Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey
- PMID: 15619601
- PMCID: PMC543864
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38336.804167.47
Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey
Abstract
Objective: To develop optimal search strategies in Medline for retrieving systematic reviews.
Design: Analytical survey.
Data sources: 161 journals published in 2000 indexed in Medline.
Main outcome measures: The sensitivity, specificity, and precision of retrieval of systematic reviews of 4862 unique terms in 782,485 combinations of one to five terms were determined by comparison with a hand search of all articles (the criterion standard) in 161 journals published during 2000 (49,028 articles).
Results: Only 753 (1.5%) of the 49,028 articles were systematic reviews. The most sensitive strategy included five terms and had a sensitivity of 99.9% (95% confidence interval 99.6% to 100%) and a specificity of 52% (51.6% to 52.5%). The strategy that best minimised the difference between sensitivity and specificity had a sensitivity of 98% (97% to 99%) and specificity of 90.8% (90.5% to 91.1%). Highest precision for multiterm strategies, 57% (54% to 60%), was achieved at a sensitivity of 71% (68% to 74%). The term "cochrane database of systematic reviews.jn." was the most precise single term search strategy (sensitivity of 56% (52% to 60%) and precision of 96% (94% to 98%)). These strategies are available through the "limit" screen of Ovid's search interface for Medline.
Conclusions: Systematic reviews can be retrieved from Medline with close to perfect sensitivity or specificity, or with high precision, by using empirical search strategies.
Figures
Comment in
-
Clever searching for evidence.BMJ. 2005 May 21;330(7501):1162-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7501.1162. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15905232 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A Critical Review of Search Strategies Used in Recent Systematic Reviews Published in Selected Prosthodontic and Implant-Related Journals: Are Systematic Reviews Actually Systematic?Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Jan/Feb;30(1):13-21. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5193. Int J Prosthodont. 2017. PMID: 28085971 Review.
-
Consistency and accuracy of indexing systematic review articles and meta-analyses in medline.Health Info Libr J. 2009 Sep;26(3):203-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00823.x. Health Info Libr J. 2009. PMID: 19712212 Review.
-
Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey.BMJ. 2005 May 21;330(7501):1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38446.498542.8F. Epub 2005 May 13. BMJ. 2005. PMID: 15894554 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey.BMJ. 2004 May 1;328(7447):1040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38068.557998.EE. Epub 2004 Apr 8. BMJ. 2004. PMID: 15073027 Free PMC article.
-
Taking advantage of the explosion of systematic reviews: an efficient MEDLINE search strategy.Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Jul-Aug;4(4):157-62. Eff Clin Pract. 2001. PMID: 11525102
Cited by
-
Equity in prenatal healthcare services globally: an umbrella review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Mar 11;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06388-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38468220 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of systematic reviews in African emergency medicine: a cross-sectional methodological study.Afr J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;13(4):331-338. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2023.10.001. Epub 2023 Nov 24. Afr J Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 38162895 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of cell-based immunotherapies on patients with glioma: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocol.BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 28;13(12):e072484. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072484. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 38154889 Free PMC article.
-
Association between stress, depression or anxiety and cancer: Rapid review of reviews.Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2023 Oct 21;16:100215. doi: 10.1016/j.cpnec.2023.100215. eCollection 2023 Nov. Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2023. PMID: 38108025 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A guide to evaluating systematic reviews for the busy clinicians or reluctant readers.Chiropr Man Therap. 2023 Sep 20;31(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12998-023-00501-4. Chiropr Man Therap. 2023. PMID: 37730646 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Montori VM, Swiontkowski MF, Cook DJ. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin Orthop 2003;(413): 43-54. - PubMed
-
- Dickersin K, Higgins K, Meinert CL. Identification of meta-analyses. The need for standard terminology. Control Clin Trials 1990;11: 52-66. - PubMed
-
- Hunt DL, McKibbon KA. Locating and appraising systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 1997;126: 532-8. - PubMed
-
- White V, Glanville J, Lefebvre C, Sheldon T. A statistical approach to designing search filters to find systematic reviews: objectivity enhances accuracy. J Information Sci 2001;27: 357-70.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources