skip to main content
10.1145/3314111.3319823acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Differential privacy for eye-tracking data

Published: 25 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

As large eye-tracking datasets are created, data privacy is a pressing concern for the eye-tracking community. De-identifying data does not guarantee privacy because multiple datasets can be linked for inferences. A common belief is that aggregating individuals' data into composite representations such as heatmaps protects the individual. However, we analytically examine the privacy of (noise-free) heatmaps and show that they do not guarantee privacy. We further propose two noise mechanisms that guarantee privacy and analyze their privacy-utility tradeoff. Analysis reveals that our Gaussian noise mechanism is an elegant solution to preserve privacy for heatmaps. Our results have implications for interdisciplinary research to create differentially private mechanisms for eye tracking.

Supplementary Material

ZIP File (a28-liu.zip)
Supplemental files.

References

[1]
(2018). Eu general data protection regulation. https://eugdpr.org.
[2]
Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., and Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 308--318. ACM.
[3]
Chuang, L., Duchowski, A., Qvarfordt, P., and Weiskopf, D., editors (2018). Ubiquitous Gaze Sensing and Interaction, volume 8 of Dagstuhl Reports, Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fü Informatik, Germany. Dagstuhl Publishing.
[4]
Duchowski, A. T. (2018). Gaze-based interaction: A 30 year retrospective. Computers & Graphics, pages -. Special Section on Serious Games and Virtual Environments.
[5]
Duchowski, A. T., Price, M. M., Meyer, M., and Orero, P. (2012). Aggregate gaze visualization with real-time heatmaps. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications, pages 13--20. ACM.
[6]
Dwork, C. (2008). Differential privacy: A survey of results. In International Conference on Theory and Applications of Models of Computation, pages 1--19. Springer.
[7]
Dwork, C. (2011). A firm foundation for private data analysis. Communications of ACM, 54(1):86--95.
[8]
Dwork, C., Roth, A., et al. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3--4):211--407.
[9]
Elias, G., Sherwin, G., and Wise, J. (1984). Eye movements while viewing NTSC format television. Technical report, SMPTE Psychophysics Subcommittee.
[10]
Fan, L. and Xiong, L. (2014). An adaptive approach to real-time aggregate monitoring with differential privacy. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 26(9):2094--2106.
[11]
Farid, H. and Bravo, M. J. (2012). Perceptual discrimination of computer generated and photographic faces. Digital Investigation, 8(3--4):226--235.
[12]
Graham, J. (2018). Is apple really better about privacy? here's what we found out. https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/talkingtech/2018/04/17/apple-make-simpler-download-your-privacy-data-year/521786002/.
[13]
Holland, C. and Komogortsev, O. V. (2011). Biometric identification via eye movement scanpaths in reading. In Biometrics (IJCB), 2011 International Joint Conference on, pages 1--8. IEEE.
[14]
Jarodzka, H., Holmqvist, K., and Gruber, H. (2017). Eye tracking in educational science: Theoretical frameworks and research agendas. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 10(1).
[15]
Ji, Z., Lipton, Z. C., and Elkan, C. (2014). Differential privacy and machine learning: a survey and review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7584.
[16]
Khamis, M., Alt, F., and Bulling, A. (2018). The past, present, and future of gaze-enabled handheld mobile devices: Survey and lessons learned. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI), pages 38:1--38:17.
[17]
Komogortsev, O. V., Jayarathna, S., Aragon, C. R., and Mahmoud, M. (2010). Biometric identification via an oculomotor plant mathematical model. In Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications, pages 57--60. ACM.
[18]
Leigh, R. J. and Zee, D. S. (2015). The neurology of eye movements. Oxford University Press, USA.
[19]
Liebling, D. J. and Preibusch, S. (2014). Privacy considerations for a pervasive eye tracking world. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication, pages 1169--1177. ACM.
[20]
Ling, R., Mardanbeigi, D., and Hansen, D. W. (2014). Synergies between head-mounted displays and headmounted eye tracking: The trajectory of development and its social consequences. In Living inside social mobile information, pages 131--156, 2251 Arbor Blvd. Dayton, OH 45439, USA.
[21]
Mader, B., Banks, M. S., and Farid, H. (2017). Identifying computer-generated portraits: The importance of training and incentives. Perception, 46(9):1062--1076.
[22]
Mital, P. K., Smith, T. J., Hill, R. L., and Henderson, J. M. (2011). Clustering of Gaze During Dynamic Scene Viewing is Predicted by Motion. Cognitive Computation, 3:5--24.
[23]
Nissim, K., Steinke, T., Wood, A., Altman, M., Bembenek, A., Bun, M., Gaboardi, M., OâĂŹBrien, D. R., and Vadhan, S. (2017). Differential privacy: A primer for a nontechnical audience. Working Group Privacy Tools Sharing Res. Data, Harvard Univ., Boston, MA, USA, Tech. Rep. TR-2017-03.
[24]
Ohm, P. (2009). Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. Ucla L. Rev., 57:1701.
[25]
Pomplun, M., Ritter, H., and Velichkovsky, B. (1996). Disambiguating complex visual information: Towards communication of personal views of a scene. Perception, 25(8):931--948.
[26]
Raiturkar, P., Farid, H., and Jain, E. (2018). Identifying computer-generated portraits: an eye tracking study. Technical report, University of Florida.
[27]
Rastogi, V. and Nath, S. (2010). Differentially private aggregation of distributed time-series with transformation and encryption. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data, pages 735--746. ACM.
[28]
van Gisbergen, M. S., van der Most, J., and Aelen, P. (2007). Visual Attention to Online Search Engine Results. Technical report, De Vos & Jansen in cooperation with Checkit. URL: http://www.iprospect.nl/wp-content/themes/iprospect/pdf/checkit/eyetracking_research.pdf (last accessed Dec. 2011).
[29]
Wooding, D. S. (2002). Fixation maps: quantifying eye-movement traces. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye tracking research & Applications (ETRA), pages 31--36. ACM.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)PrivatEyes: Appearance-based Gaze Estimation Using Federated Secure Multi-Party ComputationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36556068:ETRA(1-23)Online publication date: 28-May-2024
  • (2024)Privacy-preserving Scanpath Comparison for Pervasive Eye TrackingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36556058:ETRA(1-28)Online publication date: 28-May-2024
  • (2024)Privacy-Preserving Gaze Data Streaming in Immersive Interactive Virtual Reality: Robustness and User ExperienceIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.337203230:5(2257-2268)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ETRA '19: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications
June 2019
623 pages
ISBN:9781450367097
DOI:10.1145/3314111
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 June 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. differential privacy
  2. eye-tracking
  3. heatmaps
  4. privacy-utility tradeoff

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

ETRA '19

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 137 submissions, 50%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)298
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)14
Reflects downloads up to 25 Aug 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)PrivatEyes: Appearance-based Gaze Estimation Using Federated Secure Multi-Party ComputationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36556068:ETRA(1-23)Online publication date: 28-May-2024
  • (2024)Privacy-preserving Scanpath Comparison for Pervasive Eye TrackingProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36556058:ETRA(1-28)Online publication date: 28-May-2024
  • (2024)Privacy-Preserving Gaze Data Streaming in Immersive Interactive Virtual Reality: Robustness and User ExperienceIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2024.337203230:5(2257-2268)Online publication date: 8-Mar-2024
  • (2024)Improving QoE-Privacy Tradeoff in XR StreamingIEEE Signal Processing Letters10.1109/LSP.2024.340161631(1504-1508)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)From Lenses to Living Rooms: A Policy Brief on Eye Tracking in XR Before the Impending Boom2024 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and eXtended and Virtual Reality (AIxVR)10.1109/AIxVR59861.2024.00020(90-96)Online publication date: 17-Jan-2024
  • (2024) DPGazeSynthInformation Sciences: an International Journal10.1016/j.ins.2024.120720675:COnline publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Security and Privacy of Augmented Reality SystemsNetwork Security Empowered by Artificial Intelligence10.1007/978-3-031-53510-9_11(305-330)Online publication date: 24-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Metaverse ForensicsForecasting Cyber Crimes in the Age of the Metaverse10.4018/979-8-3693-0220-0.ch010(182-208)Online publication date: 29-Dec-2023
  • (2023)Clear Aligners and Smart Eye Tracking Technology as a New Communication Strategy between Ethical and Legal IssuesLife10.3390/life1302029713:2(297)Online publication date: 20-Jan-2023
  • (2023)Technology Cannot Fix the Privacy CrisisSSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4326794Online publication date: 2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media

-