Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Mar 8;6(1):11.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-6-11.

Patient preferences for notification of normal laboratory test results: a report from the ASIPS Collaborative

Affiliations

Patient preferences for notification of normal laboratory test results: a report from the ASIPS Collaborative

Donna M Baldwin et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Many medical errors occur during the laboratory testing process, including lost test results. Patient inquiry concerning results often represents the final safety net for locating lost results. This qualitative study sought to identify, from a patient perspective, specific preferences and factors that influence the process of communicating normal (negative) laboratory test results to patients.

Methods: We conducted 30-minute guided interviews with 20 adult patients. Patients were recruited from two practice-based research networks in Colorado that were participating in a medical errors study. A semi-structured interview elicited the participant's experience with and preference for laboratory test result notification. Quantitative descriptive statistics were generated for demographic and preference data. Qualitative results were analyzed by a team of experienced qualitative researchers using multiple styles of qualitative analyses, including a template approach and an editing approach.

Results: Ninety percent of participants wanted to be notified of all tests results. Important issues related to notification included privacy, responsive and interactive feedback, convenience, timeliness, and provision of details. Telephone notification was preferred, followed by regular mail. Electronic notification was perceived as uncomfortable because it was not secure. While 65% preferred being notified by a provider, participants acknowledge that this may be impractical; thus, they wanted to be notified by someone knowledgeable enough to answer questions. Participants do not normally discuss their preferences for test result notification with their providers.

Conclusion: Privacy, responsive and interactive feedback, convenience, and timeliness with detailed information may be critical for patient satisfaction and for improving patient safety, and are features that may be incorporated into emerging communication channels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fernald DH, Pace WD, Harris DM, West DR, Main DS, Westfall J. Event reporting to a primary care patient safety reporting system: A report from the ASIPS Collaborative. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:327–32. doi: 10.1370/afm.221. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dovey SM, Meyers DS, Phillips RL, Jr, Green LA, Fryer GE, Galliher JM, Kappus J, Grob P. A preliminary taxonomy of medical errors in family practice. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:233–8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.233. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Makeham MA, Dovey SM, County M, Kidd MR. An international taxonomy for errors in general practice: A pilot study. Med J Aust. 2002;177:68–72. - PubMed
    1. Keren R, Muret-Wagstaff S, Goldmann DA, Mandl KD. Notifying emergency department patients of negative test results: Pitfalls of passive communication. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2003;19:226–30. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000086235.54586.00. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Meza JP, Webster DS. Patient preferences for laboratory test results notification. Am J Manag Care. 2000;6:1297–300. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

-