Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2008 Dec;30(6):752-4.
doi: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181898978.

A pitfall of measuring lithium levels in neonates

Affiliations
Case Reports

A pitfall of measuring lithium levels in neonates

Toshihiro Tanaka et al. Ther Drug Monit. 2008 Dec.

Erratum in

  • Ther Drug Monit. 2009 Feb;31(1):137

Abstract

If lithium therapy is required during pregnancy or lactation, serum lithium monitoring may be indicated in the newborns. In the neonatal population, however, blood samples are often obtained with a sampling device containing lithium heparin. Given the infrequent nature of lithium measurement in the neonatal population, a risk of oversight on the use of these lithium-containing devices for lithium measurements exists. Two such neonatal cases are reported, which may have been mismanaged if the measured levels of lithium were not suspected to be spurious. Patient 1 was a 3-day-old infant with a congenital heart disease born at 31 weeks' gestation to a mother on lithium. After a surgical repair, because of a potential need to monitor lithium in the infant's serum during breastfeeding, a remaining sample of apparently serum from a previous blood testing on day 1 of life was measured for lithium as a baseline value. Despite the lack of toxic signs, the result showed a toxic lithium level of 4.19 mmol/L. Lithium levels in follow-up samples were 0.11 mmol/L (day 4) and undetectable (day 6). Patient 2 was a full-term infant exposed to maternal lithium throughout the fetal life and breastfeeding. Serum lithium at day three of life in a hospital was undetectable, but after discharge, the lithium concentrations increased to 1.1 mmol/L on day 18, with no sign of lithium toxicity or renal dysfunction. This raised a possibility of significant exposure through breastfeeding, but later they were found to be spurious due to the use of lithium-containing devices. Separate investigation of effects of sampling devices on lithium levels indicated that levels of >3 mmol/L were possible if a sampling volume of blood was substantially small compared with the capacity of a tube containing lithium heparin [corrected]

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

-