Acetabular reconstruction with impacted bone allografts and cemented acetabular components: a 2- to 13-year follow-up study of 142 aseptic revisions
- PMID: 16798986
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17227
Acetabular reconstruction with impacted bone allografts and cemented acetabular components: a 2- to 13-year follow-up study of 142 aseptic revisions
Abstract
We reviewed the clinical and radiological results of 131 patients who underwent acetabular revision for aseptic loosening with impacted bone allograft and a cemented acetabular component. The mean follow-up was 51.7 months (24 to 156). The mean post-operative Merle D'Aubigné and Postel scores were 5.7 points (4 to 6) for pain, 5.2 (3 to 6) for gait and 4.5 (2 to 6) for mobility. Radiological evaluation revealed migration greater than 5 mm in four acetabular components. Radiological failure matched clinical failure. Asymptomatic radiolucent lines were observed in 31 of 426 areas assessed (7%). Further revision was required in six patients (4.5%), this was due to infection in three and mechanical failure in three. The survival rate for the reconstruction was 95.8% (95% confidence interval 92.3 to 99.1) overall, and 98%, excluding revision due to sepsis. Our study, from an independent centre, has reproduced the results of the originators of the method.
Similar articles
-
Long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using irradiated allograft bone.Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1449-1454. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0478.R2. Bone Joint J. 2018. PMID: 30418060 Review.
-
Acetabular bone defects in THA revision: Reconstruction using morsellised virus-inactivated bone allograft and reinforcement ring. Seven-year outcomes in 95 patients.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Jun;103(4):543-548. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 30. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017. PMID: 28366746
-
Bone defect determines acetabular revision surgery.Hip Int. 2014 Oct 2;24 Suppl 10:S33-6. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000162. Hip Int. 2014. PMID: 24970036 Review.
-
Acetabular revision with morsellised allogenic bone graft and a cemented metal-backed component.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 May;88(5):586-91. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17275. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006. PMID: 16645102
-
[Acetabular reconstruction using bone allograft in the revision of total hip prosthesis].Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998 Apr;84(2):154-61. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998. PMID: 9775059 French.
Cited by
-
Tricalcium Phosphate as a Bone Substitute to Treat Massive Acetabular Bone Defects in Hip Revision Surgery: A Systematic Review and Initial Clinical Experience with 11 Cases.J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 24;12(5):1820. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051820. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 36902607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Uncemented Cups and Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes.Materials (Basel). 2022 May 23;15(10):3728. doi: 10.3390/ma15103728. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35629756 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium.HSS J. 2022 Feb;18(1):8-41. doi: 10.1177/15563316211034850. Epub 2021 Sep 28. HSS J. 2022. PMID: 35082557 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020 Jun 25;12(Suppl 1):8655. doi: 10.4081/or.2020.8655. eCollection 2020 Jun 29. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2020. PMID: 32913591 Free PMC article.
-
Bone impaction grafting with trabecular metal augments in large defects in young patients: unravelling a new perspective in surgical technique.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Aug 27;21(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03591-w. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020. PMID: 32854683 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
