Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Curr Med Sci. 2020; 40(3): 480–485.
Published online 2020 May 30. doi: 10.1007/s11596-020-2203-3
PMCID: PMC7260450
PMID: 32474860

Potential of Arbidol for Post-exposure Prophylaxis of COVID-19 Transmission: A Preliminary Report of a Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

The efficient transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome-2 coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from patients to health care workers or family members has been a worrisome and prominent feature of the ongoing outbreak. On the basis of clinical practice and in-vitro studies, we postulated that post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) using Arbidol is associated with decreased infection among individuals exposed to confirmed cases of COVID-19 infection. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on family members and health care workers who were exposed to patients confirmed to have SARS-CoV-2 infection by real-time RT-PCR and chest computed tomography (CT) from January 1 to January 16, 2020. The last follow-up date was Feb. 26, 2020. The emergence of fever and/or respiratory symptoms after exposure to the primary case was collected. The correlations between post-exposure prophylaxis and infection in household contacts and health care workers were respectively analyzed. A total of 66 members in 27 families and 124 health care workers had evidence of close exposure to patients with confirmed COVID-19. The Cox regression based on the data of the family members and health care workers with Arbidol or not showed that Arbidol PEP was a protective factor against the development of COVID-19 (HR 0.025, 95% CI 0.003–0.209, P=0.0006 for family members and HR 0.056, 95% CI 0.005–0.662, P=0.0221 for health care workers). Our findings suggest Arbidol could reduce the infection risk of the novel coronavirus in hospital and family settings. This treatment should be promoted for PEP use and should be the subject of further investigation.

Key words: Arbidol, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, post-exposure prophylaxis

Conflict of Interest Statement

We declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

The authors contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Jin-nong Zhang, moc.361@bhhwnjgnahz.

Wen-jing Wang, moc.361@xy0102jww.

Ya-nan Li, nc.ude.tsuh.liam@nyil.

Yi-fan Zhou, nc.ude.tsuh@0810nafiy.

Bo Hu, nc.ude.tsuh.liam@obuh.

References

1. Guan W, Ni Z, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in China. 2020. [Google Scholar]
2. Chan JF, Yuan S, Kok KH, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):514–523. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Uyeki TM, Bernstein HH, Bradley JS, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America: 2018 Update on Diagnosis, Treatment, Chemoprophylaxis, and Institutional Outbreak Management of Seasonal Influenza. Clin Infectious Dis. 2019;68(6):E1–E47. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy866. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Pecheur EI, Borisevich V, Halfmann P, et al. The Synthetic Antiviral Drug Arbidol Inhibits Globally Prevalent Pathogenic Viruses. J Virol. 2016;90(6):3086–3092. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02077-15. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Brooks MJ, Burtseva EI, Ellery PJ, et al. Antiviral Activity of Arbidol, a Broad-Spectrum Drug for Use Against Respiratory Viruses, Varies According to Test Conditions. J Med Virol. 2012;84(1):170–181. doi: 10.1002/jmv.22234. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Ji X, Zhao Y, Zhang M, et al. The experimetal study of the anti-SARS-Cov effect of arbidol. J Pharm PLA (Chinese) 2004;20(04):274–276. [Google Scholar]
7. Khamitov RA, Loginova S, Shchukina VN, et al. Antiviral activity of arbidol and its derivatives against the pathogen of severe acute respiratory syndrome in the cell cultures. Vopr Virusol. 2008;53(4):9–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507–513. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Zhang J, Zhou L, Yang Y, et al. Therapeutic and triage strategies for 2019 novel coronavirus disease in fever clinics. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(3):e11–e12. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30071-0. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Current Medical Science are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

-