GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
- PMID: 21195583
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
Abstract
This article is the first of a series providing guidance for use of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system of rating quality of evidence and grading strength of recommendations in systematic reviews, health technology assessments (HTAs), and clinical practice guidelines addressing alternative management options. The GRADE process begins with asking an explicit question, including specification of all important outcomes. After the evidence is collected and summarized, GRADE provides explicit criteria for rating the quality of evidence that include study design, risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and magnitude of effect. Recommendations are characterized as strong or weak (alternative terms conditional or discretionary) according to the quality of the supporting evidence and the balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of the alternative management options. GRADE suggests summarizing evidence in succinct, transparent, and informative summary of findings tables that show the quality of evidence and the magnitude of relative and absolute effects for each important outcome and/or as evidence profiles that provide, in addition, detailed information about the reason for the quality of evidence rating. Subsequent articles in this series will address GRADE's approach to formulating questions, assessing quality of evidence, and developing recommendations.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Guideline panels should not GRADE good practice statements.J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):597-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 31. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 25660962 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
[GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction - GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(5):357-68. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012. PMID: 22818160 German.
-
GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):380-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Dec 24. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21185693
-
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. Epub 2011 Jan 5. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21208779
-
Synthesis, grading, and presentation of evidence in guidelines: article 7 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):256-61. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-060ST. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012. PMID: 23256168 Review.
-
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.Allergy. 2009 May;64(5):669-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x. Allergy. 2009. PMID: 19210357 Review.
Cited by
-
Metformin for preventing the progression of chronic kidney disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013414. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013414.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38837240 Review.
-
The effect of non-pharmacological prenatal interventions on fear of childbirth: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 4;24(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05870-5. BMC Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38834980 Free PMC article.
-
A guide to interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery and surgery.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Jun 4;166(1):250. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06133-8. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024. PMID: 38833024 Review.
-
Interventions to increase vaccination in vulnerable groups: rapid overview of reviews.BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 3;24(1):1479. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18713-5. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38831275 Free PMC article.
-
Association between history of cannabis use and outcomes after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Public Health. 2024 May 17;12:1377688. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1377688. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38827608 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources