General practitioners' use of online evidence during consultations
- PMID: 15626631
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.10.003
General practitioners' use of online evidence during consultations
Abstract
Background: Clinicians have many unanswered questions during clinical encounters which may impact on the quality and outcomes of decisions made. Provision of online evidence at the point of care is one strategy that provides clinicians with easy access to up-to-date evidence in clinical settings to support evidence-based decision-making.
Aim: To determine if and when general practitioners use an online evidence system in routine clinical practice, the type of questions for which clinicians seek evidence and the extent to which the system provides clinically useful answers.
Design of study: A prospective cohort study which involved a 4-week clinical trial of Quick Clinical, an online evidence system specifically designed around the needs of general practitioners.
Setting: Two hundred and twenty-seven clinicians who had a computer with Internet access in their consulting rooms.
Methods: Computer logs and survey analysis.
Results: One hundred and ninety-three general practitioners used the online evidence system to conduct on average 8.7 searches/month. The majority of these (81%) were conducted from consulting rooms and carried out between 9a.m. and 7p.m. (83%). The most frequent searches conducted related to diagnosis (40%) and treatment (35%). 83% of clinicians believed that Quick Clinical (QC) had the potential to improve patient care, and one in four users reported direct experience of improvements in care. In 73% of queries with clinician feedback participants reported that they were able to find clinically useful information during their routine work.
Conclusion: General practitioners will use an online evidence retrieval system in routine practice, and report that its use improves the quality of patient care.
Similar articles
-
Impact of internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient-physician relationship: a survey-based study and review.J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008 Dec;108(12):699-711. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2008. PMID: 19075034 Review.
-
Protocol for the Quick Clinical study: a randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of an online evidence retrieval system on decision-making in general practice.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Aug 24;6:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-33. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006. PMID: 16928282 Free PMC article.
-
What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings?Int J Med Inform. 2007 Oct;76(10):701-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.009. Epub 2006 Aug 7. Int J Med Inform. 2007. PMID: 16893677
-
Critical incidents and journey mapping as techniques to evaluate the impact of online evidence retrieval systems on health care delivery and patient outcomes.Int J Med Inform. 2007 Feb-Mar;76(2-3):234-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.03.006. Epub 2006 Jun 22. Int J Med Inform. 2007. PMID: 16798071
-
Clinical decision-making and the Internet.J Am Coll Dent. 1999 Summer;66(2):29-39. J Am Coll Dent. 1999. PMID: 10506804 Review.
Cited by
-
Modelling of physicians' clinical information-seeking behaviour in Iran: a grounded theory study.BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 16;14(4):e080602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080602. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38626973 Free PMC article.
-
Classifying the Factors Affecting Information Therapy to Support Clinical Decisions on Addiction.Addict Health. 2023 Jul;15(3):156-162. doi: 10.34172/ahj.2023.1325. Epub 2023 Jul 29. Addict Health. 2023. PMID: 38026721 Free PMC article.
-
A Study of Factors Influencing the Volume of Responses to Posts in Physician Online Community.Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 29;11(9):1275. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091275. Healthcare (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37174819 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of perceived value and affection on Chinese residents' continuous use intention of mobile health science information: An empirical study.Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 8;11:1034231. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1034231. eCollection 2023. Front Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36844825 Free PMC article.
-
Perceived evidence use: Measurement and construct validation of managerial evidence use as perceived by subordinates.PLoS One. 2022 Apr 26;17(4):e0266894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266894. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35472069 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials