Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Hum Brain Mapp. 1998; 6(1): 59–72.
Published online 1998 Dec 7. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1998)6:1<59::AID-HBM5>3.0.CO;2-K
PMCID: PMC6873353
PMID: 9673663

Robot‐aided functional imaging: Application to a motor learning study

Hermano I. Krebs,corresponding author 1 , 2 , 3 Thomas Brashers‐Krug, 4 Scott L. Rauch, 5 , 6 Cary R. Savage, 5 Neville Hogan, 2 , 3 , 4 Robert H. Rubin, 6 , 7 , 8 Alan J. Fischman, 6 , 8 and Nathaniel M. Alpert 6
Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the neural activity underlying an implicit motor learning task. In particular, our goals were to determine whether initial phases of procedural learning of a motor task involve areas of the brain distinct from those involved in later phases of learning the task, and what changes in neural activity coincide with performance improvement. We describe a novel integration of robotic technology with functional brain imaging and its use in this study of implicit motor learning. A portable robotic device was used to generate forces that disturbed the subjects' arm movements, thereby generating a “virtual mechanical environment” that the subjects learned to manipulate. Positron emission tomography (PET) was used to measure indices of neural activity underlying learning of the motor task. Eight healthy, right‐handed male subjects participated in the study. Results support the hypothesis that different stages of implicit learning (early and late implicit learning) occur in an orderly fashion, and that distinct neural structures may be involved in these different stages. In particular, neuroimaging results indicate that the cortico‐striatal loop may play a significant role during early learning, and that the cortico‐cerebellar loop may play a significant role during late learning. Hum. Brain Mapping 6:59–72, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords: robot‐aided, functional imaging, motor learning, arm movement

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (293K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  • Aisen ML, Krebs HI, McDowell F, Hogan N, Volpe BT (1997): The effect of robot assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 54: 443–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Alpert NM, Berdichevsky D, Weise S, Tang J, Rauch SL (1993): Stereotatic transformation of PET scans by nonlinear least squares In: Uemura K, Lassen NA, Jones T, Kanno I. (eds): Quantification of Brain Function: Tracer Kinetics and Image Analysis in Brain PET, Amsterdam: Elsevier; pp 459–463. [Google Scholar]
  • Berns GS, Cohen JD, Mintun MA (1997): Brain regions responsive to novelty in the absence of awareness. Science 276: 1272–1275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brashers‐Krug T, Shadmehr R, Bizzi E (1996): Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382: 252–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Doyon J, Owen AM, Petrides M (1996): Functional anatomy of visuomotor skill learning in human subjects examined with positron emission tomography. Eur J Neurosci 8: 637–648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Friston K, Frith C, Liddle P, Frackowiak R (1991): Comparing functional (PET) images: The assessment of significant change. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 11: 690–699. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Georgopoulos AP, Kalaska JF, Crutcher MD, Caminiti R, Massey JT (1984): The representation of movement direction in the motor cortex: Single cell and population studies In: Dynamic Aspects of Neocortical Function, New York: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • Grafton ST, Woods RP, Tyszka M (1994): Functional imaging of procedural motor learning: Relating cerebral blood flow with individual subject performance. Hum Brain Mapping 1: 221–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grafton ST, Hazeltine E, Ivri R (1995): Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. J Cogn Neurosci 7: 497–510. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Graybiel AM (1995): Building action repertoires: Memory and learning functions of the basal ganglia. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5: 733–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hogan N, Krebs HI, Sharon A, Charnnarong J (1995): Interactive Robotic Therapist. U. S. Patent Number 5,466,213 MIT.
  • Kalaska JF, Cohen DA, Hyde ML, Prud'homme M (1989): Acomparison of movement direction‐related versus load direction‐related activity in primate motor cortex using a two‐dimensional reaching task. J Neurosci 9: 2080–2102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kops ER, Herzog H, Schmidt A, Holte S, Feinendegen LE (1990): Performance characteristics of an eight‐ring whole body PET scanner. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14: 437–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kosslyn SM, Alpert NM, Thompson WL, Chabris CF, Rauch SL, Anderson AK (1994): Identifying objects seen from canonical and noncanonical viewpoints: A PET investigation. Brain 117: 1055–1071. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Krebs HI, Brashers‐Krug T, Rauch SL, Savage CR, Hogan N, Rubin RH, Fischmann AJ, Alpert NM (1995): Robot‐aided functional imaging In: Proceedings of the second symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Baltimore: Wiley‐Liss; pp 296–299. [Google Scholar]
  • Krebs HI, Aisen ML, Volpe BT, Hogan N (1996): Pilot clinical trial of a robot‐aided neuro‐rehabilitation workstation with stroke patients. In: Proceedings of the Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies III. SPIE–The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 2901.
  • Krebs HI (1997): Robot‐aided neuro‐rehabilitation and functional imaging. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • Mesulam M‐M (1985): Principles of Behavioral Neurology, Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitz AR, Godschalk M, Wise SP (1991): Learning‐dependent neuronal activity in the premotor cortex: Activity during the acquisition of conditional motor associations. J Neurosci 11: 1855–1872. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1987): Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cogn Psychol 19: 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Oldfield RC (1971): The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 6: 97–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rauch SL, Savage CR, Brown HD, Curran T, Alpert NM, Kendrick A, Fischman AJ, Kosslyn SM (1995): A PET investigation of implicit and explicit sequence learning. Hum Brain Mapping 3: 271–286. [Google Scholar]
  • Rauch SL, Whalen PJ, Savage CR, Curran T, Kendrick A, Brown HD, Bush G, Breiter HC, Rosen BR (1997): Striatal recruitment during an implicit sequence learning task as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Brain Mapping 5: 124–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Roland PE, Larsen B, Lassen NA, Skinhoj E (1980): Supplementary motor area and other cortical areas in organization of voluntary movements in man. J Neurophysiol 43: 118–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schacter DL, Tulving E. (eds) (1994): Memory Systems 1994, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Shadmehr R, Mussa‐Ivaldi FA (1994): Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning a motor task. J Neurosci 14: 3208–3224. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988): Co‐Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain, New York: Thieme Medical Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Woods RP, Cherry SR, Mazziota JC (1992): Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16: 620–633. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from Human Brain Mapping are provided here courtesy of Wiley
-