Why do women of low socioeconomic status have poorer dietary behaviours than women of higher socioeconomic status? A qualitative exploration
- PMID: 16171900
- DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2005.05.003
Why do women of low socioeconomic status have poorer dietary behaviours than women of higher socioeconomic status? A qualitative exploration
Abstract
In developed countries, persons of low socioeconomic status (SES) are generally less likely to consume diets consistent with dietary guidelines. Little is known about the mechanisms that underlie SES differences in eating behaviours. Since women are often responsible for dietary choices within households, this qualitative study investigated factors that may contribute to socioeconomic inequalities in dietary behaviour among women. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 high-, 19 mid- and 18 low- SES women, recruited from Melbourne, Australia, using an area-level indicator of SES. An ecological framework, in which individual, social and environmental level influences on diet were considered, was used to guide the development of interview questions and interpretation of the data. Thematic analysis was undertaken to identify the main themes emerging from the data. Several key influences varied by SES. These included food-related values such as health consciousness, and a lack of time due to family commitments (more salient among higher SES women), as well as perceived high cost of healthy eating and lack of time due to work commitments (more important for low SES women). Reported availability of and access to good quality healthy foods did not differ strikingly across SES groups. Public health strategies aimed at reducing SES inequalities in diet might focus on promoting healthy diets that are low cost, as well as promoting time-efficient food preparation strategies for all women.
Similar articles
-
A qualitative study of the drivers of socioeconomic inequalities in men's eating behaviours.BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 14;18(1):1257. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6162-6. BMC Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30428860 Free PMC article.
-
Does social class predict diet quality?Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 May;87(5):1107-17. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1107. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008. PMID: 18469226 Review.
-
Nutrition interventions in women in low-income groups in the UK.Proc Nutr Soc. 2007 Feb;66(1):25-32. doi: 10.1017/S0029665107005265. Proc Nutr Soc. 2007. PMID: 17343769 Review.
-
How can socio-economic differences in physical activity among women be explained? A qualitative study.Women Health. 2006;43(1):93-113. doi: 10.1300/J013v43n01_06. Women Health. 2006. PMID: 17050487
-
Diet and eating habits in high and low socioeconomic groups.Nutrition. 2005 May;21(5):559-66. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.09.018. Nutrition. 2005. PMID: 15850961
Cited by
-
Time perspective, future anxiety, and hope for success in individuals awaiting bariatric surgery.Health Psychol Rep. 2021 Apr 10;10(2):111-121. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2021.105259. eCollection 2022. Health Psychol Rep. 2021. PMID: 38084328 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal Bean Consumption during Pregnancy: Distribution and Nutritional Outcomes.Nutrients. 2023 May 8;15(9):2234. doi: 10.3390/nu15092234. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 37432402 Free PMC article.
-
Multidimensional Food Poverty: Evidence from Low-Income Single Mothers in Contemporary Japan.Food Ethics. 2023;8(2):13. doi: 10.1007/s41055-023-00123-9. Epub 2023 Jun 6. Food Ethics. 2023. PMID: 37304682 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal Dietary Diversity and Birth Weight in Offspring: Evidence from a Chinese Population-Based Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 12;20(4):3228. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043228. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36833922 Free PMC article.
-
Low- and Medium-Socioeconomic-Status Group Members' Perceived Challenges and Solutions for Healthy Nutrition: Qualitative Focus Group Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Dec 2;9(4):e40123. doi: 10.2196/40123. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022. PMID: 36459403 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources