Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2005 Apr;73(4):1907-16.
doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.4.1907-1916.2005.

Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells

Susan L Fink  1 , Brad T Cookson
Affiliations
Review

Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells

Susan L Fink et al. Infect Immun. 2005 Apr.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Caspases are classified into functional subgroups. Caspases are cysteine proteases that are expressed as inactive precursor enzymes with an N-terminal prodomain followed by a two-subunit effector domain. Members of the caspase family can be classified based on their physiologic roles and substrate specificities. They are divided into two main groups: those involved in apoptosis (caspase-2, -3, -6, -7, -8, -9, and -10) and those related to caspase-1 (caspase-1, -4, -5, -13, and -14, as well as murine caspase-11 and -12), whose primary role appears to be cytokine processing and proinflammatory cell death. The caspases implicated in apoptosis can be further divided into initiator and effector subgroups. Initiator caspases (caspase-2, -8, -9, and -10) have long prodomains and function to activate effector caspases (caspase-3, -6, and -7), which have small prodomains and cleave a variety of cellular substrates. CARD, caspase recruitment domain; DED, death effector domain.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Pathways leading to cell death. Healthy cells respond to death-inducing stimuli by initiating a variety of molecular pathways leading to cell death. Completion of the proper pathway is a critical cellular function to ensure that the appropriate outcome is ultimately achieved in a multicellular organism. Failure to die in response to particular stimuli can result in abortive embryogenesis and organ dysfunction and contributes to the initiation of cancer. Proinflammatory death is vital in triggering appropriate immune responses or, in the extreme, may cause tissue pathology and organ dysfunction. Therefore, pathway utilization can dramatically influence biological systems. Apoptosis is a pathway leading to cell death that features the activation of initiator caspases that activate effector caspases to cleave cellular substrates. Apoptotic cells demonstrate cytoplasmic and nuclear condensation, DNA damage, formation of apoptotic bodies, maintenance of an intact plasma membrane, and exposure of surface molecules targeting intact cell corpses for phagocytosis. In the absence of phagocytosis, apoptotic bodies may proceed to lysis and secondary or apoptotic necrosis. Autophagy features degradation of cellular components within the intact dying cell in autophagic vacuoles. The morphological characteristics of autophagy include vacuolization, degradation of cytoplasmic contents, and slight chromatin condensation. Autophagic cells can also be taken up by phagocytosis. Oncosis is the prelethal pathway leading to cell death accompanied by cellular and organelle swelling and membrane breakdown, with the eventual release of inflammatory cellular contents. Pyroptosis is a pathway to cell death mediated by the activation of caspase-1, a protease that also activates the inflammatory cytokines, IL-1β, and IL-18. This pathway is therefore inherently proinflammatory. Pyroptosis also features cell lysis and release of inflammatory cellular contents. Undoubtedly, other pathways exist that have not yet been described.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Biological input differentially influences utilization of cell death pathways. Factors influencing cell death include the stimulus, cell type, and the surrounding milieu of the cell and, therefore, its physiological state during receipt of the stimulus, which together dictate the pathway of cell death. In column A1, a stimulus (1) delivered to a cell type of interest in its baseline physiological state (α) dictates cell death via the primary pathway (P). Altering the magnitude of the stimulus (Δ1), e.g., multiplicity of infection, concentration, or concentration per unit time, can alter the path to cell death (A2, leading to pathway Q), as does the physiological state (β) of the cell during stimulation (A3, leading to pathway R) and the cell type being studied (A4, leading to pathway S). A single stimulus can simultaneously trigger multiple pathways (column B), and blockade of the primary pathway for a given cell type (column C versus column A1) can result in the use of alternate pathway(s) (column C). Finally, multiple stimuli (2,3, or 4), which may utilize a variety of upstream signaling cascades, may converge in the use of biologically conserved effector pathways and result in cell death (column D).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

  • To the edge of cell death and back.
    Gong YN, Crawford JC, Heckmann BL, Green DR. Gong YN, et al. FEBS J. 2019 Feb;286(3):430-440. doi: 10.1111/febs.14714. Epub 2018 Dec 19. FEBS J. 2019. PMID: 30506628 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Plasma membrane changes during programmed cell deaths.
    Zhang Y, Chen X, Gueydan C, Han J. Zhang Y, et al. Cell Res. 2018 Jan;28(1):9-21. doi: 10.1038/cr.2017.133. Epub 2017 Oct 27. Cell Res. 2018. PMID: 29076500 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Analyzing morphological and ultrastructural features in cell death.
    Tinari A, Giammarioli AM, Manganelli V, Ciarlo L, Malorni W. Tinari A, et al. Methods Enzymol. 2008;442:1-26. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)01401-8. Methods Enzymol. 2008. PMID: 18662562
  • Autophagy in the eukaryotic cell.
    Reggiori F, Klionsky DJ. Reggiori F, et al. Eukaryot Cell. 2002 Feb;1(1):11-21. doi: 10.1128/EC.01.1.11-21.2002. Eukaryot Cell. 2002. PMID: 12455967 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
  • The death receptors.
    Peter ME, Scaffidi C, Medema JP, Kischkel F, Krammer PH. Peter ME, et al. Results Probl Cell Differ. 1999;23:25-63. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69184-6_3. Results Probl Cell Differ. 1999. PMID: 9950028 Review. No abstract available.
See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Albert, M. L. 2004. Death-defying immunity: do apoptotic cells influence antigen processing and presentation? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4:223-231. - PubMed
    1. Alnemri, E. S., D. J. Livingston, D. W. Nicholson, G. Salvesen, N. A. Thornberry, W. W. Wong, and J. Yuan. 1996. Human ICE/CED-3 protease nomenclature. Cell 87:171. - PubMed
    1. Ankarcrona, M., J. M. Dypbukt, E. Bonfoco, B. Zhivotovsky, S. Orrenius, S. A. Lipton, and P. Nicotera. 1995. Glutamate-induced neuronal death: a succession of necrosis or apoptosis depending on mitochondrial function. Neuron 15:961-973. - PubMed
    1. Berger, N. A. 1985. Poly(ADP-ribose) in the cellular response to DNA damage. Radiat. Res. 101:4-15. - PubMed
    1. Blagosklonny, M. V. 2000. Cell death beyond apoptosis. Leukemia 14:1502-1508. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

-