Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022; 22: 45.
Published online 2022 Feb 13. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02494-z
PMCID: PMC8842953
PMID: 35152878

The systemic-immune-inflammation index predicts the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cryomaze concomitant with mitral valve surgery

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement

Abstract

Background and aims

Inflammation plays a key role in the initiation and progression of atrial fibrillation (AF). The systemic inflammation indexes are easily evaluated and predict AF development. However, it’s role in prediction of recurrence of AF is unknown. We aim to explore the association between the systemic inflammation indexes and recurrence of AF in patients underwent cryoablation (CryoMaze) concomitant with mitral valve surgery.

Methods

We examined systemic inflammation indexes during perioperative period in 122 patients between 2015 and 2018. Systemic inflammation indexes were developed by systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocytes to monocytes ratio. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the association of each markers with recurrence of AF.

Results

Of the 122 patients included in this study, 22 patients (18%) experienced AF recurrence after CryoMaze concomitant with mitral valve surgery. There is no significant difference between each systemic inflammation indexes before surgery and recurrence of AF. In univariate analysis, MLR after surgery 3 days, PLR, MPLR, NLR, SII after surgery 7 days were able to predict recurrence of AF. In multivariate analyses, SII ≥ 1696 independently predicted recurrence (OR, 3.719; 95% CI, 1.417–9.760). Interestingly, baseline SII showed no significant in prediction of recurrence. It was sharply elevated after surgery and dropped slowly. In patients of recurrence, SII after 7 days of surgery increased again.

Conclusions

The raised SII again was associated with an increased risk of the postoperative recurrence of AF and independently predicted the late recurrence of AF after CryoMaze concomitant with mitral valve surgery.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-022-02494-z.

Keywords: Systemic-immune-inflammation index, Recurrence of atrial fibrillation, CryoMaze, Systemic immune-inflammation index

Introduction

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia associated with mitral valve disease. Nearly half of patients undergoing mitral valve surgery frequently present with AF, which is associated with poor prognosis [1]. The Cox-Maze IV operation is widely used in the surgical treatment of AF [2]. However, the efficiency was various [35]. Our recent study indicated that the efficiency of cryoablation (CryoMaze) concomitant with mitral valve surgery was achieved in 85% (95% CI, 0.76–0.91) [5].

The pathophysiological mechanisms of AF are not well known [6]. Inflammation and substrate alterations (such as fibrosis) are complex and critical for the understanding of AF [710]. The mechanism of recurrences may because of incomplete isolation, acute inflammatory changes, recovery of conduction and modification of autonomic nervous system [11]. The systemic inflammation index is a systemic inflammation based on routine blood tests [12]. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) are reported to be associated with systemic inflammation status and AF progression [13]. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) is a novel marker that brings together these three inflammatory peripheral cell counts and predict functionally significant coronary artery stenosis [1416]. In this study, we investigated the association of perioperative systemic inflammation index, and changes during treatment, with outcomes in AF patients treated with CryoMaze concomitant with mitral valve surgery.

Methods

Patients’ selection

We retrospectively studied consecutive 150 long-persistent or persistent AF patients who required to undergoing the cryoMaze procedures combined with valve-surgery at the department of cardiovascular surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theatre Command, from 2015 to 2018. Exclusion criteria were (1) emergency surgery; (2) combined with CABG or any other heart procedures; (3) previous cardiovascular surgery; (4) primary pulmonary hypertension; (5) EF < 0.40, and (6) history of cerebral hemorrhage or brain stoke within 3 months. Of these, 122 (81.3%) had baseline complete blood counts necessary for the inflammatory indexes and all clinical data available and were considered fully evaluable for this post hoc analysis.

This study was approved by the General Hospital of Northern Theatre Command’s Ethics committee. All procedures were performed by the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Surgical procedure, ablation procedure, post-operative management, and follow-up

Surgical procedure, ablation procedure, post-operative management and follow-up have been described before [5]. Briefly, after cardioplegic arrest and aortic cross-clamping, the left lesion sets and concomitant operations were performed. The lesion sets of the CryoMaze were created using cryothermia based on Nitrous Oxide (Atricure CRYO2 Cryosurgical probe, − 60 °C, 2 min). The detail of lesion sets, and ablation procedure could be found before [5].

Heart rhythm was monitored continuously throughout the hospital stay, and temporary epicardial wires were used for ventricular pacing as needed in all the patients after the surgery. Amiodarone was given intravenously from 20 to 40 mg/h, followed by oral amiodarone at 200 mg twice a day and then 200 mg/day until 3 months after discharge. According to the 24-h Holter results at 3 months, amiodarone was withdrawn for patients restore to sinus rhythm. Amiodarone was continually administered in AF patients. Electrical cardioversion was applied in patients when oral amiodarone failed to maintain sinus rhythm. After discharge, patients were followed up at outpatient clinic at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Heart rhythm was verified with 24-h Holter monitoring and echocardiography were evaluated by 2-dimensional echocardiographic analysis and Doppler color flow imaging (Philips iE33 ultrasound machine; Philips Healthcare, Andover, Mass) at each visit [5]. The definition of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence was any documented AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting ≥ 30 s after 3 months blanking period [17].

Post hoc analysis variable definitions

For this post hoc analysis, the inflammatory indexes were determined based on values of monocytes (M), neutrophils (N), lymphocytes (L), and/or platelets (P) in patients received surgical ablation at indicated data: SII defined as P × N/L, NLR defined as N/L, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) defined as P/L, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) defined as L/M, monocytes-NLR (MNLR) defined as M × N/L, monocytes-PLR (MPLR) defined as M × P/L [14, 18, 19].

Statistical analysis

The IBM SPSS.24.0 software was used for all dates analyzed. Continuous variables were presented as Mean ± SD or medians (range). And the categorical variables were described as frequencies and percentages. To compare the differences between two groups, the independent student’s t text and Mann–Whitney U text were used. Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test were used for categorical variables. Risk factors that p < 0.05 were included in the Univariate logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were generated to provide data on the predictive ability of the systemic inflammation indexes to detect recurrence of AF. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to quantify the ROC curve. Youden’s index (J = Sensitivity + Specificity − 1) was used to determine the most appropriate cut-off value. p < 0.05 was considered significant in all comparisons.

Results

Study population

A total of 122 patients who underwent CryoMaze concomitant with mitral valve surgery were included in this study. Recurrence occurred in 22 patients (18.0%). Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the cohort based on recurrence or not. Preoperative left atrial diameter (LAD) (p = 0.196) and left atrial volume indexed (LAVI) (p = 0.229) are elevated in patients have AF recurrence, but there was no statistical significance. All of patients were diagnosed with NYHA III (N = 100) or IV (N = 22) and there was no significance between two groups.

Table 1

Baseline and clinical characteristics (N = 122)

Rhythm after surgery (12 m)P
Recurrence versusNon-recurrence
Age59.640 ± 6.40359.690 ± 8.7810.978

Gender (%)

(Male versus female)

11 (50.0) versus 9 (50.0)32 (32.0) versus 68 (68.0)0.110
Degenerative disease (%)9 (40.9)47 (47.0)0.604
Hypertension (%)4 (18.2)13 (13.0)0.768
Coronary arteries disease (%)6 (27.3)28 (28.0)0.945
Diabetes (%)2 (9.1)5 (5.0)0.810
Kidneys disease (%)0 (0)3 (3.0)1.000
NYHA III (%)15 (68.2%)70 (70.0%)0.867
LAD (mm)54.500 ± 9.78751.600 ± 8.6610.168
LAVI (ml/m2)47.320 ± 8.23145.080 ± 7.7820.229
LVEDD (mm)50.590 ± 6.34547.750 ± 6.3630.060
LVEDV (ml)153.140 ± 147.128111.000 ± 36.1660.196
LVEF (%)54.000 ± 5.80056.000 ± 4.2000.192
ACC (min)83.180 ± 25.29987.440 ± 31.2550.552
CPB (min)143.820 ± 35.391146.540 ± 42.7900.782

LAD left atrium diameter, LAVI left atrial volume indexed, LVEDD left ventricular end diastolic diameter, LVEDV left ventricular end diastolic volume, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, ACC aortic clip, CPB cardiopulmonary bypass

Systemic inflammation index and recurrence

The systemic inflammation index before surgery was no related with recurrence (Additional file 1: Table S1). Furthermore, the similar results were found in the early after the surgery (Additional file 1: Tables S2, S3 and S4). Interestingly, NLR, PLR, MPLR and SII levels after 7 days of surgery were significantly higher in recurrence group (p = 0.033; p = 0.050; p = 0.042; p = 0.024) (Table 2). Furthermore, we found that in recurrence patients SII dropped along with no-recurrence patients after 1 day of surgery but elevated at 7 days after the surgery (Fig. 1).

Table 2

Inflammatory markers of day 7 in post-operative

Rhythm after surgery (12 m)P
Recurrence versusNon-recurrence
NLR-76.869 ± 2.6155.667 ± 2.3100.033
MLR-70.619 ± 0.2570.568 ± 0.1970.301
PLR-7241.901 ± 99.112201.624 ± 83.6670.050
MPLR-7185.928 ± 100.588150.150 ± 66.9690.042
MNLR-75.456 ± 2.9624.452 ± 2.4020.092
SII-72137.871 ± 1150.6151520.137 ± 786.7790.024
ALB-733.031 ± 2.35233.960 ± 3.6470.256

NLR-7 the NLR of post-day 7, MLR-7 the MLR of post-day 7, PLR-7 the PLR of post-day 7, MPLR-7 the MPLR of post-day 7, MNLR-7 the MNLR of post-day 7, SII-7 the SII of post-day 7, ALB-7 the albumin of post-day 7

Bold values indicated p < 0.05

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 12872_2022_2494_Fig1_HTML.jpg

The tendency of SII before and after surgery at indicated days

We used SII at 7 days after surgery data for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The area under the ROC curve was 0.680, and the 95% confidence interval was 0.566–0.808(Fig. 2). A cut-off points of 1696 was related to recurrence with a sensitivity of 63.6% and a specificity of 68.0%.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is 12872_2022_2494_Fig2_HTML.jpg

ROC curve analysis to determine the predictive value of SII for AF recurrence. AF atrial fibrillation, AUC area under the curve, ROC receiver operating characteristic

The distribution of characteristics in cohort and SII levels after 7 days of surgery is listed in Additional file 1: Table S5. However, there was no correlation between high SII levels after 7 days of surgery and other variables (Additional file 1: Table S5).

Univariate and multivariate analysis of recurrence

On multivariable logistic regression analysis, high SII after 7 days of surgery (OR, 3.719 (1.417–9.760), p = 0.008) were significant and independent risk factors for recurrence (Table 3).

Table 3

Univariable and multivariable logistic regression of SII-7

UnivariableMultivariable
ORpCIORpCI
High MLR-32.8550.0321.096–7.442
High PLR-73.1270.0530.986–9.919
HighMPLR-73.3800.0171.247–9.163
High NLR-73.8100.0081.422–10.208
High SII-73.7190.0081.417–9.7603.7190.0081.417–9.760

High MLR-3 the MLR of postoperative day 3 ≥ 0.63961, High PLR-7 the PLR of postoperative day 7 ≥ 174.2083, High MPLR-7 the MPLR of postoperative day7 ≥ 189.9917, High NLR-7 the NLR of postoperative day 7 ≥ 5.913194, High SII-7 the SII of postoperative day7 ≥ 1696.005051, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval; The variables of Multivariable are High MLR-3, HighMPLR-7, High NLR-7, High SII-7

Bold values indicated p < 0.05

Discussion

In our retrospective study, we focused more on the relationship between the systemic inflammation index and development of AF recurrence after CryoMaze concomitant with mitral valve surgery. We found that SII was increased immediately after the surgery and dropped within several days. Interestingly, in recurrence patients, SII levels elevated at 7 days after surgery again. Additionally, we had demonstrated that the SII are independent prognostic factor of AF recurrence in patients who had undergone CryoMaze concomitant with mitral valve surgery.

The precise mechanisms of AF recurrence have not been fully elucidated. it is well established that inflammation is independently associated with the development and recurrent of AF [20]. Several studies indicated markers of inflammation predicted recurrence of AF [21, 22]. The atrial tissue changes such as fibrosis, leukocyte infiltrates and oxidative damage may contribute to electrical and structural remodeling, which may promote recurrence of AF [23]. Some inflammatory biomarkers, including CRP, IL-6, IL-2, matrix metalloproteinase-2 and tumor necrosis factor-α, were found to be significantly associated with recurrent AF [21, 24, 25]. Moreover, anti-inflammatory therapy may reduce the recurrence AF [26].

The SII can better reflect the immune and inflammatory state of the body compared to the use of any one of these markers in isolation [27]. It has been widely studied in different cancers [12, 27]. What is more, levels of neutrophils and lymphocytes are related with initiation and progression of AF [2830]. Inflammatory mediators, released by neutrophils, such as interleukin-8, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and vascular endothelial growth factor promoted AF. Recently, platelets was reported the profibrotic actions through Transforming Growth Factor-β1 dependent manners [31]. SII not only contained the ratio of neutrophil and lymphocyte ratio, but contained the levels of platelets, which may reflect atrial fibrosis to some extent. Therefore, SII is superior to other systemic inflammation index in prognostic assessment of AF ablation in our cohort.

AF is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide. In patients underwent valve surgery, the prevalence of AF is approximately 30–50% [5]. The cut-and-sew Maze procedure is considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of AF [32]. Because of its complexity and perceived risks of bleeding, various energy sources such as radiofrequency and cryoablation to simplify surgical AF ablation. Previously, our group reported the addition of the Maze performed by cryoablation (CryoMaze) was non-inferior to CSM for efficacy and safety for patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF undergoing mitral valve surgeries [5]. The efficacy reported by us is similar with that reported by other groups [33]. So, the recurrence of AF is not blame for our procedure. Many evidences indicated acute inflammatory changes is essential for recurrence of AF [11]. Our results clearly showed SII was elevated at 1 day after the surgery, then it dropped significantly. However, in patients who would fail to ablation, SII was elevated again. Our finding supported inflammatory changes promoted AF recurrence. On the other hand, targeting local inflammation is a therapeutic option for preventing recurrences of AF. Although, inflammation is not the only factor responsible for triggering recurrences of AF [34]. Anti-inflammatory such as colchicine were consistent and promising for AF recurrence [34]. All this evidence indicated targeting inflammatory could be one method for AF recurrence in patients treated with CryoMaze concomitant with mitral valve surgery.

This was a single center retrospective analysis of a small patient cohort. In addition, the relatively small sample size in this study limited the statistical capacity. Further prospective studies would be need to confirmation of these findings with large sample size.

In conclusion, SII as an inflammatory marker is associated with an independent increased risk of AF recurrence among patients underwent CryoMaze concomitant with mitral valve surgery. Future research is needed to elucidate the specific mechanism of inflammatory biomarkers in the recurrence of AF.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AFAtrial fibrillation
CryoMazeCryoablation
LADLeft atrial diameter
LMRLymphocytes to monocytes ratio
LVEDDLeft ventricular end diastolic diameter
NLRNeutrophil to lymphocyte ratio
PLRPlatelet to lymphocyte ratio
ROCReceiver operating characteristic
SIISystemic immune-inflammation index

Authors' contributions

YL, JZ and TL wrote the main manuscript text and YL, YJ and ZY prepared Figs. 1 and 2, ZG, JH and YL prepared Tables 1, 2 and 3. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Sciences Fund Project of China (81771833, 81970310, 82070239 and 82170328), Provincial Key R & D Program (2019JH2/10300002, 2021JH2/10300082 and 2019JH8/10300084), National Scientific Research Foundation of Liaoning Province in China (20180550959 and 2020-MS-036) and Young Talent Fund of Military Science and Technology Project (18-JCJQ-QT-018).

Availability of data and materials

The essential data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by our institutional review board (the Ethics Committee of the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command.), which waived the requirement for individual patient consent because only routine patient data were used for this retrospective analysis. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yu Luo, Jian Zhang and Tao Liu contributed equally to this work

Contributor Information

Jinsong Han, moc.anis@6120sjnah.

Huishan Wang, moc.621@wnahsiuh.

References

1. Wang H, Han J, Wang Z, Yin Z, Liu Z, Jin Y, Han H. Efficacy of cut-and-sew surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with giant left atria undergoing mitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched analysis. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;31(4):796–802. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.05.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Ad N. The Cox-Maze procedure: history, results, and predictors for failure. J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol Int J Arrhythm Pacing. 2007;20(3):65–71. doi: 10.1007/s10840-007-9176-z. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
3. Gillinov AM, Gelijns AC, Parides MK, DeRose JJ, Jr, Moskowitz AJ, Voisine P, Ailawadi G, Bouchard D, Smith PK, Mack MJ, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(15):1399–1409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500528. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
4. Ad N, Suri RM, Gammie JS, Sheng S, O'Brien SM, Henry L. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation trends and outcomes in North America. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(5):1051–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.065. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Han J, Wang H, Wang Z, Yin Z, Zhang J, Jin Y, Han H: Comparison of cryomaze with cut-and-sew maze concomitant with mitral valve surgery: a randomized noninferiority trial. LID - S1043-0679(20)30423-8 [pii] LID. 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.11.028. 2020 (1532–9488 (Electronic)). [PubMed]
6. Sagnard A, Hammache N, Sellal JM, Guenancia C. New perspective in atrial fibrillation. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3713. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113713. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. Guenancia C, Toucas C, Fauchier L, Stamboul K, Garnier F, Mouhat B, Sagnard A, Lorgis L, Zeller M, Cottin Y. High rate of recurrence at long-term follow-up after new-onset atrial fibrillation during acute myocardial infarction. (1532–2092 (Electronic)). [PubMed]
8. Zhang J, Xu S, Xu Y, Liu Y, Li Z, Zhang Y, Jin Y, Xue X, Wang H. Relation of mitochondrial DNA copy number in peripheral blood to postoperative atrial fibrillation after isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. (1879–1913 (Electronic)). [PubMed]
9. Li Z, Wang Z, Yin Z, Zhang Y, Xue X, Han J, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Emmert MY, Wang H. Gender differences in fibrosis remodeling in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Oncotarget. 2017;8(32):53714–53729. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16342. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. Xue XD, Huang JH, Wang HS. Angiotensin II activates signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 via Rac1 in the atrial tissue in permanent atrial fibrillation patients with rheumatic heart disease. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015;71(1):205–213. doi: 10.1007/s12013-014-0186-z. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Stabile G, Iacopino S, Verlato R, Arena G, Pieragnoli P, Molon G, Manfrin M, Rovaris G, Curnis A, Bertaglia E, et al. Predictive role of early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cryoballoon ablation. Europace Eur Pacing Arrhythm Cardiac Electrophysiol J Working Groups Cardiac Pacing Arrhythm Cardiac Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2020;22(12):1798–1804. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. De Giorgi U, Procopio G, Giannarelli D, Sabbatini R, Bearz A, Buti S, Basso U, Mitterer M, Ortega C, Bidoli P, et al. Association of systemic inflammation index and body mass index with survival in patients with renal cell cancer treated with nivolumab. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2019;25(13):3839–3846. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3661. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Zhang H, Li J, Chen X, Wu N, Xie W, Tang H, Li C, Wu L, Xiang Y, Zhong L, et al. Association of systemic inflammation score with atrial fibrillation: a case-control study with propensity score matching. Heart Lung Circ. 2018;27(4):489–496. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.04.007. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
14. Erdogan M, Erdol MA, Ozturk S, Durmaz T. Systemic immune-inflammation index is a novel marker to predict functionally significant coronary artery stenosis. Biomark Med. 2020;14(16):1553–1561. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2020-0274. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
15. Kelesoglu S, Yilmaz Y, Elcik D, Kalay N. Systemic immune inflammation index: a novel predictor for coronary collateral circulation. Perfusion 2021:2676591211014822. [PubMed]
16. Kelesoglu S, Yilmaz Y, Elcik D, Cetinkaya Z, Inanc MT, Dogan A, Oguzhan A, Kalay N. Systemic immune inflammation index: a novel predictor of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Angiology. 2021;72(9):889–895. doi: 10.1177/00033197211007738. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. Wu Z, Jiang CA-O, Li J, Du J, Bai Y, Guo X, Wang W, Li S, Jiang C, Liu NA-O et al. Effect of family history of atrial fibrillation on recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation: a report from the Chinese atrial fibrillation registry study. LID—10.1111/jce.14919 [doi]. (1540–8167 (Electronic)). [PubMed]
18. Zhang H, Li J, Chen X, Wu N, Xie W, Tang H, Li C, Wu L, Xiang Y, Zhong L et al. Association of systemic inflammation score with atrial fibrillation: a case-control study with propensity score matching. (1444–2892 (Electronic)). [PubMed]
19. Liu X, Ge H, Feng X, Hang J, Zhang F, Jin X, Bao H, Zhou M, Han F, Li S, et al. The combination of hemogram indexes to predict exacerbation in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Front Med. 2020;7:572435. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.572435. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
20. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275–e444. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Meyre PA-O, Sticherling C, Spies F, Aeschbacher S, Blum S, Voellmin G, Madaffari A, Conen D, Osswald S, Kühne M et al. C-reactive protein for prediction of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. (1471–2261 (Electronic)). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Chen SA, Zhang MM, Zheng M, Liu F, Sun L, Bao ZY, Chen FK, Li HX, Gu XA-O. The preablation monocyte/ high density lipoprotein ratio predicts the late recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation. (1471–2261 (Electronic)). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. McGarry TJ, Narayan SM. The anatomical basis of pulmonary vein reconnection after ablation for atrial fibrillation: wounds that never felt a scar? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(10):939–941. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.032. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Cabrera-Bueno F, Medina-Palomo C, Ruiz-Salas A, Flores A, Rodriguez-Losada N, Barrera A, Jimenez-Navarro M, Alzueta J. Serum levels of interleukin-2 predict the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein ablation. Cytokine. 2015;73(1):74–78. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.01.026. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Kimura T, Takatsuki S, Inagawa K, Katsumata Y, Nishiyama T, Nishiyama N, Fukumoto K, Aizawa Y, Tanimoto Y, Tanimoto K, et al. Serum inflammation markers predicting successful initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Lung Circ. 2014;23(7):636–643. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.02.003. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Koyama T, Tada H, Sekiguchi Y, Arimoto T, Yamasaki H, Kuroki K, Machino T, Tajiri K, Zhu XD, Kanemoto-Igarashi M, Sugiyasu A: Prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrence with corticosteroids after radiofrequency catheter ablation: a randomized controlled trial. (1558–3597 (Electronic)). [PubMed]
27. Aziz MH, Sideras K, Aziz NA, Mauff K, Haen R, Roos D, Saida L, Suker M, van der Harst E, Mieog JS et al. The systemic-immune-inflammation index independently predicts survival and recurrence in resectable pancreatic cancer and its prognostic value depends on bilirubin levels: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. (1528–1140 (Electronic)). [PubMed]
28. Yin G, Ma B, Zhou B, Wu J, You L, Xie R. Inflammatory response after different ablation strategies for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Surg Forum. 2020;23(5):E703–E711. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3149. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Haran C, Gimpel D, Clark H, McCormack DJ. Preoperative neutrophil and lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after cardiac surgery. Heart Lung Circ. 2020;30(3):414–418. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.05.115. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Berkovitch A, Younis A, Grossman Y, Segev S, Kivity S, Sidi Y, Beinart R, Goldenberg I, Maor E. Relation of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio to risk of incident atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(3):396–401. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.036. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Liu Y, Lv H, Tan R, An X, Niu XH, Liu YJ, Yang X, Yin X, Xia YL. Platelets promote Ang II (Angiotensin II)-induced atrial fibrillation by releasing TGF-β1 (transforming growth factor-β1) and interacting with fibroblasts. (1524–4563 (Electronic)). [PubMed]
32. Wang H, Han J, Wang Z, Yin Z, Liu Z, Jin Y, Han H. A prospective randomized trial of the cut-and-sew Maze procedure in patients undergoing surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155(2):608–617. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.07.084. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Ad N, Holmes SD, Rongione AJ, Massimiano PS, Fornaresio LM. Does surgical ablation energy source affect long-term success of the concomitant cox maze procedure? Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(1):29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.04.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Nomani H, Saei S, Johnston TP, Sahebkar A, Mohammadpour AH. The efficacy of anti-inflammatory agents in the prevention of atrial fibrillation recurrences. Curr Med Chem. 2021;28(1):137–151. doi: 10.2174/1389450121666200302095103. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders are provided here courtesy of BMC

-