Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Jan 20;108(3):433-42.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.11540.

Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer

Esther K Wei  1 , Edward Giovannucci, Kana Wu, Bernard Rosner, Charles S Fuchs, Walter C Willett, Graham A Colditz
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of risk factors for colon and rectal cancer

Esther K Wei et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

Predictors of colorectal cancer have been extensively studied with some evidence suggesting that risk factors vary by subsite. Using data from 2 prospective cohort studies, we examined established risk factors to determine whether they were differentially associated with colon and rectal cancer. Our study population included 87,733 women from the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and 46,632 men from the Health Professionals Follow Up Study (HPFS). Exposure information was collected via biennial questionnaires (dietary variables were collected every 4 years). During the follow-up period (NHS: 1980 to May 31, 2000; HPFS: 1986 to January 31, 2000), we identified 1,139 cases of colon cancer and 339 cases of rectal cancer. We used pooled logistic regression to estimate multivariate relative risks for the 2 outcomes separately and then used polytomous logistic regression to compare these estimates. In the combined cohort, age, gender, family history of colon or rectal cancer, height, body mass index, physical activity, folate, intake of beef, pork or lamb as a main dish, intake of processed meat and alcohol were significantly associated with colon cancer risk. However, only age and sex were associated with rectal cancer. In a stepwise polytomous logistic regression procedure, family history and physical activity were associated with statistically significant different relative risks of colon and rectal cancer. Our findings support previous suggestions that family history and physical activity are not strong contributors to the etiology of rectal cancer. Future investigations of colon or rectal cancer should take into consideration risk factor differences by subsite.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Chyou P, Nomura A, Stemmermann G. A prospective study of colon and rectal cancer among Hawaii Japanese Men. Ann Epidemiol. 1996;6:276–282. - PubMed
    1. Bonithon-Kopp C, Benhamiche A. Are there several colorectal cancers? Epidemiological data. Eur J Cancer Prevention. 1999;8:S3–S12. - PubMed
    1. Yoo K, Tajima K, Inoue M, Takezaki T, Hirose K, Hamajima N, Park SK, Kang DH, Kato T, Hirai T. Reproductive factors related to the risk of colorectal cancer by subsite: a case-control analysis. Br J Cancer. 1999;79:1901–1906. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young TB, Wolf DA. Case-control study of proximal and distal colon cancer and diet in Wisconsin. Int J Cancer. 1988;42:167–175. - PubMed
    1. Wu K, Willett WC, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA, Giovannucci EL. Calcium Intake and risk of colon cancer in women and men. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2002;94:437–446. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

-