GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
- PMID: 21194891
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
Abstract
GRADE requires a clear specification of the relevant setting, population, intervention, and comparator. It also requires specification of all important outcomes--whether evidence from research studies is, or is not, available. For a particular management question, the population, intervention, and outcome should be sufficiently similar across studies that a similar magnitude of effect is plausible. Guideline developers should specify the relative importance of the outcomes before gathering the evidence and again when evidence summaries are complete. In considering the importance of a surrogate outcome, authors should rate the importance of the patient-important outcome for which the surrogate is a substitute and subsequently rate down the quality of evidence for indirectness of outcome.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):369-76. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012. PMID: 22818161 German.
-
Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012. PMID: 23256168 Review.
-
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):380-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Dec 24. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21185693
-
GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;66(2):158-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.012. Epub 2012 May 18. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013. PMID: 22609141 Review.
-
[GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence - indirectness].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(10):745-53. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.10.019. Epub 2012 Nov 16. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012. PMID: 23217728 German.
Cited by
-
European Society of Intensive Care Medicine clinical practice guideline on fluid therapy in adult critically ill patients. Part 1: the choice of resuscitation fluids.Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jun;50(6):813-831. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07369-9. Epub 2024 May 21. Intensive Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38771364
-
Ophiocordyceps sinensis preparations combined with the renin-angiotensin system inhibitor for diabetic kidney disease treatment: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and network meta-analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Apr 22;15:1360633. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1360633. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 38716236 Free PMC article.
-
Questioning the Role of Carotid Artery Ultrasound in Assessing Fluid Responsiveness in Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Crit Care Res Pract. 2024 Apr 27;2024:9102961. doi: 10.1155/2024/9102961. eCollection 2024. Crit Care Res Pract. 2024. PMID: 38716052 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An evidence based conceptual framework for the multifactorial understanding of proximal junctional kyphosis.Brain Spine. 2024 Apr 20;4:102807. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2024.102807. eCollection 2024. Brain Spine. 2024. PMID: 38712018 Free PMC article. Review.
-
World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) guideline update - XII - Recommendations on milk formula supplements with and without probiotics for infants and toddlers with CMA.World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Mar 26;17(4):100888. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100888. eCollection 2024 Apr. World Allergy Organ J. 2024. PMID: 38706757 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources