MethodsStudy design: parallel group randomised trial.
Study dates: not mentioned.
Setting: Department of Urology, Elisabethinen Hospital.
Country: Linz, Austria.
ParticipantsInclusion criteria: participants with type IIIb prostatitis (CPPS) of at least 3 months' duration and no evidence of bacteria in urinary and seminal culture tests.
Exclusion criteria: participants with other prostate pathologies, such as prostate cancer.
Sample size: 60.
Age (years):
Treatment group: 42 (range: 22‐52).
Placebo group: 43 (range: 34‐61).
Baseline NIH‐CPSI score: Group 1: 25.07 (SE 0.48); Group 2: 23.3 (SE 0.66).
Sex: not applicable.
InterventionsGroup 1 (n = 30): 1 perineally applied ESWT treatment weekly (3000 pulses each; maximum total energy flow density: 0.25 mJ/mm2; frequency: 3 Hz) for 4 weeks. Position of shockwave transducer changed after every 500 pulses to scan virtually the entire prostatic and pelvic floor region. Device used for the study was standard electromagnetic shockwave unit with a focused shockwave source (Duolith SD1, Storz Medical, Tägerwilen, Switzerland). Focus zone penetration depth was 35‐65 mm.
Group 2 (n = 30): placebo performed with same therapy head, which was also fitted with a placebo stand‐off. This stand‐off contained shock wave‐absorbing material, a layer of air and air‐filled microspheres.
Cointerventions: none.
OutcomesProstatitis symptoms
How measured: NIH‐CPSI score and subscores.
Time points measured: 1, 4 and 12 weeks following 1st session.
Time points reported: 1, 4 and 12 weeks following 1st session.
Subgroups: none.
Urinary symptoms
How measured: IPSS score.
Time points measured: 1, 4 and 12 weeks following 1st session.
Time points reported: 1, 4 and 12 weeks following 1st session.
Subgroups: none.
Sexual dysfunction
How measured: International Index of Erectile Function.
Time points measured: 1, 4 and 12 weeks following 1st session.
Time points reported: 1, 4 and 12 weeks following 1st session.
Subgroups: none.
Adverse events
How measured: narratively.
Funding sourcesNone.
Declarations of interestNone known.
NotesNone.
Risk of bias
BiasAuthors' judgementSupport for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)Unclear riskThey reported that their sample was randomly recruited. However, did not explain their method of randomisation.
Allocation concealment (selection bias)Unclear riskNo information on selection bias.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
Subjective outcomes
Low riskBlinding included the specification that neither participant nor investigator/follow‐up observer was aware of placebo or verum assignment.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes
Low riskBlinding included the specification that neither participant nor investigator/follow‐up observer was aware of placebo or verum assignment.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Low riskAll outcomes: outcome data available for all participants.
Selective reporting (reporting bias)Low riskNo suspicion of selective reporting. Reference of study protocol within study report.
Other biasLow riskNo other sources of bias identified.

CFU: colony‐forming unit; CP: chronic prostatitis; CPPS: chronic pelvic pain syndrome; EMG: electromyography; EPS: expressed prostate secretions; ESWT: extracorporeal shockwave therapy; IPSS: International Prostate Symptom Score; HPF: high power field; IQR: interquartile range; min: minute; n: number of participants; NIH: National Institutes of Health; NIH‐CPSI: National Institutes of Health ‐ Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index; NSAID: non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug; PSSI: Prostatitis Symptom Severity Index; PTNS: posterior tibial nerve stimulation; SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error; TENS: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; TRFH: transrectal radiofrequency hyperthermia; TUNA: transurethral needle ablation; WBC: white blood cell.

-