHER (http://decipher.sanger.ac.uk), which is funded by the Wellcome Trust.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

Supplementary Table 1: Computational evaluation of DNMT3A missense variants.

.

Supplementary File 1: A full list of all the collaborators, study participants and the clinicians that recruited them, in this study.

.

References

1. Tatton-Brown K, Seal S, Ruark E, et al.: Mutations in the DNA methyltransferase gene DNMT3A cause an overgrowth syndrome with intellectual disability. Nat Genet. 2014;46(4):385–388. 10.1038/ng.2917 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Tatton-Brown K, Loveday C, Yost S, et al.: Mutations in Epigenetic Regulation Genes Are a Major Cause of Overgrowth with Intellectual Disability. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100(5):725–736. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.03.010 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Okamoto N, Toribe Y, Shimojima K, et al.: Tatton-Brown-Rahman syndrome due to 2p23 microdeletion. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170A(5):1339–1342. 10.1002/ajmg.a.37588 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Tlemsani C, Luscan A, Leulliot N, et al.: SETD2 and DNMT3A screen in the Sotos-like syndrome French cohort. J Med Genet. 2016;53(11):743–751, pii: jmedgenet-2015-103638. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103638 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Xin B, Cruz Marino T, Szekely J, et al.: Novel DNMT3A germline mutations are associated with inherited Tatton-Brown-Rahman syndrome. Clin Genet. 2017;91(4):623–628. 10.1111/cge.12878 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Kosaki R, Terashima H, Kubota M, et al.: Acute myeloid leukemia-associated DNMT3A p.Arg882His mutation in a patient with Tatton-Brown-Rahman overgrowth syndrome as a constitutional mutation. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173(1):250–253. 10.1002/ajmg.a.37995 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Hollink IHIM, van den Ouweland AMW, Beverloo HB, et al.: Acute myeloid leukaemia in a case with Tatton-Brown-Rahman syndrome: the peculiar DNMT3A R882 mutation. J Med Genet. 2017;54(12):805–808. 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104574 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
8. Lemire G, Gauthier J, Soucy JF, et al.: A case of familial transmission of the newly described DNMT3A-Overgrowth Syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173(7):1887–1890. 10.1002/ajmg.a.38119 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Shen W, Heeley JM, Carlston CM, et al.: The spectrum of DNMT3A variants in Tatton-Brown-Rahman syndrome overlaps with that in hematologic malignancies. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173(11):3022–3028. 10.1002/ajmg.a.38485 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Woodcock HC, Read AW, Bower C, et al.: A matched cohort study of planned home and hospital births in Western Australia 1981-1987. Midwifery. 1994;10(3):125–135. 10.1016/0266-6138(94)90042-6 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Jaiswal S, Fontanillas P, Flannick J, et al.: Age-related clonal hematopoiesis associated with adverse outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2488–2498. 10.1056/NEJMoa1408617 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Genovese G, Kahler AK, Handsaker RE, et al.: Clonal hematopoiesis and blood-cancer risk inferred from blood DNA sequence. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2477–2487. 10.1056/NEJMoa1409405 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Tatton-Brown K, Weksberg R: Molecular mechanisms of childhood overgrowth. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013;163C(2):71–75. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31362 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Ley TJ, Ding L, Walter MJ, et al.: DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(25):2424–2433. 10.1056/NEJMoa1005143 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Yan XJ, Xu J, Gu ZH, et al.: Exome sequencing identifies somatic mutations of DNA methyltransferase gene DNMT3A in acute monocytic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2011;43(4):309–315. 10.1038/ng.788 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
16. Nikoloski G, van der Reijden BA, Jansen JH: Mutations in epigenetic regulators in myelodysplastic syndromes. Int J Hematol. 2012;95(1):8–16. 10.1007/s12185-011-0996-3 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Abdel-Wahab O, Levine RL: Mutations in epigenetic modifiers in the pathogenesis and therapy of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;121(18):3563–3572. 10.1182/blood-2013-01-451781 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Reviewer response for version 1

Wei Shen, Referee1,2
1ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
2University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Review date: 2018 May 29. Status: Approved. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.15708.r33053

In this very well written manuscript, the authors described the largest cohort of patients with the Tatton-Brown-Rahman syndrome (TBRS) to date, and further delineated the clinical phenotype associated with TBRS. It would be very interesting to explore any genotype-phenotype correlations in this cohort combined with other patients reported in the literature if needed. For example, the individuals without overgrowth in this cohort all had missense variants, whereas all patients with clearly loss-of-function variants including truncating (nonsense and frame-shift) variants or gene-deletions exhibited overgrowth. While the functional consequences of Arg882 missense variants (p.Arg882His and p.Arg882Cys) were investigated in both somatic and germline settings (Spencer DH et al. Cell 2017, Russler-Germain et al. Cancer Cell 2014), the effects of other missense variants on DNMT3A function are still unclear (presumably loss-of-function). It would be also interesting to see how many of the DNMT3A germline variants reported here were also observed as somatic mutations in leukemia.

Minor points:

  1. Please describe the protein changes for the indel variants in Table 1 according to syntax recommended by HGVS.
  2. Please change “c.2644CT” to “c.2644C>T” in the top line on page 11.
  3. Was any patient (other than the 13 patients first reported in the 2014 Nat Genet paper) previously reported? If so, please reference the original publication.  

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Reviewer response for version 1

William T. Gibson, Referee1,2 and Sharri Cyrus, Co-referee1
1Diabetes Research Group, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
2Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Competing interests: These two referees work in the same department as do the members of the CAUSES study. The CAUSES study contributed patients to this clinical cohort. This review was not discussed with the members of the CAUSES study prior to its submission.
Review date: 2018 May 18. Status: Approved. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.15708.r33035

This is a very well written article, which expands on the previously-reported phenotype and recommends management guidelines for a rare and recently-described syndrome. The inclusion of multiple patient photos and clinical details will be quite helpful for other physicians who have one or more patients with rare variants in this gene. Similarly, the aggregation of the rare variants with clinical annotations will assist clinical diagnostic labs in the interpretation of rare variants they encounter in NGS panels, clinical exomes and whole genomes.

The authors mention “joint hypermobility” as a feature, but do not offer additional details. In clinical practice, one frequently encounters patients who claim to have joint hypermobility (or to have had it in the past), yet the degree of hypermobility and the number of joints affected varies greatly from patient to patient. Thus, the phenotypic spectrum of “joint hypermobility” can vary, from minor painless hyperextensibility of the small joints of the hands in childhood all the way to significantly increased range of motion among both large and small joints that persists into adulthood. A full assessment of the Beighton scale and of range-of-motion of the other joints is not likely to have been documented by all referring clinicians, but perhaps the column on “Joint hypermobility” could be split into two columns such as “Joint hypermobility – history” (for patients who report it as a symptom) and “Joint hypermobility – demonstrated” (for patients in whom hypermobility is documented as a sign on physical exam). Alternatively, the categories “nk” “no” and “yes” could be adjusted to “nk” “no” “yes (hist)” and “yes (exam)” or something similar.

Many of the facial photos presented appear to show downslanted palpebral fissures, yet the authors comment only on “narrow palpebral fissures” in the article. Do the authors have enough data to comment on this feature, and/or could they have the available facial photographs evaluated systematically for this feature? It is likely to be some time before another cohort of this size or larger is assembled and published, so it may be worthwhile to investigate this aspect of the facial gestalt in a little more detail. It would also be helpful for the authors to comment on the presence or absence of hypertelorism, as some dysmorphologists consider an interpupullary distance greater than the 97 th %ile for age to be a useful sign in the assessment of OGID, whereas others “adjust” the eye spacing in light of the head circumference (which is frequently >+2SD for age in OGID).

Minor Spelling and Grammatical Errors:

In the abstract, the authors state “weight 32SD” – perhaps they mean “weight >+2SD” or “weight Z-score +2 or higher”?

In the abstract, “TBRS” should be followed by a period.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

OGID, PRC2 Complex, Epigenetic risk factors for rare diseases, Intracranial Aneurysms

We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Reviewer response for version 1

1North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, London North West University Healthcare NHS, London, UK
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Review date: 2018 May 2. Status: Approved. doi: 10.21956/wellcomeopenres.15708.r32979

This is a concise and well-written paper summarising the clinical phenotype in 55 patients with Tatton-Brown-Rahman syndrome due to de novo constitutive DNMT3A variants.The findings are clearly presented with the use of figures and detailed clinical information in table 1.

Minor comments are as follows:

  1. The abstract list of frequent associations should be slightly re-punctuated for clarity: ‘behavioural/psychiatric issues, most frequently autistic spectrum disorder (51%);’
  2. There is no indication of the male: female ratio within the cohort. This is relevant to the frequency of cryptorchidism in affected males.
  3. Although increased weight (≥2 SD) is clearly a feature (Figure 3), this is in the context of overgrowth (height and/or head circumference ≥2 SD). It would be helpful to know the frequency of true obesity (BMI ≥ 30) and to make this distinction in the paper.
  4. Although the focus of the paper is a clinical description of TBRS, it would be helpful to discuss briefly the clustering of missense and in-frame deletions (with two exceptions) within the three DNMT3A domains and possible genotype-phenotype correlation (this is only mentioned in the context of AML).

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Yes

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.


Articles from Wellcome Open Research are provided here courtesy of The Wellcome Trust

-