Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):765-71.
doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2134. Epub 2007 Aug 21.

The value of patient self-report for disease surveillance

Affiliations

The value of patient self-report for disease surveillance

Florence T Bourgeois et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the accuracy of self-reported information from patients and families for use in a disease surveillance system.

Design: Patients and their parents presenting to the emergency department (ED) waiting room of an urban, tertiary care children's hospital were asked to use a Self-Report Tool, which consisted of a questionnaire asking questions related to the subjects' current illness.

Measurements: The sensitivity and specificity of three data sources for assigning patients to disease categories was measured: the ED chief complaint, physician diagnostic coding, and the completed Self-Report Tool. The gold standard metric for comparison was a medical record abstraction.

Results: A total of 936 subjects were enrolled. Compared to ED chief complaints, the Self-Report Tool was more than twice as sensitive in identifying respiratory illnesses (Rate ratio [RR]: 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.81-2.44), and dermatological problems (RR: 2.23, 95% CI 1.56-3.17), as well as significantly more sensitive in detecting fever (RR: 1.90, 95% CI 1.67-2.17), gastrointestinal problems (RR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.20), and injuries (RR: 1.16, 95% CI 1.08-1.24). Sensitivities were also significantly higher when the Self-Report Tool performance was compared to diagnostic codes, with a sensitivity rate ratio of 4.42 (95% CI 3.45-5.68) for fever, 1.70 (95% CI 1.49-1.93) for respiratory problems, 1.15 (95% CI 1.04-1.27) for gastrointestinal problems, 2.02 (95% CI 1.42-2.87) for dermatologic problems, and 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.11) for injuries.

Conclusions: Disease category assignment based on patient-reported information was significantly more sensitive in correctly identifying a disease category than data currently used by national and regional disease surveillance systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recursive partitioning tree for classification of gastrointestinal problems. GI = gastrointestinal problem, Class = disease category assigned by the tree, Case = actual outcome as measured by gold standard, N = total number of subjects in each node of the tree.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mandl KD, Overhage JM, Wagner MM, et al. Implementing syndromic surveillance: a practical guide informed by the early experience J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11(2):141-150[PrePrint published Nov 121, 2003; as doi:2010.1197/jamia.M1356]. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lombardo J, Burkom H, Elbert E, et al. A systems overview of the Electronic Surveillance System for the Early Notification of Community-Based Epidemics (ESSENCE II) J Urban Health Jun 2003;80(2 Suppl 1):i32-i42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Loonsk JW. BioSense—a national initiative for early detection and quantification of public health emergencies MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(Suppl):53-55Sep 24. - PubMed
    1. Tsui FC, Espino JU, Dato VM, Gesteland PH, Hutman J, Wagner MM. Technical description of RODS: a real-time public health surveillance system J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003;10(5):399-408. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lober WB, Karras BT, Wagner MM, et al. Roundtable on bioterrorism detection: information system-based surveillance J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9(2):105-115. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

-