Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;6(2):159-73.
doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00194.x.

Conflicting influences on UK mothers' decisions to introduce solid foods to their infants

Affiliations

Conflicting influences on UK mothers' decisions to introduce solid foods to their infants

Madelynne A Arden. Matern Child Nutr. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Adherence to recommendations to wait until 6 months to introduce solid foods into infants' diets is very poor. An in-depth understanding of the factors involved in this decision is essential if health practitioners are to offer suitable advice and health education. A cross-sectional electronic questionnaire study was conducted with 105 mothers recruited via UK-based Internet parenting discussion forums. Ratings of variables important in making the decision to introduce solid foods were analyzed using factor analysis and multiple regression. Open-ended questions were analyzed qualitatively using content analysis. In this sample of educated women, later weaning was found to be associated with a focus on the importance of the recommendations and a perception that health visitor advice and support was poor. Earlier weaning was associated with a focus on the importance of putative weaning signs from the baby. Qualitative analysis revealed a number of conflicting influences on the decision about when to give solid foods: recommendations, guidelines and advice, signs from the baby, beliefs about solids and maternal considerations. The conflict that some mothers experience in deciding when to give their babies solid food between the rigid recommendations, more tailored guidance from health professionals and their perceptions of putative weaning signs from their infants poses a particular problem for those attempting to provide clear and helpful health education information. Future research must assess the extent to which this conflict is prevalent in the general population, and investigate the salience and utility of different health education messages to promote good infant health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest have been declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alder E.M., Williams F.L.R., Anderson A.S., Forsyth S., Florey C. du V. & Van Der Velde P. (2004) What influences the timing of the introduction of solid foods to infants? The British Journal of Nutrition 92, 527–531. - PubMed
    1. Anderson A.S., Guthrie C.‐A., Alder E.M., Forsyth S., Howie P.W. & Williams F.L.R. (2001) Rattling the plate – reasons and rationales for early weaning. Health Education Research 16, 471–479. - PubMed
    1. Ardery G., Carter B.L., Milchak J.L., Bergus G.R., Dawson J.D., James P.A. et al. (2007) Explicit and implicit evaluation of physician adherence to hypertension guidelines. Journal of Clinical Hypertension 9, 113–119. - PubMed
    1. Baruch Y. (1999) Response rate in academic studies – a comparative analysis. Human Relations 52, 421–438.
    1. Bedford A. (1997) On Clark‐Watson's tripartite model of anxiety and depression. Psychological Reports 80, 125–126. - PubMed

MeSH terms

-